Lingard signs new £100k 4 year contract (Sky) | Official: Option to extend for a further year

Status
Not open for further replies.

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,976
Location
Hollywood CA
I don't think that stands to reason at all. Just because we have more money doesn't mean we should be throwing it away.
We don't throw it away. We invest it on players the manager wants as part of his long term strategy.
 

ravi2

Full Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2012
Messages
9,045
Location
Canada
is this a late april fools thread or something?
The club cannot be serious
 

AndyJ1985

New Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
8,954
We pay more than other clubs because we make more money and can. For example, we pay about 50% more than Arsenal, so it stands to reason that our squad players get paid more despite not being perceived to be better than theirs.
That makes no sense. Player value is global, not relative to each club. Why should we pay average players more than other clubs just because we can afford to? Sounds like a stupid way to do business and a good way to continue our trend of spending vast sums of money and having nothing to show for it.
 

Martial

Full Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2015
Messages
583
How much would it cost to buy a squad player of similar quality?

I think it would cost us far more to buy a replacement, than the total increase in wages we give him over 4 years.

Like I read somewhere else, an increase of wage of 50k over 4 years amounts to around 10.4m. Could we buy a similar quality replacement for less?
 

Wayne's World

Full Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2010
Messages
9,338
Location
Ireland
Isn't it no wonder we are making no progress as a club when we are giving Jesse fecking Lingard 100k a week. Should be sold in the summer, don't care about this local lad shit and he tries hard...he's not good enough and never will be for Manchester United
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,976
Location
Hollywood CA
That makes no sense. Player value is global, not relative to each club. Why should we pay average players more than other clubs just because we can afford to? Sounds like a stupid way to do business and a good way to continue our trend of spending vast sums of money and having nothing to show for it.
Its not global, its relative to a club's income and how much the club can afford to pay their players in weekly wages. This is why clubs have wage structures.
 

JohnnyKills

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Messages
7,100
So Lingard is now going to be on more than Tottenham's highest paid player.

We've gone from being the stingiest club in the world in 2010 to the most profligate in 2017.
 

Attila

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
11,073
Location
RIP Mino
Supports
Trad Bricks
Manchester United midfielder Jesse Lingard has signed a new contract at Old Trafford that could earn him £100,000 a week.

The 24-year-old England international is now committed to the Premier League club until 2021 and there is the option to extend the deal by a further year.

Lingard has made 70 appearances for United, who he joined as a seven-year-old, and won four caps for his country.

"Manchester United has always been a big part of my life," said Lingard.

"I have been with the club since the age of seven and I feel great pride every time I pull the shirt on."

Lingard holds the rare distinction of scoring in three successive games for his club at Wembley.

After netting the winner in last season's FA Cup final, Lingard also scored against Leicester in the Community Shield and Southampton as United won the EFL Cup in February.

"To have scored in two cup finals for my boyhood club were immensely proud moments for me and my family," he added.

"As a team, we have already won a major trophy this season and I look forward to helping us win many more under this great manager."

United boss Jose Mourinho said: "Jesse is a popular member of the squad and I am delighted he has signed a new contract.

"He has good intelligence which, when combined with his energy and ability, makes for a player with a great future ahead of him."

Lingard had spells on loan at Leicester, Birmingham and Brighton before he was given his first-team debut by Mourinho's predecessor Louis van Gaal against Swansea in the opening game of the 2014-15 season.

This season he has played 29 times, scoring five goals.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/39518118
 

JohnnyKills

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Messages
7,100
Will also make it harder to shift these players in the future when a better alternative comes available. Who else is mad enough to pay £100k for Lingard?
 

Devil may care

New Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
35,976
Now we've got that out of the way, you're trying to be pragmatic here so what is going to happen when we are actually after top talent? Basically if we are talking to Griezmann he'd be well within his rights to want 400K a week if we are tossing this kind of money around on medicore squad fillers, it makes a rod for the clubs back when negotiating which is not good business.
 

MrPooni

New Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
2,423
Happy for him. A few more rockets at Wembley and it will be worth every penny.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,976
Location
Hollywood CA
So Lingard is now going to be on more than Tottenham's highest paid player.

We've gone from being the stingiest club in the world in 2010 to the most profligate in 2017.
Spurs are horrible on wages. Half their players could easily double their wages by moving elsewhere...and they probably will at some point.
 

AndyJ1985

New Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
8,954
Rival fans will be happier about this news than most United fans, which says it all.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,976
Location
Hollywood CA
Now we've got that out of the way, you're trying to be pragmatic here so what is going to happen when we are actually after top talent? Basically if we are talking to Griezmann he'd be well within his rights to want 400K a week if we are tossing this kind of money around on medicore squad fillers, it makes a rod for the clubs back when negotiating which is not good business.
Sounds like you're inventing a straw man of 400k to prove a non-existent point. If we buy Griezmann he would certainly be within his rights to pursue Zlatan/Rooney/Schweinsteiger type numbers.
 

ike

Full Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
288
Location
vi
Fantastic news!
I might be in the minority here but I think he's a fantastic player that will continue to improve as he matures.
 

J-Stander

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
5,748
Shambolic. Wouldn't get in over half the teams and the league and were trebling his wages. feck off.
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
45,047
Will also make it harder to shift these players in the future when a better alternative comes available. Who else is mad enough to pay £100k for Lingard?
It's a gamble. I'm assuming his contract was running out so it was either sell for pennies or keep him for another few years. One of the things I was worried about was Jose gutting the team and replacing with mercenaries. So I'm calm about this news.
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
45,047
Jesse Lingard has signed a new four-year contract with Manchester United worth up to £100,000-a-week.

It's understood that Lingard and his new representatives have already agreed terms with United and the deal will be announced shortly.

The 24-year-old winger will earn a basic £75,000-a-week, rising to £100,000 if United qualify for the Champions League by finishing in the top-four or winning the Europa League.

Lingard had just over a year left on the £30,000-a-week contract he signed in February 2015 before joining Derby County on loan. The 24-year-old had previously had spells at Brighton, Birmingham and Leicester City.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...ed-star-Jesse-Lingard-close-new-contract.html
 

Devil may care

New Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
35,976
Sounds like you're inventing a straw man of 400k to prove a non-existent point. If we buy Griezmann he would certainly be within his rights to pursue Zlatan/Rooney/Schweinsteiger type numbers.
It's a not a straw man argument at all, we have just shown that prices are going up when we offer a player like Lingard that kind of money, we just moved the goalposts for what we pay an average nobody, a world class superstar will then surely expect to be the beneficiary of that knock on effect, it's business 101.
 

SirAF

Ageist
Joined
Sep 28, 2003
Messages
37,786
Location
The reaction at the wage :lol: Even squad players will be paid premium at a club like United - just how it is.
 

Isotope

Ten Years a Cafite
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
23,818
I believe most of the wages would be paid off by shirt sales in Manchester; and image rights from twitter.
 

AndyJ1985

New Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
8,954
Will also make it harder to shift these players in the future when a better alternative comes available. Who else is mad enough to pay £100k for Lingard?
No one, just as no one is mad enough to pay Young £120k, or Rooney £250k, or Jones £80k, or Depay £100k, or Schweinsteiger £250k. The list goes on. Our club is so poorly run but what's worse is we're not learning from our mistakes.
 
Joined
Mar 1, 2016
Messages
1,390
Location
melbourne
Sounds like you're inventing a straw man of 400k to prove a non-existent point. If we buy Griezmann he would certainly be within his rights to pursue Zlatan/Rooney/Schweinsteiger type numbers.
He has given us more than Rooney or Schweinsteiger over the last 2 years, now that you mention it.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,959
Why don't you text your mate Gary Neville and ask him to have a word with Jose about this.
Seriously mate, do you think that people like Lingard and an ancient Carrick can make us win the league?
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,976
Location
Hollywood CA
It's a not a straw man argument at all, we have just shown that prices are going up when we offer a player like Lingard that kind of money, we just moved the goalposts for what we pay an average nobody, a world class superstar will then surely expect to be the beneficiary of that knock on effect, it's business 101.
You're just inventing a false construct to support your non-existent point. What we pay Lingard or Darmian or Rojo, have feck all to do with Griezmann. Each player is evaluated individually relative to their football and brand values.
 

LilyWhiteSpur

New Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2017
Messages
12,370
Location
Northern Ireland
Supports
Tottenham
Bloody hell! That's shockingly money for him. The wages in football will ultimately kill the sport IMO it's simply not sustainable long term.
 

Paul the Wolf

Score Predictions Competition Organiser
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
18,064
Location
France - can't win anything with Swedish turnips
Presumably it is Lingard who has to pay United £100k a week to be able to play in the team, would make more sense.

Apparently we have a choice between a player of Messi's standard or we have to have Lingard - according to Lingard's fans/apologists there is nothing in between.

They say things come in threes , first Brexit, then Trump, now Lingard, the lunatics really have taken over the asylum.

Just when I thought we may have a chance of winning the league soon, looks like at least another 4 year wait
 
Status
Not open for further replies.