Eboue
nasty little twerp with crazy bitter-man opinions
oh dear god not the sanctity of our ads
I'm not telling you but I left the most recent a few months before July 2018. You're going to have to be more specific though, just saying what you said means nothing.Which two? And when? The LMS systems have been rebuilt and the content is all new as of July 2018.
It's good to see you (partially, at least) acknowledge that non-binaries deserve to be treated with the same respect and dignity as everyone else. As for separating them from the fetishists: If you assume that the majority are genuine, and treat them accordingly, you'll be correct while also doing the only right thing. Treating someone like shit for someone else's actions is never the right thing to do.Oh I have a few trans lesbian friends who are in agreement, how many do you have?
Also regarding gender fluid non binary identities suffering dysphoria, I've never said they don't except the difference is separating those people from the fetishists is extremely hard to do, I mean we could make them all walk around with, ya know, yellow stars but look what happened that last time.
Your username should have been Onetrack.
Again, what gives you any expert knowledge in the area if trans politics? I'm still waiting to hear about your credentials that you were so keen in bragging about. And "talking to a couple of people who identify as gender fluid" doesn't mean you now have a doctorate.
The one on Blair White? No, it's entirely correct, the woman is massively bigoted.Is the internet article wrong? I said I'm taking it with a pinch of salt so open to being educated on it.
You would have to see it to believe it.I'm not telling you but I left the most recent a few months before July 2018. You're going to have to be more specific though, just saying what you said means nothing.
You still can but not on this forum. You can call their post daft but not the person themselves.I used to prefer the old internet days, when if someone got outraged over stupid shit you could just call them a daft cnut and move on with your day.
Are you saying that there are gender specific clothes? If so what is off limits for a male and what is off limits for a female?Does this person dress in male clothes when identifying as Callum and female clothes when identifying as Abi?
If yes then it should be easy enough for everyone they work with to know which name to call them on that day i suppose.
To be honest I don't trust your account of things but subconscious racism is a massive issue in recruitment.You would have to see it to believe it.
A question might ask, which of these 3 candidates would you promote. One of these answers might subtly claim you are racist because of institutional racism, and suggest diversity training.
No background on the candidates is given, no detail of the position they currently hold or are being promoted to.
It's little more than a way to say you are racist if you pick the wrong option.
It's absurd.
There are much better ways to frame such a question, where in reality there should be no right or wrong answer. But we only convert what they send to SCORMs and then test them frequently. It's not for us to comment on the content, at least in the workplace.
Because we can enable or disable content dependant on region, this sort of content might appear in EMEA and NAM markets, but not in APAC, obviously at the clients discretion. Always struck me as odd as well.
I can comfortably say that I know a lot more than you.
Vintage cafso you are telling a transgendered person that they are transphobic? Let me get this straight, you are telling me you know more than myself?
This is me by the way. Are you really saying the above? That you know more about being transgender than I myself?
https://www.instagram.com/candifluffy/
Contender for post of the year for me.Vintage caf
Agreed.Contender for post of the year for me.
What? The comment was in response to the insinuation that non-binary people are mentally ill. That's a factually incorrect statement. In fact, none of her statements or claims about non-binary people are supported by facts or science. Her being trans doesn't change that.Vintage caf
What? Where?I think it's laughable you're calling the transwoman transphobic.
Look, I really don't want to be a dick to you but this should serve as a reminder to not throw accusations around like some of you like to do so much. Especially over a conversation in small pieces of text, when you actually can't really be sure who is on the other end. It's hard to form such a strong opinion about someone over exchanges in text imo. Some things when read sound much harsher than a person really intended.What? The comment was in response to the insinuation that non-binary people are mentally ill. That's a factually incorrect statement. In fact, none of her statements or claims about non-binary people are supported by facts or science. Her being trans doesn't change that.
Do you mean he only recruits Asian women, or that the only women he recruits are Asian? There are plenty of cantankerous blinkered old professors out there with major hiring biases, which I guess is difficult to combat other than waiting for them to retire. On the other hand, depending on the field, if it's a tiny pool of people with both knowledge of the specific field and maths background, it's not out the bounds of reason to assume most of the women meeting those criteria will be Asian anyway.
I do know of several young female PIs who are only interested in having all-female labs. From the students they take on to the technicians and postdocs. Hard to say really where I stand on that sort of thing.
I explained why no one takes action. Can't rock the boat since you'll drown too.Sounds suspiciously 'made up' or if not, subject to a discrimination case.
No not really, having said that Male and Female London Police uniforms are slightly different. What i was getting at though is if this person dresses differently depending on what they identify as that day then it should be no problem for their workmates to know whether to call them Callum or Abi.Are you saying that there are gender specific clothes? If so what is off limits for a male and what is off limits for a female?
I dunno how you can look at the horrible shit that Rudie is saying and come to any conclusion other than she is a bigot. Did you read https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Blaire_White? This is who she had claimed to be very similar to.Look, I really don't want to be a dick to you but this should serve as a reminder to not throw accusations around like some of you like to do so much. Especially over a conversation in small pieces of text, when you actually can't really be sure who is on the other end. It's hard to form such a strong opinion about someone over exchanges in text imo. Some things when read sound much harsher than a person really intended.
Granted, in some cases it could indeed be a bigot, a transphobe, a racist, etc, but in other cases it's often just someone with a different opinion on a certain topic. But like with most social issues, tempers fly high as a lot of people take them very personal.
What I'm basically saying, is that with name calling and putting people in boxes, (like both the left and the right like to do all the time) we're not going to solve anything. It will only divide people further.
Thing is, I didn't call her a transphobe. I didn't even call her statement transphobic. Without knowing her gender at the time, the impression I got was that she was pro trans-rights, but misattributed some of the problems they face to non-binaries. She did this by claiming dudes dress up as women and claim to be genderqueer in order to go into ladies restrooms and have a wank. I pointed out that said claim has no basis in reality, and that's it's the go-to argument for transphobes wanting to deny transpersons their rights. When someone repeats a harmful and factually untrue talking point like that, it's only fair to point out its primary purpose, on the off chance that they might actually not have realised it wasn't factual.Look, I really don't want to be a dick to you but this should serve as a reminder to not throw accusations around like some of you like to do so much. Especially over a conversation in small pieces of text, when you actually can't really be sure who is on the other end. It's hard to form such a strong opinion about someone over exchanges in text imo. Some things when read sound much harsher than a person really intended.
Granted, in some cases it could indeed be a bigot, a transphobe, a racist, etc, but in other cases it's often just someone with a different opinion on a certain topic. But like with most social issues, tempers fly high as a lot of people take them very personal.
What I'm basically saying, is that with name calling and putting people in boxes, (like both the left and the right like to do all the time) we're not going to solve anything. It will only divide people further.
Oh I have a few trans lesbian friends who are in agreement, how many do you have?
Also regarding gender fluid non binary identities suffering dysphoria, I've never said they don't except the difference is separating those people from the fetishists is extremely hard to do, I mean we could make them all walk around with, ya know, yellow stars but look what happened last time.
Your username should have been Onetrack.
Again, what gives you any expert knowledge in the area of trans politics? I'm still waiting to hear about your credentials that you were so keen in bragging about. And "talking to a couple of people who identify as gender fluid" doesn't mean you now have a doctorate.
Double the amount of track of my current one, at least
Yeah it's probably harshest on the students. Bit of a stereotype I know but two of these all female labs I know of both outsource almost all of their data analysis. So by default their students dont get the same level of exposure to managing data and statistics that most other students are getting.I think all-female labs aren't good. It will also heavily limit their students' prospects since academia is all incestuous neworking. I have a female PI, who is very into diversity, but there are other men besides myself around in lab.
You think being a transwoman means you can’t hold transphobic views?I think it's laughable you're calling the transwoman transphobic.
Of course they can but since there's no scientific evidence to support non binary and the hundreds of genders that are out there then it's a bit like being bigoted against Smurfs, those little blue bastards (no offense to anyone who identifies as one by the way).You think being a transwoman means you can’t hold transphobic views?
If a black man went around saying that black people are inherently evil, I think it’s safe to say he has racist views.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Hey you're not the gate keeper of bigotry! (see what I did there?)I dunno how you can look at the horrible shit that Rudie is saying and come to any conclusion other than she is a bigot. Did you read https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Blaire_White? This is who she had claimed to be very similar to.
I agree with some of what Blaire White has to say and as a Woman will defend her right to say it.
I'd suggest anyone who interested watching some of Blaire White, she and myself hold very similar views.
No, you're a bigot for lying about, grossly mischaracterising (you know, like how you're right now mischaracterising the reason for people calling you a bigot) and denying the identities of non-binaries. It's amazing how hard this is for you to grasp. You are not a victim here, you're an aggressor (and since you seem to struggle with simple concepts, by "here" I mean this thread on RedCafe.)Yeah, I'm a bigot for saying that transgender girls deserve better, to not be told that their identities mean nothing because they'll be lost in a sea with thousands of others, that they are more then a fetish and can actually contribute to society.
Holding similar views is sharing similar views, views on non binaries and views on people like Jessica Yaniv etc. Sorry I didn't think I had to list each one.
"Hold very similar views" and "agree with some of what she says" are two very different things. For example, I agree with some of what Joe Biden says, but I hold very similar views to Bernie Sanders. The opposite is not true. So I think you're actually full of shit.
As a member of the LGBQT community, all I can say is thank feck the majority of us don't share your abhorrent views.
You haven't actually said that it is lying though.Hey you're not the gate keeper of bigotry! (see what I did there?)
Because rationalwiki, that totally independent and 100% truthful source of information wouldn't lie and isn't just someone's view! I'm sure that'll hold some sway in a court of law.
Did my sarcasm allude you? Why don't you watch the video from the previous post and let me know if you support the individual in question. If not then you've answered your own questions.You haven't actually said that it is lying though.
I just pointed out that you made two very different claims with regard to the similarity between your's and White's views.Holding similar views is sharing similar views, views on non binaries and views on people like Jessica Yaniv etc. Sorry I didn't think I had to list each one.
I have no objection to calling out individuals who cause harm to the community by acting like morons. I have simply objected to condemning a whole group, and especially doing so through spreading disgusting falsehoods.I suppose being all inclusive you fully support the transgender individual that Blaire is talking about here? Well I guess you must do because you couldn't possibly share similar views with Blaire right?
Nothing personal, it doesn't affect me. I'm just equipped with the ability to empathise, and basic human decency, so I try not to shy away from calling out bigotry.Also, you seem to be taking this personally, I forgot to ask you your pronouns didn't I? Is that it? Lemme guess, are they 'snow/flake'?
So that you can question and mock my experiences? Nah, I'm good. You see, I have very little faith that you won't trivialise and belittle me for it.Oh enlighten me on your LGBQT credentials oh wise one. And try to do it without shouting bigot! It's tiresome.
Fair enough, now I just feel bad so I'll leave it, contrary to popular belief I don't think anyone should be belittled but also nothing immune from sceptism. I fight for survival and am militant with it and see the damage done by fetishists who damage all including people they claim to represent but I see how it can be construed. I apologise for causing any offense.So that you can question and mock my experiences? Nah, I'm good. You see, I have very little faith that you won't trivialise and belittle me for it.
That's fine, you wouldn't know either way ultimately.To be honest I don't trust your account of things but subconscious racism is a massive issue in recruitment.
You've used this term a lot, could you sometimes be jumping to conclusions about their reasoning? I presume its an odd and confusing transition and some parts of life take a while to figure out how to navigate? I have no idea how to react to the 6 year old personally.Fair enough, now I just feel bad so I'll leave it, contrary to popular belief I don't think anyone should be belittled but also nothing immune from sceptism. I fight for survival and am militant with it and see the damage done by fetishists who damage all including people they claim to represent but I see how it can be construed. I apologise for causing any offense.
That pic is fecked.
Wow, so much wrong in one post from someone trying to sound inclusive.Basically abusing a subset...
I see no reason to be less tolerant to a girl dressed as a pony, than to a trans person.
If they want to be included in a community as you identify with that community, and are told 'sorry you can't be because you don't qualify as I don't recognise your feelings as valid' - surely that's literally the definition of being exclusive, simply because you don't approve of their self identity?Wow, so much wrong in one post from someone trying to sound inclusive.
Lost your whole argument there, a girl dressed isn't trans or a subset and neither is S&M. Sorry but you've just shown how bigoted you are
And I've never said that having a fetish is bad, saying you're transgender because of your fetish or your fetish makes you transgender however is.
Are you serious right now? Because I'm not sure if you are...If they want to be included in a community as you identify with that community, and are told 'sorry you can't be because you don't qualify as I don't recognise your feelings as valid' - surely that's literally the definition of being exclusive, simply because you don't approve of their self identity?
And yes you have; the last few pages you've been ridiculing them.
ps. You need to look up the definition of bigoted. The only group I'm outwardly hostile to is pattern day traders on commodities. Yet I still accept they want to be defined as serious folk, even if they are clowns dressed up as them.
To be blunt, you've come off that way in this thread as well. I think its time for you to just take a step back and let things sit instead of continuing. You've made your point, no need to pound it into the ground.So that you can question and mock my experiences? Nah, I'm good. You see, I have very little faith that you won't trivialise and belittle me for it.
I'm going to regret getting involved in this but how can that be a bigoted position? Bigotry requires intolerance which is the precise opposite of the poster's point. You may disagree with the argument made, or the language used, but it is clearly not a bigoted position by definition of the word.Wow, so much wrong in one post from someone trying to sound inclusive.
Lost your whole argument there, a girl dressed isn't trans or a subset and neither is S&M. Sorry but you've just shown how bigoted you are