Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.

MF1138

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
285
What if Jassim doesn't actually have backing from the Qatari state... and it just turns out he is the Qatari Michael Knighton :lol:
 

Red in STL

Turnover not takeover
Joined
Dec 1, 2022
Messages
9,902
Location
In Bed
Supports
The only team that matters
What if Jassim doesn't actually have backing from the Qatari state... and it just turns out he is the Qatari Michael Knighton :lol:
Then he definitely needs to do an act in front of the Stretty
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,714
That sort of stuff is in the data room, which has been available since ~ January.
At each stage more sensitive financial data is given. The first phase was meant for clubs to place indicative bids ie to weed our the chancers from serious bidders. The data room provided bidders to place such bid. Now the real dance begin
 

Berbaclass

Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
39,156
Location
Cooper Station
It’s nothing like what the Glazers did - INEOS have clearly stated no new debt will be leveraged against the club. The club will be debt free.
That doesn't mean the club will be debt free. That suggests that the existing debt will remain.
 

MackRobinson

New Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2017
Messages
5,134
Location
Terminal D
Supports
Football
You said the following, " I believe the over-the-top pro-Qatar rhetoric has more to do with the belief in having more transfer funds than anything else mentioned."

The "pro-Qatar" rhetoric is purely about transfers, as per what I just quoted you. You dismiss everything else which has been the reason for people wanting Qatar. But as I stated, under the Glazers post SAF we've, spent the most, and we still want them out. So, could it be more than just transfer for the pro-Qatar people?
I didn't dismiss it. I just said I don't think it's as important as people are leading on. I already explained my reasons why I believe this (i.e. the negativity toward INEOS with so little information about the details of their bid and the dismissal of the things they said they would do like invest in infrastructure and not place more debt on the club for starters)
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,934
Location
Somewhere out there
It’s a rock and a hard place. SJR is playing the community card to create a bit of artificial romance in the media, and likely brings debt, financing, and a similar situation to what we have now with the Glazers. Qatar on the other hand bring sportswashing alongside a shedload of cash.

I don’t really want either of them, but then again I can’t really think of anyone I would want in an ideal world.
How the funk is it similar to the Glazers man? The biggest company the Glazers owned was Manchester United, with a measly profit in it’s best years of 100m and revenues of 600-700m.
INEOS turns over 65bn, and has annual profits of 2bn.

United was liable to pay all debt under the Glazers, they had no other income streams do it. Under INEOS all debt with be moved to the much much bigger company and none on the football club.

It’s absolutely nothing like Glazer ownership. It’s ok to prefer Qatari oil money without having to post absolute nonsense regarding INEOS bid.
 

Red in STL

Turnover not takeover
Joined
Dec 1, 2022
Messages
9,902
Location
In Bed
Supports
The only team that matters
How is any of this stopping them from just sending an encrypted email? It's a bit silly that due diligence must be done at their offices in such a short time span.
I doubt many, if any, businesses would let their financial books off the premises and especially not via electronic means
 

enghuei

Cheats at Tetris
Joined
Jan 7, 2006
Messages
2,417
Location
6793 miles away from Manchester
All that detective work and you didn't read the original post he was referring to when I first responded.



Phase 2 was referring to the meeting. Try again
Phase 2 refers to more than just the meeting that have been happening these past 2 weeks. Anyone who has progressed past phase 1 and is invited to submit a more concrete bid is in phase 2.

That sort of stuff is in the data room, which has been available since ~ January.
No they are not. Multiple reports have said that prospective bidders have lamented the fact that the the info available in the data room during the initial stage of the sale process is “very limited”. Only those who get past phase 1 and proceed to phase 2 which only started in March are allowed access to more detailed financial info.
 

MTF

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
5,243
Location
New York City
At each stage more sensitive financial data is given. The first phase was meant for clubs to place indicative bids ie to weed our the chancers from serious bidders. The data room provided bidders to place such bid. Now the real dance begin
It's a company, not a CIA operation. There's decreasing returns in terms of impact to valuation x new information. The most relevant pieces of information are in the public financial statements. People invest billions of dollars everyday in listed companies without access to more than the public documents.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,714
It's a company, not a CIA operation. There's decreasing returns in terms of impact to valuation x new information. The most relevant pieces of information are in the public financial statements. People invest billions of dollars everyday in listed companies without access to more than the public documents.
No company like their sensitive financial details to be aired in public especially if the company in question is making a loss and is on sale
 

red thru&thru

Full Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
7,657
I didn't dismiss it. I just said I don't think it's as important as people are leading on. I already explained my reasons why I believe this (i.e. the negativity toward INEOS with so little information about the details of their bid and the dismissal of the things they said they would do like invest in infrastructure and not place more debt on the club for starters)
Yeah, so, it's your opinion.

And I have taken word from both the bidders, via their actual press release. So that is actually is coming from the horses mouth, and even if it is little to go by, that is what any of us can go off. And comparing the two statements, Jassim's is a lot more reassuring.
 

Berbaclass

Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
39,156
Location
Cooper Station
Not when we know a) INEOS has put £800m funding for the debt in place with GS and JPM; and b) there is a change of control clause which means the debt must be cleared within 10 days of a takeover.
Nothing has been publically stated about the debt by INEOS

Who says there is a change of control clause?
 

Nou_Camp99

what would Souness do?
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
10,274
Same if you’re spending 5bn why only spend 30 minutes at the potential new place.
At least Jassim advisors spent most of the day there doing due diligence. INEOS went for a photo op it seems, more than happy to pose for the cameras.
I imagine because Jim has been to OT quite a lot in his lifetime and probably didn't need the tour??? He did go on to Carrington as well. Wasn't like he went home. Hahaha
 

Teja

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
5,856
It’s nothing like what the Glazers did - INEOS have clearly stated no new debt will be leveraged against the club. The club will be debt free.
They never really confirmed that they wouldn't pull cash out one way or the other. Even if it's not against the club, they can have the club pay the loan amount effectively.

I think they will have huge amount of popular support if they clarified exactly what their plan is for existing / new debt.
 

romufc

Full Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2019
Messages
12,559
I imagine because Jim has been to OT quite a lot in his lifetime and probably didn't need the tour??? He did go on to Carrington as well. Wasn't like he went home. Hahaha
So how do you know the Qataris have never been to OT?
 

MTF

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
5,243
Location
New York City
Thread about how there is not a lot of additional value in the due diligence/non-public data for companies that are already listed on a stock exchange:

 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,714
It's strange that nothing was leaked from SJR camp yet
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,714
Indeed. But surely £6b doesn't make financial sense. Qatar aren't in it for monies.
I suspect that neither party want united because of financial purposes. Its more about greenwashing/sportswashing. Now its a matter if how money both parties are willing to spend on such practices
 
Status
Not open for further replies.