Casemiro | United Player

Status
Not open for further replies.

gormless

Full Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2008
Messages
8,545
Location
comfortable and settled in my rut
Who remembers the days of only giving 30+ year olds one year contracts? Seemed to work relatively well.

Saying that, Casemiro is class. But he also plays with Modric and Kroos. May look a very different (and expensive) player here at United, but he’s obviously an improvement on what we have.
Football is different. Players go far longer into their 30s now.
 

RedMilo

Full Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Messages
1,317
IS THIS RELIABLE?
No, old Juan is a mythical legend that the muppets in the FDJ thread used to call on when logic was being ignored. If his predictions were true then FDJ would have signed 6 weeks ago :lol:
 

DiceRoller

Full Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2014
Messages
412
Location
Dublin
Casemiro is one of the best CDM's in the world and they love him. Will be a massive loss for them if he comes.
If that’s true, then there’s zero chance he joins us. It’s horrible to say, but nobody who is the best player in the world is joining Manchester United now.
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
9,957
Would we be moaning if debruyne or salah came available only if we gave them 5 year contract?
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
It feels like people are forgetting that it's McFred we have in midfield, or maybe they're repressing it because they're traumatised (don't blame them), but we need an upgrade in midfield, simple as, and if an opportunity like this crops up to get a player like Casemiro even at 30 years old, you take it.

It's better than having to deal with watching McFred for the rest of the season.
The exact same logic, with almost the exact same words, was used to justify countless previous failed signings that got us into this state.

In all seriousness, I don't understand the thought process that lead you to type those words unironically. Is it that you've forgotten the circumstances that caused us to make all those buys and don't see that it's the exact same situation with a different player subbed in? Do you for some random reason think Casemiro will be an exception in a way those other players whose purchases were backed with the exact same process, confidence and logic weren't? Or do you not accept that each one of those failed purchases set us back further than simply signing nobody in that moment would have?

It genuinely baffles me that people can be on a forum where we discuss the issues that got the club into this mess day after day and yet immediately jump into the same pattern of mistakes again with zero self-awareness, apparently having taken in nothing.

"Better than what we have" isn't good enough if you're spending that sort of money. Never has been, never will be. If the player doesn't justify the transfer in their own right while fitting into a clear well-thought pre-existing plan, they shouldn't be bought. Because a bad transfer takes multiple times as long to fix as no transfer.

And if we're so desperate for an immediate fix, buy someone cheaper who fits the minimum requirement of being "better than what we have" until you can identify the right big money signing. Because a hell of a lot of players other than Casemiro are better than Scott McTominay. And at least a cheaper undercooked purchase won't be a millstone around the neck of the club for years to come if it goes wrong.

It isn't even about Casemiro. Any time we end the summer in an air of desperation looking to spend massive money on a player who doesn't seem to fit the plan we had up to that point and doesn't appear to have been one of our first choices but is "better than what we have" or "too good to turn down", alarm bells should be ringing. If Casemiro was someone we wanted from the start of the summer or even the type of player we wanted from the start of the summer, fine. But we've seen zero sign that this signing was part of our main plan when the transfer window opened. The whiff of Woodwardism off this deal.
 

Leftback99

Might have a bedwetting fetish.
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
14,517
The exact same logic, with almost the exact same words, was used to justify countless previous failed signings that got us into this state.

In all seriousness, I don't understand the thought process that lead you to type those words unironically. Is it that you've forgotten the circumstances that caused us to make all those buys and don't see that it's the exact same situation with a different player subbed in? Do you for some random reason think Casemiro will be an exception in a way those other players whose purchases were backed with the exact same process, confidence and logic weren't? Or do you not accept that each one of those failed purchases set us back further than simply signing nobody in that moment would have?

It genuinely baffles me that people can be on a forum where we discuss the issues that got the club into this mess day after day and yet immediately jump into the same pattern of mistakes again with zero self-awareness, apparently having taken in nothing.

"Better than what we have" isn't good enough if you're spending that sort of money. Never has been, never will be. If the player doesn't justify the transfer in their own right while fitting into a clear well-thought pre-existing plan, they shouldn't be bought. Because a bad transfer takes multiple times as long to fix as no transfer.

And if we're so desperate for an immediate fix, buy someone cheaper who fits the minimum requirement of being "better than what we have" until you can identify the right big money signing. Because a hell of a lot of players other than Casemiro are better than Scott McTominay. And at least a cheaper undercooked purchase won't be a millstone around the neck of the club for years to come if it goes wrong.

It isn't even about Casemiro. Any time we end the summer in an air of desperation looking to spend massive money on a player who doesn't seem to fit the plan we had up to that point and doesn't appear to have been one of our first choices but is "better than what we have" or "too good to turn down", alarm bells should be ringing. If Casemiro was someone we wanted from the start of the summer or even the type of player we wanted from the start of the summer, fine. But we've seen zero sign that this signing was part of our main plan when the transfer window opened. The whiff of Woodwardism off this deal.
Spot on.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,834
The exact same logic, with almost the exact same words, was used to justify countless previous failed signings that got us into this state.

In all seriousness, I don't understand the thought process that lead you to type those words unironically. Is it that you've forgotten the circumstances that caused us to make all those buys and don't see that it's the exact same situation with a different player subbed in? Do you for some random reason think Casemiro will be an exception in a way those other players whose purchases were backed with the exact same process, confidence and logic weren't? Or do you not accept that each one of those failed purchases set us back further than simply signing nobody in that moment would have?

It genuinely baffles me that people can be on a forum where we discuss the issues that got the club into this mess day after day and yet immediately jump into the same pattern of mistakes again with zero self-awareness, apparently having taken in nothing.

"Better than what we have" isn't good enough if you're spending that sort of money. Never has been, never will be. If the player doesn't justify the transfer in their own right while fitting into a clear well-thought pre-existing plan, they shouldn't be bought. Because a bad transfer takes multiple times as long to fix as no transfer.

And if we're so desperate for an immediate fix, buy someone cheaper who fits the minimum requirement of being "better than what we have" until you can identify the right big money signing. Because a hell of a lot of players other than Casemiro are better than Scott McTominay. And at least a cheaper undercooked purchase won't be a millstone around the neck of the club for years to come if it goes wrong.

It isn't even about Casemiro. Any time we end the summer in an air of desperation looking to spend massive money on a player who doesn't seem to fit the plan we had up to that point and doesn't appear to have been one of our first choices but is "better than what we have" or "too good to turn down", alarm bells should be ringing. If Casemiro was someone we wanted from the start of the summer or even the type of player we wanted from the start of the summer, fine. But we've seen zero sign that this signing was part of our main plan when the transfer window opened. The whiff of Woodwardism off this deal.
I don't mind desperation with this guy who is surely one of the best around in his position
 

Spark

Full Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2012
Messages
2,280
Football is different. Players go far longer into their 30s now.
I mean we literally had Giggs and Scholes play till 40, Rio till he was lateish 30s etc. All on one year contracts.

The only thing that’s different is that we’re run by mugs.
 

Big Ben Foster

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
12,894
Location
BR -> MI -> TX
Supports
Also support Vasco da Gama
The exact same logic, with almost the exact same words, was used to justify countless previous failed signings that got us into this state.

In all seriousness, I don't understand the thought process that lead you to type those words unironically. Is it that you've forgotten the circumstances that caused us to make all those buys and don't see that it's the exact same situation with a different player subbed in? Do you for some random reason think Casemiro will be an exception in a way those other players whose purchases were backed with the exact same process, confidence and logic weren't? Or do you not accept that each one of those failed purchases set us back further than simply signing nobody in that moment would have?

It genuinely baffles me that people can be on a forum where we discuss the issues that got the club into this mess day after day and yet immediately jump into the same pattern of mistakes again with zero self-awareness, apparently having taken in nothing.

"Better than what we have" isn't good enough if you're spending that sort of money. Never has been, never will be. If the player doesn't justify the transfer in their own right while fitting into a clear well-thought pre-existing plan, they shouldn't be bought. Because a bad transfer takes multiple times as long to fix as no transfer.

And if we're so desperate for an immediate fix, buy someone cheaper who fits the minimum requirement of being "better than what we have" until you can identify the right big money signing. Because a hell of a lot of players other than Casemiro are better than Scott McTominay. And at least a cheaper undercooked purchase won't be a millstone around the neck of the club for years to come if it goes wrong.

It isn't even about Casemiro. Any time we end the summer in an air of desperation looking to spend massive money on a player who doesn't seem to fit the plan we had up to that point and doesn't appear to have been one of our first choices but is "better than what we have" or "too good to turn down", alarm bells should be ringing. If Casemiro was someone we wanted from the start of the summer or even the type of player we wanted from the start of the summer, fine. But we've seen zero sign that this signing was part of our main plan when the transfer window opened. The whiff of Woodwardism off this deal.
Fantastic post. And I say that as someone who is normally a huge Casemiro fan.
 

VanHaal'sRedArmy

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2015
Messages
2,623
Thiago Silva still starts for Chelsea at 37. I mean c'mon if you have a chance to sign a 31 year old world class cdm at United you jump at that. He provides a spine to a spineless bunch of sorry ass footballers.
 

AjaxCunian

vexingwijsneus
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
4,241
Supports
Ajax & United
He would never get away with stuff like this for us.

Fernandinho, Ramos, Pepe and Casemiro have been the most underpunished players I've probably seen in my lifetime watching football.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
Casemiro is world class in my opinion. The only risk of this signing is he’s 30 and this could become like Matic where players on long contract on the declined and we are struggling to move him on. But prime Casemiro is far level above prime Matic Imo and Casemiro is much more mobile than Matic was. So unlike when we signed Matic, Casemiro might still have more years in him like 3-4 years of world class level.
 

tbtt

WUM
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
1,011
All clubs need veterans and you don't have home-grown veterans any more after a decade of disaster. Proven winners, with their winning experiences and mentality, should be bought from market. To attract younger, hungry talents, you need this type of veterans in the team. Overpayment is unavoidable, but it's worth a risk.
 

Brwned

Have you ever been in love before?
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
50,849
There’s no way someone like Casemiro, who’s reached the pinnacle of the game, would come to a place like this and feel motivated. He’d come here for a payday. No matter how good he could be, we absolutely don’t need another player in that situation.
 

OrcaFat

Full Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2013
Messages
5,672
Or y'know we could actually go for someone alittle younger who's best days might not be behind him the moment he steps through the doors at Carrington.
Well yes.

Still, 30 is not old in the modern game. And DM is a key position. Casimeiro is just about the best there is so it’s verging on moronic to complain about the money it’s going to cost given our recent performances.
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
44,007
Don't sign Casemiro, because Di Maria and McGuire didn't work out, or whatever.
 

ChaddyP

Full Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2011
Messages
13,852
Location
Jamaica
Jose would definitely do it just for the memes :lol:

--- AWB --- Maguire -- Varane -- Martinez --- Shaw
----------------------------- Casemiro -------------------------------
--------------- McT -------------------- Fred -------------------------
with elanga and rashford up top
 

Tom Van Persie

No relation
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
24,627
Our midfield is McTominay and Fred. If Madrid are demanding silly money for him and he's asking for a ridiculous wage then fair enough but around 50M that's being quoted would be a fair price. We paid that for Fred and nearly that much for Matic. If he's wanting to be the 2nd best paid player at the club then I say give him it. He upgrades our midfield massively. It goes without saying really.
 

sepulturite

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
2,239
I don't mind desperation with this guy who is surely one of the best around in his position
This is exactly my thinking as well, and while I agree with nearly everything @sullydnl said, this is Casemiro we're talking about. Any other player and I'd completely agree.
 

JSArsenal

Full Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
1,731
Well yes.

Still, 30 is not old in the modern game. And DM is a key position. Casimeiro is just about the best there is so it’s verging on moronic to complain about the money it’s going to cost given our recent performances.
Tbf, didn't Matthaus play till he was like 40? I think there have always been players who played into their late 30s, feels like it was more common in the 70s and 80s than it is now.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,834
It’s not ironic: Fred in his element chasing and harassing and not worrying what’s behind him; Casemiro cleans up loose balls, holds position and recycles constantly. They’re a logical and organic partnership. Just need a proper user of the ball amidst them and you’ve got at least an above average midfield. I can’t understand how people wouldn’t want him here.
Yeah who can we get that provides quality on the ball in the middle, no point mentioning De Jong because can't afford both in a million years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.