Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .

The Firestarter

Full Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2010
Messages
28,236
Why wouldn't the EU delay Brexit any further. You heard Tusk and the others. It would be a massive victory for them. The longer the delay the more likely we are to remain because they know that people are getting totally sick and fed up of the ongoing problems.
They are afraid of what might pop up in Brussels after the potential EU elections in the UK.
 

spiriticon

Full Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
7,449
Inappropriate joke
We need a general election.

Let Corbyn have a go of this Brexit thing, then we can all hunt Jews later.

I just want it sorted now. In or out. The businesses are suffering, Europe is facepalming, everyone is sick of it.
 

Eire Red United

New Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2016
Messages
2,723
Location
Ireland
It's totally hypocritical for them to campaign to stay in the EU on the basis that leaving would do damage to the Scottish economy etc when Scotland is more dependent on the UK internal market than the UK is with the EU economically.
It isn’t. Leaving the UK wouldn’t mean Scotland wouldn’t still trade with England, they clearly would. It’s not as though the 26 counties here don’t trade with England massively despite being independent for years.
 

Ducklegs

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Jun 17, 2011
Messages
8,761
Why is Parliament struggling to sort this?
35million people took 2 seconds, in a binary vote, to get us here.
Anyone would think this was too complex an issue, to put before an uninformed electorate, in a referendum.

At least our MPs are representative.
fecking idiots voted for by fecking idiots.
People forget, MPs CHOSE to put the vote to the people, then CHOSE to trigger article 50 based on the result.

So when we have them screeching and reeing about not agreeing with this, not wanting that, the people didnt know what they were voting for etc.

These were the stupid feckers who decided to put it to the people in the forst place, then decided to kick it all off.

Its not the public that is to blame, its not uneducated white people from the former coal towns, or racists, or just ignorant zenophobes, or what ever other slur people want to throw at the people who voted to leave,

Its the MPs that are to blame 100%, for starting the process, for not being genuine in their voting intentions, and for the monkey shit flinging they have been indulging themselves in for the past two and a bit years.
 

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
It isn’t. Leaving the UK wouldn’t mean Scotland wouldn’t still trade with England, they clearly would. It’s not as though the 26 counties here don’t trade with England massively despite being independent for years.
If the UK leaves the EU and Scotland leaves the UK to join the EU, then yes it will still trade with the UK, the same way that the UK will still trade with the EU once it leaves. So in the case you state - it’s exactly the same as Brexit. It’s exactly the same argument that brexiteers like to come out with ‘its scaremongering, of course we’ll still trade with the EU’. Yes, but on what terms.

The rub is that 15% of Scottish jobs are completely dependent on the UK internal market, more specifically with England, this includes one of their two crown jewel industries, their financial sector, which mostly sells financial products to English customers. Naturally the majority of these jobs will come to England or other parts of the UK, why would they cut their profit margin to stay in Scotland where trading terms are worse because they are the EU? It would also be bad for business from a PR perspective for these banks to stay in Scotland and the EU.

Personally I think it would be good for England if Scotland went independent because there’d be a massive opportunity to get that financial sector here, I’d specifically like to see Manchester make a play for it.
 
Last edited:

Paul the Wolf

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
17,831
Location
France - can't win anything with Swedish turnips


Thought I'd pop over to look at the Daily Mail, a rare imposed insanity but they are now calling the Hard Brexiters traitors for not backing May's deal.


But more to the point I now understand why people are so in favour of the Custom's Union motion.

It is incorrect , Goods will not be able to move freely between the UK and the EU with just a Custom's Union.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,944
Location
France


Thought I'd pop over to look at the Daily Mail, a rare imposed insanity but they are now calling the Hard Brexiters traitors for not backing May's deal.


But more to the point I now understand why people are so in favour of the Custom's Union motion.

It is incorrect , Goods will not be able to move freely between the UK and the EU with just a Custom's Union.
Someone should send them to the Bulgaria-Turkey border.
 

madzo2007

Full Member
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
2,197
Location
Belfast, Ireland
Should there be a no-deal, the EU would set the UK three preconditions to enter trade talks the note states:

  • Ensuring that Britain abides by its financial commitments — the so-called Brexit bill part of the agreement;

  • Guaranteeing the rights of EU citizens in the UK as well as of Britons working and residing elsewhere in the EU;

  • Finding a solution that keeps open the border in Northern Ireland along the lines of the arrangement in the withdrawal agreement, meaning the backstop — the insurance policy that ensures that the border in Ireland remains open under all circumstances.
(Taken from www.buzzfeed.com/albertonardelli/eu-uk-brexit-choices-no-deal-delay)
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,094
Location
Centreback
So the options narrow.

1) Hard Brexit
2) Long delay assuming the EU agrees to it.

In the event of 2) Euro elections will have to include the UK and even to get there there will have to be more on offer than "Can we have more time to argue please?"

How about a GE and 2nd (possibly binding) referendum at the same time?

The options being 1) leave or stay and 2) If leave May's deal or no deal?
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,544
Someone should send them to the Bulgaria-Turkey border.
That has nothing to do with movement of goods though?

From what i previously read that's to do with truck permits, goods are free to move. Surely no one foresees issues with truck controls between NI and the republic even if they're then going on to central europe?
 
Last edited:

Ubik

Nothing happens until something moves!
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Messages
18,933
That has nothing to do with movement of goods though?

From what i previously read that's to do with truck permits, goods are free to move. Surely no one foresees issues with truck controls between NI and the republic even if they're then going on to central europe?
As far as I know a customs union reduces the need for checks but doesn't eliminate them entirely. For that you need a harmony of standards between both sides, ie with the single market. Which is more along the lines of Labour's proposal, but I don't see that getting Tory support.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,944
Location
France
That has nothing to do with movement of goods though?

From what i previously read that's to do with truck permits, goods are free to move. Surely no one foresees issues with truck controls between NI and the republic even if they're then going on to central europe?
There are custom checks between Turkey and the EU on top of the necessity to check truck drivers permits and routes. Also that's not the issue, there is an actual border and infrastructures along it which is the problem that we have with the Irish border, if the turkish model was acceptable we wouldn't be in that situation.
 

Dante

Average bang
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
25,280
Location
My wit's end
Ignoring a referendum where it was laid out in plain terms what voting out entailed (and all the scare mongering that came with it) and then demanding a second referendum before the results of the first one is even implemented or asking for a soft brexit which isn’t actually what leave was painted as (by both sides), is democratic I suppose?

You’re all asking for the far right to truly have cause to get behind by literally wanting to overturn the results of the referendum.
The reason not to have a referendum over EVERY little issue is that Democracy allows for people who are more qualified than the general population (ie. politicians) to make the more complicated decisions.

But if they can't (ie. as in NOW), what other recourse is there over than another Referendum?
 

Dr. Dwayne

Self proclaimed tagline king.
Joined
May 9, 2006
Messages
97,638
Location
Nearer my Cas, to thee
For terrorism ?

Brexit causes more terrorism.

I feel thats a reach if I'm honest.
Oops, the recent advisory is on the safety and security tab:

Demonstrations and civil unrest
Demonstrations are expected to take place in London on March 29, 2019. Demonstrators will march in the Parliament’s vicinity, near the main government buildings on Whitehall and near Westminster Abbey.

Heightened security measures may be in place.

Avoid areas where demonstrations are taking place. Exercise vigilance and caution on public transit nearby.

Demonstrations occur and have the potential to suddenly turn violent. They can lead to significant disruptions to traffic and public transportation.

  • Avoid all demonstrations and large gatherings taking place
  • Follow the advice of local authorities
  • Monitor local mediafor information on ongoing demonstration
 

vidic blood & sand

New Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2013
Messages
4,134
I've always been a strong leaver, but I think it's time to settle this once and for all with another vote. We should be out of the EU this morning, but parliament hates democracy.
This time the vote should be Remain or Leave (with no deal), but this time the government must honor the result. Personally I think it's still 50/50 and could go either way.
What's the point pursuing a deal that leavers and remainers don't really want. It should be a "winner takes all vote", not a "peoples vote", we already had that.
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,799
I sadly live in the highest leave vote area in Wales. I’ve spoken to numerous people who voted leave, some just brief conversations. The absolute overwhelming majority say they didn’t know what they were voting for, they still don’t care if we stay or leave, they’re not bothered by the outcome, it’s getting on their nerves.

Hardly any of these people have ever taken an interest in politics, never voted in a general election but got caught full up on the £350 nhs bus and the ‘excitement and drama’ the tv debates caused at the time.

If article50 was revoked most of these people wouldn’t bat an eyelid and just get on with their everyday lives, some would probably vote remain, some probably wouldn’t even bother voting again, they’re bored of it now.

I think It all goes to show the numbers we would see voting either way in another vote could be drastically different and people deserve the right to vote again.
 

GloryHunter07

Full Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2007
Messages
12,152
I've always been a strong leaver, but I think it's time to settle this once and for all with another vote. We should be out of the EU this morning, but parliament hates democracy.
This time the vote should be Remain or Leave (with no deal), but this time the government must honor the result. Personally I think it's still 50/50 and could go either way.
What's the point pursuing a deal that leavers and remainers don't really want. It should be a "winner takes all vote", not a "peoples vote", we already had that.
You think No Deal is "winner takes all"? How bizarre.
 

horsechoker

The Caf's Roy Keane.
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
52,419
Location
The stable
I sadly live in the highest leave vote area in Wales. I’ve spoken to numerous people who voted leave, some just brief conversations. The absolute overwhelming majority say they didn’t know what they were voting for, they still don’t care if we stay or leave, they’re not bothered by the outcome, it’s getting on their nerves.

Hardly any of these people have ever taken an interest in politics, never voted in a general election but got caught full up on the £350 nhs bus and the ‘excitement and drama’ the tv debates caused at the time.

If article50 was revoked most of these people wouldn’t bat an eyelid and just get on with their everyday lives, some would probably vote remain, some probably wouldn’t even bother voting again, they’re bored of it now.

I think It all goes to show the numbers we would see voting either way in another vote could be drastically different and people deserve the right to vote again.
People complain that a lot of people should have voted but I think a lot of people shouldn't have voted.
 

TheGame

Full Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Messages
19,313
Location
In the Land of Saints and Sinners
I've always been a strong leaver, but I think it's time to settle this once and for all with another vote. We should be out of the EU this morning, but parliament hates democracy.
This time the vote should be Remain or Leave (with no deal), but this time the government must honor the result. Personally I think it's still 50/50 and could go either way.
What's the point pursuing a deal that leavers and remainers don't really want. It should be a "winner takes all vote", not a "peoples vote", we already had that.
Parliament hates democracy? It was agreed MPs would have a say on the final agreement. What about the Vote Leave campaign who broke election spending rules?

The official Vote Leave campaign said there would be a deal before they left, no deal was not mentioned so for those banging on about that’s what people voted for is bollocks.