McFred is the worst midfield 2 of the PL’s top 10 teams

justsomebloke

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
5,963
Fred and McT are solid not necessarily a title winning midfield but obviously good enough to be second best. After watching the Milan tie, we should consider a move for Kessie. He’s a definite upgrade over Fred.
I was thinking the same thing, what a player. But the problem would be he'd fit into the same primary slot as Fred, Pogba, DVB and McT. He's clearly not a holding midfielder, nor a no 10. Might make sense if we end up selling Pogba I guess.
 

romufc

Full Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2019
Messages
12,559
Then we must have an awesome coach, but we don’t have that either, oh I know it’s because we’re lucky because of Covid and everyone else is crap
Oh yes, I forgot about the coach. I wonder if fans who use covid as a reasoning actually believe we have not been impacted. Considering we will have played alot of games by the end of the season.
 

justsomebloke

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
5,963
Oh yes, I forgot about the coach. I wonder if fans who use covid as a reasoning actually believe we have not been impacted. Considering we will have played alot of games by the end of the season.
We have been impacted worse than anyone else. Nobody had as short a summer break or pre-season as we did. At least not in England.
 

romufc

Full Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2019
Messages
12,559
We have been impacted worse than anyone else. Nobody had as short a summer break or pre-season as we did. At least not in England.
I agree, yet the narrative is we are second because everyone else is shit and covid...

Fans are quick to dish out negative comments. It feels like you need the perfect player in each position to be successful.

People have forgotten what made us so successful in the past. Yes, the likes of Ronaldo, Vidic, Scholes, Rooney were amazing players but the squad needed Oshea, Brown, Fletcher, Park and the like to become successful.
 

Pablo18th

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
108
It seems reality has no chance against the dogged determination of many fans to believe this.

We are not rubbish against teams that sit back. On the contrary, we overwhelmingly beat them.

Our results are not better in games where we don't have the ball (as much).

In fact, the complete opposite is the case.


10 of our 16 PL wins came in matches where we dominated possession (more than 58%). Only 2 came in matches where the opponent dominated possession, with a further 2 in matches where the opposition had a significant margin (54-58%).

Our 9 draws has no patterns regarding possession at all - in 4 we had a possession advantage, in 4 the opposition had the advantage, while one was pretty much even.

Our 4 losses similarly has no very clear profile - 2 where we dominated posession, 1 even, one where the opposition dominated.

If we break down the record by degree of possession, it looks like this:

Dominated possession (58% or more): 10-3-2
Significantly higher possession (54-58%): 0-1-0
Pretty much even (47-53%): 2-1-1
Significantly inferior (43-47%) 2-2-0
Greatly inferior (less than 43%): 2-2-1

In summation: We dominate possession in the great majority of games we win, and we win the great majority of games where we dominate possession.


For reference, this is our PL record:

Losses

Dominated possession (58% or more): Crystal Palace, Sheffield United
Significantly higher possession (54-58%):
Pretty much even (47-53%): Arsenal
Significantly inferior (43-47%)
Greatly inferior (less than 43%): Tottenham

Draws:

Dominated possession (58% or more): Everton, WBA, Crystal Palace
Significantly higher possession (54-58%): Arsenal
Pretty much even (47-53%): Chelsea H
Significantly inferior (53-47%): Leicester, City
Greatly inferior (less than 43%): Liverpool, Chelsea A

Wins:

Dominated possession (58% or more): Fulham, Burnley, Wolves, Sheffield United, West Ham A, WBA, Newcastle H, Southampton H, Newcastle A, West Ham H
Significantly higher possession (54-58%):
Pretty much even (47-53%): Aston Villa, Southampton A
Significantly inferior (43-47%): Everton, Brighton
Greatly inferior (less than 43%): Leeds, Man City
Thank you. McFred are not world class but do a very good job in the PL. Contrary to popular belief it will actually be quite hard to sign a player that would easily improve on them. It seems like our fans like players that play for other teams as they mostly notice the good things. Game in game out most players will not stand under the light of this scrutiny.
 

Solius

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Staff
Joined
Dec 31, 2007
Messages
86,662
They're great for certain games.

When you look at our poor results this season since going top, they've all been against teams that have sat back. When McTominay and Fred are the ones we rely on to help break teams down, we struggle. They almost become facilitators.

Wan-Bissaka has nowhere to go? Knock it to Scott, he passes to Fred, Fred goes wide, we go again from that side. Ad infinitum.

With someone like Pogba in the team we make the middle of the pitch a lot more dangerous and that makes better space out wide.

In those games in the future it has to be Pogba plus one of McTom or Fred, and we need to sign another creative mid as well to cover for an injured/leaving Pogba.
 

Schmeichel's Cartwheel

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Dec 21, 2014
Messages
11,420
Location
Manchester
The caf will love them because they run around a lot, McTominay especially because he’s got that British passport & came through the academy, which means double points on here. Neither are good enough though. McTominay is a decent squad player. I’d sell & upgrade on Fred.
 

edcunited1878

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2014
Messages
8,935
Location
San Diego, CA
The overall skillset of a McTominay/Fred partnership lacks, yes, but together as a unit, they function very well together for the purpose of this current United team.
 

AgentSmith

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
1,557
Rodri Gundogan

Fred McTominay

Ndidi Tielemans

Kante Kovacic

Soucek Rice

Fabinho Thiago

Allan Doucouré

Højbjerg Ndombele

Luiz McGinn

Partey Xhaka

Where would you rank the McFred sandwich compared to the rest of the top 10?
 

FrankWhite

Not Frank White
Joined
May 3, 2017
Messages
1,069
Rodri Gundogan

Fred McTominay

Ndidi Tielemans

Kante Kovacic

Soucek Rice

Fabinho Thiago

Allan Doucouré

Højbjerg Ndombele

Luiz McGinn

Partey Xhaka

Where would you rank the McFred sandwich compared to the rest of the top 10?
Probably 5th but this isn't a fair comparison as these are the other teams first choice duo and McFred isn't ours. That's Pogba and one of McFred.
 

edcunited1878

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2014
Messages
8,935
Location
San Diego, CA
Rodri Gundogan

Fred McTominay

Ndidi Tielemans

Kante Kovacic

Soucek Rice

Fabinho Thiago

Allan Doucouré

Højbjerg Ndombele

Luiz McGinn

Partey Xhaka

Where would you rank the McFred sandwich compared to the rest of the top 10?
Rodri and Gundogan play more with KDB and are supported by inside fullbacks like Cancelo - City's team shape and tactics supplement their "two central midfielders"

Ndidi and Tielemans are good in their setup, but I don't know how Tielemans would fare if he's responsible for more of the pitch around him as Leicester play with a back 3/5

Kante and Kovacic have played with a back 3/5 and the team presses - Kovacic is a better passer than McTominay, but this duo is similar to how Fred and McTominay function

Soucek and Rice are similar in function. Wouldn't mind Rice, but he'd be too expensive and McTominay will be allowed to develop as Rice has been doing at West Ham

Fabinho and Thiago usually are paired with another CM like Henderson or Wijnaldum, so that's not a central midfield duo like McTominay and Fred

Allan and Doucoure aren't a better pairing than Fred and McTominay - might pass a little better, but not better overall

Hojbjerg isn't always paired with Ndombele, it's usually Sissoko or Winks. Hojbjerg is tidy and disciplined, like a larger and tatted up version of Winks. Ndombele is good, but he's not functioning like a Fred or McTominay.

Luiz and McGinn are nice, but off the ball they aren't better than Fred and McTominay.

Partey and Xhaka....Xhaka is bad and a poor leader.

Overall, I'd put McFred bang in the middle. But with Pogba and Fred, Pogba and McTominay, or Pogba and a well rested Matic, it's a top 3 duo on it's own. McTominay and Matic are the weakest pairing with Pogba because one doesn't pass well or have good enough vision (McTominay) and the other doesn't get around the pitch as well for 90 minutes (Matic). Pogba's been a different player since his Arsenal penalty and after he got over Covid and worked his way into fitness. There's a spark and willingness and effort off the ball he's given on a more consistent basis. It was very evident before he got injured against Everton.
 

justsomebloke

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
5,963
Rodri and Gundogan play more with KDB and are supported by inside fullbacks like Cancelo - City's team shape and tactics supplement their "two central midfielders"

Ndidi and Tielemans are good in their setup, but I don't know how Tielemans would fare if he's responsible for more of the pitch around him as Leicester play with a back 3/5

Kante and Kovacic have played with a back 3/5 and the team presses - Kovacic is a better passer than McTominay, but this duo is similar to how Fred and McTominay function

Soucek and Rice are similar in function. Wouldn't mind Rice, but he'd be too expensive and McTominay will be allowed to develop as Rice has been doing at West Ham

Fabinho and Thiago usually are paired with another CM like Henderson or Wijnaldum, so that's not a central midfield duo like McTominay and Fred

Allan and Doucoure aren't a better pairing than Fred and McTominay - might pass a little better, but not better overall

Hojbjerg isn't always paired with Ndombele, it's usually Sissoko or Winks. Hojbjerg is tidy and disciplined, like a larger and tatted up version of Winks. Ndombele is good, but he's not functioning like a Fred or McTominay.

Luiz and McGinn are nice, but off the ball they aren't better than Fred and McTominay.

Partey and Xhaka....Xhaka is bad and a poor leader.

Overall, I'd put McFred bang in the middle. But with Pogba and Fred, Pogba and McTominay, or Pogba and a well rested Matic, it's a top 3 duo on it's own. McTominay and Matic are the weakest pairing with Pogba because one doesn't pass well or have good enough vision (McTominay) and the other doesn't get around the pitch as well for 90 minutes (Matic). Pogba's been a different player since his Arsenal penalty and after he got over Covid and worked his way into fitness. There's a spark and willingness and effort off the ball he's given on a more consistent basis. It was very evident before he got injured against Everton.
Great overview, and agree with your conclusions.
 

justsomebloke

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
5,963
The caf will love them because they run around a lot, McTominay especially because he’s got that British passport & came through the academy, which means double points on here. Neither are good enough though. McTominay is a decent squad player. I’d sell & upgrade on Fred.
Right. It's much easier to make your judgment seem reasonable, including to yourself, if you assume that opposing views reflect nothing more than simple-mindedness and prejudice. Funnily, I can't recall any posters arguing that these are good players because they run a lot, or making a point of McTominay being a British academy player. It's almost like they have other reasons for thinking more highly of McFred than you. Can this be?
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
Rodri Gundogan

Fred McTominay

Ndidi Tielemans

Kante Kovacic

Soucek Rice

Fabinho Thiago

Allan Doucouré

Højbjerg Ndombele

Luiz McGinn

Partey Xhaka

Where would you rank the McFred sandwich compared to the rest of the top 10?
Any of those play behind a 10? This is such a weird thread to make, it takes tactics etc and throws them out the window. How many of these duos works behind Bruno and Pogba? Is it even a midfield 2 at that stage?
 

TwoSheds

More sheds (and tiles) than you, probably
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
12,998
What do people see when they watch Rice play football honestly? He appears to be like Gattuso and Pirlo rolled into one in some people's eyes :lol:
 

Eli Zee

Full Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2017
Messages
1,061
If we play mctoninay and Fred together, I think we need Pogba/VDB and Bruno starting too. I think we'd need to play with 2 more in so we can have extra offensive quality in the midfield since Fred and mctominay are more defensive.

so basically play like a 4-3-1-2. Or a 4-2-2-2.

4-3-3 with an out of position RW and only 1 midfielder that's great on the ball is probably not the best way to get the most out of our players
 

laughtersassassin

Full Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
11,497
What do people see when they watch Rice play football honestly? He appears to be like Gattuso and Pirlo rolled into one in some people's eyes :lol:
Well for us he will give us the ability to only play one Dm.

Right now we play two make shift ones in McTominay and Fred which is detrimental more times than not.

Wether it's rice or not it's a step we need to take. McFred won't get you to the top of world football.
 
Last edited:

TwoSheds

More sheds (and tiles) than you, probably
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
12,998
Well for us he will give us the ability to only play one Dm.

Right now we play two make shift ones in McTominay and Fred which is detrimental more times than not.
Does he though? Yeah for sure he's a good defender (because he's a defender playing in midfield) but they play him next to either Soucek or Noble, both pretty defensive players. Plus there's a no.10 ahead of them so...is he a one man midfield in defence? I'm not so sure. And he's thoroughly average in attack, that's for sure.
 

laughtersassassin

Full Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
11,497
Does he though? Yeah for sure he's a good defender (because he's a defender playing in midfield) but they play him next to either Soucek or Noble, both pretty defensive players. Plus there's a no.10 ahead of them so...is he a one man midfield in defence? I'm not so sure. And he's thoroughly average in attack, that's for sure.
That's just how West Ham play. I think so.

Put it this way defensively he is way more solid than McT or Fred. Fred's positioning is just too erratic.

As long as we don't have a new DM we will be stuck playing McFred together it seems.

And that is holding us back.

Bruno Rice Pogba sounds a whole lot better to me. But if there are other DMs that could do the job in all for it. If we weren't selling Lingard to West Ham I probably wouldn't consider Rice due to his price but with Lingard we have some leverage.
 

OmarUnited4ever

Full Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2021
Messages
3,444
It seems reality has no chance against the dogged determination of many fans to believe this.

We are not rubbish against teams that sit back. On the contrary, we overwhelmingly beat them.

Our results are not better in games where we don't have the ball (as much).

In fact, the complete opposite is the case.


10 of our 16 PL wins came in matches where we dominated possession (more than 58%). Only 2 came in matches where the opponent dominated possession, with a further 2 in matches where the opposition had a significant margin (54-58%).

Our 9 draws has no patterns regarding possession at all - in 4 we had a possession advantage, in 4 the opposition had the advantage, while one was pretty much even.

Our 4 losses similarly has no very clear profile - 2 where we dominated possession, 1 even, one where the opposition dominated.

If we break down the record by degree of possession, it looks like this:

Dominated possession (58% or more): 10-3-2
Significantly higher possession (54-58%): 0-1-0
Pretty much even (47-53%): 2-1-1
Significantly inferior (43-47%) 2-2-0
Greatly inferior (less than 43%): 2-2-1

In summation: We dominate possession in the great majority of games we win, and we win the great majority of games where we dominate possession.


For reference, this is our PL record:

Losses

Dominated possession (58% or more): Crystal Palace, Sheffield United
Significantly higher possession (54-58%):
Pretty much even (47-53%): Arsenal
Significantly inferior (43-47%)
Greatly inferior (less than 43%): Tottenham

Draws:

Dominated possession (58% or more): Everton, WBA, Crystal Palace
Significantly higher possession (54-58%): Arsenal
Pretty much even (47-53%): Chelsea H
Significantly inferior (53-47%): Leicester, City
Greatly inferior (less than 43%): Liverpool, Chelsea A

Wins:

Dominated possession (58% or more): Fulham, Burnley, Wolves, Sheffield United, West Ham A, WBA, Newcastle H, Southampton H, Newcastle A, West Ham H
Significantly higher possession (54-58%):
Pretty much even (47-53%): Aston Villa, Southampton A
Significantly inferior (43-47%): Everton, Brighton
Greatly inferior (less than 43%): Leeds, Man City

Excellent post.

And I would say your assessment is right, which in short is we win most of the games we dominate, but I think the sense of us struggling from teams that deploy a low block tactics stem from the fact that most of the points we dropped this season came from teams that sat back and we dominated them in possession.

So perhaps it's just that we dropped around 12 points to teams we dominated is an issue that might explain why we are behind city, but I believe that's not enough justification of why we are behind city, there are further issues to be resolved and areas to be improved.

On the topic, I 100% disagree that most of the top 10 teams starting 2 CMs are better than Mcfred, only the ones in City and Liverpool are better, the Liecester duo are only slightly better. The rest, Mcfred are the better pair ( Partey and Kante as individuals are better)
 
Last edited:

justsomebloke

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
5,963
Of course KdB and Gundogan as a pair are better than Mcfred, I'll also give you Kova/Kante, and also Hendo/Fabinho of last season..

But that's it, Xakha isnt that good, Partey is but he is new. Mcfred is definitely better than Ndidi/Teilsmann as a pair,cfe



Excellent post.

And I would say your assessment is right, which in short is we win most of the games we dominate, but I think the sense of us struggling from teams that deploy a low block tactics stem from the fact that most of the points we dropped this season came from teams that sat back and we dominated them in possession.

So perhaps it's just that we dropped around 12 points to teams we dominated is an issue that might explain why we are behind city, but I believe that's not enough justification of why we are behind city, there are further issues to be resolved and areas to be improved.

On the topic, I 100% disagree that most of the top 10 teams starting 2 CMs are better than Mcfred, only the ones in City and Liverpool are better, the Liecester duo are only slightly better. The rest, Mcfred are the better pair ( Partey and Kante as individuals are better)
Well, no. :) For draws and losses, 5 were against teams who dominated us for possession, 6 were against teams where we dominated possession and 2 came in matches where possession was pretty even. So, no clear pattern there one way or the other.
 

MichaelRed

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
1,649
Rodri and Gundogan play more with KDB and are supported by inside fullbacks like Cancelo - City's team shape and tactics supplement their "two central midfielders"

Ndidi and Tielemans are good in their setup, but I don't know how Tielemans would fare if he's responsible for more of the pitch around him as Leicester play with a back 3/5

Kante and Kovacic have played with a back 3/5 and the team presses - Kovacic is a better passer than McTominay, but this duo is similar to how Fred and McTominay function

Soucek and Rice are similar in function. Wouldn't mind Rice, but he'd be too expensive and McTominay will be allowed to develop as Rice has been doing at West Ham

Fabinho and Thiago usually are paired with another CM like Henderson or Wijnaldum, so that's not a central midfield duo like McTominay and Fred

Allan and Doucoure aren't a better pairing than Fred and McTominay - might pass a little better, but not better overall

Hojbjerg isn't always paired with Ndombele, it's usually Sissoko or Winks. Hojbjerg is tidy and disciplined, like a larger and tatted up version of Winks. Ndombele is good, but he's not functioning like a Fred or McTominay.

Luiz and McGinn are nice, but off the ball they aren't better than Fred and McTominay.

Partey and Xhaka....Xhaka is bad and a poor leader.

Overall, I'd put McFred bang in the middle. But with Pogba and Fred, Pogba and McTominay, or Pogba and a well rested Matic, it's a top 3 duo on it's own. McTominay and Matic are the weakest pairing with Pogba because one doesn't pass well or have good enough vision (McTominay) and the other doesn't get around the pitch as well for 90 minutes (Matic). Pogba's been a different player since his Arsenal penalty and after he got over Covid and worked his way into fitness. There's a spark and willingness and effort off the ball he's given on a more consistent basis. It was very evident before he got injured against Everton.
Pogba and McTominay is worse than Fred & McTominay. McTominay isn't a defensive player and just gets in Pogba's way when they play together in the middle.
 

Rocknrolla69er

Full Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2015
Messages
651
Were stagnant and stale with those two paired together , we rely on. Moments of individual brilliance to get a goal,I'm not Pogbas biggest fan but we look alot more creative and dangerous with another creative pivot on the pitch

We need a midfielder who can defend but look after the ball and create better than Fred and Mctominay both who give it away a lot and don't have Pogbas passing range.

Kessie looks after the ball very well, very tidy in possesion. So does Van de Beek but the lads never had a run in the team.
 

OmarUnited4ever

Full Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2021
Messages
3,444
Well, no. :) For draws and losses, 5 were against teams who dominated us for possession, 6 were against teams where we dominated possession and 2 came in matches where possession was pretty even. So, no clear pattern there one way or the other.
I didn't mean it in terms of a stat that indicates a pattern, but some sort of a general sense where people think we drop points against teams we dominate, hence posters on here commenting that we struggle to breakdown low block defenses, that sense most likely stems from us dropping points against the likes of WBA & Sheffield United.

i actually agree with assessment that is based the stats you provided there is no specific pattern.

Edit: i dont think i worded the bolded part in my earlier comment property sorry for the confusion.
 

Raven

Full Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2012
Messages
6,737
Location
Ireland
Shit thread. None of those other midfielder play in a 2. Get a fecking clue.
 

Carl

has permanently erect nipples
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
45,375
No one forced us to play Mc Fred. We could play VDB Pogba.
We could, but we would lose. No idea why anyone thinks that partnership would work when neither of those players have shown they can be the defensive one in a midfield 2 and VDB in particular has shown nothing to suggest he's good enough.

Even Pep doesn't play with a midfield without at least one absolutely killer defensive midfielder.
 

Jonno

Full Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
8,375
Location
Preston, Lancashire
The likes of KdB-Gundogan, Kovacic-Kante, Ndidi-Tielemans isn’t even a debate, but I genuinely would rather have the likes of Rice-Soucek or Xhaka-Partey in our midfield than McFred. They make us lose so much attacking impetus for the benefit of slightly more defensive stability.

I rate both players individually (I started the Fred was value for money thread!), but they are frankly shit together. Their limitations on the ball stifle us so much in our build up play.

We desperately need a new midfield 2 this summer if we are to challenge for the title next season. Pogba and a new DM.
By that token we should be comparing the bolded with Pogba & Bruno, no?
 

Carl

has permanently erect nipples
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
45,375
Something definitely doesn't add up. We have a shit goalkeeper, shit right back, shit CBs, shit CM, shit striker, no RW, a politician at LW and a PE teacher for a manager yet we're second in the league.
 

UnofficialDevil

Anti Scottish and Preoccupied with Donkeys.
Joined
Aug 5, 2006
Messages
19,026
Location
I'm not anti Scottish, I just wanted Moyes out.
We could, but we would lose. No idea why anyone thinks that partnership would work when neither of those players have shown they can be the defensive one in a midfield 2 and VDB in particular has shown nothing to suggest he's good enough.

Even Pep doesn't play with a midfield without at least one absolutely killer defensive midfielder.
I don't see the difference. MCT is a box to box midfielder, Pogba is a box to box midfielder. Fred is a central midfielder and VDB is a central midfielder.
 

Carl

has permanently erect nipples
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
45,375
I don't see the difference. MCT is a box to box midfielder, Pogba is a box to box midfielder. Fred is a central midfielder and VDB is a central midfielder.
McTominay is better defensively than Pogba. From the very little we've seen of VDB, Fred is far superior defensively.

McFred is a very defensive midfield duo. Pogba and VDB would be really quite attacking.
 

UnofficialDevil

Anti Scottish and Preoccupied with Donkeys.
Joined
Aug 5, 2006
Messages
19,026
Location
I'm not anti Scottish, I just wanted Moyes out.
McTominay is better defensively than Pogba. From the very little we've seen of VDB, Fred is far superior defensively.

McFred is a very defensive midfield duo. Pogba and VDB would be really quite attacking.
I can't disagree, but I wouldn't mind seeing that "attacking midfield duo" against weaker teams instead of the "defensive midfield" duo. Specially in games where we are clear favourites.
 

M Bison

Full Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
6,840
Location
In the Wilderness
Supports
York City
Having just watched City/Everton, i'm struggling to see why anyone would swap Allan and Andre Gomes for McFred, who i think are Everton's first choice CM? I havent looked at either's stats this year, but dont remember either producing much, although the same could be said of Fred.
 

M Bison

Full Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
6,840
Location
In the Wilderness
Supports
York City
Something definitely doesn't add up. We have a shit goalkeeper, shit right back, shit CBs, shit CM, shit striker, no RW, a politician at LW and a PE teacher for a manager yet we're second in the league.
Interesting, this is my point maybe we're both missing something :lol:

Maybe we should burst Rashy's bubble or improve our coaching...