Nobody here knows. It’s absurd so many posters are making any sort of these claims.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
We never appreciated Rooney enough.
Preparing to spend 120 million we don't have, on a player Levy doesn't want to sell - least of all to a Premier League club. All of this well reported, multiple times. Can't take you people serious
He had a better goals to game ratio than Sesko did whilst they were both in Austria at the time. Going on to score 2 goals against his team when they both shared the pitch on that match infact..I'd argue he's a better talent than Sesko but Sesko stands out enough to be the next big thing, and for us to try to sign him a year ago
If Kane wants to come, he should force the move himself but he looks like he is Levy's bitch so I'm not counting on it.
I think it's not realistic to expect a 20 years from a foreign league to come straight away as main striker leading a club as big as Man Utd. Only absolute top class player in the mould of Kane can handle the pressure.
My guess is Hojlund, Rashford and Martial rotate up top. Garnacho and Sancho rotate at LW when Rashford is top. Antony and Sancho or Mount when needed to rotate at RW assuming Amad goes on loan again.
Think I’d rather this strategy than overspending on strikers over the hill. At very worst we can still re-sell.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
This is worrying from a Denmark fan. And people expect him to come in straight as main ST at 20. We need a more established ST.
Sign the player the management seemingly want to sign
If we’re prepared to pay £120m on Kane might as well spend £150-200m on Mbappe. Younger innit.
Honestly United were linked with Osimhen last year we didn't go for it now his price is unreasonable.
I think we will get rid of Martial in the next 12 months.
Agreed, I think in this day and age that is fine. A good bit higher I would move on.
If this is true it's just a matter of time imo. 5m cash + some add ons is definitely not a big difference.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I see this a lot, but I'm not sure I agree. We need more goals from a striker, I think we all agree on that, but I think we'll do fine if he can get say 15-20 goals in all competitions. I think we can expect more goals from other sources as well this season, so Højlund's goals alone won't be the most important thing. Although I think he'll surprise some people, his movement alone should get him goals with the caliber of player we have to supply him.
So that’s PSG, Inter and Juve that all would want him.
And then there are other Danes who love him and think he can do a great job. Are you just going to listen to the ones that feel it's too early? No one has claimed he's going to be the main striker, anyway. Martial will likely start ahead of him when fit, and Rashford will rotate with him.
In that case if we should be prepared to spend 120m on Kane then we should be prepared to spend 300m on Mbappe in which case we should be prepared to spend 7.4 billion to genetically modify Messi and bring back a younger version of him.
He’s supposedly a Utd fan and everything we’ve heard so far suggests he’s desperate to play for us. As long as we can reach an agreement with Atalanta then I think he’ll pick us over PSG.
PSG seem to be in the hunt for every fecker going
A denmark fan who is also a chelsea fan. Naturally opposition and rival fans will look at it differently to a Utd fan.
I don't think we're currently in a position to sign the strikers who are established enough and at the right quality. The only viable options are Kane and Osimhen and we're seemingly priced out of those deals.
You never know. Ten Hag is a brilliant coach, so there’s every chance he’ll be just be fine. From a coaching standpoint, I think he’d be in great hands but for him I’d had hoped for a more steady rise.
I’m saying this as a fan of Højlund. For United, it’s a no brainer. For him, he could do with another year or two at lower tier club
Agree. This is a logical thinking. At 20 we still need to develop him and I think we still need another ST if we want to be a serious contender.
Ah. The old “we only have x amount for one player parallel negotiation to drive price down before then signing both” routine.
That assumes we have 120m available to buy him.
His contract is out next summer so for sure he'll leave and we'll replace him then, but he'll stay this summer. Can't see anyone taking him. So we are stuck with what we have this summer and then next summer depending on how the attackers do, either get more forward depth or get a starting CF.
Personal terms are always easy to agree. Not big news. Think we will get this done though for around maybe €60m-€65m. Going rate for promising young players these days unfortunately.
Spoiler alert. We don't. That’s why their post was daft.
