Top 4 race 2016/17

Kraftwerker

Formerly RedAddict
Joined
May 30, 2008
Messages
13,871
Location
We can't stop here. This is bat country.
Sez the man who constantly bitches about other teams and the source of their funding.
Bitter and defensive about retaining your stranglehold on the PL seems top of your list of priorities.
Is competition not healthy?
Since Abramovich took over at Chelsea we've been more successful than them, and since Mansour took over at City, we've been more successful than you.

Financially we can easily compete with the oil funded clubs through using our own resources.

I'm perfectly comfortable with that. Things are looking very bright for us now we've secured a proper Fergie successor.
 

stevieg4ever

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 14, 2014
Messages
173
Supports
Liverpool
Yes there have been good players signed, im not questioning that, but overall the club's transfer policy has been detrimental to our overall progress.
And even some of the so called "good" ones are only good in relative terms to the crap ones we sign. We seem to be content with "decent job" as opposed to players that will move the club forward and have us at least competing for trophies.

Carry on over analysing random adjectives as it pleases you, by all means, but ultimately they haven't been good enough.
I would take issue with a couple in particular though:
Moreno - no disaster? Recall the Europa League final??
Can - I don't think he is good enough if we want to press on. It's unfair on the lad because he has been deployed i all manner of positions. He is too slow in possession l feel. He tends to play when others are absent, hardly every game.

Klopp has been better, l agree, and that brings cause for hope.

One-eyed analysis here. Just remember the term reckless is what I was taking issue with. Poor transfers aren't, by default, reckless.

You say it's been a disaster since Rodgers but don't mention several of his buys: Coutinho, Lovren, Sturridge, Origi, Clyne, Lallana, Milner and Firmino. They range from excellent to pretty good. Even Allen did a decent job and was sold for good money.

Also, Klopp's business has been very good overall: Mané, Wijnaldum and Matip are very good business.

As for your list:

Karius isn't reckless at all - too cheap to be.
Can - plays nearly every game. Was excellent at times last season and under Rodgers but has lost his way this season. Not reckless.
Benteke - the one really big outlay on your list. Sold a year later for the same price. How's this different to Di Maria?
Balotelli - terrible business.
Moreno - very average full back but not a complete disaster.

The other names, I agree were largely poor business but that's not reason to lambast the club as having a disastrous transfer record. The facts simply don't back it up. It's not perfect at all, but whose is?

As an aside, Cissoko is an odd one to mention. He did absolutely nothing wrong in a Liverpool shirt - came on loan, did a job, left. Not reckless.
 

Francoruud

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 2, 2017
Messages
295
Location
London
Supports
Chelsea
Since Abramovich took over at Chelsea we've been more successful than them, and since Mansour took over at City, we've been more successful than you.

Financially we can easily compete with the oil funded clubs through using our own resources.

I'm perfectly comfortable with that. Things are looking very bright for us now we've secured a proper Fergie successor.
Not really.

Man United since 2003-04:
Champions League - 1
Premier League - 5
FA Cup - 2
League Cup - 3
Club World Cup - 1

Major trophies - 12

Chelsea since 2003-04:
Champions League - 1
Premier League - 4
FA Cup - 4
League Cup - 3
Europa League 1

Major trophies - 13

And we're close to adding the 5th league title this season.

So no, not really. You haven't been more successful than us since Abramovich took over. We've been the most successful side in England since. But we've both been by far the most successful sides. City have only won 4 in that time span, Arsenal 4 and Liverpool 3. No one else has more than 1.

Have to say City are well behind our pace though. By the 9th year of the Abramovich era, we'd already won 10.
 

Gentleman Jim

It's absolutely amazing! Perfect even.
Joined
Jun 14, 2015
Messages
3,158
Location
Salford
Supports
city
Since Abramovich took over at Chelsea we've been more successful than them, and since Mansour took over at City, we've been more successful than you.

Financially we can easily compete with the oil funded clubs through using our own resources.

I'm perfectly comfortable with that. Things are looking very bright for us now we've secured a proper Fergie successor.
Great, everything's rosy for you on and off the field.
Have a nice day.
 

antihenry

CAF GRU Rep
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
7,401
Location
Chelsea FC
Since Abramovich took over at Chelsea we've been more successful than them, and since Mansour took over at City, we've been more successful than you.

Financially we can easily compete with the oil funded clubs through using our own resources.

I'm perfectly comfortable with that. Things are looking very bright for us now we've secured a proper Fergie successor.
Actually, if Conte wins the league this year, Chelsea will have matched the United's PL record of that period (5 titles since 2003/04 season) and have won more trophies overall than United since Abramovich took over.
 

Thunderhead

Full Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2016
Messages
3,156
Supports
City
Have to say City are well behind our pace though. By the 9th year of the Abramovich era, we'd already won 10.
yeah but Chelsea were probably starting 10 years ahead of City when Abramovich took over, you were already regulars in Europe and winning the odd FA Cup, we were still yoyo-ing up and down the division and had no idea where we would finish season to season.
 

Eire Red United

New Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2016
Messages
2,723
Location
Ireland
As opposed to a City team you said would finish closer to Everton than you guys who you've got only 2 points more than in all those unbeaten games.
Also I never said your not in good form I said some of you guys believe your in amazing form compared to the rest of the top 6, which you aren't.
Who made that ludicrous statement?
 

Kraftwerker

Formerly RedAddict
Joined
May 30, 2008
Messages
13,871
Location
We can't stop here. This is bat country.
Not really.

Man United since 2003-04:
Champions League - 1
Premier League - 5
FA Cup - 2
League Cup - 3
Club World Cup - 1

Major trophies - 12

Chelsea since 2003-04:
Champions League - 1
Premier League - 4
FA Cup - 4
League Cup - 3
Europa League 1

Major trophies - 13

And we're close to adding the 5th league title this season.

So no, not really. You haven't been more successful than us since Abramovich took over. We've been the most successful side in England since. But we've both been by far the most successful sides. City have only won 4 in that time span, Arsenal 4 and Liverpool 3. No one else has more than 1.

Have to say City are well behind our pace though. By the 9th year of the Abramovich era, we'd already won 10.
Ok, I'd call that pretty neck-and-neck, with United's 5 league titles (including a league and CL double) tipping the scales slightly in our favour.

The context of Chelsea's CL win (surrendering the league, playing Greece style football) kind of cheapens it in my eyes.

But I can't question the numbers.
 

Francoruud

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 2, 2017
Messages
295
Location
London
Supports
Chelsea
Ok, I'd call that pretty neck-and-neck, with United's 5 league titles (including a league and CL double) tipping the scales slightly in our favour.

The context of Chelsea's CL win (surrendering the league, playing Greece style football) kind of cheapens it in my eyes.

But I can't question the numbers.
I honestly couldn't care less. We got to 6 straight CL semi finals and got f**ked quite a few times by bad luck (and some ref cheating). That crop of players deserved to win the CL. Only thing that would have made it even better in my eyes is if we'd knocked Liverpool out on our way to knocking Barcelona out and going on to win it.

Knocking out Arsenal's Invincibles only to have Raneiri feck up a 2-0 lead at home that would have seen us knock out Monaco and go to the final.
Beating Ronaldinho and Barca at that team's peak and also beating Bayern only to go out to a ghost Liverpool goal.
Going out again on shit luck to penalties against Liverpool.
Finally beating Liverpool, getting to the final, one kick away from lifting the trophy only to have our captain slip on the fecking kick. What are the odds?
We come roaring back the next year again, determined to make up for Moscow, only to have Barca do a ref job on us.

Took another 3 years for us to get another real chance. You think I care about the kind of football we played while winning it? All the "pleasing" football we played for the neutrals got us absolutely nothing :lol:

I hear you but we represented the Premier League brilliantly in Europe all those years and deserved a trophy and indeed it's sitting in our trophy room right now so it doesn't matter how you see it. ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: sizzling sausages

MDFC Manager

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
24,432
I honestly couldn't care less. We got to 6 straight CL semi finals and got f**ked quite a few times by bad luck (and some ref cheating). That crop of players deserved to win the CL. Only thing that would have made it even better in my eyes is if we'd knocked Liverpool out on our way to knocking Barcelona out and going on to win it.

Knocking out Arsenal's Invincibles only to have Raneiri feck up a 2-0 lead at home that would have seen us knock out Monaco and go to the final.
Beating Ronaldinho and Barca at that team's peak and also beating Bayern only to go out to a ghost Liverpool goal.
Going out again on shit luck to penalties against Liverpool.
Finally beating Liverpool, getting to the final, one kick away from lifting the trophy only to have our captain slip on the fecking kick. What are the odds?
We come roaring back the next year again, determined to make up for Moscow, only to have Barca do a ref job on us.

Took another 3 years for us to get another real chance. You think I care about the kind of football we played while winning it? All the "pleasing" football we played for the neutrals got us absolutely nothing :lol:

I hear you but we represented the Premier League brilliantly in Europe all those years and deserved a trophy and indeed it's sitting in our trophy room right now so it doesn't matter how you see it. ;)
But best of all, you've managed to properly represent London at the European stage:lol:
 

Kraftwerker

Formerly RedAddict
Joined
May 30, 2008
Messages
13,871
Location
We can't stop here. This is bat country.
I honestly couldn't care less. We got to 6 straight CL semi finals and got f**ked quite a few times by bad luck (and some ref cheating). That crop of players deserved to win the CL. Only thing that would have made it even better in my eyes is if we'd knocked Liverpool out on our way to knocking Barcelona out and going on to win it.

Knocking out Arsenal's Invincibles only to have Raneiri feck up a 2-0 lead at home that would have seen us knock out Monaco and go to the final.
Beating Ronaldinho and Barca at that team's peak and also beating Bayern only to go out to a ghost Liverpool goal.
Going out again on shit luck to penalties against Liverpool.
Finally beating Liverpool, getting to the final, one kick away from lifting the trophy only to have our captain slip on the fecking kick. What are the odds?
We come roaring back the next year again, determined to make up for Moscow, only to have Barca do a ref job on us.

Took another 3 years for us to get another real chance. You think I care about the kind of football we played while winning it? All the "pleasing" football we played for the neutrals got us absolutely nothing :lol:

I hear you but we represented the Premier League brilliantly in Europe all those years and deserved a trophy and indeed it's sitting in our trophy room right now so it doesn't matter how you see it. ;)
Fair enough.
 

Treble_Winning

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 12, 2016
Messages
1,221
Ok, I'd call that pretty neck-and-neck, with United's 5 league titles (including a league and CL double) tipping the scales slightly in our favour.

The context of Chelsea's CL win (surrendering the league, playing Greece style football) kind of cheapens it in my eyes.

But I can't question the numbers.
We have also won the Club World Cup while they have won the Europa League, though the Europa League is considered a more serious competition, the CWC is actually a very interesting one because you have to play against teams from other continents, which makes it unique as a competition. Chelsea had their chance to win the same trophy but were beaten in the final, so it's not true that it is a joke competition or a glorified friendly etc. They did try to win it, but couldn't. It's not really that easy to play South American teams because they have a totally different approach to football.

The fact that UTD have won 5 league titles + the CWC puts us slightly ahead of Chelsea IMO, though I am sure Chelsea fans will argue the same on account of the fact that they have won more cups + the Europa League. We can put that right by winning it this season.
 

Treble_Winning

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 12, 2016
Messages
1,221
I honestly couldn't care less. We got to 6 straight CL semi finals and got f**ked quite a few times by bad luck (and some ref cheating). That crop of players deserved to win the CL. Only thing that would have made it even better in my eyes is if we'd knocked Liverpool out on our way to knocking Barcelona out and going on to win it.

Knocking out Arsenal's Invincibles only to have Raneiri feck up a 2-0 lead at home that would have seen us knock out Monaco and go to the final.
Beating Ronaldinho and Barca at that team's peak and also beating Bayern only to go out to a ghost Liverpool goal.
Going out again on shit luck to penalties against Liverpool.
Finally beating Liverpool, getting to the final, one kick away from lifting the trophy only to have our captain slip on the fecking kick. What are the odds?
We come roaring back the next year again, determined to make up for Moscow, only to have Barca do a ref job on us.

Took another 3 years for us to get another real chance. You think I care about the kind of football we played while winning it? All the "pleasing" football we played for the neutrals got us absolutely nothing :lol:

I hear you but we represented the Premier League brilliantly in Europe all those years and deserved a trophy and indeed it's sitting in our trophy room right now so it doesn't matter how you see it. ;)
I still cannot believe that Chelsea have had managers such as Mourinho, Ancelotti, Hiddink, Scolari, etc - but the one who won the CL was Roberto Di Matteo. It just boggles the mind that he has a CL winner's medal especially when compared with the pedigree of the others.

And the other time they got to the final, they were managed by Avram Grant (!!!!)

I think that Chelsea should learn from history - the only way they will win the CL is if they appoint a shit manager!!! Will they appoint David Moyes next?? :)
 

Terminator

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2015
Messages
1,928
If it wasnt for peak Barca, we might have had 1 or 2 more CLs. The 2009 and 2011 finals were hopeless, we never stood a chance.:(
 

Francoruud

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 2, 2017
Messages
295
Location
London
Supports
Chelsea
I still cannot believe that Chelsea have had managers such as Mourinho, Ancelotti, Hiddink, Scolari, etc - but the one who won the CL was Roberto Di Matteo. It just boggles the mind that he has a CL winner's medal especially when compared with the pedigree of the others.

And the other time they got to the final, they were managed by Avram Grant (!!!!)

I think that Chelsea should learn from history - the only way they will win the CL is if they appoint a shit manager!!! Will they appoint David Moyes next?? :)
I'll make sure to pass your recommendation to Roman and the board.
 

Kentonio

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
13,188
Location
Stamford Bridge
Supports
Chelsea
The fact that UTD have won 5 league titles + the CWC puts us slightly ahead of Chelsea IMO, though I am sure Chelsea fans will argue the same on account of the fact that they have won more cups + the Europa League. We can put that right by winning it this season.
Are you finally accepting you're not likely to win the league this season? :)
 

hellohello

Full Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Messages
1,819
Supports
Tottenham
If it wasnt for peak Barca, we might have had 1 or 2 more CLs. The 2009 and 2011 finals were hopeless, we never stood a chance.:(
Said every runner up ever. ;)
Real would have had more league titles too!

But yeah, they were unfairly good weren't they.
 

AshfordLad

New Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2014
Messages
2,293
The context of Chelsea's CL win (surrendering the league, playing Greece style football) kind of cheapens it in my eyes.
It came with the added reward of knocking spurs out of europe for next season. It was glorious. I would want it to be the exact same way when we win it again.

Unlike Chelsea we have won more than one so you'll have to be more specific :)
They are clearly talking about post Abramovich era. So rather than him needing to be specific, you need to read properly. :D
 
Last edited:

AshfordLad

New Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2014
Messages
2,293
I think that Chelsea should learn from history - the only way they will win the CL is if they appoint a shit manager!!! Will they appoint David Moyes next?? :)
Given that Conte is only a level above Neville and Giggs (and several levels below fsw and wenger), I'd say we have found out shite manager already ;)
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
It came with the added reward of knocking spurs out of europe for next season. It was glorious. I would want it to be the exact same way when we win it again.


They are clearly talking about post Abramovich era. So rather than him needing to be specific, you need to read properly. :D
He could have been talking about Jose Torres from the legendary 68 Benfica team when referencing JT!
 

Treble_Winning

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 12, 2016
Messages
1,221
Given that Conte is only a level above Neville and Giggs (and several levels below fsw and wenger), I'd say we have found out shite manager already ;)
Wenger and Benitez are not shit managers. They have won league titles, managed big clubs, and are well respected and credible managers. Conte is not a shit manager either, though he has to prove himself over a longer period of time in order to be considered better than those two. If he wins the title this season and retains it next season, and also adds a cup, he would then be able to lay claim to being better than them, as he would have proven himself in two different leagues.

However Di Matteo is another story altogether. He was an ex player with hardly any experience. Was handed the job only because his predecessor was sacked mid-season. In other words he was basically a caretaker / interim appointment. And somehow he won the CL, which really boggles the mind. And he did it with a team consisting of Kalou, Bosingwa, Meireles, Bertrand and Mikel, with Torres as his main striker - hardly stacked with quality in every department. Crazy achievement.
 

D2Z

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 1, 2016
Messages
529
Location
Milton
Supports
Undercover "Chelsea fan" ;)
Wenger and Benitez are not shit managers. They have won league titles, managed big clubs, and are well respected and credible managers. Conte is not a shit manager either, though he has to prove himself over a longer period of time in order to be considered better than those two. If he wins the title this season and retains it next season, and also adds a cup, he would then be able to lay claim to being better than them, as he would have proven himself in two different leagues.

However Di Matteo is another story altogether. He was an ex player with hardly any experience. Was handed the job only because his predecessor was sacked mid-season. In other words he was basically a caretaker / interim appointment. And somehow he won the CL, which really boggles the mind. And he did it with a team consisting of Kalou, Bosingwa, Meireles, Bertrand and Mikel, with Torres as his main striker - hardly stacked with quality in every department. Crazy achievement.
I think the Champions League win from Chelsea had nothing to do with their squad quality. They were a team that refused to be put down, and that undying resilience is what won them glory.
 

salford_

New Member
Joined
May 12, 2013
Messages
2,952
We have also won the Club World Cup while they have won the Europa League, though the Europa League is considered a more serious competition, the CWC is actually a very interesting one because you have to play against teams from other continents, which makes it unique as a competition. Chelsea had their chance to win the same trophy but were beaten in the final, so it's not true that it is a joke competition or a glorified friendly etc. They did try to win it, but couldn't. It's not really that easy to play South American teams because they have a totally different approach to football.

The fact that UTD have won 5 league titles + the CWC puts us slightly ahead of Chelsea IMO, though I am sure Chelsea fans will argue the same on account of the fact that they have won more cups + the Europa League. We can put that right by winning it this season.
The club world cup does not count. Otherwise you may aswell include the International champions cup or whatever it was that lpool, psg, chelsea, barca etc took part in last yr or yr before. You get a trophy at the end of it, but it is not a major honour in any way shape or form. No way. The Europa league is a major honour, and is levels above CWC. There is no chance Madrid, Utd, barca, chelsea, whoever it is, is devastated when they lose the final. It is essentially a friendly tournament
 

P-Nut

fan of well-known French footballer Fabinho
Joined
Oct 16, 2015
Messages
21,687
Location
Oldham, Greater Manchester
The club world cup does not count. Otherwise you may aswell include the International champions cup or whatever it was that lpool, psg, chelsea, barca etc took part in last yr or yr before. You get a trophy at the end of it, but it is not a major honour in any way shape or form. No way. The Europa league is a major honour, and is levels above CWC. There is no chance Madrid, Utd, barca, chelsea, whoever it is, is devastated when they lose the final. It is essentially a friendly tournament
It's not the same as a present season tournament at all otherwise teams would refuse to take part in it or send weakened squads over and let the big players have a rest.

It's not seen as being as big as the champions league or europa league but it's a chance to stamp your name as the best team in the world and add a badge on your shirt saying just that!
 

salford_

New Member
Joined
May 12, 2013
Messages
2,952
It's not the same as a present season tournament at all otherwise teams would refuse to take part in it or send weakened squads over and let the big players have a rest.

It's not seen as being as big as the champions league or europa league but it's a chance to stamp your name as the best team in the world and add a badge on your shirt saying just that!
Its a shit tournament lol. Its not a major honour.
 

D2Z

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 1, 2016
Messages
529
Location
Milton
Supports
Undercover "Chelsea fan" ;)
It's not the same as a present season tournament at all otherwise teams would refuse to take part in it or send weakened squads over and let the big players have a rest.

It's not seen as being as big as the champions league or europa league but it's a chance to stamp your name as the best team in the world and add a badge on your shirt saying just that!
What..... Absolutely not.
 

Shark

@NotShark
Joined
Feb 1, 2012
Messages
26,581
Location
Ireland
You look at that City defense and you look at ours and there's no contest right now. They will drop more points than us from now until the end, I'm certain we can finish above them.