Would you sack or keep Ole? (Poll reopened)

Sack or Keep OLE?

  • Sack Ole & appoint new coach ASAP

  • Keep Ole & back him to finish rebuild


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

manunited1919

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
3,580
Yeah, know what you mean. Only thing is that I think a whole bunch of other managers would also look lost here.

I mean, who ffs took a look at this squad at the start and said, yeah it's good enough to go into the season? No words, all together.
More than half the CAF was fully on board with the program. I remember getting called a moaner for insisting we should prioritize our midfield and forwards instead of buying Maguire.
 

Aresma7

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 4, 2014
Messages
166
If we are to start our winning ways again we need to ship out the american owners. I’ll gladly take 12 or 13 in the league if it means we are heading in the right direction. Our three last investments have been sensible, good signings. Not big name players way past their peak.

If we had just scored on those penalties and avoided injury on key players this early in the season it could have been a different story. I don’t think sacking Ole would help before we got a proper suitable candidate ready. But he has to do something about Rashford. And Young...
 

7even

Resident moaner, hypocrite and moron
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
4,218
Location
Lifetime vacation
I feel sorry for him. Nothing works and players regress in front of his eyes. Must be depressing.

Ole will be last one to know when it’s over and that is a little bit sad. He deserves better then this.
 

bonothom

Full Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2014
Messages
843
I think Ole will win the title next season............................Championship title that is.
 

Toad

Full Member
Joined
May 11, 2013
Messages
3,665
Location
England
Managers need time, especially at a very broken club like us. Need to weed out to shit players and freshen up the squad with the right players. It’s a huge task, one that takes extra long with our board and woodie just so distant in terms of the footballing aspect - it’s all business.

BUT - our form at the tail end of last season and start of this is horrid and only getting worse. Ole’s lack of experience at the top level is now a huge worry - with these dull performances and general lack on plan B or even plan A.

We are at best of a top 6 team, but 9 points from 8 is diabolical - Oles words don’t really ease us either. He’s failing miserably, sadly.
He definitely does need time to sort out this shambles, any manager would. The thing I am stuggling with is how naive he was to come into the season with such a shit and weak in-depth squad and seriously think we stand a chance at fighting for even a Europa league spot.

Not replacing Lukaku was a shambles.
Relying on half a dozen youth to try and emulate the past is also just as bad. I know we have a history of youth and that’s what our club is all about but feck me, you can clearly see this lit isn’t going to drag us to the top of the table at this stage of their careers.
 

Kemizee

New Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
649
Location
Lagos, Nigeria
Ain't nobody giving up a multimillion pound pay-off
This * 1,000,000. For all the 'he loves the club more than himself and puts the club first'. This is the freaking reason he is not gonna voluntarily resign. He is not that thick. He loves himself more. What he says is just media propaganda to buy more time.
 

Sir Scott McToMinay

New Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2018
Messages
2,737
Location
Acapulco, Somalia
I think Ole will win the title next season............................Championship title that is.
No chance we’re winning the Championship title with Ole managing us, also players like Fred, Mata, Lindelof, Gomes, Greenwood and Martial would be eaten alive in the Championship, we’ll possibly make the playoffs at best.
 

van Hooijdonk

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 10, 2009
Messages
2,384
Changed my vote to sack. I think it's enough. He is a huge part of this mess and I think it's time to go.
 

jderbyshire

Has anybody seen my fleshlight?
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
4,187
I voted to keep him and this result hasn't changed my mind. Before and during the last transfer window I was consistently saying we needed a bare minimum of six new signings. We got three who've all done well, but its just not enough. Most of this mess is not on Ole. We've been through this three times already and it changes nothing because who is the manager is less important than the overall structure and philosophy, which is set upstairs these days.

I back Ole and I don't see how sacking him would accomplish anything other than another go on this manager-go-around while the real problem remains. Yes we might get a new manager bounce but we should be thinking much larger than that. So my stance is still give Ole more time and more money, then judge the situation further on.
Absolutely agree.
 

fergiesarmy1

New Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2013
Messages
3,595
No chance we’re winning the Championship title with Ole managing us, also players like Fred, Mata, Lindelof, Gomes, Greenwood and Martial would be eaten alive in the Championship, we’ll possibly make the playoffs at best.
Don’t tell the glazers that, they may target the “richest game in football” :lol:
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,290

Aged so well, that line. Or not.

Stand by managers that have proven themselves to be up to the job. Unless they're retiring soon like LVG or blow up all their relationships at the club like Mourinho.
 

Kemizee

New Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
649
Location
Lagos, Nigeria
Still in the keep camp because I don't think sacking him right now would fix anything. At least wait till Christmas? Let's get some of those injured players back in the team?

Anyway ideally I'd like him to move up and we get in a proper coach. Let them handle the football, and let Ole and team deal with recruitment, etc...
Why should we do this?
 

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,648
I voted to keep him and this result hasn't changed my mind. Before and during the last transfer window I was consistently saying we needed a bare minimum of six new signings. We got three who've all done well, but its just not enough. Most of this mess is not on Ole. We've been through this three times already and it changes nothing because who is the manager is less important than the overall structure and philosophy, which is set upstairs these days.

I back Ole and I don't see how sacking him would accomplish anything other than another go on this manager-go-around while the real problem remains. Yes we might get a new manager bounce but we should be thinking much larger than that. So my stance is still give Ole more time and more money, then judge the situation further on.
Clueless like our manager.

He decided to go into the season with this team. He spent 130m on 2 players. Most of the mess this team is on him.
 

decorativeed

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
12,389
Location
Tameside
I genuinely don't know who could come in and turn this shit show around even if we fired Ole. The squad is paper thin and mediocre at best, so it's no surprise we are so poor. We need a new everything to improve.
 

bonothom

Full Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2014
Messages
843
I voted to keep him and this result hasn't changed my mind. Before and during the last transfer window I was consistently saying we needed a bare minimum of six new signings. We got three who've all done well, but its just not enough. Most of this mess is not on Ole. We've been through this three times already and it changes nothing because who is the manager is less important than the overall structure and philosophy, which is set upstairs these days.

I back Ole and I don't see how sacking him would accomplish anything other than another go on this manager-go-around while the real problem remains. Yes we might get a new manager bounce but we should be thinking much larger than that. So my stance is still give Ole more time and more money, then judge the situation further on.
Will you still be backing him when we are in the bottom 3 at Xmas. The last 16 League games United have 17 points, 1 more point than Southampton and 1 less than Newcastle.
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,532
Go back 12 months and I'm sure we had threads saying this was a title challenging team. How times change.
 

ManchesterYoda

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2016
Messages
747
He definitely does need time to sort out this shambles, any manager would. The thing I am stuggling with is how naive he was to come into the season with such a shit and weak in-depth squad and seriously think we stand a chance at fighting for even a Europa league spot.

Not replacing Lukaku was a shambles.
Relying on half a dozen youth to try and emulate the past is also just as bad. I know we have a history of youth and that’s what our club is all about but feck me, you can clearly see this lit isn’t going to drag us to the top of the table at this stage of their careers.
Solskjaer created this shambles. His coaching is rubbish. His tactics are rubbish. His team selections are rubbish.
Fans praise his 3 transfer signings but they were the wrong signings. If we were only signing 3 players, we should have signed TWO left footed right side attacking players and a midfielder because that was our PRIORITY. We are stacked on the left side of attack, CB and RB. Instead of signing TWO attackers for the right he signed ANOTHER left sided attacker. WHY? Maguire and Wan-Bissaka are good additions long term. I don't feel the same about Daniel James. I think he is a bad signing, not just because he isn't very good but because we didn't need ANOTHER left sided attacker, we needed TWO right sided attackers. The reason we need TWO is because we don't even have one.
The mistake we made signing Daniel James is the exact same mistake we made when we signed Sanchez. Why do we keep buying the wrong players? I don't understand how people can be so stupid. WE NEED SOMEONE TO PLAY ON THE RIGHT! How is it that there are so many fans that don't see it?
Every attacking player we have IS SHIT PLAYING ON THE RIGHT yet people still say "put Rashford on he right, put James on the right". Solskjaer is OBSESSED with playing Pereira on the right. Why?
When the new manager comes in, whenever that is, if the FIRST signing they make is a left footed right side attacker, I will KNOW there's a very good chance we've finally got the right manager.
I've been saying this over and over and over since Moyes was manager. It's beyond depressing. What makes it worse is that recently Liverpool have been playing a perfectly balanced front 3 which makes their attack as effective as it can possibly be. STILL so many United fans just don't see it. They don't understand why balance is important. They don't understand that a team can NEVER play to it's full potential if it is unbalanced.
 

Alemar

Full Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2017
Messages
7,617
STILL so many United fans just don't see it. They don't understand why balance is important. They don't understand that a team can NEVER play to it's full potential if it is unbalanced.
They do understand. But how can we (United fans) influence transfers?
 

Irwin99

Full Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2018
Messages
9,365
I voted to keep him and this result hasn't changed my mind. Before and during the last transfer window I was consistently saying we needed a bare minimum of six new signings. We got three who've all done well, but its just not enough. Most of this mess is not on Ole. We've been through this three times already and it changes nothing because who is the manager is less important than the overall structure and philosophy, which is set upstairs these days.

I back Ole and I don't see how sacking him would accomplish anything other than another go on this manager-go-around while the real problem remains. Yes we might get a new manager bounce but we should be thinking much larger than that. So my stance is still give Ole more time and more money, then judge the situation further on.
This is the biggest issue I have as I think the club is rotten in terms of structure, owners and hierarchy, BUT if Ole was genuinely happy with this squad at the start of the season and that it was mostly his decision not to add one or two stop gap signings then I think you do have to question his judgement. The emphasis he's put on the young players to help this team get Top 4 has been counter productive and extremely unfair. Yes Greenwood has got the odd goal and he's a really exciting player but he often looks lost out there and we're sending him on to grab a goal in a premier league match. The same with Chong. Some of the young lads clearly aren't ready and to throw them into this mess is not right. Ole said in the summer that adding another striker would halt Greenwood's progress and now it seems he admits that we need to get someone in January. That's a big error in judgement.
 

CR1

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 18, 2019
Messages
125
Clueless like our manager.

He decided to go into the season with this team. He spent 130m on 2 players. Most of the mess this team is on him.
I guess that you were against his appointment then? And that you didn't ever sing "Ole's at the wheel.." believing in him as the manager because he gave minutes to the Academy players and played the United way for as long as the squad at his disposal allowed it?

Otherwise your accusation could be leveled at yourself.

And how do you know what team he decided to go into the season with? What choice did he have? How do you know he didn't have a whole list of players that was turned downed by the money men?

"Most of the mess this team is on him"

He's signed three of those players (who've all done well btw) so that's hardly correct.
 
Last edited:

CR1

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 18, 2019
Messages
125
Will you still be backing him when we are in the bottom 3 at Xmas. The last 16 League games United have 17 points, 1 more point than Southampton and 1 less than Newcastle.
No, if we keep loosing it will become untenable and I'll be forced to change my stance. But I prefer to stick with Ole even if we're solid mid-table and then make the decision further on when:

A. We've had more time to evaluate the situation
B. More prospective managers will be available

Even if we were to get a new interim manager in - who would make the decision on who to sign in Jan? Woodward? No thanks. I much prefer Ole making that call, on account of his transfer record so far. So if Ole can stay on throughout the season that would be best I think. But we'll see.
 

TMDaines

Fun sponge.
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
13,997
Sticking with Ole at this point is like sticking with Roy Carroll because switching keepers post-Schmeichel clearly hadn’t worked so far at that point so time must surely be the solution. You don’t give incompetence more time than necessary once it has shown itself.
 

peridigm

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
13,866
I voted to keep him and this result hasn't changed my mind. Before and during the last transfer window I was consistently saying we needed a bare minimum of six new signings. We got three who've all done well, but its just not enough. Most of this mess is not on Ole. We've been through this three times already and it changes nothing because who is the manager is less important than the overall structure and philosophy, which is set upstairs these days.

I back Ole and I don't see how sacking him would accomplish anything other than another go on this manager-go-around while the real problem remains. Yes we might get a new manager bounce but we should be thinking much larger than that. So my stance is still give Ole more time and more money, then judge the situation further on.
I agree 100% but... I'm starting to ask myself does Ole have the football brain to rebuild this squad. We signed two great defenders last window. I don't know if they were Ole's first choice but by all accounts it would appear so. James was not signed to be a starter week in/week out but has found himself in that position due to injuries.

Let's look at his decision to move Axel to RB and play Rojo at CB. We all know Rojo is a liability when he plays, so why play him in very important position in a game as close as it was? It's incomprehensible.
What is our style of play? I'm just a forum junky so it's no surprise I can't see what he is trying to accomplish with these players but you have pundits who eat, sleep, and shit football every day and they have no idea either.
Back Ole in January seems to be the popular answer. There is no disputing we need to strengthen the squad in many areas. We're weak in just about every position on the pitch barring defense. January is not a window to buy 5 or 6 players. We might sign a striker, that much is obvious but I doubt we'll sign a right sided attacking player or central midfielder.

The problem is if he's given more time and not backed, it's just biding time until the inevitable happens and the owners will be happy they didn't spend money in January. It's just so hard to see them backing him in January or next summer when he's not showing any signs of progress. We're regressing. We have a squad of individuals that are not displaying any signs of playing tactical football. It's a lot of running around chasing after the ball, some interlinking play, but for the most part, its kick and run. Is that what Ole is coaching? Kick and run football? I seriously doubt it but you have to wonder since these players have all shown they can play to a higher standard.

I'm still in the keep Ole camp but if we don't start picking up points in the next 4-6 weeks and show progress then he needs to go. I just don't see the point in sacking him now just to bring in another caretaker until the end of the season.
 

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,648
I guess that you were against his appointment then? And that you didn't ever sing "Ole's at the wheel.." believing in him as the manager because he gave minutes to the Academy players and played the United way for as long as the squad at his disposal allowed it?

Otherwise your accusation could be leveled at yourself.

And how do you know what team he decided to go into the season with? What choice did he have? How do you know he didn't have a whole list of players that was turned downed by the money men?

"Most of the mess this team is on him"

He's signed three of those players (who've all done well btw) so that's hardly correct.
Yes I was. Right from the off it was clear he wasn't someone we should make in charge for our rebuild.

How do I know?

From what HE said during interviews. Didn't he say he was happy with the squad on more than once? Didn't he say he will give young players a chance and they were ready? Didn't he say we chose not to go for a forward because he wasn't the 'right type'?

He has signed three players and didn't address midfield and attack. We lost many senior players that he oversaw going on loan or selling without replacing. So, yes most of the mess is on him. And will take a while for the next one in line to fix his mess.
 

Devil may care

New Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
35,976
We'd all like the Glazers gone but that isn't easily achieved, but Woodward has to be removed from his position for things to improve. That being said this squad is poor but there is no excuse for how bad we are but the coahing, I love Ole but he looks miles out of his depth, outcoached by fecking Brucie, there is absolutely no style of play or system, we have a team of strangers and that is on Ole, this is a side that's barely good enough for top 6, but if we keep Ole much longer we'll be bottom 6 and free falling.
 

passing-wind

Full Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2013
Messages
3,041
I voted to keep him and this result hasn't changed my mind. Before and during the last transfer window I was consistently saying we needed a bare minimum of six new signings. We got three who've all done well, but its just not enough. Most of this mess is not on Ole. We've been through this three times already and it changes nothing because who is the manager is less important than the overall structure and philosophy, which is set upstairs these days.

I back Ole and I don't see how sacking him would accomplish anything other than another go on this manager-go-around while the real problem remains. Yes we might get a new manager bounce but we should be thinking much larger than that. So my stance is still give Ole more time and more money, then judge the situation further on.
I surely do wonder what you must see in Ole to back him. This isn't Klopp who has many credentials even beyond trophies to be given time. Backing Solskjaer is like putting Steve Bruce in charge and "hoping for the best". The fact that the only thing Ole has going for him is "hope" just shows how much of a pathetic manager he has become. Get rid
 

Isotope

Ten Years a Cafite
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
23,622
The problem with Ole is, he doesn't have credential to afford us believe he can turn things better. He's been in charge since March with one of the worst United managerial record to this time. He's had ample of time to improve players, system, and even the squad with 150m to spend.
 

In Rainbows

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
6,759
Even if Ole spent it on midfield and attack, the excuse would be "you need a solid base to be able to attack." That was the excuse for Mourinho. There's always an excuse for these "back the manager" types. I'm sick of it.
 

Tarrou

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
25,635
Location
Sydney
I'm still in the keep camp because there are no obvious alternatives. However, if Poch becomes available and we haven't improved by then - I'd go for him
 

ryansgirl

Full Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2001
Messages
2,914
Location
where the sun rises
0-1 away at Newcastle is hardly anything to go into apocalypse mode despite the below par play. United have shored up at the back despite conceding an unnecessary goal - if we were getting thumped regularly as in 0-2 or 0-3 that would be different. Ole knows he will struggle with this squad and current situation. To pretend that the dross brought in for ridiculous money under Mourinho for example is not affecting the current situation is unfair.

The midfield and attack are the obvious problems plus lack of coherence in the team overall. The quality of the squad and not enough cover for injuries of course. However, look at the fundamentals - United need to get coaching staff that will come in, identify exactly what's wrong and be less chummy, bringing in a colder eye and zero enabling of whatever it is that is being enabled and dragging the squad down.

New players and new coaching staff - preferably from Europe, thanks. The biggest problem is how we will get the likes of Sancho etc to join with the current set-up and situation.

I like Michael Carrick but I cannot see what he has done at any time to be a member of United's coaching staff.
 

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,648
I'm still in the keep camp because there are no obvious alternatives. However, if Poch becomes available and we haven't improved by then - I'd go for him
Not involved in the relegation battle is a good alternative. Because Ole at the wheel is going to drive us there.
 

Tarrou

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
25,635
Location
Sydney
Not involved in the relegation battle is a good alternative. Because Ole at the wheel is going to drive us there.
I don't think so but..

there is no guarantee a new manager doesn't increase the chances of that. Making a change has downside risk as well.

Who would you put in charge?
 

Amerifan

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
986
I'm still in the keep camp because there are no obvious alternatives. However, if Poch becomes available and we haven't improved by then - I'd go for him
This is where I am. Sacking Ole and having Phelan or Carrick take over for the rest of the season will only make things worse. Despite his bad run, I’d change my vote for Poch if he was genuinely excited by the challenge.
 

ryansgirl

Full Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2001
Messages
2,914
Location
where the sun rises
I'm still in the keep camp because there are no obvious alternatives. However, if Poch becomes available and we haven't improved by then - I'd go for him
Ooh, yes please, Spurs were just taken out by a Bayern team that didn't just beat them 3-0 - they put 7 goals past them.

There is unrest at Spurs around Pochettino - do you think importing that here is going to bring any improvement? No silverware - I repeat, no silverware. Oh, he knows how to build teams! He certainly has deteriorated in that respect at Spurs over some months.

Ole as a Director of Football and Allegri/Eddie Howe actually make sense although Howe is a real outlier in terms of being appointed as Manager of Manchester United.
 

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,648
I don't think so but..

there is no guarantee a new manager doesn't increase the chances of that. Making a change has downside risk as well.

Who would you put in charge?
I'm pretty sure any senior manager out there can be able to post better results than 20% win rate in like 6 months or so.

Every day you have someone who is absolutely impotent at coaching those players is detrimental in the long run.
 

ryansgirl

Full Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2001
Messages
2,914
Location
where the sun rises
This is where I am. Sacking Ole and having Phelan or Carrick take over for the rest of the season will only make things worse. Despite his bad run, I’d change my vote for Poch if he was genuinely excited by the challenge.
What - the challenge of actually winning something? No thanks, I don't want our club to be the experiment to see if Pochettino can actually have real success with a club as in titles and trophies.
 

Un4givableB

Full Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2013
Messages
1,687
I'm still in the keep camp because there are no obvious alternatives. However, if Poch becomes available and we haven't improved by then - I'd go for him
Any real top class manager who isn't in a job is an obvious alternative.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.