That was a few weeks back mate. Unless he’s been reinfected?Tom Hanks now too
That was a few weeks back mate. Unless he’s been reinfected?Tom Hanks now too
Their advice to just wash your hands kinda backfired.Which is why they'll all be routinely tested to reduce the risk of taking down everyone at once.
The posts saying Boris needs testing because he's too important are just as ridiculous as those saying he doesn't.
Supposed to be a number of cases in Wuhan, China too.Tom Hanks now too
Sheffield stuck out for me as a wierd result, whether they're testing more or they have a more local outbreak is stirring the curiosity.Cheers pal.
It’s everywhere in fairness and will only increase by the bucket load daily I’d imagine, when you consider how fast it moved from a market in China to the entire globe.
I hope he dies. I very much doubt he will but I think it would be a wake up call for the world. I'm also wary of how a PM who has already shown a reckless attitude to the pandemic would behave if he himself were to be immune.The amount of people replying to Boris' tweet saying they hope he dies...some of them 15/16 year olds. He's a bellend but shame on you.
Down to inches ?Find that interesting. They say anonymised but if you can identify someone through trends in the anonymised data alongside other data sets then it isn't under EU law.
I wonder how specific they can track these.
He’s followed the scientific advice and you hope he dies for it? Erm... ok.I hope he dies. I very much doubt he will but I think it would be a wake up call for the world. I'm also wary of how a PM who has already shown a reckless attitude to the pandemic would behave if he himself were to be immune.
Damn.I hope he dies. I very much doubt he will but I think it would be a wake up call for the world. I'm also wary of how a PM who has already shown a reckless attitude to the pandemic would behave if he himself were to be immune.
Heard Italy has a few infected.Supposed to be a number of cases in Wuhan, China too.
If I truly thought he could be trusted to follow scientific majority views, which he has dismissed previously, I would be praying for him.He’s followed the scientific advice and you hope he dies for it? Erm... ok.
Surely it must be due to more testing that?Sheffield stuck out for me as a wierd result, whether they're testing more or they have a more local outbreak is stirring the curiosity.
Mental post.If I truly thought he could be trusted to follow scientific majority views, which he has dismissed previously, I would be praying for him.
Oh well saidAt entertaining idiocy?
Terrible thing to say about him, isn’t it..Damn.
Supposed to be a number of cases in Wuhan, China too.
To be fair it matches to praying to Asclepius.Mental post.
If the mods decide that's not a thing we can say, I'll take the hit.Damn.
Supposed to be a number of cases in Wuhan, China too.
Just found an article & their director of health is attributing it down to rigorous testing - seems like they're on the front foot & others trusts should take note.Surely it must be due to more testing that?
Yeah, but when you figure down from total beds to acute care beds the UK resolves into a single dubious datapoint from 2017. I think that's because someone changed the definitions in 2010 so it's now difficult to ascertain the true numbers. A better source for the relative distribution of hospital beds over time is presented here. It's sufficiently clear from the figures that both governments reduced general and acute care beds, but it's certainly not the case that the 2000's government reduced them at a faster rate. I'm not really pointing fingers though, most advanced healthcare systems have being trying to make as much healthcare external to hospitals as they can.The data from 2010 does not separate general from acute, and the data before is not adjusted for population.
If you fiddle around with the graph here you can see acute beds per capita adjusted for a lot of countries. The UK does not stand out as governments change or compared to its neighbours - the only one that does is Korea.
https://data.oecd.org/healtheqt/hospital-beds.htm
Supposed to be a number of cases in Wuhan, China too.
Ah, well that would do it. No doubt also proof that it’s more widespread than the entire negative numbers show.Just found an article & their director of health is attributing it down to rigorous testing - seems like they're on the front foot & others trusts should take note.
He didn't. The chief medical officer recommended it.Why did Borris feel the need to test himself if he had mild symptoms? There are doctors Pharmacists and nurses who aren't tested and this bellend needs a test from mild symptoms?
Pretty understandably, given the CMO had to see him regularly before this.He didn't. The chief medical officer recommended it.
Oh no DOTA, please don't talk like that I....I hope he dies. I very much doubt he will but I think it would be a wake up call for the world. I'm also wary of how a PM who has already shown a reckless attitude to the pandemic would behave if he himself were to be immune.
Should be banned for that.I hope he dies. I very much doubt he will but I think it would be a wake up call for the world. I'm also wary of how a PM who has already shown a reckless attitude to the pandemic would behave if he himself were to be immune.
I got a warning for suggesting the De Gea would benefit from any enforced rest due to injury. Think this might be going a lot further.I hope he dies. I very much doubt he will but I think it would be a wake up call for the world. I'm also wary of how a PM who has already shown a reckless attitude to the pandemic would behave if he himself were to be immune.
Rutland got it good so far.https://covidlive.co.uk/ might work
I'm following quite closely. Do you think America has woken up to the reality of this yet?Should be banned for that.
And what do you mean 'it would be a wake up call for the world'? Have you not looked out of your window or turned a TV on in the last month?
We have a very good virology dept so don't know if that's encouraging more tests but also, a Uni lecturer tested positive early on which could have caused quite a spread.Sheffield stuck out for me as a wierd result, whether they're testing more or they have a more local outbreak is stirring the curiosity.
I hope things like this do:I'm following quite closely. Do you think America has woken up to the reality of this yet?
No...I'm following quite closely. Do you think America has woken up to the reality of this yet?
I wasn't really looking to debate whether one government has done better than the other. Simply refuting the suggestion that had Corbyn and Labour been voted in everything would automatically be rosy now.Yeah, but when you figure down from total beds to acute care beds the UK resolves into a single dubious datapoint from 2017. I think that's because someone changed the definitions in 2010 so it's now difficult to ascertain the true numbers. A better source for the relative distribution of hospital beds over time is presented here. It's sufficiently clear from the figures that both governments reduced general and acute care beds, but it's certainly not the case that the 2000's government reduced them at a faster rate. I'm not really pointing fingers though, most advanced healthcare systems have being trying to make as much healthcare external to hospitals as they can.
Two areas that post 2010 governments have done better in is in expanding critical and social care bed numbers.
You know that's nowhere near the whole story though. You know the fecking president is talking about getting people back to work very soon.No...
oh wait:
I hope he dies. I very much doubt he will but I think it would be a wake up call for the world. I'm also wary of how a PM who has already shown a reckless attitude to the pandemic would behave if he himself were to be immune.
What the feck is your problem mate?Ok, the PM got tested. Fine. Not a problem with that. But the majority of the spanners on this thread seem to be ignoring the main component of the annoyance behind most of the comments which is that front line NHS staff can't get the tests.
Or have we gone back to ignoring the NHS after clapping outside our houses for a minute last night?
Grumble grumble
There are firm rules about player discussion and no such rules about other people.I got a warning for suggesting the De Gea would benefit from any enforced rest due to injury. Think this might be going a lot further.