Klopp hasn't got a low net spend. Their first 11 also costs near half a billion ffs. Their starting 11 cost more than Madrids in the final last year as well. They were, by far, the biggest spenders in England last year as well.
It's mind boggling. You should see the love in for him on the main thread. A loser manager. Actually not even a loser manager. A never even in it manager.
The football gods had been generous towards Liverpool. Maybe They had been thinking "Well I think They're alright, let's give them more chances to win trophies" until someone like you posted this kind of crap and They turned around and said "Nope, feck you, it's the water I'm telling you".
I agree with the last part, that's something that irks me about people who praise Pep so much. He's the equivalent of me playing FM with unlimited funds. Also why Leicester's PL win was so special & why Mou's Cl wins with Porto and Inter were so good.
This is how I feel about Pep. He is sort of a luxury manager, you let take him over the best squad in the world and give him unlimited backing in the transfer market and he will take the team to another level and make it the best in the world or in history. This does not diminish his achievments, he's obviously one of the best if not the best coach in the world.
Either you really don't get why United fans love him or you're on a wum.It's mind boggling. You should see the love in for him on the main thread. A loser manager. Actually not even a loser manager. A never even in it manager.
I'd go with the latter, for sure.
That would be my guess too.
Real Madrid have a low spend, because their bought all their best players before the market when crazy. Liverpool are also performing with the investment. Yes they havn't won any trophies, but at least they are in the race for the biggest trophies.
Your name should read as “Dumpster” because that’s where your post belongs.It's mind boggling. You should see the love in for him on the main thread. A loser manager. Actually not even a loser manager. A never even in it manager.
The Liverpool fans really have the wind behind their sails these days.
As deluded as 95% of the United fans at caf. It's the posters of the other clubs who contribute to the thoughtful and enjoyable posts here.
Yeah sure mate.As deluded as 95% of the United fans at caf. It's the posters of the other clubs who contribute to the thoughtful and enjoyable posts here.
Ray of hope for usAs deluded as 95% of the United fans at caf. It's the posters of the other clubs who contribute to the thoughtful and enjoyable posts here.
NetSpend is only relevant to the smaller clubs who are forced to sell their players in order to remain in the black. The bigger clubs, such as Liverpool, turn a profit through merchandising, match-day revenue, broadcasting rights, sponsorship and claiming the prize-money for winning trophies - admittedly, that last one does not apply to Liverpool.
Man United isn't the barometer here. I'd also add we have some fantastic players thats been mismanaged but that's a seperate point. I'm also not arguing he hasn't spent the money well? What does spending it well got to do with it?
You are clearly ignorant of the facts.
Fabinho is the main man in our midfield now.
I'm not really sure what we are arguing about anymore. Klopp has needed to spend to challenge for league title against one of the best pl teams in history. And he also managed to make a CL Final. No he's not working on a shoe string budget, but he also doesn't have silly money like City or PSG, nor the prestige of man utd, barcalona and Madrid.
Well, he should be. Didn’t understand why Fabinho didn’t start. But if he and Keita should finally break through into the first team consistently, that’s a pretty good midfield. Overall, all you need right now would be another centre back and ideally a midfielder who’s somewhat of a threat in front of goal. That team is pretty close to becoming really good. Not there yet, but almost.
You were praising him for a low net spend as if he's Poch or somebody,
He has lower netspend than City and is taking the title race to the wire as well as knocking them out of the CL last year. Also knocking out Bayern Munich is pretty good. But yeah, he hasnt spent a pittance, but he's doing very well with what he has unlike Mourinho and Van Gaal. I was mentioning his Dortmund days because he was competing very well against Bayern Munich who had a massive advantage in very possible way. He's already proven, he can win trophies the hard way with Dortmund. We've yet to see if he will with Liverpool, but I personally can't blame him if he loses out to City.
Absolutely. Pesky Pool fans I tell ya
Net spend is not only for selling clubs dude. What kind of stupid comment is that. The guy spent money because he made the money from sales. Klopp sold Coutinho who is beyond over-rated and couldn't fit in his system to buy players that did and look where they are now. Pretty smart move tbh.
Pretty sure Klopp wanted Coutinho to stay and did his best to keep him so I’m not sure it was the genius move you’re making it out to be. Worked out well though yeah.
He “sold him” because he didn’t want to fecking stay. Stop lying to yourself.
Time for a thread title change?
I can remember Woddy having a conference with the board, club or owners laying out and discussing our net spend. So obviously net spend does matter, because all clubs except PSG and City have a budget. Obviously taking that conference into consideration, our club cares about netspend since the glazers want to make a profit from the club. The whole thing dismissing netspend was mainly something used to take digs at Rafa at liverpool for his failures.
Oh, the cringe
Not this again!
