What? So because a few people were wring in the same way they are all reliable?
Transfer Tweets - 2020/21 | Check the OP for blacklisted sources before posting
- Thread starter Damien
- Start date
- Status
No. Their track record makes them reliable. I believe that when reliable sources are saying the same thing then it’s very likely someone is feeding them that information. Logically in this case it was probably the intermediaries who felt they had a deal. Of course we now live in an age where people think the guardian and actual journalists share the same reliability as some random eejits on twitter.
OK but you are saying they are reliable and quoting information that was completely wrong to prove it?
As far as I can see.
Edit: fecking hell the thing you are quoting isn’t even what was said - Harris said €60m - €60m.
Time to bring back the Tweets:
After his various injury issues at Roma, a bunch of clubs are interested in signing Rick Karsdorp from various leagues (Southampton, Atalanta, Schalke, Besiktas, etc.).
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
After his various injury issues at Roma, a bunch of clubs are interested in signing Rick Karsdorp from various leagues (Southampton, Atalanta, Schalke, Besiktas, etc.).
No...I’m saying they are reliable - because they are reliable based on their track records - and that it’s entirely possible the information was accurate when they reported on it - namely a deal had been agreed between the 3rd parties working on behalf of the clubs - and then as Harris is saying that deal was then vetoed by the club.
There’s no point debating it. We’ll find out how reliable the info is when Sancho either hands in a transfer request or announces he’s staying.
But none of them have said who you are claiming!
None of them have even said the same thing.
Happy to leave it here though.
Naughty Luckhurst, not sure Zorc actually said the words "Decision is final".
The Gattuso contract renewal coverage is being taken to the next level. Apparently, di Marzio has details on what'll happen in the upcoming meeting between Gattuso and de Laurentiis. They'll meet up for dinner but not commence contract renewal discussions immediately. There's no rush from either party over renewing the contract.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
That's unsurprising. After they got Berge, I think the writing was on the wall for Lundstram.
Berge will eventually slot into Norwood’s place so there is room for Lundstram, the wages he’s asking for are clearly the issue so we’re happy enough to get rid.
Why would he take Norwood’s place? That’s weird; Norwood is a passer and Berge is an anchor. They fit very nicely together and Norwood I believe was one of your better players last season. Am I wrong?
Sancho alternative ?
He plays best in a deeper position and Wilder has already said that it is the plan to move him there in time. Norwood is a fantastic player, it’s just a plan for the future.
Do anyone knows who took the picture? Im guessing Di Marzio but Im not really sure since its only watermarked a couple of hundred times.Gattuso and Napoli have met up to discuss a contract renewal.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
EDIT: Here's a photo of them meeting together
Mike Ashley's still pursuing the Saudis to purchase Newcastle.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
United briefing?
I'm intrigued at how Stone says that United found the wages unreasonable when Romano declared that we had a 100% personal agreement with him. It seems like both clubs are trying to put down each other whenever they can.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I'm intrigued at how Stone says that United found the wages unreasonable when Romano declared that we had a 100% personal agreement with him. It seems like both clubs are trying to put down each other whenever they can.
Yup, this is a briefing.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
120 million euros upfront ? Yeah,that is just not going to happen.
I think the add-ons pertain to bonuses. They want 120 million Euros guaranteed. Whether it's all up front or part of it is depends on the negotiations.
Boohoo.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I presume it means the package as a whole (fee + wages + agent fees) rather than invididually. Either way it's just posturing I think, would be surprised if we don't sign him.
Wasn't a large chunk of the Raiola money from Juventus as a % of the transfer fee... Something they agreed when he took Pogba to Juve?
It was.
Looks like a second briefing from United (posting this to affirm Hirst's and Luckhurst's Tweets):
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Harris said Sancho would hand in a transfer request forgoing his share of the transfer fee...that seems to tie in with this briefing about agent fees being the issue.
Liverpool's first signing is now official:
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Are they advertising Colgate now?
Yeah, I guess that's what he meant. Sometimes his Tweets can be unclear.
Their home kit looks terrible.
Yeah personally I think it is coming down to an issue with agents fees from reading Romano's tweet and also our first instalment looks to be well short of what Dortmund want.Why we can't just meet in the middle for this first instalment I haven't got a clue
"Premier League Champions" ... such cringe.
Just wanted to point out that Zorc said the exact same thing about Dembele and he moved to Barcelona in that same summer... just gamesmanship between the two parties. I think the deal will happen... just not as early as the muppet in me would like
So so small time.
- Status