sullydnl
Ross Kemp's caf ID
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2012
- Messages
- 34,063
Not moving early enough on these measures is a huge concern.Okay thought so. Yeah, I guess the more you let it spread the bigger/longer lockdown you need to control it. I reckon if at the initial outbreak, China and the govts had acted pro-actively they wouldn't have to take measures as severe as they've had to now (China have now been in lockdown for over a month IIRC).
For example, banning all flights from China at the end of January. Or if China themselves went into lockdown just a week earlier. But we're still delaying it, and i think the crash is going to be even more severe.
*By China i mean the province at the epicenter
Though the other concern being expressed (which is particularly disputed in this thread) is that implementing severe measure too early will also carry risk precisely because they are so unsustainable. If extremely difficult measures are implemented early and then inevitably come to an end, what's the plan afterwards? Especially if the virus is just hitting its peak elsewhere at that point? The Deputy Chief Medical Officer today warned of the dangers of secondary peaks of the illness. One can only imagine how difficult it would be to return to the harshest measures for a second time when the population is only just recovering from the first bout.