OH Behave , no cry babies in here today, the discussion has been pretty decent, well it wasI see the UK cry babies are still here!
F1 2021 Season
- Thread starter pauldyson1uk
- Start date
Yep, if you're not sure about something before it's implemented, then you must continue to be against it even after it's demonstrated to be a good thing. Because if there is one thing we don't have enough of in this world, it's people doubling down on wrong opinions.
There you go. Spells it out clearly.
I don't think the Norris / Le Clerc incident is the same. Don't think you can apply normal corner rules to a chicane either. Don't care too much because I'm not a big fan of either driver but I do reckon Verstappen is more to blame here.
@Rado_N
You ok mate? finally accepting Max is a wreckless driver?I see the UK cry babies are still here!
That was funny.Loved that bit where Toto celebrates Bottas overtaking then realises he didn’t make it stick.
Damon Hill, former world champion
Same. I'd say today was 60-40 Max's fault.
plenty were against it at first, including Max and Seb all changed their minds, are they all pricks also !
His Belgian connection + the fact that most F1 fans I know are tired of Lewis winning means that they want Max to win yeah. I don't particularly dislike him or anything but it's true that such incidents aren't isolated cases throughout his career, he needs to be a better decision-maker at times and realize that he's not racing alone, no one is gonna give him anything and that he might be playing with his opponent's safety sometims. Not saying Lewis is exempt from those things, but imo it seems like Max is more involved in stuff like that and that's just a pity.
They both are. I'm not fan of neither of them.There you go. Spells it out clearly.
@Rado_N
You ok mate? finally accepting Max is a wreckless driver?
reckless? i wouldn’t call landing your car on someone’s head, then trying to accelerate off their head, then getting out of the car without even checking on that person’s head, reckless.You ok mate? finally accepting Max is a wreckless driver?
Max always had the choice of bailing out of the move and going again another lap.
I don’t think Lewis had another choice.
I don’t think Lewis had another choice.
I think if max was going into anyone else he would have bailed but he benefited from taking out Lewis
Correct.
Did he know though? Its not like the cars have rear camera or big mirrors to see where his rear end hit Hamilton car.
So you suggest he thought his car was levitating?
of course he knew, what did he think his car was resting on so far up , his ego !
People were saying Max tried to kill Hamilton. That’s not a decent discussion.OH Behave , no cry babies in here today, the discussion has been pretty decent, well it was
Who said that?
I was working only thing I have seen is just reply of the crash.... I'm not suggesting anything, just asking a simple question.
who said that ?
Ricciardo 
It will be really interesting what the fall out of Max/Hamilton will be. From a championship perspective, I'm hoping that Max gets a penalty. RB have the better car, so any penalty will help to keep the championship battle interesting for longer.
It will be really interesting what the fall out of Max/Hamilton will be. From a championship perspective, I'm hoping that Max gets a penalty. RB have the better car, so any penalty will help to keep the championship battle interesting for longer.
I don't think anybody said he tried to kill him. Damien Hill said he deliberately took him out and Jonny Herbert agreed with him and some on here agreed with that.
I don’t think it was on this forum I read it. Apologies. Tom van Persie did say he nearly killed him though which I wouldn’t class as decent discussion.
This is fun with the Sky team strongly disagreeing. Damon vs Di Resta.
Interestingly Max was very angry about Lewis celebrating the win at Silverstone, he called out "disrespectful", despite Lewis asking if he was OK almost immediately. Surely he should have even harsher words for himself, given that he didn't even bother to ask that question after driving over Lewis' head...
Di Resta is off his rocker.
Max has 3/4 of his car off the track, why is he ignoring that? He says let them race but you can't just throw your car into something and try to force a gap open. This isn't DTM like he keeps trying to compare it to.
Herbert is absolutely bang on.
an observation and without the Halo it would be correct, so because of one comment , its not a decent discussion
The car did impact his head. If it wasn't for the halo he might have been killed.
Mate, you might as well just stop this bullshit. It’s transparent as feck, you’re simply just embarrassing yourself at this point. You prefer Max to Lewis. As do others in this thread. And as do others the other way around. It’s perfectly fine. There’s no need to fake objectivity.
Not watching now but Di Resta has always had a Hamilton complex so I tend to ignore most of what he says when he’s involved.
Probably because he was stood right next to Lewis' car watching him try to reverse out.
As accidents go Silverstone was a massive crash. This was an awkward low speed crash. Trying to equate the two is absurd.
You’re opinions are a joke.
But that’s not Verstappen killing Hamilton though is it?an observation and without the Halo it would be correct, so because of one comment , its not a decent discussion
How is it not? Doesn't say anything about intent, guilt or blame
You wouldn't class an accurate statement as decent discussion? His tyres made contact with Lewis' head, that isn't far away from doing serious damage.
Accept my opinion as fact or you're a fanboy
Sorry which of those facts are not facts?Accept my opinion as fact or you're a fanboy
One a world champion, one a nobody
Maybe it’s a translation thing then. Anyway thank god for the Halo.
I am not normally a fan of Paul, but today he has been OK , to say he is a nobody is a tad harsh.
Rafa is that you?