Rice cost £105m and Chelsea bought Enzo in January for over £100m. I don't think it's unreasonable for them to demand £100m
There not the same thing at all.
RIce was always over valued at 100m by West ham being young and english always cost daft money, so he always going to cost that no matter who went in for him.
Enzo Fernández had a release clause and Benfica refused to take less even when Chelsea tried repeatedly to negotiate because they didn't want to lose him.
Brighton are using these two completely different situations to demand a similar fee. £80 million is a very good offer for Caciedo and as the previous poster said Brighton are now taking the piss a bit.
Not the first time they've treated Chelsea this way (Cucurella) which I personally find hilarious, i mean it's Chelsea but it certainly doesn't bode well for any other team wanting to negotiate with them, Spursesque to say the least.