Juan Mata | Official: Signs two-year contract with option of a third

ottosec

Full Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
6,550
I remember when this guy had 20 goals and 40 assists in a single season for Chelsea...
 

Garebo

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 25, 2019
Messages
67
He's played as a #10 every game in pre-season except one and looked just as bad as always. Moves at a snail's pace, no goal threat, no defensive contribution and creates little. Lingard has been better than him and in the tiny amount of time we let Gomes and Pereira play that role they both offered more as well.

His new contract is a mistake only slightly less dumb than the new one for Jones.
No, it isn't less dumb. Jones is much younger and a better player in his position than Mata.
 

Sky1981

Fending off the urge
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
30,071
Location
Under the bright neon lights of sincity
IMO, and i may be wrong here but i think Mata's extension is 2 fold.
1. He provides experience to our younger core in that area of the pitch. I wouldn't trust Pereira to have an impact in a crunch match against the top sides.
2. He has a genuine love for the club so he could be looked at as an ambassador and/or mentor. Perhaps a learning platform for Gomes and others.
He brings skill, experience and passion for the badge. We could use alot more of that in this current United side.
I'd rather he doesnt share anything with kids at this rate.

Exeperiences is overrated. It matters if youre legends of the game, not a bench warming smiling blogger who part timing as a footballer
 

Jinn

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
2,084
Fully fit squad and Mata doesn't start the game. His inclusion and Matic's inclusion from the start is based on the amount of injuries we have. At most they are bench players and i expect them to come on for the last 15 minutes using their experience to see out a game.
Does anyone really believe that the manager or any of his staff wants to start these guys? Especially when you here them talk of being the fittest team and high pressing etc.
Fred should have started, however, i understand the managers point of view. The guy has only played one game in months. Probably easing him back in was the plan. I'm still not convinced that he will start once Pogba is fit and yes, we do need reinforcements in that position.

All in all, no injuries and we would have put up a better performance.
 

Lee565

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2019
Messages
5,079
What does mata have over Gomes both ability and physically wise because I cant see it?
 

Dve

Full Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Messages
2,922
Mata does not have much left of offer. He is already slow and weak in duels, and he´s not a dribbler. Passes - that was supposed to be his force. When he does not hit them, there is not much left. Mata of all United players, is the one that has declined most under Solskjær. I think he´s working hard in training and gives his best, but It´s not given for everyone to be sharp in early 30-ties.
 

Maticmaker

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Messages
4,720
Mata is no doubt a great guy, a lovely fellow, and he's my daughters favourite; but football wise I can count on one hand the number of really good games (whole games)he has had for us since he arrived and on two hands the number of passages of play within games where he has been top class.

Why we ever brought him here I don't know? Mata was reputedly a good No.10, but I haven't seen that in him, he was also (once) supposed be our attacking player down the right side, again apart from the Liverpool away game a few seasons back, he was much too slow and continually drifted inside. Some of his passing whilst accurate has usually been backwards or side-wards for the majority of times, but in fairness he has scored a few (a couple at least) of goals from fantastic free-kicks.

Whatever value he has in the dressing room must be fantastic for him to have lasted so long!
 

bond19821982

Last Man Standing champion 2019/20
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
10,427
Location
Nnc
He should have finished that chance. No way any recognized striker is missing it.
 

gerdm07

Thinks we should have kept Pereira
Joined
Aug 8, 2011
Messages
2,773
I think one of the most important attributes in a no. 10 is the ability to dribble into space and make the defense react. When the defense reacts that is when you make the pass that can break down a defense. All the best no. 10s have this attribute. If Mata finds himself with the ball and space in front and starts to dribble, well, the chasing defenders are able to catch him and thwart his advance. Therefore, Mata is forced to make an early, safer pass and the possibility of creating a good opportunity is lost.

His slowness makes him an ineffective no. 10 and winger. He should only be used after 70 minutes against fatigued defenders.
 

Water Melon

Guest
Asset protection ended up in having to paywages to a liability. He is not the United level player these days. Nice person? Most probably yes. Good enough to play for United - absolutely not.
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,400
Location
Birmingham
I get uoset every time the commebtator says "creative". When he isn't scoring, he's useless.
 

Amerifan

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
986
Fully fit squad and Mata doesn't start the game. His inclusion and Matic's inclusion from the start is based on the amount of injuries we have. At most they are bench players and i expect them to come on for the last 15 minutes using their experience to see out a game.
Does anyone really believe that the manager or any of his staff wants to start these guys? Especially when you here them talk of being the fittest team and high pressing etc.
Fred should have started, however, i understand the managers point of view. The guy has only played one game in months. Probably easing him back in was the plan. I'm still not convinced that he will start once Pogba is fit and yes, we do need reinforcements in that position.

All in all, no injuries and we would have put up a better performance.
Exactly. Some of these posts make it sound like Ole is selecting Mata and Matic over Isco and Xabi. There’s no one better available on the bench. Fred is better, but two games after a few days rest for a player who hasn’t played since last season is an injury waiting to happen.
 

TheRedDevil'sAdvocate

Full Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
3,675
Location
The rainbow's end
I remember when this guy had 20 goals and 40 assists in a single season for Chelsea...
And i still remember the two seasons in thirteen whole years when Theo Walcott actually looked like the man who could lead Arsenal's attack. He's playing for Everton now and that's where Mata should be too. They are about the same age too.
 

Revaulx

Full Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
6,046
Location
Saddleworth
Mata is no doubt a great guy, a lovely fellow, and he's my daughters favourite; but football wise I can count on one hand the number of really good games (whole games)he has had for us since he arrived and on two hands the number of passages of play within games where he has been top class.

Why we ever brought him here I don't know? Mata was reputedly a good No.10, but I haven't seen that in him, he was also (once) supposed be our attacking player down the right side, again apart from the Liverpool away game a few seasons back, he was much too slow and continually drifted inside. Some of his passing whilst accurate has usually been backwards or side-wards for the majority of times, but in fairness he has scored a few (a couple at least) of goals from fantastic free-kicks.

Whatever value he has in the dressing room must be fantastic for him to have lasted so long!
Ed was desperate to give the impression he was in control when we were floundering around in Moyes' terrible post-Christmas spell. Mata was out of favour at Chelsea and the press were all going on about how despicably he was being treated by Big Bad Jose. Just the sort of thing Ed can't resist..
 

Foxbatt

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,297
At this moment in time anyone on the bench is better than Mata. At least they can run, tackle and head the ball. Honestly I would have Jones and Rojo instead of Mata now.
 

Maticmaker

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Messages
4,720
Ed was desperate to give the impression he was in control when we were floundering around in Moyes' terrible post-Christmas spell. Mata was out of favour at Chelsea and the press were all going on about how despicably he was being treated by Big Bad Jose. Just the sort of thing Ed can't resist..
Yes I agree, you could say it was Woodward's first sortie into player transfers...and its got worse ever since! ;)
 

Foxbatt

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,297
Ed and United had highlighted Thiago Alcantra. Dithering Dave said he has not seen him play and didn't want him then. He wanted Fellaini and Coleman. I really don't think even Woodward is going to buy players that the managers have refused. He may refuse to pay for players managers want.
 

Judas

Open to offers
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,142
Location
Where the grass is greener.
He's past it, its that simple. He's in a clear decline, has been for ages. Rather see Gomes try and potentially fail than see Mata starting for us in 2019, it's tragic.
 

Maticmaker

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Messages
4,720
Massive decline from him, Matic like.
Sorry have to defend Matic! (Maticmaker!!)

His transfer was one Jose wanted and for once Ed Woodward came through.

Matic's move was an obvious one, he was only destined for one or two seasons to shore up our mid-field and to be Mourhino's man on the pitch. Chelsea let him go because of his recurring back injury, he had the op last close season, but he's now not what he was in mobility terms and to be fair he was never a creative midfielder.

Matic had a great first season for us, but doubt we shall not see that level from him again, think he will go at the end of this season.
 

Dr. Dwayne

Self proclaimed tagline king.
Joined
May 9, 2006
Messages
97,643
Location
Nearer my Cas, to thee
Sorry have to defend Matic! (Maticmaker!!)

His transfer was one Jose wanted and for once Ed Woodward came through.

Matic's move was an obvious one, he was only destined for one or two seasons to shore up our mid-field and to be Mourhino's man on the pitch. Chelsea let him go because of his recurring back injury, he had the op last close season, but he's now not what he was in mobility terms and to be fair he was never a creative midfielder.

Matic had a great first season for us, but doubt we shall not see that level from him again, think he will go at the end of this season.
Yes, I don't think anyone disagrees with that but what most of us are saying is that he's done at this level.
 

Maticmaker

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Messages
4,720
Yes, I don't think anyone disagrees with that but what most of us are saying is that he's done at this level.
Yes, I agree, but at the moment Ole has no choice but to call on him; had Pogba and Fred in particular, done the business Matic would be gone now!

McTominay will be ready next season and possibly Pereira, but we still need strengthening in that area.
 

Foxbatt

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,297
I know this is the Mata thread but what we needed to strengthen was the midfield and up front. The CBs could have held for one more season if we had done that.
 

Alabaster Codify7

New Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
6,553
Location
Wales
This was a completely unnecessary extension and no other top club would have done this.

Imagine this - in the summer, we had thanked Mata and shaken his hand and wished him well. Woodward had signed off on allowing Ole to sign a new #10 for around £70-80m.

New signing first choice; Lingard/Pereira/Gomes as backups. With the intention being for the new guy to be The Man who played most games and contributed 10 goals a season.

Like a dream. A pipedream. Yet, a pipedream other clubs are capable of making a reality.
 

R'hllor

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
15,419
Nothing against Mata personally, think he is class act in every sense, i just dont wanna see him starting our games, dont mind he is taking wages for nothing, if Jones can why not others.
 

finneh

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
7,318
This was a completely unnecessary extension and no other top club would have done this.

Imagine this - in the summer, we had thanked Mata and shaken his hand and wished him well. Woodward had signed off on allowing Ole to sign a new #10 for around £70-80m.

New signing first choice; Lingard/Pereira/Gomes as backups. With the intention being for the new guy to be The Man who played most games and contributed 10 goals a season.

Like a dream. A pipedream. Yet, a pipedream other clubs are capable of making a reality.
That's the problem unfortunately. The choice wasn't Mata or Eriksen... It was Mata or no-one.

With that choice and with an already threadbare squad it was the common sense (albeit frustrating) decision.
 

Alabaster Codify7

New Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
6,553
Location
Wales
That's the problem unfortunately. The choice wasn't Mata or Eriksen... It was Mata or no-one.

With that choice and with an already threadbare squad it was the common sense (albeit frustrating) decision.

Yep.
It's been said before. Replacing a player is more expensive than extending that player's contract. For a club aiming for league titles and glory, the latter doesnt come into their thinking. But if the club simply wants top 4/CL qualification, extending a player's contract is cheaper and who knows, they might just find that little drop extra and help drag us to 4th. Jones, Mata, Smalling, Young, all these type of players have previously helped us grind out results and finish top 4, a couple of times. It's cheaper to hope they do that again than to replace them.
 

dev1l

Full Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2006
Messages
9,598
I also have the feeling that Mata s extension had to do something with DeGea s new contract, them being close friends. (Herrera, another close friend of him had already left)
 

finneh

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
7,318
Yep.
It's been said before. Replacing a player is more expensive than extending that player's contract. For a club aiming for league titles and glory, the latter doesnt come into their thinking. But if the club simply wants top 4/CL qualification, extending a player's contract is cheaper and who knows, they might just find that little drop extra and help drag us to 4th. Jones, Mata, Smalling, Young, all these type of players have previously helped us grind out results and finish top 4, a couple of times. It's cheaper to hope they do that again than to replace them.
As I said in another thread, after fortunately finishing second we should have invested £150m net in each of the following two summers. Instead we invested £110m total. That £190m difference is a Mata replacement, a Herrera replacement and a right winger.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,492
That's the problem unfortunately. The choice wasn't Mata or Eriksen... It was Mata or no-one.

With that choice and with an already threadbare squad it was the common sense (albeit frustrating) decision.
Id have taken no one and given his squad place to Gomes
 

Alabaster Codify7

New Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
6,553
Location
Wales
As I said in another thread, after fortunately finishing second we should have invested £150m net in each of the following two summers. Instead we invested £110m total. That £190m difference is a Mata replacement, a Herrera replacement and a right winger.

Yep, but that's the logic and approach of a board that are aiming to improve upon what was just achieved by finishing 2nd. Our board aren't interested in that, they are only interested in finishing top 4 and ensuring the season tickets get renewed. We finished second and the tickets were renewed, no need for them to spend much.