Tom Van Persie
No relation
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2012
- Messages
- 25,240
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Might make business sense, they're hoovering up free transfers and obviously haven't much money to work with so maybe they feel he can be sold in a year for a profit?Donnarumma to Barca just doesn't make sense.
Sterling is the only one in that list mentioned in the article.‘Why not buy both, City have Mahrez, Sterling, Foden, Silva, De Bruyne and Torres for two positions’.
Yeah business wise it makes sense I suppose. But surely, they'll send him straight out on loan?Might make business sense, they're hoovering up free transfers and obviously haven't much money to work with so maybe they feel he can be sold in a year for a profit?
But why would Donnarumma agree to it? According to Fabrizio, Ter Stegen is untouchable and Donnarumma is far too good to be a backup, even at Barca.Might make business sense, they're hoovering up free transfers and obviously haven't much money to work with so maybe they feel he can be sold in a year for a profit?
I get frustrated watching Sterling for England and City a cumulative maybe 8-10 times per year. I can’t handle watching him weekly at United.Laporte and Sterling would do nicely for us.
Maybe it is he wants to play more than them being unhappy with him.Why Laporte ?
He was their best CB last year and before.
Grass is always greener on the other side, matePeople on here get at Rashford and yet want to sign Sterling? I am baffled
Get those two and would happily take a Bissouma/Locatelli/Saul because see us being priced out for RiceSeems like Varane and Sancho are the deals the club is working on? Hopefully they come concrete soon
I think Sterling is a good player that at times is very good. But yeah that doesn’t make sense.People on here get at Rashford and yet want to sign Sterling? I am baffled
I would think City fans would swap Sterling for Rashford in a heartbeatI think Sterling is a good player that at times is very good. But yeah that doesn’t make sense.
Oh come one, United fans are used to it by watching our very own Ronaldo wanna be Rashy week in week outI get frustrated watching Sterling for England and City a cumulative maybe 8-10 times per year. I can’t handle watching him weekly at United.
I wouldn’t doubt that for a second.I would think City fans would swap Sterling for Rashford in a heartbeat
Allegri actually explained it pretty well on TV a few months ago. Morata is a big game player, in a single game, especially a big one, he's fantastic. He's just not consistent over a seasonMorata is one of those things that makes me think there are some things in football that football people see, that I, as a non football person, don’t.
Big club after big club and top manager after top manager continually want him, and for the life of me I just don’t understand why.
PSG, Liverpool, Barcelona, Raiola is in bed with Juventus, do possibly them tooKane to City, Lukaku to Chelsea, mbappe to Madrid...where does Haaland go next year? Bayern would be the only real competitor?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
This is the equivalent of a starving man with a toothpick.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
That seems like a waste of ink
Cue Dr Evil laugh
Think La Liga demands that every player has a buy out clause in their contract.
Benzema reportedly has a buyout clause of 1 billion euros.
This reads like an accounting trick. Barca padding their balance sheet? @Sassy Colin thoughts?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Because in a forum you have the right to reply. I think that’s how it worksYou disagree with me mate because you said this: ''But he came in to steady a sinking ship. Remember SAF said that titles were won on the back of 1-0 wins.''
And then your next post you switched 180 degree.
Again, not sure why are you replying to my post. One post you disagree with the original point, one post you agree on the same original point.
Unless they are selling Ter Stegen which is unlikely. Donnarumma is not going to a club for a squad role position.Donnarumma to Barca just doesn't make sense.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Who'd pay 100M for a past it croc?This reads like an accounting trick. Barca padding their balance sheet? @Sassy Colin thoughts?
Right? But if the release clause is 100M then that's his value on their balance sheet isn't it? Crooked as feck, Barca are.Who'd pay 100M for a past it croc?
The article also includes the following players as options:Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Seems Rice is still possible for Chelsea
I mean...they're already linked to more than 6 players.We will be seen a bit differently as Champions League winners and this is where we have to step up. If we really want to build something, I’m all in, I can tell you. And I’m happy to talk about it and discuss it. If our beliefs match, we go from there.
Two or three [signings] could be very, very good. It’s a constant thing to never deny change. That you always bring new energy, new guys who question the old beliefs, who challenge everybody in the training and in matches, so I think it’s a good thing.
We don’t need another seven and another complete turnover because it’s also our job to keep on improving, because we have still a young squad and it’s not about stealing from them the chance to prove it again that they are capable of growing and evolving. But we have some ideas, of course, to make the group stronger and I think this can always be a positive thing to challenge all of us.
NoRight? But if the release clause is 100M then that's his value on their balance sheet isn't it? Crooked as feck, Barca are.
How else will they ascribe value to the player asset?