Am I going crazy or did you say this yesterday too?
2020 US Elections | Biden certified as President | Dems control Congress
- Thread starter Raoul
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) was joined by comedian Ali Woods to look back at the best and worst moments of a rollercoaster season with the annual United Hour Awards.
Has Ten Hag been sacked yet? We're not sure and we hope not, but it's looking more likely as the days pass.
Who should replace him and why is it taking so long to make a decision?
- Status
I wouldn't say its a panic, but there is a growing sentiment that none of the current field would beat Trump the way an Obama like figure (or similar) would have beaten him. The Dems are still looking for that person with the election less than a year away, which is increasingly complicated by the fact that Dems are more factionalized now than in recent memory.
To be clear, that growing sentiment is to be found among big donors, not Democratic voters in general. Voters are about as happy with their choice of candidates as they've ever been.
I read the post you linked.
It seems most are not too happy with Obama's intervention.
The voters are tired of the same ol stuff.
They want what Bernie and Warren are saying.
But you cannot do that and please the corporations.
That is what this is about.
nonsense.
I'm sure Sanders fans are happy. Beyond that, the rest of the Democratic Party (as in the majority of Dems) don't seem particularly elated about having identified "The One" this cycle.
If the voters want what Bernie and Warren are saying, then Bernie or Warren will be the candidate. If they're not, it's because the majority of the voters didn't want what they were saying. The jury is out on that one.
He did.
What a lovely poem.
The corporate candidates get a lot more favourable air time.
Also there are a lot of independent voters up for grab.
the best you can do?
That’s got nothing to do with what @nimic said
I interpret this as they are happy with the amount of candidate choices, not they are happy with having identified the one person they think can beat Trump. The verdict is definitely still out on the latter.
What does that have to do with Democratic voters being or not being happy with their choices?
The liberal media does not go out to find fault with corporate candidates.
Free air time for them.
There's no question in my mind that none of the current candidates have managed anything like the momentum Obama had going in 2007. He was a once in a life time candidate (at least in a short life time like mine up to now). The closest is Bernie with his supporters, but Obama didn't have nearly as many detractors within the dems as Bernie has. (I say all this despite being critical of him now)
But then it doesn't need Obama to beat Trump. Worth remembering even the non-charismatic Hillary only just about lost against him too. It really shouldn't be rocket science to beat him whoever the candidate will be.
But then it doesn't need Obama to beat Trump. Worth remembering even the non-charismatic Hillary only just about lost against him too. It really shouldn't be rocket science to beat him whoever the candidate will be.
Here’s the PEW data the graph is based on...
https://www.people-press.org/2019/0...20-field-better-than-in-2016-similar-to-2008/
https://www.people-press.org/2019/0...20-field-better-than-in-2016-similar-to-2008/
Which wouldn't be addressed unless the Dems find "the one" who can beat Trump and actually implement policies.
Again, what's your point? I didn't say that Democratic voters should be satisfied with their candidates, but that they are. Which they are. You called that nonsense, so I assumed you had something to say about it (and not whether or not the liberal media gives more air time to the corporate dems).
You would think so, but the Dems are fractured and factionalized at the moment, which is precisely the sort of thing that Trump is relying on for next November - one of two angry Dem factions who are sulking about not having their candidate become the nominee, and as a result staying home to pout about it.
Last edited:
Absolutely agree, if either half of the democrats starts sulking Trump won't even have to put up a fight. I'm just hoping 3 years (4 years then) of Trump will have been enough to concentrate minds on both sides. Might just be wishful thinking on my side.
No love for Tiffany and Barron ?
When you say 'the one' you are being sarcastic. Come on.
I understand where you are coming from about needing to beat Trump.
We had two popular presidents who did nothing for what people need.
Clinton in fact hurt them.
Trump is the personification of peoples hate.
People hate because they do not see a future for themselves and worse their children.
We can get them back by offering real policies.
Health care would be a start.
But that wont happen if we buy into what you usually say.
Cannot get policies through the Senate.
Moderates will not vote even if Dems control Congress.
Things can only change through a Peoples Revolution.
Don't blame people who wont turn up again for another Corporate candidate.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
that FDR video was brilliant.
This is a pretty good ad for Warren and Pete.
You are not helping Warren.
She doesn't require much help. To the average person who is content with what they have, this sort of thing is likely to resonate.
True. To the many who are suffering....and dying when they don't need to it does nothing.
Why many will not vote or vote for Trump.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/blac...uted-their-support_n_5dd188aae4b0d2e79f8eb357
Black South Carolinians Say Buttigieg Campaign Misleadingly Touted Their Support
A number of Black officials in South Carolina said their support for Mayor Pete Buttigieg’s presidential campaign has been overstated or misstated completely.
State Rep. Thigpen, who identified himself as a state co-chair for the Bernie Sanders 2020 campaign, said he was alarmed when the Buttigieg campaign press release listed him as an endorser.
“I thought I made it clear to them that I was a strong Bernie Sanders supporter — actually co-chair of the state, and I was not seeking to endorse their candidate or the plan,” Thigpen told The Intercept.
Thigpen said the Buttigieg campaign listed him as a supporter without his permission after he told them he might agree to giving them a simple quote of support for continuing the conversation about racial inequality.
Black South Carolinians Say Buttigieg Campaign Misleadingly Touted Their Support
A number of Black officials in South Carolina said their support for Mayor Pete Buttigieg’s presidential campaign has been overstated or misstated completely.
State Rep. Thigpen, who identified himself as a state co-chair for the Bernie Sanders 2020 campaign, said he was alarmed when the Buttigieg campaign press release listed him as an endorser.
“I thought I made it clear to them that I was a strong Bernie Sanders supporter — actually co-chair of the state, and I was not seeking to endorse their candidate or the plan,” Thigpen told The Intercept.
Thigpen said the Buttigieg campaign listed him as a supporter without his permission after he told them he might agree to giving them a simple quote of support for continuing the conversation about racial inequality.
There was definitely similar stuff about the Obamas posted. It was stupid then too. Though at least the Obamas are educated
Not to mention we’ve got stuff like this trending on social media...
'Stick it to the lips'.
Lips heads exploding
I wouldn’t mind but they’ve written liberals with a B right there in the same post
I was confused myself, but then I remembered either a Russian or Trump supporter made it, and it made sense.
- Status