g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });

Protests following the killing of George Floyd

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
66,337
Location
France
It's originally not relevant, because "police brutality" and "racism" are two different issues. But now it seems people like to mix them up so it somehow becomes relevant?
So you are suggesting that under all circumstances two issues can't be linked?
 

syrian_scholes

Honorary Straw Hat
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Messages
14,004
Location
Houston

:)

It seems Houston had a huge turnout without much of the problems last night. (Despite the problematic past of it's vocal police chief). I feel it's important to highlight these too now that it's happening everywhere. If we only focus on terrible stuff from both sides we lose sight of what we're talking about.
60k according to local news media.
 

hmchan

Full Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2017
Messages
1,429
Location
Hong Kong
Surely the two things are intertwined, you’d have to be an idiot not to see that.
You can have "police brutality" without "racism", while you can also have "racism" without "police brutality", so how are they intertwined?
 

Ekkie Thump

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2013
Messages
3,893
Supports
Leeds United
You can have "police brutality" without "racism", while you can also have "racism" without "police brutality", so how are they intertwined?
You can also have "police brutality" with "racism". This is when they are intertwined.
 

Fingeredmouse

Full Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2014
Messages
5,659
Location
Glasgow
You can have "police brutality" without "racism", while you can also have "racism" without "police brutality", so how are they intertwined?
Is your mind always this discontinuous or just when your choosing to be pointlessly pedantic? Enjoy your derailment enterprises.
 

F-Red

Full Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2008
Messages
10,962
Location
Cheshire
You can have "police brutality" without "racism", while you can also have "racism" without "police brutality", so how are they intertwined?
Broadly the two are consistently and mutually associated.
 

hmchan

Full Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2017
Messages
1,429
Location
Hong Kong
You can also have "police brutality" with "racism". This is when they are intertwined.
I never deny the possibility of "police brutality" with "racism", but I see little to no evidence supporting this theory in this Floyd tragedy.

When an already-subdued white man in Dallas is killed, it’s police brutality; when a black man in Minnesota is killed in an identical manner, it’s racism.
 

Grinner

Not fat gutted. Hirsuteness of shoulders TBD.
Staff
Joined
May 5, 2003
Messages
72,287
Location
I love free dirt and rocks!
Supports
Arsenal
I never deny the possibility of "police brutality" with "racism", but I see little to no evidence supporting this theory in this Floyd tragedy.

When an already-subdued white man in Dallas is killed, it’s police brutality; when a black man in Minnesota is killed in an identical manner, it’s racism.
Tell me how you see the Floyd arrest by laying out the facts as you know them. I'm not sure that you know enough about the case and policing in the USA to make such a claim so I'd like for you to prove me wrong.
 

Fingeredmouse

Full Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2014
Messages
5,659
Location
Glasgow
I never deny the possibility of "police brutality" with "racism", but I see little to no evidence supporting this theory in this Floyd tragedy.

When an already-subdued white man in Dallas is killed, it’s police brutality; when a black man in Minnesota is killed in an identical manner, it’s racism.
Leaving aside the obvious balance of probabilities, the context and history and the overwhelming statistics does it actually fecking matter what the precise motivation of an individual in a single case is? Why are you obsessed with categorisation of motivation? You're either a fecking pedant who feels a desperate need to win some point that matters only to them regarding categorisation semantics or you're attempting to undermine the perception of racism and police treatment of black people in the US (and, indeed, other countries).
If you genuinely wanted to make a point about police treatment of suspects, underclasses, criminals and general brutality it does seem that you've chosen an odd way to achieve that aim. Whether the individual act was, in of itself, motivated by racism or not is utterly irrelevant when the plight of black people in the US to be exposed to Police brutality is an inherent by product of systematic racism in the first place.
 

Deery

Dreary
Joined
May 21, 2019
Messages
18,590
I never deny the possibility of "police brutality" with "racism", but I see little to no evidence supporting this theory in this Floyd tragedy.

When an already-subdued white man in Dallas is killed, it’s police brutality; when a black man in Minnesota is killed in an identical manner, it’s racism.
When there is years, upon years, upon years of institutionalised racism within the police force and hundreds upon hundreds of black murders at the hands of the police, you cannot compare that to the death of one man in Dallas.
Albeit both involved police brutality only one can be judged as racist because the system has promoted racism for years.

Not taking anything away from the man in Dallas as he didn’t deserve to die either, but there is no overlooking the fact racism is rife within the police force.
 

Denis' cuff

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2007
Messages
7,774
Location
here
Leaving aside the obvious balance of probabilities, the context and history and the overwhelming statistics does it actually fecking matter what the precise motivation of an individual in a single case is? Why are you obsessed with categorisation of motivation? You're either a fecking pedant who feels a desperate need to win some point that matters only to them regarding categorisation semantics or you're attempting to undermine the perception of racism and police treatment of black people in the US (and, indeed, other countries).
If you genuinely wanted to make a point about police treatment of suspects, underclasses, criminals and general brutality it does seem that you've chosen an odd way to achieve that aim. Whether the individual act was, in of itself, motivated by racism or not is utterly irrelevant when the plight of black people in the US to be exposed to Police brutality is an inherent by product of systematic racism in the first place.
postage.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,616
Location
Hollywood CA
It's originally not relevant, because "police brutality" and "racism" are two different issues. But now it seems people like to mix them up so it somehow becomes relevant?
They are two separate issues, but that doesn't mean they don't frequently intersect and wind up as one in the same.
 

Andycoleno9

matchday malcontent
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
29,276
Location
Croatia
Yes, we simply don’t know. “Maybe they did try CPR” you say? It’s not an entree, you don’t just “try” CPR. You administer it until the emergency services arrive - you do not stop even one second sooner. How did it not strike you as odd that the man filmed a relatively long clip of another man dying rather than putting down the camera and rendering aid? I don’t particularly care to be honest, but I don’t see why you find our reactions so questionable.
This. And certainly is not normal to film 2 minute video near dead body. Awful.
I am not Poirot but based on the body position nobody didn't try anything.
 

blue blue

Full Member
Joined
May 23, 2016
Messages
1,144
Supports
chelsea
I am not sure they would even blame their Donald. Its everyone else that is at fault. Its a witch-hunt dont you know!
They may not blame him at the moment but there is much scope for that to change. If he doesn't complete a good trade deal with China there will be some whos jobs will be threatened by Chinese imports. If he does get a good deal he is trading with those people who caused the "Chinese virus".

In the next 3-4 months the US economy is just about fit to tank. They have taken on huge levels of debt to pay the unemployed and are looking to take on more. The whole world is in for the worst recession since the 30's and his working class supporters are the ones who are going to feel it most.

I know I don't have my finger on the USA pulse but real hardship will change a lot of opinion.
 

hmchan

Full Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2017
Messages
1,429
Location
Hong Kong
Tell me how you see the Floyd arrest by laying out the facts as you know them. I'm not sure that you know enough about the case and policing in the USA to make such a claim so I'd like for you to prove me wrong.
I've got to admit I don't know very much about the Floyd arrest. I only understand that he was arrested for using a counterfeit bill and knelt to death despite he was subdued, as shown from the footage. I'm unaware of any history of Chauvin being a racist, nor he had racially discriminated Floyd during the murder. So maybe you could fill the gap in for me and convince me in the other way, how this case is linked to racism more than police brutality except that the victim happens to be a black man?

As for policing in the US, I'm aware that black Americans are 2.5x more likely to be killed by cops than white Americans, and I've explained this phenomenon in my previous posts already. Meanwhile, black people are also treated unfairly by the cops in many ways, for example they are more frequently pulled over and searched, they are treated less respectfully etc. These are classic examples of racism, not the death of Floyd with all due respect.
 

jungledrums

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2014
Messages
2,674
I wouldn't bother engaging in that derailment any further.

This just seems like wilful ignorance or trolling at this stage.
I don’t get that sense from him at all, even though I think he’s simplifying the matter. He seems like a curious guy trying to make sense of all this. Do you actually get the sense he’s trolling?
 

RedDevil@84

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2014
Messages
21,787
Location
USA
I believe that the main root of the problem is the number of guns. Without addressing it, the problem won't be solved. Even if the police become less violent and less racist, a shitload of lives will be lost purely cause of guns in the US. So while I am happy about the protests that try to address the problem of police racism, and police brutality, I feel that they are relatively small parts of the bigger problem.
This discussion has been done to death. There is no way Americans will select not to have guns. We have heard the arguments and replies a thousand times. A good number of Americans grow up to believe guns are a necessity like just anything else in the world. Guess if you are tuned to look at things in one way, it gets difficult to think in any other way.
 

Carolina Red

Moderator
Staff
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
36,580
Location
South Carolina
“The scenes have been disturbingly familiar to CIA analysts accustomed to monitoring scenes of societal unraveling abroad — the massing of protesters, the ensuing crackdowns and the awkwardly staged displays of strength by a leader determined to project authority.

In interviews and posts on social media in recent days, current and former U.S. intelligence officials have expressed dismay at the similarity between events at home and the signs of decline or democratic regression they were trained to detect in other nations.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...b210b8-a4f6-11ea-bb20-ebf0921f3bbd_story.html
 

F-Red

Full Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2008
Messages
10,962
Location
Cheshire
I've got to admit I don't know very much about the Floyd arrest. I only understand that he was arrested for using a counterfeit bill and knelt to death despite he was subdued, as shown from the footage. I'm unaware of any history of Chauvin being a racist, nor he had racially discriminated Floyd during the murder. So maybe you could fill the gap in for me and convince me in the other way, how this case is linked to racism more than police brutality except that the victim happens to be a black man?

As for policing in the US, I'm aware that black Americans are 2.5x more likely to be killed by cops than white Americans, and I've explained this phenomenon in my previous posts already. Meanwhile, black people are also treated unfairly by the cops in many ways, for example they are more frequently pulled over and searched, they are treated less respectfully etc. These are classic examples of racism, not the death of Floyd with all due respect.
I think you've answered your own question. Who has a gun pulled out on them for a forged bank note? Racial profiling in full effect.
 

RedC

Full Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2011
Messages
5,671
“The scenes have been disturbingly familiar to CIA analysts accustomed to monitoring scenes of societal unraveling abroad — the massing of protesters, the ensuing crackdowns and the awkwardly staged displays of strength by a leader determined to project authority.

In interviews and posts on social media in recent days, current and former U.S. intelligence officials have expressed dismay at the similarity between events at home and the signs of decline or democratic regression they were trained to detect in other nations.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...b210b8-a4f6-11ea-bb20-ebf0921f3bbd_story.html
Trained to detect/instigate.
 

hmchan

Full Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2017
Messages
1,429
Location
Hong Kong
I think you've answered your own question. Who has a gun pulled out on them for a forged bank note? Racial profiling in full effect.
Excessive force used against an unarmed/subdued person - classic example of police brutality. Same applies to the white man Tony Timpa in Dallas.
 

Withnail

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
30,812
Location
The Arena of the Unwell
I don’t get that sense from him at all, even though I think he’s simplifying the matter. He seems like a curious guy trying to make sense of all this. Do you actually get the sense he’s trolling?
Probably not, I think it's more likely wilful ignorance.

He's already decided his position even though by his own admission he knows little about the specifics of the case and doesn't seem to be willing to see how the effects of systemic racism are manifested. He also seems to be suggesting that this couldn't possibly be anything to do with racism because the cop didn't utter a racial slur while doing it.

I'm not sure what else anyone can say to change his mind which is why I suggested leaving it there.
 

Fingeredmouse

Full Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2014
Messages
5,659
Location
Glasgow
I don’t get that sense from him at all, even though I think he’s simplifying the matter. He seems like a curious guy trying to make sense of all this. Do you actually get the sense he’s trolling?
Deliberately trolling? Maybe not. Pedantically pursuing a broadly irrelevant point relentlessly? Certainly.
...and, no, I don't think he's "a curious guy trying to make sense of it all". Curious people listen. The poster concerned appears to be trying to win a poorly chaired sixth form debate.

Edit: And no, this isn't brutality towards this poster in a personal sense, it's just general posting brutality that happens to manifest disproportionally against said poster through coincidental correlation.