scream
Full Member
Really pleased with this signing - a quality addition.
Then why keep him? He'll be a waste of wages and the longer he sits on the bench the more his market value drops. He could free up space and funds for a midfielder we'd actually use.VDB hasn't earned the right to play any games yet so he doesn't need to be considered at all.
He is poor wherever we play him
I doubt he will be anyone's back up.Guessing he'll be Brunos back up and van de Beek is going to be rotated as #8.
Ah I get that, still I'd rather them fresh and ready to go.They won't be training with Ten Hag, Mitchell or Schteve though, and the sooner they can get integrated to EtH style the better, even if they didn't play, they should go for that week of working under EtH.
Eriksen trained under ten Hag at Ajax for a bit before he signed for Brentford so ten Hag's style won't be alien to him.They won't be training with Ten Hag, Mitchell or Schteve though, and the sooner they can get integrated to EtH style the better, even if they didn't play, they should go for that week of working under EtH.
He played off the right mostly for Spurs. Much deeper for Brentford and Inter.He's a very good player, but I don't really understand where he'll play? Unless the idea is to use him as a rotation option with Bruno (but then what happens to Donny?).
Lost Pogba who was on 350k and signed Eriksen as his replacement for half of his wages. Has there been a better deal for us ?
Assuming they can close FdJ then absolutely this! It’s no surprise, but nevertheless very reassuring, to see the type of players EtH is targeting.The signing I'm the most excited about. Feels like he'll add a completely new dimension to our game.
Him and FDJ should ensure that we're moving towards a team better and more comfortable with possession than the shit show we have watched in last few years.
Can or should?Eriksen can play deeper in midfield though.
Have you not seen the Scott Mctominay is a striker thread...Can or should?
Are we going to shoehorn players into positions that aren't their best role? He's spent most of his career as an attacking midfielder, even at times playing as an attacker out wide. To convert him to a deep lying player for the sake of trying to fit in too many similar players doesn't make any sense to me.
Can. And I'm not saying he should be a deep lying playmaker but can work as a box to box cm. Also in modern football positions are not so fixed that he's be just near opposing box when he'll play as an attacking midfielder.Can or should?
Are we going to shoehorn players into positions that aren't their best role? He's spent most of his career as an attacking midfielder, even at times playing as an attacker out wide. To convert him to a deep lying player for the sake of trying to fit in too many similar players doesn't make any sense to me.
Sell the virus!He played off the right mostly for Spurs. Much deeper for Brentford and Inter.
I think he'll be a bit like a right side Pogba
To be fair a lot of attacking mids drop deeper as they get older. If you look at how ETH uses his players there is a fair amount of flexibility in the positions they take up and so an intelligent player like this will have no problem moving into space and swapping between a central and attacking role during the flow of a game.Can or should?
Are we going to shoehorn players into positions that aren't their best role? He's spent most of his career as an attacking midfielder, even at times playing as an attacker out wide. To convert him to a deep lying player for the sake of trying to fit in too many similar players doesn't make any sense to me.
He will naturally slot into that role now. It's clear to see with his current age and experience.Can or should?
Are we going to shoehorn players into positions that aren't their best role? He's spent most of his career as an attacking midfielder, even at times playing as an attacker out wide. To convert him to a deep lying player for the sake of trying to fit in too many similar players doesn't make any sense to me.
Underrated reference.Christer Eriksen
Simple as that bro
For me, personally, he hasn't done anything wrong and he was clearly the best player I have ever seen playing for Brentford in terms of pure talent and technique. Can't see anyone, apart from the total idiots, having anything bad to day about him. I am sure he will get a clap when he comes out to warm up - if he is in the squad obviously - but with all ex-players once you leave and you play against us then to me you are just another one of the enemy For those 90 odd minutes he is fair game as are all opposition players right? Don't think he will be targeted at all though and he is not the sort of player who gets under the opposition skin so think it will be fine. Then again I have a bit of a soft spot for United so might have a softer stance on it...
He was brilliant in a deep role for Brentford. Reminding me of Scholesy.Can or should?
Are we going to shoehorn players into positions that aren't their best role? He's spent most of his career as an attacking midfielder, even at times playing as an attacker out wide. To convert him to a deep lying player for the sake of trying to fit in too many similar players doesn't make any sense to me.
We have friendlies against Atletico Madrid and Rayo Vallecano a week before our season starts. I'd expect our new signings to feature in either of those games.So if he isn't on the pre season tour, do we have other friendlies after the tour, before the season starts?
Firoghalfjers!First time in a while I am tempted to buy a shirt with a name.
What number you guys reckon?
Thanks. Are 2 games enough time for Eriksen, Martinez and De Jong to be prepared for the new season though?We have friendlies against Atletico Madrid and Rayo Vallecano a week before our season starts. I'd expect our new signings to feature in either of those games.