Tony247
Full Member
- Joined
- May 2, 2018
- Messages
- 9,801
Management possibly want return on their investment so that they prefer to sell him for 15m in coming year or two rather than letting him walk out for free.
a year on loan at Ajax or a similar attacking club would do wonders and make him ready.
Thinks too highly of himself though I'm afraid. He seems motivated for money/fame and that seldom is the best motivation long term with very young players. Boy, have we seen it with players who shine for a short amount of time and then get an "I've made it" attitude and put their gloves down. Januzaj, Morrison, Macheda, the list goes on
Hope he sees the bigger picture, has patience, goes on loan and puts in a great amount of work. He could be great under the right guidance.
Why would Ajax pick him? They have their own younger talents who have already shown more in their first team
I don't know, maybe if they sell Van de Beek? Or if they get a compensation if he becomes good later on? Or a possibility to buy him? Anyways, I also suggested another attacking team.
All in all, if Chong only becomes semi-good, he might stay at Ajax or return to Ajax later on. Or if he becomes good for us, Ajax could get a fee. Playerwise, PSV, Ajax, etc has had similar players like Lozano, Ziyech, so on.
Incorrect, if they are not 1st team prem quality by 20, they never will be. I think that's the rubric anyway.20 year old who is very fragile not impressing in limited game time shouldn't be a problem. He is talented player, his performances for U23 shows that where he dribbles past players for fun and scores ridiculous goals.
I don't rate him very highly as others but extending his contract is very easy decision. You don't let go young players so early just because they found it hard to step up.
I'm not sure what you mean by similar players. Lozano came through the ranks at PSV, he didn't sign for a club like United and then come back on loan to PSV. In terms of playing style, I guess they're both quick but Lozano is a hard worker
Ziyech did sign from another club, but is a different kind of player completely to Chong. Did he first go on loan to Ajax before he signed for them? Else I don't get the connection you tried to make as he's not a speed based player, instead he's the playmaker who finds the players with movement.
I'm not sure what you're getting at, it seems like you're fishing for a 1:1 comparison with a similar player - I'm just mentioning similar attacking players that flourished at dutch clubs. All I was saying was just that Ajax or a similar attacking-minded club would be a good fit.
In 2021 maybeSancho alternative ?
ftfySancho replacement ?
He should have gotten James's playing time last season. Already a better player and with a much higher ceiling imo.
When we first got linked to an unproven championship playerImagine saying that when we first got linked to James.
Imagine thinking either of them are good enough.Imagine saying that when we first got linked to James.
Imagine thinking either of them are good enough.
When we first got linked to an unproven championship player
There's no evidence to suggest that whatsoever. He looked OK in the youth/u23s but was way out of his depth each time he appeared for the 1st team. He lacked confidence and gave the ball away numerous times. While he's talented, he's also raw and badly in need of experience outside of Utd where there'll be little spotlight on him. Hopefully he starts to put in a shift at Werder Bremen, and I don't mean just the odd great goal here and there. He needs to show what Gnabry did; an all round team game and contribute in all areas of the pitch.He should have gotten James's playing time last season. Already a better player and with a much higher ceiling imo.
There's no evidence to suggest that whatsoever. He looked OK in the youth/u23s but was way out of his depth each time he appeared for the 1st team. He lacked confidence and gave the ball away numerous times. While he's talented, he's also raw and badly in need of experience outside of Utd where there'll be little spotlight on him. Hopefully he starts to put in a shift at Werder Bremen, and I don't mean just the odd great goal here and there. He needs to show what Gnabry did; an all round team game and contribute in all areas of the pitch.
He didn't just look "OK". Since he moved up to the U23s, he's consistently been one of our best players. No need to undersell him to make your point. I don't think there's anything wrong with people believing he has a higher ceiling that Dan James, he was considered a "super talent" when we first signed him and has delivered at every level bar the first team, and that includes his appearances against men's teams in the EFL trophy where he was our best player. I'd be frankly stunned if he doesn't end up a better footballer than James.There's no evidence to suggest that whatsoever. He looked OK in the youth/u23s but was way out of his depth each time he appeared for the 1st team. He lacked confidence and gave the ball away numerous times. While he's talented, he's also raw and badly in need of experience outside of Utd where there'll be little spotlight on him. Hopefully he starts to put in a shift at Werder Bremen, and I don't mean just the odd great goal here and there. He needs to show what Gnabry did; an all round team game and contribute in all areas of the pitch.
Is there a loan watch thread?
He should have gotten James's playing time last season. Already a better player and with a much higher ceiling imo.
From the loan report thats done weekly on Reddit, the Brugge fans do not rate him at all.I couldn't find any thread for him in the performance forum and I wanted to see what others think of his move to Brugge.
He has played at least 45' in 8 of 11 games (527'). 2 cameos in the closing stages of the game (9' and 16' respectively) and one game sat on the bench.
Total of 552 minutes in 11 games. And he's recorded 1 goal in the cup vs fourth tier opposition in the opening round.
Also registered 4 assists. One against the bottom opposition and 3 against mid table clubs.
However his contributions have dried up in the last 30 days.
Are there people who watch him regularly ?
From the loan report thats done weekly on Reddit, the Brugge fans do not rate him at all.
Comments like this are very common:
"Agressive in the first half, but nowhere in the second. (fatigue?) Not reliable. Easily dispossessable. As a result, not involved much. Rating: 5.9/10."
“Chong brings really nothing extra.” ~@Tuur2903 on Twitter
“I still wonder what they saw in Chong.” ~@njits39 on Twitter