Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .

redshaw

Full Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2015
Messages
9,714
The 2016 referendum just asked if the UK should stay in or leave the EU but it didn't say whether there was any type of deal. Many people had many different opinions of what leaving the EU meant. Even now, two and a half years later, you can see that people still think it means many different things.
But no matter what any of us think there is a large enough proportion of Brexit voters who want no deal because they've been told that leaving with just WTO is nothing to be frightened of. Don't see how a government / parliament can deny that to the voters.
I see that line being used by some remainers since 2016 arguing hey it never said what type of deal and suggesting a Norway deal for example or soft brexit. I doubt it.

Brexit is about leaving or remaining. People voting leave would expect to end FoM, stop being a net contributor to the EU whether it's £200-240m a month or £350m, an ability to do trade deals and not be under EU laws and jurisdiction and get back UK fishing waters.

I don't believe people voting leave were thinking of a Norway deal or some other soft brexit deal where we stay in this sacrifice that. Norway have FoM and pay 95% of the fee to the EU for example.
 
Last edited:

MoskvaRed

Full Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2013
Messages
5,233
Location
Not Moskva
Out of curiosity how would cafites vote if they were MPs?

Consider you have this WA in front of you and if it gets voted down, we could be getting no-deal Brexit, or a referendum (with unknown options), or a GE . Would you vote for it or against it?

EDIT: For the record, I would probably vote for it.
I’d vote against it in the hope that, if we are still on the cliff edge in late March, there would be enough responsible MPs to avert disaster by voting to postpone Art 50. You can’t in good conscience reverse 45 years of integration, with the resulting enormous disruption, and make the UK poorer and less influential on the basis of a wafer thin referendum result influenced by outright lies and foreign powers.
 

711

Verified Bird Expert
Scout
Joined
Dec 10, 2007
Messages
24,279
Location
Don't sign old players and cast offs
He doesn't need to hear it. His mind is made up.
Like it was made up before the referendum you mean, when he wrote two articles, one for and one against, until he decided which way to jump at the very last minute. He is supposed to be a prospective leader and should be trying to influence opinion, but whenever anything happens he becomes paralysed with indecision and disappears for days on end.
 

Honest John

Full Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2002
Messages
8,352
Location
Hampshire
Like it was made up before the referendum you mean, when he wrote two articles, one for and one against, until he decided which way to jump at the very last minute. He is supposed to be a prospective leader and should be trying to influence opinion, but whenever anything happens he becomes paralysed with indecision and disappears for days on end.
Looking at the beeb feed I think he's there with his brother now.
 

Stick

Full Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2005
Messages
6,686
Supports
Liverpool
He doesn't need to hear it. His mind is made up.
I would say he has probably drafted two responses and both are polar opposites. He will release whichever will lead to his chances of furthering his quest for power.
 

Paul the Wolf

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
17,831
Location
France - can't win anything with Swedish turnips
I see that line being used by some remainers since 2016 arguing hey it never said what type of deal and suggesting a Norway deal for example or soft brexit. I doubt it.

Brexit is about leaving or remaining. People voting leave would expect to end FoM, stop being a net contributor to the EU whether it's £200-240m a month or £350m, an ability to do trade deals and not be under EU laws and jurisdiction and get back UK fishing waters.

I don't believe people voting leave were thinking of a Norway deal of some other soft brexit deal where we stay in this sacrifice that. Norway have FoM and pay 95% of the fee to the EU for example.
Agreed.

Whatever deal May could have brought back I don't see parliament agreeing to it. Labour will vote down any deal just trying to force a GE. And part of the Tories will never agree either. Never mind the DUp or SNP and the rest. Don't see how she gets the numbers to get any deal through. Btw imo Norway will be disastrous for the UK short of no deal.
 

Stick

Full Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2005
Messages
6,686
Supports
Liverpool
Like it was made up before the referendum you mean, when he wrote two articles, one for and one against, until he decided which way to jump at the very last minute. He is supposed to be a prospective leader and should be trying to influence opinion, but whenever anything happens he becomes paralysed with indecision and disappears for days on end.
You said it much more eloquently than I did!
 

Honest John

Full Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2002
Messages
8,352
Location
Hampshire
I would say he has probably drafted two responses and both are polar opposites. He will release whichever will lead to his chances of furthering his quest for power.
If May wins and does so comfortably then her chances of getting her deal through increase. Boris will then need to swing in behind her if he wants to capitalise on the fact that she is probably be giving undertakings, right now, that she won't contest the next election as leader.

The party that backed May in this VoNC may not back Boris as leader if it becomes known he voted to oust her.

I don't think that Boris has declared his writing a letter. It is conceivable the he will actually vote for May tonight.
 

MoskvaRed

Full Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2013
Messages
5,233
Location
Not Moskva
I see that line being used by some remainers since 2016 arguing hey it never said what type of deal and suggesting a Norway deal for example or soft brexit. I doubt it.

Brexit is about leaving or remaining. People voting leave would expect to end FoM, stop being a net contributor to the EU whether it's £200-240m a month or £350m, an ability to do trade deals and not be under EU laws and jurisdiction and get back UK fishing waters.

I don't believe people voting leave were thinking of a Norway deal or some other soft brexit deal where we stay in this sacrifice that. Norway have FoM and pay 95% of the fee to the EU for example.
I agree no one voted for Norway (and why would you - it would be ridiculous for a country as big as the UK to be in that rule taker situation), but Leavers were constantly told that we could leave in the way you describe while having similar access to European markets as we enjoy today. No doubt a sizeable percentage of voters - some hardcore, ideological Brexiteers, as well as others who are unable to grasp, or too old, too alienated and/or too xenophobic to care, what a hard Brexit really entails - would still vote Leave if there was a second referendum tomorrow. But it’s disingenuous to assume that there is still 51.9% so exercised by sovereignty or fishing (0.2% of GDP!) that they are willing to plunge the country into chaos.
 

FlawlessThaw

most 'know it all' poster
Joined
Oct 26, 2005
Messages
29,603
I see that line being used by some remainers since 2016 arguing hey it never said what type of deal and suggesting a Norway deal for example or soft brexit. I doubt it.

Brexit is about leaving or remaining. People voting leave would expect to end FoM, stop being a net contributor to the EU whether it's £200-240m a month or £350m, an ability to do trade deals and not be under EU laws and jurisdiction and get back UK fishing waters.

I don't believe people voting leave were thinking of a Norway deal or some other soft brexit deal where we stay in this sacrifice that. Norway have FoM and pay 95% of the fee to the EU for example.
Yeah I call bollocks to that.

 

unchanged_lineup

Tarheel Tech Wizard
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
16,819
Location
Leaving A Breakfast On All Of Your Doorsteps
Supports
Janet jazz jazz jam
Tory Brexiteers have launched a pamphlet setting out proposals for an alternative EU Withdrawal Agreement.

The paper, entitled A Better Deal, retains many elements of Mrs May's package but removes what they referred to as "poison pills" which prevented her securing cross-party support.

Backers of the new approach - including former Brexit Secretary Dominic Raab - said that the British Parliament had effectively rejected the PM's deal by making it impossible for her to get it through the Commons.

The document, drawn up by a former adviser to Liam Fox, Shanker Singham, customs expert Hans Maessen and lawyer Robert MacLean, proposed:

- No single customs territory between the UK and the EU, allowing Britain to regain control over tariffs and regulations and negotiate trade agreements with other countries;

- A 10-year, extendable backstop featuring advanced customs facilitation measures to keep the Irish border open, a zero-tariff free trade agreement in goods and a commitment by all parties not to place infrastructure on the border;

- Mutual recognition of regulations, with measures to ensure that the animal health and disease control zone on the island of Ireland can be maintained;

- Level playing field provisions on labour, the environment, competition and state aid;.

- The removal of geographic indications provisions from the Withdrawal Agreement, to be considered as part of a later free trade deal;

- The removal of language on World Trade Organisation collaboration, ensuring that the UK can operate independently in the WTO.

Launching the paper, former Brexit secretary Dominic Raab said: "There are modest and reasonable changes that could help salvage the proposed deal with the EU.

"The UK needs a unilateral exit mechanism from the backstop, but we can give the Irish Government assurances that we would put in place specific measures to guarantee no return to a hard border."

"This proposal can help deliver this and allay fears that the UK would be stuck indefinitely in an undemocratic regime of laws we have no control over and can't exit."

Also backing the paper was Mr Raab's predecessor as Brexit secretary David Davis.

Labour MP David Lammy, a supporter of the Best for Britain campaign for a second referendum, said: "The alternative plan of two failed Brexit secretaries is not a solution but a recipe for disaster.


"Not only would it create a hard border in Ireland, it would cut the UK off from our closest partners and make the whole country poorer, disproportionately hurting the worst off.

"As we stand, there is no clear majority in this House for any specific Brexit plan. The way to unblock our politics and get a mandate for a tangible plan to move forward is through a people's vote, which gives the option to remain in the EU."
https://www.breakingnews.ie/world/b...N7_-aD_M78DyeBNNkxvj0KeaA9UykhFPj_gJhV9ktyYg4
 

FlawlessThaw

most 'know it all' poster
Joined
Oct 26, 2005
Messages
29,603
The problem with that is that the morons like Farage and the others didn't realise that staying in the single market meant keeping the 4 freedoms including freedom of movement and if they didn't do you think the electorate did?
I honestly don't think the electorate knew what they were voting for. So to say they did is a bit foolhardy.
 

Ubik

Nothing happens until something moves!
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Messages
18,939
We got any bets on the number of Tory votes against May? I will go for a relatively sedate 78.
 

SteveJ

all-round nice guy, aka Uncle Joe Kardashian
Scout
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
62,851
Christ, she can't even tell the truth about standing down before the next election.
 

mancan92

Full Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2011
Messages
10,218
Location
Loughborough university
All of these brexiteers are complete cowards look at JR Mogg already saying he wouldnt run for Parliament. How can these people continuously get away with this crap.
 

Ubik

Nothing happens until something moves!
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Messages
18,939

Would be a pretty bloody nose for her.
 

ThierryHenry

wishes he could watch Arsenal games with KM
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
13,721
Location
London Town
We got any bets on the number of Tory votes against May? I will go for a relatively sedate 78.
Even fewer. 65.

Will any abstain?

I think this is a move that the Brexiteers make purely because they have to, and can point back to this time at the next leadership election? Still, no-one wants to poison their future by being associated with Brexit, so they’ll let May fight this on her own, though they have to look to be fighting her as she does it.
 

ThierryHenry

wishes he could watch Arsenal games with KM
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
13,721
Location
London Town
I just don’t understand.

Maybe I’m too much of a logician, but surely there’s some joined up thinking here?! The Brexiteers must have realised by now that there’s no happy ending for them if they take charge of negotiations. The only situation I see that satisfies all parties is that they pretend to struggle, May’s deal eventually gets through, she then falls on her sword and everyone can spend the rest of the their careers pretending they could have “done Brexit better”.

David Davis is already playing that card after spending 18 months in charge of negotiations. :lol: