automaticflare
Full Member
- Joined
- May 11, 2016
- Messages
- 1,490
We went to Chelsea and attacked and lost. If Jose had played like we did at Liverpool we would have got a point. Without Pogba we would have lost at Liverpool if we had attacked more. Sure, the players were dire too but the tactics were good. We had a few chances to score too.
Why is that Liverpool there for taking when we were without Pogba while this Liverpool that started the match against City is not there for the taking when they did not even have Countinhio in the side against City?
Because holt is a knobhead.
Custis is a knob too but nice to see him act so biligerantly towards holt’s stupid nonsense here.
Holt was probably equally as belligerent towards Custis Andy Carroll statement.
Newspaper reporters are arseholes basically.