Westminster Politics

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
So why aren't you guys ridiculing Kelvin Hopkins and mentioning how shambolic the Labour Party is?

Or doesn't it count when it's your side?

The implication is that Corbin ignored allegations of sexual abuse for his own political gain. If true, it shatters everything Corbyn's acolytes hold dear about him.
 

Cheesy

Bread with dipping sauce
Scout
Joined
Oct 16, 2011
Messages
36,181
Tories have removed the whip from Charlie Elphicke so looks like a serious allegation is on its way.
 

Cheesy

Bread with dipping sauce
Scout
Joined
Oct 16, 2011
Messages
36,181
Got it, I didn't know there was a 'chief whip' and a 'whip'. Silly me
Removing the whip from someone basically just means removing/suspending them from the party, so to speak, which means they're an independent MP and no longer actually associated with the party itself. It's not an actual position.
 

Cheesy

Bread with dipping sauce
Scout
Joined
Oct 16, 2011
Messages
36,181
Thanks man :D
No problem! Can see how it'd seem confusing at first. Interestingly Elphicke denies this and seems surprised that the Tories have effectively suspended him. Suggests it's serious enough for them to have gone to the papers and police before actually notifying Elphicke himself.

The damaging part, of course, will be if it's revealed May and other prominent Tories were sitting on this and knew. Between this incident, the stuff with Hopkins/Lewis, and the Tory dossier, a lot of old skeletons are coming out on all sides of the political divide.
 

Kentonio

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
13,188
Location
Stamford Bridge
Supports
Chelsea
One of the worst PMs and administration in history, it has to be.
I'm young, Blair's govt is the only one I really remember clearly.
For the Caftards getting on a bit, has there been any this bad?
I go back to the Thatcher era, and the simple answer is no there haven't been any this bad. Even back during the Thatcher backstabbing period, and then the Major sleaze scandals, it was more strong politicians being brought down by scandal. Now it's incredibly weak and vacuous nobodies rising to the highest positions in the land and falling again. Both in the U.K. and the US we're currently living with the weakest set of politicians in my lifetime. None of these people would have made it to cabinet level in the past, it's extremely disturbing.
 

Jippy

Sleeps with tramps, bangs jacuzzis, dirty shoes
Staff
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
57,459
Location
Jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams
I go back to the Thatcher era, and the simple answer is no there haven't been any this bad. Even back during the Thatcher backstabbing period, and then the Major sleaze scandals, it was more strong politicians being brought down by scandal. Now it's incredibly weak and vacuous nobodies rising to the highest positions in the land and falling again. Both in the U.K. and the US we're currently living with the weakest set of politicians in my lifetime. None of these people would have made it to cabinet level in the past, it's extremely disturbing.
This completely. At least under Thatcher and Major's 'seven bastards', and Blair, you seemed to have more heavyweights.
Maybe it's cos we give less of a shit about politics collectively that we don't know them, I dunno.
Ruth Davidson is about the only current Tory of substance.
 

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
Politics is a lot harder these days. The internet and proliferation of information is changing the way democracies work. Hopefully it will turn out to be for the better when covering up foul behaviour for political gain becomes impossible or just too risky.
 

DenisIrwin

New Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2014
Messages
2,337
So why aren't you guys ridiculing Kelvin Hopkins and mentioning how shambolic the Labour Party is?

Or doesn't it count when it's your side?
Mark my words: this will be exposed as chicken coup #3 and Ava's allegations were bogus.
 

Cheesy

Bread with dipping sauce
Scout
Joined
Oct 16, 2011
Messages
36,181
This completely. At least under Thatcher and Major's 'seven bastards', and Blair, you seemed to have more heavyweights.
Maybe it's cos we give less of a shit about politics collectively that we don't know them, I dunno.
Ruth Davidson is about the only current Tory of substance.
Davidson's a good orator and strong politician but is still vastly overrated all the same. At Holyrood she's fine when attacking SNP policy from an opposition stand-point, but as soon as she's forced to defend actual Tory policy whenever it comes up she tends to crumble. Part of why she's liked is because she comes across as being different for a Tory, which is an illusion that disappears once you remember she basically backs most of what the Tories are doing, or blindly tolerates it if she doesn't, as in the case of Brexit.

When she appears on QT she tends to be on as the sole Scottish Parliament representative, which again allows her to get away with a lot more than what she would otherwise in regards to certain claims. I do rate her as a politician and think she's someone to look out for, but at the same time I think she'd struggle in Westminster. She's only ever known being someone on the attack and being a figure of opposition; from what I've seen of her having to actually govern would result in a lot of changed perceptions since she'd no longer be able to shirk responsibility for Tory actions.
 

DOTA

wants Amber Rudd to call him a naughty boy
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Messages
24,504
Davidson's a good orator and strong politician but is still vastly overrated all the same. At Holyrood she's fine when attacking SNP policy from an opposition stand-point, but as soon as she's forced to defend actual Tory policy whenever it comes up she tends to crumble. Part of why she's liked is because she comes across as being different for a Tory, which is an illusion that disappears once you remember she basically backs most of what the Tories are doing, or blindly tolerates it if she doesn't, as in the case of Brexit.

When she appears on QT she tends to be on as the sole Scottish Parliament representative, which again allows her to get away with a lot more than what she would otherwise in regards to certain claims. I do rate her as a politician and think she's someone to look out for, but at the same time I think she'd struggle in Westminster. She's only ever known being someone on the attack and being a figure of opposition; from what I've seen of her having to actually govern would result in a lot of changed perceptions since she'd no longer be able to shirk responsibility for Tory actions.
This is fair, I think. In current circumstances she has a very flattering role.
 

Jippy

Sleeps with tramps, bangs jacuzzis, dirty shoes
Staff
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
57,459
Location
Jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams
Davidson's a good orator and strong politician but is still vastly overrated all the same. At Holyrood she's fine when attacking SNP policy from an opposition stand-point, but as soon as she's forced to defend actual Tory policy whenever it comes up she tends to crumble. Part of why she's liked is because she comes across as being different for a Tory, which is an illusion that disappears once you remember she basically backs most of what the Tories are doing, or blindly tolerates it if she doesn't, as in the case of Brexit.

When she appears on QT she tends to be on as the sole Scottish Parliament representative, which again allows her to get away with a lot more than what she would otherwise in regards to certain claims. I do rate her as a politician and think she's someone to look out for, but at the same time I think she'd struggle in Westminster. She's only ever known being someone on the attack and being a figure of opposition; from what I've seen of her having to actually govern would result in a lot of changed perceptions since she'd no longer be able to shirk responsibility for Tory actions.
As Dota says, very good points raised and maybe it is just the fact that she seems likable, unlike the Westminster lot.
I know she was talking about running the Scottish Tories as a more separate outfit- not sure what happened with that.
Maybe I should check out her voting record.
 

Ubik

Nothing happens until something moves!
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Messages
18,940
May's not even gonna be strong enough to sack a lightweight like Patel, is she?
 

Cheesy

Bread with dipping sauce
Scout
Joined
Oct 16, 2011
Messages
36,181
May's not even gonna be strong enough to sack a lightweight like Patel, is she?
Probably not, nah. I doubt this one will particularly go anywhere since it's not linked to the whole harassment scandal.
 

Barca84

Full Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2013
Messages
3,763
Location
NOT BARCELONA
Supports
Doesn't support Barca
Well documented that sacking him means an imminent leadership challenge. It's not going to happen.

A party of spineless, inhumane, self obsessed parasites but at least the longer they are in power the more they show themselves for what they really are. They'll all be out of a job soon.
 

Nogbadthebad

Full Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2011
Messages
5,454
Location
Wolverhampton
What the feck.

Its about the only thing you can say in response to that.

And she won't be sacked for it. We will continue to pay her £140K a year, plus over £200K in expenses of course. If they keep this up, it will be time to reinforce the lamposts in westminster.
 

Dan

Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
14,364
Suspended last week and now he’s been found dead. Saying now he’s killed himself.

 

12OunceEpilogue

In perfect harmony
Scout
Joined
Oct 2, 2016
Messages
18,447
Location
Wigan
Suspended last week and now he’s been found dead. Saying now he’s killed himself.

Yes this has just been on BBC's TV bulletin. There'll be more to hear from this I'm sure, but for the moment all you can say is RIP.
 

Sassy Colin

Death or the gladioli!
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Messages
71,123
Location
Aliens are in control of my tagline & location
What the feck.

Its about the only thing you can say in response to that.

And she won't be sacked for it. We will continue to pay her £140K a year, plus over £200K in expenses of course. If they keep this up, it will be time to reinforce the lamposts in westminster.
I honestly thought nothing these degenerates do would surprise me, but this literally takes the piss...
The issue is that she has broken the ministerial code, if you actually read the BBC report, you would find that:

The BBC understands Ms Patel suggested some of Britain's aid budget go to the Israeli army, after the visit in August.

She asked her officials to see if Britain could support humanitarian operations conducted by the Israeli army in the occupied Golan Heights area.

The BBC understands the Foreign Office advised that because Britain did not officially recognise Israel's annexation of the area, it would be hard for the Department for International Development to work there.

Speaking in the Commons, Foreign Office minister Alistair Burt defended Ms Patel's "perfectly legitimate" right to raise the matter - saying it was within the context of providing medical help for Syrian refugees who could not get assistance in their own country.
Your posts read really rather racist, whereas, whilst the intention was honourable, the channels used were totally inappropriate.

Mind you, the tweet was totally out of context to the reality of the discussions.
 

Nogbadthebad

Full Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2011
Messages
5,454
Location
Wolverhampton
The issue is that she has broken the ministerial code, if you actually read the BBC report, you would find that:



Your posts read really rather racist, whereas, whilst the intention was honourable, the channels used were totally inappropriate.

Mind you, the tweet was totally out of context to the reality of the discussions.

Racist? What the actual feck are you talking about.

Quote my post again, highlight the racist part or apologize and piss right off you twat.
 

Fergies Gum

Full Member
Joined
May 23, 2011
Messages
13,582
Why on earth is Priti Patel have a meeting with the Israel PM without letting May know? Whats even more ridiculous is May found out the meeting took place 2 months after it happened, so why on earth didn't she mention this meeting once she got back from her holiday.
 

Sassy Colin

Death or the gladioli!
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Messages
71,123
Location
Aliens are in control of my tagline & location
Racist? What the actual feck are you talking about.

Quote my post again, highlight the racist part or apologize and piss right off you twat.
First of all, you should be reported for this, wind your fecking neck in.

2nd, your post came directly after it was suggested, out of context, that UK aid should be given to the Israeli Army. Quite clearly, you were up in arms that the UK might be supporting the Israeli Army, nothing else could be inferred from your post, and the other one, whereas the intention was to assist in humanitarian aid.

The issue is that she broke the ministerial code, whichever country she had been talking to.
 

Dobba

Full Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Messages
28,648
Location
"You and your paper can feck off."
Good to see the aid line isn't just used to defend British arms deals with Saudi Arabia. Yes, it's in an area that they're illegally occupying but that isn't the important bit. Aid. Focus on the aid.
 

I Believe

everything Nigel Farage told me
Joined
Aug 7, 2017
Messages
863
Location
Gtr Manchester
If true, it shatters everything Corbyn's acolytes hold dear about him.
It should do, but to the left leaning labour faithful he is the new messiah, so wouldn't hold your breath.

Corbyn has been around along time and never got anywhere near a position of authority in Government or even in a position within the Opposition, indeed at times he almost seem to deliberately stay 'outside the tent' (certainly Tony Blair's). 'Billy no mates' for most of his political career, he now is surrounded by admirers, you can't want to deny him his 'time in the sun' ...surely?

May's mistake in calling the snap election has been a blessing and a curse for Jeremy, blessing because some voters, thinking May would walk it, thought it would be OK/safe to vote for their favourite labour MP, well that didn't work, except it gave Jeremy some hope that one day he might make it.

A curse, because he has five years to go before another election and as we all know a week is a long time in politics, let alone five years. Also because May's government is under pressure, then no Tory's, despite the fake press coverage are going to rock the boat or bring down the Government, in many ways Theresa is now 'fire proof' to do what she likes basically, so she's taking ever opportunity to 'sandbag' her cabinet, presented by the current chaos.

It will be interesting to see in the coming weeks after the sexual harassment/bullying affair, the Paradise Papers publication and of course Brexit, who and how many politicians will remain standing... on either side!
 

Dobba

Full Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Messages
28,648
Location
"You and your paper can feck off."
It should do, but to the left leaning labour faithful he is the new messiah, so wouldn't hold your breath.

Corbyn has been around along time and never got anywhere near a position of authority in Government or even in a position within the Opposition, indeed at times he almost seem to deliberately stay 'outside the tent' (certainly Tony Blair's). 'Billy no mates' for most of his political career, he now is surrounded by admirers, you can't want to deny him his 'time in the sun' ...surely?

May's mistake in calling the snap election has been a blessing and a curse for Jeremy, blessing because some voters, thinking May would walk it, thought it would be OK/safe to vote for their favourite labour MP, well that didn't work, except it gave Jeremy some hope that one day he might make it.

A curse, because he has five years to go before another election and as we all know a week is a long time in politics, let alone five years. Also because May's government is under pressure, then no Tory's, despite the fake press coverage are going to rock the boat or bring down the Government, in many ways Theresa is now 'fire proof' to do what she likes basically, so she's taking ever opportunity to 'sandbag' her cabinet, presented by the current chaos.

It will be interesting to see in the coming weeks after the sexual harassment/bullying affair, the Paradise Papers publication and of course Brexit, who and how many politicians will remain standing... on either side!
When is fake press, not fake press? The fact you mentioned 'fake press' immediately after the complete guff in italics is absolute gold by the way.
 
Last edited: