Pedro at Chelsea

FromTheBench

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2014
Messages
10,479
Another meh performance. Not the player we needed, imo. Or a massive improvement over our starters anyway.

He is one of those players who are as good as the team behind him too much. Good, but not as great as some were making out him to be in desperation.
 

Jazz

Just in case anyone missed it. I don't like Mount.
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
31,143
The arse-seeing on here when LVG and Woody didn't get him:rolleyes:
 

kps88

Full Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2008
Messages
22,518
Was always going to take time to settle into this league and playing for a struggling Chelsea side doesn't help. Still think there's a good chance he'll come good eventually and he doesn't look fazed by the physical side of things, which is always a good sign.
 

Bwuk

Full Member
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
17,508
I still think he's a great player, but something is wrong at Chelsea. I can see Mourinho leaving in the next few months, which is bizarre considering they walked the league last year.
 

HabeasC

Full Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2013
Messages
3,600
If you gave me the choice of Martial or Pedro then, it was a pretty easy decision. Think it is even easier now, just that the result has changed.
 

worldinmotion66

Full Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
2,028
He'll come good. He's never played or lived outside of the Barcelona bubble, I'm sure he'll take six months to settle, it must be a complete culture shock. The demands on a player are far greater in this league, but he's got the attributes to be a success at Chelsea. I would have still liked him at United, if truth be told.
 

Ringo 07

Full Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
5,615
Location
Schweiniesque
Pedro would not have offered more than Mata...we dodged a bullet...Van Gaal has been outrageously accurate with transfer decisions...He's making Moyes look like a Steve Kean clone which might actually be a compliment to Moyes......Mourinho is the one who will lose faith in a new big money signing after 3 games if they don't perform...also he will never give youth a chance.....Van Gaal is a better manager every day of the week in terms of long term health of a club even if Mouinho wins more silver in the short term with heavy spending
 

Tyrion

Full Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2014
Messages
5,236
Location
Ireland
He was definitely overrated by some when we missed out on him but he's obviously a good player. He can't make Chelsea play on his own which is understandable.

The arse-seeing on here when LVG and Woody didn't get him:rolleyes:
When we miss out on a player, they become great.
When we sign them, they become decent.

If we had signed him, he'd probably be called a 'Barcelona cast off'.
If we'd missed out on Schneiderlin, he'd be called a 'proven Premier League star'.

Criticising United is the fashion it seems and will be until we win the league again and shut people up.
 

Krovv

RedCafe Verified
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Messages
2,544
Location
Getting knocked out of all cups
Supports
Arsenal
Criticising United is the fashion it seems and will be until we win the league again and shut people up.
Even then some of you will criticise the club for not winning the Champions League or League Cup or FA Cup. You need to win the quadruple and the European Super Cup and the Club World Cup for the moaners to stop moaning. Not to mention that you'd need to sign Messi and Ronaldo after winning the quadruple. And win the Third World War.
 

suheilsworld

Full Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2008
Messages
3,497
Location
Abu Dhabi, UAE
He was definitely overrated by some when we missed out on him but he's obviously a good player. He can't make Chelsea play on his own which is understandable.



When we miss out on a player, they become great.
When we sign them, they become decent.

If we had signed him, he'd probably be called a 'Barcelona cast off'.
If we'd missed out on Schneiderlin, he'd be called a 'proven Premier League star'.

Criticising United is the fashion it seems and will be until we win the league again and shut people up.
This!
 

NK86

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
10,470
He is still a very good player to have. He is not a Hazard who will go on a mazy run and produce a moment of brilliance out of the blue but he will score important goals for Chelsea this season.
 

Mindhunter

Full Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
3,640
He is a good player. Let's not be too swift with "We dodged a bullet there". Martial is a young 19 year old whereas Pedro has a lot of experience in winning the La Liga and the CL.

I would have definitely liked Pedro here. We would have needed his pace on the right wing. It would have come at the expense of some creativity though.
 

drmuji

Full Member
Joined
May 28, 2009
Messages
2,314
Location
Lahore, Pakistan
How can he suddenly be shite, after we didn't get him. I remember, a lot of us were singing his praises and the "world class" statement was branded around and now we suddenly see him as a bullet dodged. I think it's sour grapes, to be honest.
I mean, it's been only 2 and a half months. The lad has lived all his life in a different environment and played in a different culture with very different "philosophy" (I am allowed to use the term here? :wenger:). Now coming to England, playing under a manager who always would would teach restrain and people always looking at you about how and what you are doing with no Messi around. It's difficult and different
Give the boy sometime and I am sure he will shine through. Although as united supporter, I don't want that :devil:
 

krazyrobus

Full Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2007
Messages
4,751
How can he suddenly be shite, after we didn't get him. I remember, a lot of us were singing his praises and the "world class" statement was branded around and now we suddenly see him as a bullet dodged. I think it's sour grapes, to be honest.
I mean, it's been only 2 and a half months. The lad has lived all his life in a different environment and played in a different culture with very different "philosophy" (I am allowed to use the term here? :wenger:). Now coming to England, playing under a manager who always would would teach restrain and people always looking at you about how and what you are doing with no Messi around. It's difficult and different
Give the boy sometime and I am sure he will shine through. Although as united supporter, I don't want that :devil:
Agree 100%, there's a lot of Captain Hindsight here.
 

ivaldo

Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
28,701
Exactly, feck me lads he just left his beloved club that he didnt really want to leave and is settling in in a new country. Dont be surprised if he scores against us.
Depay is getting the same treatment.
 

buckooo1978

Full Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
13,777
Pedro will come good....like Hazard and like Aguero.....just a few bad games and settling in process for him
 

ItsEssexRob

Has a slight gambling problem
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
11,728
Location
Essex
Supports
Chelsea
As I said hes under huge scrutiny here following what happened in the summer, its obvious you cant wait to jump on him as I would in the reverse situation, fact is he had one very good debut game, and 1 good game since with 5 average games. Comparing him to the likes of Sanchez is nuts hes had a whole season.
 

Samid

He's no Bilal Ilyas Jhandir
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
49,818
Location
Oslo, Norway
"We've fecked this up" has become to "we've dodged a bullet". Say what you want about RAWK but the caf isn't far behind when it comes to knee-jerks.
 

Fahad Jawaid

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
1,196
I will be honest, i was very keen on him and i still stand by and feel we need him more, when you see Depay, whose a young player having a difficult time to adopt the league and when your first option of the bench in wing positions is young, he would have been very handy for us. I watch us and there are so many times players like Young, Valencia and Depay are in a decent position against the full back and their final ball lets them down.

We will be such a complete team to play against if we get a player like Reus/Griezmann/Robben on one wing and we will not have games like PSV or Newcastle where we knocked on the door and our finishing or final ball let us down time and time again. With Pedro he might not be as good as the above mentioned players but with Depay whose young he would have been the perfect player to come in do a job and let Depay develop, one thing you can't criticise Pedro is, he may not be a Hazard and go past three players but when he will be in good positions he will deliver quality, its what we lack and against packed defenses we struggle and need a Blind like pass or Martial conjuring up some magic to go ahead.
 

Wade3

Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Messages
2,729
I will be honest, i was very keen on him and i still stand by and feel we need him more, when you see Depay, whose a young player having a difficult time to adopt the league and when your first option of the bench in wing positions is young, he would have been very handy for us. I watch us and there are so many times players like Young, Valencia and Depay are in a decent position against the full back and their final ball lets them down.

We will be such a complete team to play against if we get a player like Reus/Griezmann/Robben on one wing and we will not have games like PSV or Newcastle where we knocked on the door and our finishing or final ball let us down time and time again. With Pedro he might not be as good as the above mentioned players but with Depay whose young he would have been the perfect player to come in do a job and let Depay develop, one thing you can't criticise Pedro is, he may not be a Hazard and go past three players but when he will be in good positions he will deliver quality, its what we lack and against packed defenses we struggle and need a Blind like pass or Martial conjuring up some magic to go ahead.
Ironically enough, Depay was brilliant in the PSV game.
 

ItsEssexRob

Has a slight gambling problem
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
11,728
Location
Essex
Supports
Chelsea
"We've fecked this up" has become to "we've dodged a bullet". Say what you want about RAWK but the caf isn't far behind when it comes to knee-jerks.
It was fecked up, theres no point trying to justify it by his performances with us, even if he turns out an entire season of shit performances because its entirely possible he may have played differently at a different club. As it happens he hasnt been terrible even when not influential and has provided two goals and two assists already.
 

KM

I’m afraid I just blue myself
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
49,783
It was fecked up, theres no point trying to justify it by his performances with us, even if he turns out an entire season of shit performances because its entirely possible he may have played differently at a different club. As it happens he hasnt been terrible even when not influential and has provided two goals and two assists already.
There is a great possibility that we might not have signed Martial had we signed Pedro, so I'm not sure if that'll count as fecking this up. Pedro is a very good player but nearly all of the reds will prefer Martial in their team based on the current showing and the potential he possesses.
 

Fahad Jawaid

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
1,196
Ironically enough, Depay was brilliant in the PSV game.
And ironically enough you missed the whole point of the post, and just looked at Depay against PSV and jumped on the gun. My point was about final ball which includes finishing or assists which we lacked although we had fair bit of openings, i remember Young and Depay had two great chances along with Smalling to make it a two or even a three goal lead. What i meant was i feel Pedro is far more polished and established and would have complemented Depay more, because it would have allowed us to phase him into the side rather than be the creative spark, and for Young obviously he's a good squad player to have but he's hit and miss and Pedro would have been an improvement on him. Would you Disagree that Pedro with our Setup is more unlikely to have more assists or goals than Depay or Young?
 

ItsEssexRob

Has a slight gambling problem
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
11,728
Location
Essex
Supports
Chelsea
There is a great possibility that we might not have signed Martial had we signed Pedro, so I'm not sure if that'll count as fecking this up. Pedro is a very good player but nearly all of the reds will prefer Martial in their team based on the current showing and the potential he possesses.
Yeha but youre using this as methods to bash Pedro and justify it. Based on your recent spending theres nothing to suggest you wouldnt have got both, but the spin will be that it was either Pedro or Martial and that so far Martial has been better( true after a few games).
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,503
Location
Birmingham
I have a feeling he would look better in our possession based system.
 

VanGaalEra

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2014
Messages
13,270
Extremely happy with this, the shit we got over missing out on him and then signing Martial was ridiculous.
 

Wade3

Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Messages
2,729
And ironically enough you missed the whole point of the post, and just looked at Depay against PSV and jumped on the gun. My point was about final ball which includes finishing or assists which we lacked although we had fair bit of openings, i remember Young and Depay had two great chances along with Smalling to make it a two or even a three goal lead. What i meant was i feel Pedro is far more polished and established and would have complemented Depay more, because it would have allowed us to phase him into the side rather than be the creative spark, and for Young obviously he's a good squad player to have but he's hit and miss and Pedro would have been an improvement on him. Would you Disagree that Pedro with our Setup is more unlikely to have more assists or goals than Depay or Young?
Did I say anything against your post? How could I miss the point then? You shouldn't assume things so easily. I pointed out the irony that Depay finished well against PSV, nothing else.
 

Šjor Bepo

Wout is love, Wout is life; all hail Wout!
Joined
Mar 29, 2011
Messages
15,735
i would say not signing him was the best piece of business we made this summer but we signed Bastian :drool::drool::drool:

Thats what you get when you expect from Pedro to play like Hazard, he is an average player that fitted perfectly in Tiki Taka system. He would probably be good in Bayern and maybe Arsenal when they are at their best but other then that, he is fecked outside Barca/Spain. Dont think he would be in my first 11 at Chelsea, in big games Cesc is playing behind the striker, Willian should be first name on the team sheet and in lesser games where Cesc plays deeper im not sure i would start Pedro over Oscar. The Pedro thread this summer was a joke, if the Pedro name was censored i would thought we are talking about Ribery or Robben. I expect that he would still have good numbers anywhere he plays but....
 

::sonny::

Full Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
17,868
Location
Milan
He is a good player. Let's not be too swift with "We dodged a bullet there". Martial is a young 19 year old whereas Pedro has a lot of experience in winning the La Liga and the CL.

I would have definitely liked Pedro here. We would have needed his pace on the right wing. It would have come at the expense of some creativity though.
I would prefer Mane on the right, or even Pereira instead of Pedro.
 

Jagga7

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2011
Messages
7,081
Location
in a cave
The hysteria when we didn't sign him by a lot of posters was ridiculous. He was apparently the catalyst we needed to challenge for the league and European honours.

Good player but massively overrated by a lot on here.