g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });

Rasmus Højlund | Signed for United

Status
Not open for further replies.

roseguy64

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2010
Messages
12,349
Location
Jamaica
Well if we all believe what we read in the news/social media, then PSG are prepared to pay as much as us with a higher salary. So "overpaying" doesn't seem to only apply to us it would seem. No idea if we are overpaying or not in this case, time will tell. If he can lead the line and score 25 goals next season for us then we will be calling him a bargain.
No, PSG weren't prepared to go higher than their first bid which is roughly about his value that they bid.
 

Abraxas

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
6,107
Brilliant to get it over the line. Going down to the last few days is a mistake. We want to get a new striker bedded into the club. Absolutely crucial.

It's over the odds for sure but it's also who we've clearly identified as the stand out option and they've been willing to pay for that. In the long run we'll see.
 

roseguy64

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2010
Messages
12,349
Location
Jamaica
His current price is purely dictated by the market. We are desperate for a striker and there's a shortage of them. It's good to keep that in mind when judging how well he does at United. So basically I think, anything above 60 is overpriced and doesn't determine his quality. We simply don't have a choice.
I will not keep that in mind. Didn't do that for Antony and won't for this guy.
 

dedek_mraz

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 29, 2016
Messages
62
horrible deal, shame ... for that money you add whatever extra it takes and go get Kane. As far as young prospects go, Hojlund is nothing special, we should have pursued Šeško instead, for that kind of money Leipzig would have sold him (not that either him or Hojlund are worth that sum though) :houllier:
 

kaku06

Vulgarian
Joined
Jul 26, 2022
Messages
2,513
feck me we've caved again :lol:
Seriously we did. I don’t understand the jump from our first offer of around £50m including add ons to this in a couple of days. I was thinking it’ll get done for £55m plus add ons but boy I was wrong.
 

Andycoleno9

matchday malcontent
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
29,269
Location
Croatia
People can spin this as much as they want but spending 80 mil euros on striker who has one pro season behind him in which he scored only 9 league goals is absolutely mental.
 

lsd

The Oracle
Joined
Jun 5, 2016
Messages
10,934
Forget Hojlund, the real action in this thread is this here slapfight.

It's laughable but what can you do? Ornstein reported it first i wasn't the only one who saw it and now for some reason it's gone. I blame aliens
 

Gandalf

Full Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2018
Messages
4,856
Location
Alabama but always Wales in my heart
horrible deal, shame ... for that money you add whatever extra it takes and go get Kane. As far as young prospects go, Hojlund is nothing special, we should have pursued Šeško instead, for that kind of money Leipzig would have sold him (not that either him or Hojlund are worth that sum though) :houllier:
Well he is better than Sesko for one and Levy point blank refused to sell Kane to us so just as well you were not involved in the transfer.
 

kafta

Perpetual Under 11's Team Player
Joined
Sep 29, 2004
Messages
5,634
Location
Beirut
We overpaid for sure. I can only hope he does well. The players that do well, their fee gets ignored. Still I’m glad we finally have a young and hungry striker.
 

Real Name

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2020
Messages
14,388
Location
Croatia
horrible deal, shame ... for that money you add whatever extra it takes and go get Kane. As far as young prospects go, Hojlund is nothing special, we should have pursued Šeško instead, for that kind of money Leipzig would have sold him (not that either him or Hojlund are worth that sum though) :houllier:
Quality rant.
 

NYAS

Full Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2012
Messages
4,324
The Athletic literally posted an article a few weeks ago saying that Atalanta wanted €100m. Now it’s “they actually wanted €90m and you idiots paid €85m”. Bunch of wankers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.