Maticmaker
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2018
- Messages
- 4,713
Is that the same SS that Les Dawson used to say his mother-in-law got thrown out of for cruelty?But you like the SS?
This is how Nazi Germany started.
Is that the same SS that Les Dawson used to say his mother-in-law got thrown out of for cruelty?But you like the SS?
This is how Nazi Germany started.
Is the ISS really big enough to fit the whole government?Could we just send the most incompetent politicians to the ISS and then impose 10 year quarantine periods on any returnees?
You could create an overflow outside?Is the ISS really big enough to fit the whole government?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I understand as rejoining probably won't be feesible in the near future much like a Lib Dem government.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Indeed. Its good that old people voted to feck young people. And then as a thanks we spent 4 months stuck in our homes to keep them safe. Class.Brexit has now cost more than the International Space Station
LSE estimates suggest the ongoing cost of Brexit could be two to three times greater than the impact of Covid-19.
https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/p...al-space-station/17/09/#.X2SCHWQ_BKk.facebook
But, yeah, hooray for taking our country back or whatever the feck it is. We've not even hit the part where this hurts us either, we're just getting started.
Really, really, REALLY pisses me off that Scotland voted against this shite and is getting dragged down as well. Same can be said for a lot of places in the UK. I genuinely wonder how many people who voted for Brexit have died of old age already. Not trying to be a dick but, well...
The Sun's Director of Fashion @Jippy has rightly pointed out that the site is a pile of crap. They're just a right wing think tank. Came up in my Google feed and promptly blocked soon after.Indeed. Its good that old people voted to feck young people. And then as a thanks we spent 4 months stuck in our homes to keep them safe. Class.
Goodness me. You are older than I thought. What a memory eh. They don't make them like that anymore.
Jo Swinson will be pleased. Lib Dems, perpetual Tory enablers.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Its illogical but its because the leavers, enabled by the right wing media, have painted one referendum as being the "will of the people". To question it is "treason".Something I don't quite understand yet: why is one referendum so decisive? To leave the fecking European Union because of one referendum is quite drastic, no?
What if in 20 years time people want another referendum and vote to join the EU again? You can do this every 10 years and the results can vary.
Again, how is 1 referendum so decisive?
It should have had a super majority too, but you know our country just loves the psycho drama that is brexit.Something I don't quite understand yet: why is one referendum so decisive? To leave the fecking European Union because of one referendum is quite drastic, no?
What if in 20 years time people want another referendum and vote to join the EU again? You can do this every 10 years and the results can vary.
Again, how is 1 referendum so decisive?
There were actually one referendum and two elections - if the public really wanted to stop Brexit, they were given enough opportunities.Something I don't quite understand yet: why is one referendum so decisive? To leave the fecking European Union because of one referendum is quite drastic, no?
What if in 20 years time people want another referendum and vote to join the EU again? You can do this every 10 years and the results can vary.
Again, how is 1 referendum so decisive?
Slightly disingenuous, in 2017 labour were still committed to leaving IIRC and 2019 you could easily argue that the percentage of votes for parties that wanted a second ref was higher than those who wanted to leave but placed across different parties. Tories had the luxury of being the one credible leave party (and the brexit party had made deals and stood down in certain seats too).There were actually one referendum and two elections - if the public really wanted to stop Brexit, they were given enough opportunities.
What about LibDems then? The public had the choice, if they really wanted to stay in the EU.Slightly disingenuous, in 2017 labour were still committed to leaving IIRC and 2019 you could easily argue that the percentage of votes for parties that wanted a second ref was higher than those who wanted to leave but placed across different parties. Tories had the luxury of being the one credible leave party (and the brexit party had made deals and stood down in certain seats too).
A better question is why was there a referendum at all? Moronic decision by Cameron.Something I don't quite understand yet: why is one referendum so decisive? To leave the fecking European Union because of one referendum is quite drastic, no?
What if in 20 years time people want another referendum and vote to join the EU again? You can do this every 10 years and the results can vary.
Again, how is 1 referendum so decisive?
That’s the point isn’t it, the Lib Dem’s in most peoples mind aren’t a credible party. Especially when general elections aren’t ONLY about Brexit. But like I said if you were to add up second ref parties in 2019 it is a bigger vote share than leave, but just across too many different parties. Hence why it is slightly disingenuous to say ‘you had your chance to remain’.What about LibDems then? The public had the choice, if they really wanted to stay in the EU.
Haha . Not quite that old - actually watched again it a few weeks ago on TV, don't think the new version will be quite so funny.Goodness me. You are older than I thought. What a memory eh. They don't make them like that anymore.
Agreed.. The Tories benefited by uniting the leave vote while the remain/second referendum vote was scattered across multiple parties. In our FPTP system this was a massive factor.Slightly disingenuous, in 2017 labour were still committed to leaving IIRC and 2019 you could easily argue that the percentage of votes for parties that wanted a second ref was higher than those who wanted to leave but placed across different parties. Tories had the luxury of being the one credible leave party (and the brexit party had made deals and stood down in certain seats too).
When was the last time the LibDems won an election?What about LibDems then? The public had the choice, if they really wanted to stay in the EU.
True. It was to settle Tory infighting.A better question is why was there a referendum at all? Moronic decision by Cameron.
Am I right in saying we will be subject to a certain amount of licenses for lorries that will add to the delay?It's all going terribly well...
Brexit letter warns of 7,000-truck queues in Kent
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54260470
They still won't understand until January. Over four years of explaining has not penetrated the Brexit mind.I wonder if people are starting to understand why borders work the way they do on the continent? And why no one wants them.
I stayed an extra week. Still here and considering it.
c'mon we all know in January (despite calais and rotterdam functioning perfectly well) it will be the EU's faultThey still won't until understand until January. Over four years of explaining has not penetrated the Brexit mind.
Yes amongst other things - also most lorries that cross the Channel are not British but if they're going to be stuck in endless queues would they even bother, time is money , they don't want their lorries and drivers stuck in the UK doing nothing.Am I right in saying we will be subject to a certain amount of licenses for lorries that will add to the delay?
If Johnson plays the dirty, you can see the customs on this side of the channel will stop every single British lorry and search it from top to bottom and go through the paperwork with a fine toothcomb.c'mon we all know in January (despite calais and rotterdam functioning perfectly well) it will be the EU's fault