BREAKING: Louis van Gaal sacked

[Red-Man-Walking]

For those unwilling or unable to sift through the thread, here's an artist's impression of the events of today:

 

[Rado_N]

 

[Sky1981]

Take the ban cina, die for the cause, it's worth the fun. Lol

It's temp anyway right?

 

[Sad Chris]

Are you sad, Chris?

What would drive you to that conclusion?

 

[unchanged_lineup]

Your use of percentages on the chart but decimals in the data labels is the most aggravating thing in this whole thread

I know, kerazy right???

 

[unchanged_lineup]

Ban him!

And to make it worse guys, I lectured this stuff for a while. I'd fail myself.

 

[Zarlak]

For those unwilling or unable to sift through the thread, here's an artist's impression of the events of today:

 

[Revan]

@KingEric7

Good God, I was happy when he returned, and then clicked there to see that he hasn't posted since 3th of February (so, he has left immediately after his return).

And then watched his last posts. It seems that he has really lost the touch with reality.

 

[Summit]

For those unwilling or unable to sift through the thread, here's an artist's impression of the events of today:

 

[Flying_Heckfish]

Er..yeah. or something.

 

[Beachryan]

Can we keep this same thread for when he is sacked? The confusion will be glorious.

 

[JonDahl]

Regardless of whether it is true or not, this would still have made you look like an idiot.

Yep. And when Itchy plays Scratchy's skeleton like a xylophone, he strikes the same rib in succession, yet he produces two clearly different tones.

It's a shame nobody made this point earlier.

This fecking forum.

 

[MyOnlySolskjaer]

 

[milemuncher777]

For those unwilling or unable to sift through the thread, here's an artist's impression of the events of today:

 

[MDFC Manager]

Seriously, why is the thread still here? Any other poster and the thread would have been locked or at least renamed and the poster would have been banned long ago.

Indeed

 

[nick2004]

 

[Jev]

I didn't read this.

Your arrogance confirms his point though.

 

[Treble]

This thread is worse than LVG's stint here

 

[Van Piorsing]

Can we keep this same thread for when he is sacked? The confusion will be glorious.

We must or the sack will never happen.

 

[Olly Gunnar Solskjær]

Great thread, brilliant reactions.

 

[Pexbo]

Can someone put Official: in the title just for round two of the shits, giggles and drama?

 

[VeevaVee]

Me when I first read the thread title

When he really leaves, this will also be my first reply.

 

[Mr. Meeseeks]

I didn't read this.

This fecking forum sometimes.

I'm just glad I still have access to the Newbies

 

[Red-Man-Walking]

Can someone put Official: in the title just for round two of the shits, giggles and drama?

Or end it with (via Manchester United Official Twitter).

 

[Cina]

Great thread, brilliant reactions.

All thanks to you Sir Olly.

 

[The Stain]

Tried making a gif, just ended up with this:

 

[Edgar Allan Pillow]

I find this thread very funny but this kind of reasoning alot less.

Rules are the same for anyone, that is one of the principals behind justice which is the only way rules can be acceptable by those who need to follow them. I belong to a community, The community has rules that apply to everybody in that community, hence the rules apply to me and I have to follow them. When rules apply to some and not to others, they become vague and unsupportable. If wumming isn't allowed on this forum, it should be not allowed for moderators either.

If you want to allow wumming in a certain context like this then the rules should be changed and clarified in the policy that everybody has to follow. The rule should be described as you described it in your post. Wumming not allowed for normal members to protect the community from continious and unappropriate wumming but allowed for forum moderators under the condition it is done with moderation and with the goal to provide some fun and excitment on the forum.

However high profile poster, this is again very vague and hence unspupportable. What is a high profile poster, under what conditions can a poster regard himself as high profile and be allowed to wum ? Nothing is clarified on this matter hence the policy about it is just vague and bad. Vague rules are bad, simple as that.

Forum moderators should be giving the right example. They start a wumming thread, a new poster sees this and thinks it is allowed, so he does the same and gets banned without a moments notice or chance to appeal. It is not just in my opnion.

Haven't you heard of "This is being performed by professionals. DO NOT try this at home" ?

 

[Olly Gunnar Solskjær]

All thanks to you Sir Olly.

What on earth are you talking about, I had absolutely no idea about any of this...

 

[limerickcitykid]

Your use of percentages on the chart but decimals in the data labels is the most aggravating thing in this whole thread

I find it not even adding to 100% even more aggravating.

 

[Fergus' son]

I'm quite aware if what OP means, the point is its the reactions that provide the humour.

Like I said, easily amused.

 

[Red-Man-Walking]

I find it not even adding to 100% even more aggravating.

Feck me, all this talk of Illuminati and bannings distracted me so much I didn't even notice.

 

[UnofficialDevil]

Title of this thread needs to be changed.

 

[Pexbo]

Tried making a gif, just ended up with this:

fecking hell

 

[Rado_N]

What on earth are you talking about, I had absolutely no idea about any of this...

Look what you caused!!

 

[Olly Gunnar Solskjær]

Look what you caused!!

I may have done the Photoshop and suggested the thread be made, but apart from that it had nothing to do with me.

 

[Rado_N]

I may have done the Photoshop and suggested the thread be made, but apart from that it had nothing to do with me.

 

[Cina]

I may have done the Photoshop and suggested the thread be made, but apart from that it had nothing to do with me.

You lovable rogue.

 

[Damien]

I'm not talking about a full banning, but maybe a couple of months suspension for Cina to clear his head.

Six

 

[Damien]

You lovable rogue.

So I'm guessing it is now safe to say the background?

 

[Rado_N]

Your arrogance confirms his point though.

lighten up