redcucumber
Full Member
- Joined
- May 18, 2022
- Messages
- 3,329
Are you a dafty? No one made the point that United dominated the game and won it easily, you said Arsenal dominated the game and that there was only one winner for most of it. The game was a draw at 0-0 and at 1-1 for 40 minutes of the 90. For the majority of the game, the remaining 50 minutes, United were either one or two goals up. I don't know why it's a reflection of our standards being through the floor that we are happy with how that game went given we won, but yeh, we were good in that game. Good enough to win 3-1. ten Hag was only a handful of games in and we'd had a rocky start after losing to Brighton and Brentford. Arteta has been at Arsenal for 3 years so we were up against a team that has had much more time together and was in good form. We came out on top. Happy days.It's really hard to take any post seriously when youngun's chuck in the childish little green emoji things as they think it somehow helps their point. This is a great forum, shame that emoji is available.
If you truly think Utd were good in that game, your standards are through the floor. One poor VAR decision away from a very different game too (unsuprising given the officials), but hey never mind. Onwards and upwards.
Utd were very good in moments during that game, and I respect that. I have no problem with the counter attacking tactics, Utd are an extremely dangerous team. When I read Utd dominated the game, or won the match 'easily' I just chuckle.
The facts are, despite that defeat, Arsenal have picked up 27 more points than Utd if you look at the past 38 games, not too bad considering our front 4 combined cost £3m less than Antony, our team is rubbish and the manager is Peps cone boy. Peace.
You keep going on about the Odegaard foul, but it was a foul. It wasn't the 'softest' VAR decision, it was the right call. A poor VAR decision was the one we had go against us on Sunday against Everton.
I don't quite get the point of looking at the past 38 games, it seems like a rather arbitrary figure to pluck out of nowhere. I also don't get the point of bringing up finances, unless you're under the impression that Arsenal haven't also spent an absolute feck tonne of money in the past couple of years?