Ed Woodward's position - on top of the world?

Should Woodward be removed from his Role as CE of Manchester United?

  • Yes - he should go

    Votes: 200 58.1%
  • no - he deserves another chance.

    Votes: 144 41.9%

  • Total voters
    344

LARulz

Full Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
18,201
It could be that Moyes didn't want to activate Fellaini's release clause, coz he wrote it and didn't want to burn the bridges with Everton.
Think it was more to do with him thinking nobody would pay that much so would bid low if the clause ran out and try and use that as reasoning.

Ed has to go in my opinion. He just does not seem to know what to do when bidding for players such as knowing valuations/realistic bids etc.
 

Agent Red

Full Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2011
Messages
7,030
One issue when Moyes vs. Mourinho was discussed was potential difficulty in attracting top players once SAF was gone. As a manager I always felt Moyes was the right choice and still do, but that was the main issue to overcome.

Woody seems hellbent on making that shortcoming count, the twat.
It's this line that most concerns me. Not so much SAF vs. Moyes vs. Mourinho but just that the club should have done everything in its power to make the window as smooth as possible for Moyes and I feel it failed on that front. Ideally we would have had clear targets that were brought in early and had a chance for a bit of a pre-season with us. I accept that things aren't always that straightforward and sometimes you miss out on the players you want or are priced out the market. That's fine, but the club made a big mistake making all that fuss at the beginning of the window about how much money we had and how hard we were working with Woodward jetting off everywhere on urgent business. Even if that narrative was just to see a bit of a push on the season tickets, I think it's been unhelpful to Moyes in creating this atmosphere of disappointment and frustration that really needn't have been there.
 

JustAFan

The Adebayo Akinfenwa of football photoshoppers
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Messages
32,377
Location
An evil little city in the NE United States
It appears that Woodward is getting all the flak, we don't know how culpable is in all this Moyes is. It depends how long Moyes list was. He might have tried the early bids and then been left with nothing. It was then up to Moyes to give him other targets. People keep saying Moyes is so thorough, now has he been so thorough that is why everything has been last minute or not thorough enough to have backup targets ready.
Again do we really think that Woodward just sits there waiting for list of players to be sent up from Moyes? If that is how it works, we are truly in a mess. Call a freaking meeting. Make a freaking phone call. They are supposed to work together. Tell Moyes submit the list by such and such a date, end of. In fact in the heirarchy of the club Moyes is probably under Woodward. So yes Moyes' input is necessary, but if as several people have suggested Woodward just sat around waiting for a list of players to be handed to him, well it still points to him not doing his job properly and there being a mess at the club transfer wise right now.
 

Red-Indian

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2003
Messages
6,432
Location
Supposedly working in office
I think what annoyed me more than anything else was the amount of information that got out about our transfers - the size of our bids, the rejections etc. We know we had rejected bids for
- Cesc
- Fellaini
- Baines
- Khedira
- Herrera

We did get Fellaini in the end but the whole thing seems fairly unprofessional. I've worked in M&A for years and if there's any parallels, what I can say is that the actual bid is really almost the final step in the process. There's a huge amount of groundwork in terms of agreeing willingness to sell, broad valuation, and legalities before placing the bid which can then be negotiated slightly. If you're having so many bids rejected, you're doing something wrong...basically you aren't completing your homework.
 

Sultan

Gentleness adorns everything
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
48,569
Location
Redcafe
Moyes' job is to identify players he wants - very early in his new job as a manager he identified Fellaini, and we all knew there was a release fee lasting most of the summer. However, in his wisdom he waits until the very last hour of the window. We've paid an extra few million for the privilege. I don't buy this he was a second or third choice. Fellaini should have been here pre-season getting to know his team mates. He could have possibly even helped get better results against Chelsea and Liverpool.
 

rio's upper lip

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2007
Messages
2,527
Woodward is in the position where ultimately the buck stops with him. The manager identifies the targets and passes them on.

Failure to land targets, for whatever reason, is the responsibility of the person doing the negotiations, ie. the CEO
The direction that he has taken United in this summer, announcing to all and sundry that we are rolling in transfer loot, was niaive. Yes, he may have been trying to come across to the fans as more communicative, but now the club looks a laughing stock. Better to do business quietly and get it done.
Gill always gave off a persona as someone who got things done, Woodward doesn't at present

Its early days & I have to say im not impressed by the last few days in particular. Can he learn from it? I hope so.

I wonder how much to recruit Levy?
:lol:
 

Sultan

Gentleness adorns everything
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
48,569
Location
Redcafe
Again do we really think that Woodward just sits there waiting for list of players to be sent up from Moyes? If that is how it works, we are truly in a mess. Call a freaking meeting. Make a freaking phone call. They are supposed to work together. Tell Moyes submit the list by such and such a date, end of. In fact in the heirarchy of the club Moyes is probably under Woodward. So yes Moyes' input is necessary, but if as several people have suggested Woodward just sat around waiting for a list of players to be handed to him, well it still points to him not doing his job properly and there being a mess at the club transfer wise right now.
Dossiers on players are done years in advance, and kept on record. Clubs now have massive scouting networks. Ideally we should jump at the opportunity as soon a one of our targets become available.
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,185
Location
Montevideo
Let him stay as commercial boss! However, a football man with experience in transfers is needed in this position.
That's Richard Arnold's job and he would do it just fine without a moron in charge further up. We don't need to create a Director of Football to get what Gill gave us, just someone other than this inept tosser. It won't stop with transfers, I'd bet my left bollock he will be equally inept dealing with the FA as well. He is just a fecking suit doing a job that requires a man that lives and breathes football.
 

Crackers

greasy ginfers
Joined
May 30, 2012
Messages
29,321
Location
Glazers Out
Interesting point of reference on whether Woodward would spend in the future,
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...er-United-says-vice-chairman-Ed-Woodward.html
Has a few quotes like
Woodward also revealed that the owners will continue to support big purchases of established stars, much like the summer purchase of Robin van Persie for Arsenal for £24m.
He added: 'The Robin van Persie deal perhaps stands out as people incorrectly viewed that we had a policy of only buying young players.
'The DNA of the club has always been to buy young players and to develop players. And that’s what Sir Alex has always preferred to do.

'But equally he’s always taken the view that if a top player comes along that he wants then, once every few years, he’ll do it. And he was backed to do that in a wholehearted manner and we’ll continue to do that.
'Ever since the takeover the Glazers have supported Sir Alex Ferguson 100 per cent in the transfer market. Every player that he has gone after, in conjunction with [chief executive] David Gill has been signed off and approved by Joel Glazer.
'Joel’s never said no. It’s not about how much money the club had, the club has always had sufficient funds to buy players and that position is even stronger going forward because of our financial strength.'
Makes you wonder what his approach was in the market last year, and if there was a change from this stance this year . If so, why?
 

Ash_G

Full Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2010
Messages
7,402
Moyes' job is to identify players he wants - very early in his new job as a manager he identified Fellaini, and we all knew there was a release fee lasting most of the summer. However, in his wisdom he waits until the very last hour of the window. We've paid an extra few million for the privilege. I don't buy this he was a second or third choice. Fellaini should have been here pre-season getting to know his team mates. He could have possibly even helped get better results against Chelsea and Liverpool.
Yeah an I don't think the argument that we only had x amount to spend works now as we were clearly looking at buying both Herrera and fellaini who would have been in excess of £40m at least. The worst thing is , is we've lost out in far better players for sums less than what we've paid over his release clause, and he was already overpriced. As you said there is also the cost if not having added him sooner to gel him in and perhaps help us in the league earlier.
 

DomesticTadpole

Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
101,369
Location
Barrow In Furness
Again do we really think that Woodward just sits there waiting for list of players to be sent up from Moyes? If that is how it works, we are truly in a mess. Call a freaking meeting. Make a freaking phone call. They are supposed to work together. Tell Moyes submit the list by such and such a date, end of. In fact in the heirarchy of the club Moyes is probably under Woodward. So yes Moyes' input is necessary, but if as several people have suggested Woodward just sat around waiting for a list of players to be handed to him, well it still points to him not doing his job properly and there being a mess at the club transfer wise right now.
Woodward is not a DOF, he can only go after targets given to him by the manager. If some of those targets have been given ridiculously late, then that is Moyes fault. Ed might not have stood a chance in the end. We will never ever find out.
 

Member 60376

Guest
Would Edward Woodward?
Yes, Edward Woodward would,
If he could.
But he can't
 

Stretch

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2005
Messages
10,225
Location
Is he normal?
Has United announced a new deal for Nani like Marcotti said? No. How do we know that the clubs are being honest with figures? These people lie all the time in the media. We know that we made a bid for Fabregas and Thiago and Baines and Fellaini. That's it.

Where does it say we made a bid for Herrera? All we know is that there were Spanish lawyers talking to them. Ballague says it's most likely on United's behalf. That's not a detail. That's speculation like most other things. There might have been bids for numerous other players turned down that we have no idea about.

Bilbao's president himself confirmed it. And they rejected it. That was our first bid, made about 4 days ago. Everton made public what Fellaini's release clause was and what we signed him for eventually. We didn't bid for Thiago. You've actually not shown anything in your post. As I told you, we do know some details. The one's in my post are certainly clear. So again, yes, we do have some details.
 

Sultan

Gentleness adorns everything
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
48,569
Location
Redcafe
That's Richard Arnold's job and he would do it just fine without a moron in charge further up. We don't need to create a Director of Football to get what Gill gave us, just someone other than this inept tosser. It won't stop with transfers, I'd bet my left bollock he will be equally inept dealing with the FA as well. He is just a fecking suit doing a job that requires a man that lives and breathes football.
Quite!

I wonder how he'll cope with contract renewals. He is very much a Glazerite having helped the family leverage the club purchase, and I doubt he will be moved onto another position.
 

Sultan

Gentleness adorns everything
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
48,569
Location
Redcafe
Woodward is not a DOF, he can only go after targets given to him by the manager. If some of those targets have been given ridiculously late, then that is Moyes fault. Ed might not have stood a chance in the end. We will never ever find out.
Fellaini had been a target since July when Moyes took over.
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,185
Location
Montevideo
Quite!

I wonder how he'll cope with contract renewals. He is very much a Glazerite having helped the family leverage the club purchase, and I doubt he will be moved onto another position.
Indeed. I was never particularly anti-Glazer as I couldn't see much to hold against them with the club and team being run properly. It's all looking a bit shit going forward with this chap though and I'm not liking it one bit. Some indicated I was a drama queen for having a right fit last night, but it had nothing to do with squad strengthening but how it all stank. The fish rots from the head, how long until it starts affecting the club, its culture and, by extension, the players?

It IS a big deal IMO.
 

Sultan

Gentleness adorns everything
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
48,569
Location
Redcafe
I wonder if he's trying too hard impress his bosses trying to save transfer fees/purchases? Surely he will be aware success on the pitch is the most important factor in achieving success financially.
 

Kinky Melinky

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2000
Messages
27,145
Location
Sligo
We dont know all the details. All we know is he acted too slow, and way too cautious. Deals take time, Bale deal was in negotiations since May it was revealed by his agent. Deals can get drawn out. Yesterdays shambles was due to some imposters/fakers trying to act the dick, rather than official United parties getting it wrong. He still has a few questions to answer, but nothing so far worth resigning over.

What exactly happened with all of that, and how did it have an impact on potential signings?

I haven't read up about it yet, but it seems very odd that imposters could hijack the transfer activity of Manchester United. It all sounds very Liverpool 1990s / 2000s where any excuse goes
 

Snow

Somewhere down the lane, a licky boom boom down
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
33,454
Location
Lousy Smarch weather
Bilbao's president himself confirmed it. And they rejected it. That was our first bid, made about 4 days ago. Everton made public what Fellaini's release clause was and what we signed him for eventually. We didn't bid for Thiago. You've actually not shown anything in your post. As I told you, we do know some details. The one's in my post are certainly clear. So again, yes, we do have some details.
Rejecting a bid isn't a detail. You don't know if Woodward was on it. We've only seen lawyers there. So much crap on Woodward without any details on his job and what he's done. That's what this thread is about.

The club did poorly this summer. That much is obvious. Herrera and Fellaini must have been backup options to sign. Otherwise there wouldn't have been these late bids. Why we weren't in for Özil I don't know. Fact is none of us do which is what I'm saying. Only detail you've come up with is Fellaini's release clause and his transfer fee. That's it. A Herrera bid was rejected, loads of bids are rejected. Probably dozens at least this summer. Not much of a detail.
 

DomesticTadpole

Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
101,369
Location
Barrow In Furness
Fellaini had been a target since July when Moyes took over.
Yes, but it appears that fans wanted someone more creative as well, any targets for that position were also down to Moyes. If Fellaini was a target from the start, why didn't we just get him straight away, let him settle in, not sign him last minute and make him look like a panic buy and 2nd or 3rd choice when he wasn't? If Moyes wanted to help out Everton just bid more than the buyout clause. The uproar about the price would have died down by now.
 

DomesticTadpole

Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
101,369
Location
Barrow In Furness
A lot of the problems seem to come from other clubs revealing the bids we have made, when in the past it would have been kept quite, fear of Fergie maybe.
 

Kinky Melinky

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2000
Messages
27,145
Location
Sligo
allowing release clause of £23.5million to expire, then having to pay £27.5 million for him.

Well whilst that would appear to be completely retarded, I get the feeling that prior to the release clause expiring United figured they had somebody more suitable. That's the truly retarded part. It sounds like it boiled down to a lack of communication. The release clause expired, United failed to get their man and then waited an exceptionally long time to finally get somebody in.
 

Mr Anderson

Eats, shoots, leaves
Joined
Jul 6, 2009
Messages
24,299
Location
Ireland
What exactly happened with all of that, and how did it have an impact on potential signings?

I haven't read up about it yet, but it seems very odd that imposters could hijack the transfer activity of Manchester United. It all sounds very Liverpool 1990s / 2000s where any excuse goes

it is still up in the air. no one really knows for sure, only that United have distanced themselves for all of this. it was mentioned, in this thread, that it may have been Herrera's men trying to buy-out his contract (like the idea raised about Thiago's move), and we either didnt want to match it in the end, or they fecked up with some paperwork as reported. Very strange dealings eitherway, making us look like the twats. It is plausible but not confirmed.
 

Kinky Melinky

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2000
Messages
27,145
Location
Sligo
it is still up in the air. no one really knows for sure, only that United have distanced themselves for all of this. it was mentioned, in this thread, that it may have been Herrera's men trying to buy-out his contract (like the idea raised about Thiago's move), and we either didnt want to match it in the end, or they fecked up with some paperwork as reported. Very strange dealings eitherway, making us look like the twats. It is plausible but not confirmed.

Cheers
 

Sultan

Gentleness adorns everything
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
48,569
Location
Redcafe
it is still up in the air. no one really knows for sure, only that United have distanced themselves for all of this. it was mentioned, in this thread, that it may have been Herrera's men trying to buy-out his contract (like the idea raised about Thiago's move), and we either didnt want to match it in the end, or they fecked up with some paperwork as reported. Very strange dealings eitherway, making us look like the twats. It is plausible but not confirmed.
Herera's men would not have access to that sort of money, and more importantly they'd have to have a contract in place before paying off his contract.
 

roseguy64

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2010
Messages
12,258
Location
Jamaica
The Herrera thread has some news regarding that. Seems we were too late in trying to get him and that we'd have needed some Spanish government help to get the deal through.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,660
Location
London
Moyes' job is to identify players he wants - very early in his new job as a manager he identified Fellaini, and we all knew there was a release fee lasting most of the summer. However, in his wisdom he waits until the very last hour of the window. We've paid an extra few million for the privilege. I don't buy this he was a second or third choice. Fellaini should have been here pre-season getting to know his team mates. He could have possibly even helped get better results against Chelsea and Liverpool.
Agree with this. I don't think that it was the right move letting Fellaini deal to be concluded in the last minute when it could have happened 2 months ago.I don't know what were they thinking. Moyes doesn't need to get the impression that he's looking for players outside of Everton, he instead should have looked for players outside of Everton. Or sign Everton duo in the beginning of June and work on with that. We all knew that this is the first season and knowing that Moyes is super-cautious we would have understand that and wait for next season to get more quality players. But now, they had to talk so much that we are after the best talents in the world, can spend 70m in a single player, make absurd bids on a player that neither the club nor the player would have accepted, try an impossible deal four days before the deadline and end up in the end with the player everybody predicted we'll sign since May (for 4m more than his release clause).

Poor management, nothing else. Point is that Moyes in the end would be judged by the results in the pitch and at the moment no-one can/should do it cause we had only 4 competitive matches. Woody had screwed it big, full stop.
 

Mr Anderson

Eats, shoots, leaves
Joined
Jul 6, 2009
Messages
24,299
Location
Ireland
Herera's men would not have access to that sort of money, and more importantly they'd have to have a contract in place before paying off his contract.

That is what is going around, and posted here previously. I dont know what is and isnt true. I dont know the in's and out's of it, only it wasnt our men involved as reported by most.
 

Mad Winger

New Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2011
Messages
4,138
Location
#ShinjiIsFree
These are the players we "know" that we bid on, but failed to get.

- Fabregas
- Baines
- Khedira
- Herrera
- Coentrao


Cesc
Was pretty much impossible to get. With Thiago leaving and Xavi getting older, he's going to play a pretty important part in one of the best teams in the world, which also happens to be his dream club. Barca also didn't want to sell him, obviously... Does that mean that we shouldn't even make an effort? Obviously not. But we couldn't expect to get him, unless we made a ridiculous offer.

Baines
Moyes wanted him, but not for any price. Seeing as Evra is still awesome, there was no point in overspending(like we did for Fellaini) on a player in the same position. The reason the transfer took so long and utlimately failed has to be because we did our best to get a good deal for both players, seeing as Fellaini was coming anyways.

Khedira
It was a pretty quick and random offer that seemed bound to fail. Just like with Fabregas, we'd have to make an ridiculous offer to get him. All in all, the bid was just a shot in the dark.

Herrera
By the sound of it, we were only slightly interested, but made a decent offer. It was Bilbao that chose to turn us down. I guess they were hoping that we'd overpay out of desperation, something I'm glad that we didn't. To pay nearly 40 million for a relatively unproven and unknown youngster, is madness.

Coentrao
Obviously a last minute solution because we failed to get Baines in the Fellaini deal. I don't think we can blame Woody for this, because I'm pretty sure that Everton chose to let the process go slowly, either in hope of finding a replacement, or to make us overpay.


Summary
I've heard reports saying that Moyes himself only really wanted 3 players: Fellaini, Baines, and Fabregas. We got one of them at least. I'm happy that we didn't get Baines, seeing as he would be a "luxury" signing that we don't need. Fabregas was just a shot in the dark, so I'm not really disappointed we didn't get him. Khedira and Herrera would have been overpayed panic solutions, and Coentrao was just a last-minute attempt.

Overall I don't think we did THAT bad. Seriously, who else could we have signed without overpaying? Thiago? For all we know, he didn't even want to play for us.

No, the players we needed were either unavailable or overpriced. I'm happy that we got Fellaini.
 

Snow

Somewhere down the lane, a licky boom boom down
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
33,454
Location
Lousy Smarch weather
Quite possibly because we already have two good No.10s in Rooney and Kagawa.
We're playing Ashley Young instead. Better having the three of them interchanging behind RvP than our rigid no-chance creating midfield that we've but forward in recent games.
 

Rory 7

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2002
Messages
7,454
Location
A car park in Saipan
I had to vote no on this one and as someone earlier on said if we are voting on this how long will it be before we are calling for Moyes head?

The reality is his position being untenable or not will be decided by the Glazers, no one else. Thats the sad reality of the position the club is in, we're in new territory now, the new management team and executive team are answerable to the owners and all that matters to them is finishing top four and continuing to service the debt they have heaped on the club. As fans we may think his performance in the window is shocking. As fans we may be disappointed but as I said we are in new territory now. No longer do we have a legend at the helm who will force through signings that will keep us at the top. This is the post-Ferguson era, it was inevitable the road was going to be a rocky one.

Ferguson has asked us to get behind our new manager and thats what, in fairness, most supporters have done. If those voting yes are saying Woodward hasn't backed Moyes, show me one shred of evidence that is true. Moyes only last Friday said there was a possibility we might bring in no one. Moyes has repeatedly said this transfer window has been difficult. Yes it has been difficult. But perhaps, and this is the real killer, its been difficult because the club don't have the kinds of budgets that we would like us to be playing with. Do we really believe United under the Glazers would pay 40 odd million for an Ozil for example? I just can't see it.

If on the other hand you are voting yes because Woodward 'screwed' up Cesc, Thiago, Herrara and Coentrao - the answer for me is 'maybe'. But I'm yet to be convinced because everything Moyes has said in relation to transfers seems to be in concert with the top brass at the club. In other words, Moyes & Woodward worked on this window together, hand in hand. My reading of what has happened is Moyes & Woodward had a fair belief that signing ONE midfielder would be success. Yes they've gone about it in a different way to the previous manager but there you go, thats the world we live in now.

If Moyes expresses his belief that Woodward ballsed this up then yes he has to go. But Moyes won't, these two are a new team and none of us can do anything about that.

Untenable? Sadly thats not something that the fanbase will decide ever with the Glazers.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,660
Location
London
That is what is going around, and posted here previously. I dont know what is and isnt true. I dont know the in's and out's of it, only it wasnt our men involved as reported by most.
Or the club said so in order to save face.
 

Successful

Owes the Caf £25 (With interests)
Joined
Dec 15, 2006
Messages
7,347
Location
On top of the league
The Fabregas bid is the biggest fear factor. He OBVIOUSLY don't have a clue about the market nor value of players. It's like he started learning about football this summer and didn't do his homework. If we had a poll on redcafe the valuation of Fabregas would be NOWHERE near £26m!! Barcelona must have had a lot of jokes around this subject. Why the hell should he have another go? I mean, how is this guy even able to get around in society when he's so far away from reality??? Throw him out on the street or give him a new job, preferably as a trashcan in the public toilets at Old Trafford.
 

EvilChuck

Full Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2009
Messages
8,481
Location
Social distancing
Moyes' job is to identify players he wants - very early in his new job as a manager he identified Fellaini, and we all knew there was a release fee lasting most of the summer. However, in his wisdom he waits until the very last hour of the window. We've paid an extra few million for the privilege. I don't buy this he was a second or third choice. Fellaini should have been here pre-season getting to know his team mates. He could have possibly even helped get better results against Chelsea and Liverpool.

Is it not the case that if we met the release clause we'd have to pay it all up front? We usually pay transfer fees in installments and add ons, but Everton would still claim to be getting a deal worth £27million even if it was actually something like £18 million spread across 2 years, with the other £9 million spread across incentives and achievments (that we may not even achieve)
 

manusteve

Full Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2001
Messages
1,928
It's amazing how he failed on so many different occasions during this transfer window. Honestly, for a CEO of United, he should be hung to dry forthwith. American organisations (as in Glazer as owners) usually sack people and they are out of the door immediately. I fear this fecker will be around for a while yet unless he resigns.