Newcastle United now owned by the PIF | PL receives "legally binding assurances that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia will not control NUFC" ;)

C'est Moi Cantona

Full Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
8,920
I'll admit I don't know the answer to this question, but has any City manager ever been directly challenged about their owners like Eddie Howe was yesterday?
 

Pickle85

Full Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2021
Messages
6,800
You mean you know feck all about what you are talking about.
Nope. I mean that you've clearly done some reading on the internet which has led to you post loony nonsense like the US is as responsible for the invasion as the actual country doing the invading which, however you slice it, is tinfoil hat mental. I think the reason you're swimming against the current on this is because you want to feel like you're smarter and more informed than 'the masses'. The irony being that that is a depressingly common and predictable way of conspiracy theories gaining traction. The US are far from blameless (like our own government) on many, many foreign policy issues but to say that they're as much to blame for this situation as the country actually doing the invading is one of the stupidest things I've ever read on here.
 

Mr Pigeon

Illiterate Flying Rat
Scout
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Messages
26,467
Location
bin
fecking hell this thread is turning into the scripts for several perfume ads.
 

Pickle85

Full Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2021
Messages
6,800
Thank you for confirming you know nothing and are lazy to boot
Not sure that's what's been confirmed here. Thanks for confirming you can't spell or construct an articulate sentence or argument. Keep reading your online sources though...you're clearly extraordinarily well informed. Who'd have thought that the US was actually as culpable as Russia for the invasion of Ukraine...you've really opened my eyes!
 

Pickle85

Full Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2021
Messages
6,800
All you had to do was google The Maidan Conflict.
Russia are INVADING UKRAINE you absolute loon. It is impossible for anyone else to be as responsible for their actions. This is the last post I'm wasting as you're either a tinfoil hat nutter or Russian.
 

Real Name

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2020
Messages
14,419
Location
Croatia
I'm not mentioning names but one poster is writing like he's been briefed by Peskov who recently said Russia didn't want to attack cities in Ukraine but did it cause of the attitude of the West. Poor sods didn't want to invade Ukraine but NATO and West made them do it..
 

Bluelion7

Full Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2021
Messages
1,229
Supports
Chelsea
Putin is a lunatic who would willingly go to war with NATO and potentially launch a nuclear strike, MBS has no such notions.

To clarify the point though. If we seize Newcastle MBS would retaliate financially but it will have no impact on the war taking place in Europe now whereas squeezing the oligarchs is a genuine strategy to force Putin to back down or be removed from within. Too much is being made of who is worse and which regime is more abhorrent and none of that has anything to do with the actions being taken.
That’s, again, NOT true. Their is a reason we approached the OPEC leaders BEFORE going after oligarchs. Pressing the oligarchs is meant to ratchet up the internal pressure in the country to take Putin out, but they don’t have the funds or ability to affect the invasion at all.
OPEC stabilizing the price per barrel down to 60 bucks would essentially make this war impossible for Putin, wether he wanted it or not. He’s having to beg China to feed his soldiers as is.
OPEC and the crown prince could do it, we asked them, they met with Putin twice after that and sided with him instead.
That is exactly what happened. The crown prince is an ally of Putins and is directly enabling this invasion. States like the UAE wanted to break off and help and he shut it down REAL fast.
 

2cents

Historiographer, and obtainer of rare antiquities
Scout
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
16,371
Brutal, but for a country like Saudi Arabia to act against state terrorists -- hardly something that should be newsworthy?
I dunno, seems pretty newsworthy to me.
 

GuybrushThreepwood

Full Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2019
Messages
1,168
Supports
Blackburn Rovers
I know there's a 'morality maze', but I personally would be very uncomfortable with and would definitely oppose such a takeover of Blackburn, knowing what I know about the regime. I'd rather us remain a mid-table Championship team without such ownership, that become a major force in the Premier League with it, and I'm not really a 'win at all costs' kind of fan, though maybe people won't believe me there. But then again at least in my lifetime Blackburn have won 2 major trophies (I still find it funny that we've won silverware more recently than the likes of Everton, Villa, Leeds, Newcastle, West Ham etc.), while Newcastle on the other hand haven't won anything.

A colleague of mine that's a Liverpool fan said they would strongly protest in they'd ever been linked with such a takeover. I will say though that it is easier to take such a stance, when you've already seen your club win plenty of silverware. Yes they had a 30 year league title drought, but they'd at least won numerous cup competitions (Champions League x 2, FA Cup x 2, UEFA Cup x 1, Club World Cup x 1, League Cup x 3) just in the 21st century before finally ending it. Would he have had exactly the same attitude if Liverpool had gone more than 50 years without winning any major silverware like Newcastle have done? I'm not so sure.
 

Rob

Full Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2009
Messages
3,246
Supports
Liverpool
All you had to do was google The Maidan Conflict.
This sounds like my estranged friend’s girlfriend telling me to “do my own research” when explaining how Democrats and Hollywood are satanic pedophiles. I did Google the conflict, btw, and found no reason why the US, as terrible as they may be, are as responsible for this as Russia. As far as I can gather, Ukraine had a corrupt President who decided to opt out of an agreement with the EU and instead go for one with Eurasia and Russia, resulting in massive protests and ultimately him fleeing the country.
 

Red Dreams

Full Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2003
Messages
55,381
Location
Across the Universe....from Old Trafford.
This sounds like my estranged friend’s girlfriend telling me to “do my own research” when explaining how Democrats and Hollywood are satanic pedophiles. I did Google the conflict, btw, and found no reason why the US, as terrible as they may be, are as responsible for this as Russia. As far as I can gather, Ukraine had a corrupt President who decided to opt out of an agreement with the EU and instead go for one with Eurasia and Russia, resulting in massive protests and ultimately him fleeing the country.
The US directly helped with the overthrow of the regime that was friendly to the Russians and helped install an extreme right wing government that was anti Russian.
Our senators Graham and McCain were there in 2014 promising help.
Thus the 14,000 dead in the Donbass conflict.

But to your point on 'do your own research' You are right.

I responded to Mockney above.
 

Real Name

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2020
Messages
14,419
Location
Croatia
How many were killed then?
Its not about the number but about the notion it was all Ukraine's fault cause they bombed Luhansk and Donbas thus making poor Russia to invade which they didnt want to, at least its how they portray it.
 

RedSky

Shepherd’s Delight
Scout
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
74,450
Location
Hereford FC (Soccermanager)
REMINDER:

This is the football forum, for football discussion. This is a thread about Newcastle and their new owners.

It is not a thread about America, Ukraine and Russia.
 

Fridge chutney

Do your best.
Joined
Sep 11, 2016
Messages
8,993
I guess that’s why one of our morons was holding up a Russian flag at the derby, where songs like ‘f### Ukraine’ were sung too. I found it embarrassing tbh. Let’s get our own house in order before criticising others too much……..
Still awaiting evidence that this actually happened. And even if it did, this is a dangerously pathetic false equivalence.

"Hey, the biggest club in the world has a few bellend fans. Therefore that club cannot criticise other clubs for being vessels of murderous autocratic regimes".
 

Gandalf

Full Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2018
Messages
4,862
Location
Alabama but always Wales in my heart
That’s, again, NOT true. Their is a reason we approached the OPEC leaders BEFORE going after oligarchs. Pressing the oligarchs is meant to ratchet up the internal pressure in the country to take Putin out, but they don’t have the funds or ability to affect the invasion at all.
OPEC stabilizing the price per barrel down to 60 bucks would essentially make this war impossible for Putin, wether he wanted it or not. He’s having to beg China to feed his soldiers as is.
OPEC and the crown prince could do it, we asked them, they met with Putin twice after that and sided with him instead.
That is exactly what happened. The crown prince is an ally of Putins and is directly enabling this invasion. States like the UAE wanted to break off and help and he shut it down REAL fast.
You are completely missing the point so I am not really sure if it is worth trying to explain but what the hell.

Putin, bad guy with nukes who will potentially launch them at NATO members.
MBS, bad guy with lots of oil who wants to do business with NATO members.

If you seize Newcastle you are going after a sovereign state which is not engaged in conflict with the West or it's allies. Leaving aside the lack of pretext for taking this action you will not achieve anything other than pissing off MBS and the only thing you are likely to accomplish is to push him further towards Russia in retaliation.

Seizing the assets of the oligarchs who support Putin is justified due to the conflict and they have no capacity to strike back at NATO. They might if you squeeze all of them hard enough be able to effect regime change as they and their supporters are within Putin's inner circle with direct access. It is a long shot but it is a legitimate strategy when attempting to avoid the potentially world ending consequences of a full blown military confrontation between Putin and NATO.

For the record I believe we should not have allowed the ownership groups of Newcastle or Manchester City to buy their way into the game in this country and I would stop supporting Manchester United in a second if they were bought out by a similar entity. None of this is relevant though because again the current actions of the Government are not related to any ethical or moral concerns but are part of a far larger strategy enacted by all NATO member states of sanctions and asset seizure designed to isolate and punish Russia to the point where continued aggression on their part becomes untenable.
 

UnrelatedPsuedo

I pity the poor fool who stinks like I do!
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
10,446
Location
Blitztown
REMINDER:

This is the football forum, for football discussion. This is a thread about Newcastle and their new owners.

It is not a thread about America, Ukraine and Russia.
I think you should let it play. To not do so is being complicit in their sports washing. Fcuk it. Let every thread on Newcastle descend into absolute chaos.

I’d be over the moon if, when someone mentions their new golden boy striker has ‘42 goal involvements this year’, someone chirps up with ‘42 is the same number of humans executed without trial by cousins of your board members last year’

Not 100% serious but also hoping it happens.
 

Noot

Full Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2021
Messages
623
Supports
Manchester City
I'll admit I don't know the answer to this question, but has any City manager ever been directly challenged about their owners like Eddie Howe was yesterday?
Yes. Constantly.

There's certainly more of a media highlight now because of the Saudi relations to the war in Ukraine.