No, because nothing in Sweden’s strategy/society has changed since the peak in April. That’s the point!
I didn't say it had changed.
Look, I think lockdown was the right strategy for many of the countries that have chosen it but I have been steadfast from the beginning in saying while, in the short-term, Australia, NZ etc look like they've done an amazing job, there is not much point in congratulating some countries and attacking others (ie Sweden) until we get to the end of this thing. And the long term impacts may not be seen for years, if not decades.
I also think there is no one strategy beats all and all countries must make their own decisions regarding what is right for them. There is no way any country in Europe could realistically do what NZ has done for instance. Its just impossible, each country is far more interconnected with dozens of other countries than NZ is with any country.
Within this particular idea, while I think Sweden has made many mistakes, I did not see much point in getting hysterical about things and criticising them because we are nowhere near the end yet.
However, you are doing the exact same thing but in reverse. Jingoistically proclaiming how Sweden are 'pissing on UK/Belgium/Spain/Italy'. Even if you were, there is nothing at all to pat yourself on the back about for pissing on the 4 worst affected countries in the continent so far. Saying how good a job Sweden has done...when we have no idea how Sweden's curves will go (or indeed other countries') in the future. Posting economic charts (predicted) when we do not know how this will affect the economies of countries into the future.
As an example to the above. Japan never really locked down. They didn't close borders as such, though international tourism did of course fall off a cliff. They all wear masks and generally as a population social distance (when not stuff on top of each other on Tokyo trains). Restaurants and night-life areas have stayed mostly open. And yet they have had a sudden increase in their number of cases.