He could have a point on this one though,Erik will only be able to bite his tongue for so long
Was mocked yesterday for suggesting ETH threatening to resign, and then actually resigning (if final resolution isn't announced) would move the needle in any way, because 'he's only an employee', as if his profile and what that decision would signify to the markets, was no more than that of some data scout.
Admittedly only a 'layperson' myself, but piecing it broadly together from 'informed' twitter types, there are a lot of people with little sentimental interest in football but who have stakes at some level in United alongside the Glazers, who are also losing patience (and seeing corroborated what closer examination of their corporate intelligence-gathering should have revealed- these aren't 'serious people', to paraphrase Succession) , particularly when it comes to this club, and they're neglecting fiduciary responsibility with heir antics, let alone the kind of duty towards clubs flourishing that the rest of us care about. ETH leaving would play into a narrative, which at some level is all these things are (probabilities and trends) -a suspicion around a truth the Glazers have been trying to suppress, about the 'brand', let alone the team, that a few sponsorships coasting off the back of SAF's era and the odd trophy since, can't obscure, and the way they've run out of track. In practical terms, Glazers can't afford not to cash out to all intents and purposes anyway, but, again, we've read the news about savvier groups fecking up deals with their hubris and what saves us in the end, in that event, might indeed be other 'sharks' essentially forcing them to resurrect it and on worse terms for the Glazers themselves...
