zenith
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2013
- Messages
- 1,859
Defensive actions, FFS. I swear done people just wanna see a Rocky or terminator version of a CB in our team, without regard to true effectiveness.
One of many things I disagreed with Mourinho about. I'm sorry that you think everything he says must be correct.
I asked for the last 10 years because we can actually look the stats up. Some people who "didnt win the ball much" like Carrick, actually did win the ball a decent amount. When theres no data to look at you can name anyone.
Rio actually made a decent amount of clearances. Just starting to look at the numbers, first ones I have are from 09/10 and he made 10.1 of those actions per game (tackles, interceptions, clearances, shot blocks and aerials) - again Lindelof was at 8 last game so Rio wouldnt be someone who makes as few.
Rio is also one of those players who did have standout physical properties. He was quick and had decent strength
And your point is? Aha, perhaps you mean we should leave all references to some of the best players in history? So..no more Best, Charlton, Pele, etc...how far back are we allowed to go in your opinion?Maldini was a left back that played CB in his late 30's..
My point was that Maldini played as a fullback for most of his career and peak years. So not sure why you're bringing up a fullback to make a point on a CB.And your point is? Aha, perhaps you mean we should leave all references to some of the best players in history? So..no more Best, Charlton, Pele, etc...how far back are we allowed to go in your opinion?
The point I was making about Maldini was that already then (approximately 30 years ago) he had identified that reading of the game was more important than making tackles.
Matip won more tackles and interceptions, but VVD bettered him in terms of blocks, aerials and clearances. Among Liverpool's CBs in the last EPL season, Van Dijk was last for tackles, second for Interceptions and blocks, and top for aerials and clearances. Among our five senior CBs last EPL season - with the exception of Rojo who played just over 200 minutes, Lindelof was marginally top for tackles, third best for aerials, and dead last for interceptions, blocks and clearances. This season so far, he's unsuprisingly bettered Maguire in terms of tackles, but has made less interceptions, headers, clearances, blocks and passes too. It's been two games though.
Yeah it's already happened, some will tell you Tuanzebe should be starting ahead of himNow that Smalling and Jones are out of the way I wonder how long it will take for the caf to start on Lindelof
or has it started already?
Until he sorts this out, I think all these arguments are pointless. It's one of the most important skills for a CB and he's one of the worst I've seen at it.Completely fecks up at least one high ball a game. Massive flaw in his game.
He played all along the back line and has been voted the best defender in the World. Lindelof has played a lot of his career at right back for Sweden. The point is about defending, not a defined position.My point was that Maldini played as a fullback for most of his career and peak years. So not sure why you're bringing up a fullback to make a point on a CB.
Yeah it's already happened, some will tell you Tuanzebe should be starting ahead of him
My point was that Maldini played as a fullback for most of his career and peak years. So not sure why you're bringing up a fullback to make a point on a CB.
Lindelof won't come close to Maldini that much I'm sure of. We're not discussing Lindelof as a fullback but rather as a CB instead. And bringing up a LB from the past who played the majority of his career at fullback doesn't help Lindelof in that regard.He played all along the back line and has been voted the best defender in the World. Lindelof has played a lot of his career at right back for Sweden. The point is about defending, not a defined position.
Although he played as a left back for most of his career, Maldini was naturally right footed, and began playing for Milan as a right back.No he didn't. He moved to CB in the late 90s and ended up playing more games there than he ever did at LB, and most will say it was as a CB that he went from world class to being in the conversation for the best of all time. He was named Captain and won everything there was to win as a centre back.
He played all along the back line and has been voted the best defender in the World. Lindelof has played a lot of his career at right back for Sweden. The point is about defending, not a defined position.
He should.
It's not even close for pace and I have a lad I know too well who trains with them both daily who has confirmed that.Based on what?
Their stats are very similar and one did it in the PL and one in the championship. Lindelof beats Tuanzebe in passing and Tuanzebe beats him in aerial duels won. But it might be that you face more aerial duels in the Championship. Lindelof also beats him for pace according to the chart that Lukaku posted.
Based on what?
Their stats are very similar and one did it in the PL and one in the championship. Lindelof beats Tuanzebe in passing and Tuanzebe beats him in aerial duels won. But it might be that you face more aerial duels in the Championship. Lindelof also beats him for pace according to the chart that Lukaku posted.
Yes, he has. At under 21 he took over from Emil Krafth when he got injured and from then on was first choice at right back for all of their games in the European Championships.No, he hasn't.
Although he played as a left back for most of his career, Maldini was naturally right footed, and began playing for Milan as a right back.
Maldini was renowned for his technical ability, athleticism, sliding tackles, stamina, composure and fast energetic forward runs as a left-back or wing-back.[96][97][98][99][100] He was also an excellent crosser of the ball, and was an effective attacking threat, scoring and assisting several goals throughout his career.[101][102] In the final few years of his career, as he lost speed, he was moved to a centre-back position, where he excelled in relying on his experience, tactical ability, positioning and timing to win the ball.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paolo_Maldini
The point was he converted to playing CB later in his career when he had lost speed. He played the majority of his peak years at left back until he lost his pace was the point I made and I'm correct.That's wrong. His first full season as centre back was 98-99. He played 289 games there, as opposed to 232 as a left back. He also played a grand total of two top flight games at right back, he was moved to left back pretty much immediately.
Yes, he has. At under 21 he took over from Emil Krafth when he got injured and from then on was first choice at right back for all of their games in the European Championships.
I have actually watched them both play a lot. Tuanzebe definitely beats him for pace, I don't even think no one would argue with that. I think it's pretty close with aerial duels. Imo Tuanzebes passing is better and he's also better at bringing the ball forward. However, that's not why I want to play Tuanzebe. I want to play Tuanzebe because he's quicker and stronger and complement Maguire in a better way. He's better at the high pressing game where he's both stronger and faster and a better tackler, which is important when he's aggressive high up the pitch. I think Linedelos has a sealing in his potential and I really don't see him reaching any high level which I think Tuanzebe can. Tuanzebe can solve 1 vs 1 problems better than Lindelof and that is important if Ole wants his high pressing game. I think Lindelof is very much an okayish player but I just see Tuanzebe as the superior talent.
Don't you think Lindelof's passing stats are better because he was passing the ball to Manchester United players and Axel was passing to Championship players?Of course Tuanzebe is quicker, at least for acceleration. Sorry for the trolling on that part, was more poking fun at people using stats without context. Lindelof however is a lot faster than people give him credit for. I've also watched them both quite a bit. The rest of your post just sounds like you're basing it on your subjective opinion? The stats show that Lindelof is the better passer and Tuanzebe has more bad touches per game.
Anyway, I don't really care enough to argue. If Tuanzebe is better/has higher potential he will displace Lindelof eventually and then that's great for us.
Nah, he's a good prospect but not ready. It's possible he could exceed Lindelof in the future but Victor is further ahead in his development and deserving of his first team spot. Tuanzebe will get his chance to but as it stands he has proven nothing at this level.He should.
Don't you think Lindelof's passing stats are better because he was passing the ball to Manchester United players and Axel was passing to Championship players?
Depends if you rate Lukaku et al as Manchester United players, but it is a fair point. Depends what criteria they use for a successful pass I guess. It's not dependent on who your teammate is if the criteria is to just reach your man and it doesn't matter if they manage to get it under control.
So can anyone tell me a top bracket CB from the past 10 years who, during the seasons they were a top CB, make as few defensive actions as Lindelof?
And on top of that aren't either quick, or strong?
Then why has Smalling got a high pass percentage if he was being marked?Lindelof is also being marked by Premier League players instead of by Championship players. It's a lot harder to complete passes in the PL, that's why it's the top division. You have less time and so does the player you pass to.
Good post. This defensive actions stat is so subjective it's ridiculous, totally dependent on the system and a players role. These stats dont work in a vacuum, all we can really see is that Lindelof is forming a good partnership with Maguire and we have only conceded via a total wonder goal.The questions was: are there any top centre backs who have less “defensive actions” than Lindelof. Defensive actions defined as the sum of tackles, interceptions, clearances, blocks, and aerials. Aerials are by the way defined as offensive action in WhoScored database, but I included them anyways. I cannot measure relative speed nor strength compared to Lindelof.
I went through some centre backs in the top clubs and also picked some of the centrebacks who are generally considered to be among the best in the world. This is not a random or representative sample, I picked the ones I thought of and took the stats from last year’s domestic league. All CBs ranked top 10 in the world by Fourfourtwo are there. All of them played more than 10 league games last year. Many of them play in dominant teams, but of course the best ones do.
The answer is yes, there are many top class CB who have "less defensive actions" than Lindelöf. Some examples from last season: Umtiti, Lenglet, Stones, Boateng, Kimpembe, Bonucci, Nacho, Savic, Thiago Silva, Ramos, Chiellini and Rugani.
Below is my list with player and "total defensive actions". I can post the whole detailed list if someone teach me how to include a picture.
VvD 12,6
Godin 11,1
de Ligt 10,8
Pique 10,6
Koulibaly 9,8
Hummels 9,7
Varane 9,6
Laporte 9,4
Vertonghen 9,4
Alderweireld 8,9
Lindelof 8,7
Rugani 8,6
Chiellini 8,6
Ramos 8,5
Thiago Silva 8,5
Savic 8
Nacho 8
Bonucci 7,1
Kimpembe 6,9
Boateng 6,7
Stones 6,7
Lenglet 6,6
Umtiti 5,3
Hopefully this should end the "defensive actions" debate.The questions was: are there any top centre backs who have less “defensive actions” than Lindelof. Defensive actions defined as the sum of tackles, interceptions, clearances, blocks, and aerials. Aerials are by the way defined as offensive action in WhoScored database, but I included them anyways. I cannot measure relative speed nor strength compared to Lindelof.
I went through some centre backs in the top clubs and also picked some of the centrebacks who are generally considered to be among the best in the world. This is not a random or representative sample, I picked the ones I thought of and took the stats from last year’s domestic league. All CBs ranked top 10 in the world by Fourfourtwo are there. All of them played more than 10 league games last year. Many of them play in dominant teams, but of course the best ones do.
The answer is yes, there are many top class CB who have "less defensive actions" than Lindelöf. Some examples from last season: Umtiti, Lenglet, Stones, Boateng, Kimpembe, Bonucci, Nacho, Savic, Thiago Silva, Ramos, Chiellini and Rugani.
Below is my list with player and "total defensive actions". I can post the whole detailed list if someone teach me how to include a picture.
VvD 12,6
Godin 11,1
de Ligt 10,8
Pique 10,6
Koulibaly 9,8
Hummels 9,7
Varane 9,6
Laporte 9,4
Vertonghen 9,4
Alderweireld 8,9
Lindelof 8,7
Rugani 8,6
Chiellini 8,6
Ramos 8,5
Thiago Silva 8,5
Savic 8
Nacho 8
Bonucci 7,1
Kimpembe 6,9
Boateng 6,7
Stones 6,7
Lenglet 6,6
Umtiti 5,3
The questions was: are there any top centre backs who have less “defensive actions” than Lindelof. Defensive actions defined as the sum of tackles, interceptions, clearances, blocks, and aerials. Aerials are by the way defined as offensive action in WhoScored database, but I included them anyways. I cannot measure relative speed nor strength compared to Lindelof.
I went through some centre backs in the top clubs and also picked some of the centrebacks who are generally considered to be among the best in the world. This is not a random or representative sample, I picked the ones I thought of and took the stats from last year’s domestic league. All CBs ranked top 10 in the world by Fourfourtwo are there. All of them played more than 10 league games last year. Many of them play in dominant teams, but of course the best ones do.
The answer is yes, there are many top class CB who have "less defensive actions" than Lindelöf. Some examples from last season: Umtiti, Lenglet, Stones, Boateng, Kimpembe, Bonucci, Nacho, Savic, Thiago Silva, Ramos, Chiellini and Rugani.
Below is my list with player and "total defensive actions". I can post the whole detailed list if someone teach me how to include a picture.
VvD 12,6
Godin 11,1
de Ligt 10,8
Pique 10,6
Koulibaly 9,8
Hummels 9,7
Varane 9,6
Laporte 9,4
Vertonghen 9,4
Alderweireld 8,9
Lindelof 8,7
Rugani 8,6
Chiellini 8,6
Ramos 8,5
Thiago Silva 8,5
Savic 8
Nacho 8
Bonucci 7,1
Kimpembe 6,9
Boateng 6,7
Stones 6,7
Lenglet 6,6
Umtiti 5,3
Of course Tuanzebe is quicker, at least for acceleration. Sorry for the trolling on that part, was more poking fun at people using stats without context. Lindelof however is a lot faster than people give him credit for. I've also watched them both quite a bit. The rest of your post just sounds like you're basing it on your subjective opinion? The stats show that Lindelof is the better passer and Tuanzebe has more bad touches per game.
Anyway, I don't really care enough to argue. If Tuanzebe is better/has higher potential he will displace Lindelof eventually and then that's great for us.
Then why has Smalling got a high pass percentage if he was being marked?
It was until you said that Lindelof is marked by prem players whilst making his passes (which are mostly safe side ways passes) and Tuanzebe is marked by championship players. Smalling is derided on here due to his inability to pass the ball but has a high pass%. So either they aren't marked by opposing players contrary to what you said or Smalling is brilliant on the ball with a high pass% whilst being marked by prem markers.I thought this was about Lindelof and Tuanzebe?
It's easy to have a high pass completion if they're all back to De Gea.