g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });

MEN banned from the press conference today | Some journalists banned for running articles without approaching United for comment first

Josep Dowling

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
7,681
MEN referencing the Munich Air Disaster and a black and white photo of Old Trafford. Absolutely pathetic.
 

Amir

Full Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2000
Messages
24,996
Location
Rehovot, Israel
For those defending MEN and Journalistic freedom of speech. Why are there so many sources banned in the caf?
Because in this day and age of internet and social media, it's easy for anyone to write absolute crap and send it worldwide within seconds. Doesn't mean the more serious media outlets are like that.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
31,980
Hearing from sources at the club what is happening IS journalism. If it's done well enough, with different sources, etc.

I'd say the true problem is that people just aren't happy with what they are hearing.
It's not about being happy or unhappy. The banned journalists were not respected by many on the caf before Ten Hag took charge.

It's about them being inept at critically analysing the issue and having more than one side of the story to give more educated views.
 

Velvet Revolver

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2010
Messages
1,355
Location
Inside Scholes's Brain
Because in this day and age of internet and social media, it's easy for anyone to write absolute crap and send it worldwide within seconds. Doesn't mean the more serious media outlets are like that.
Ok, so in that case the club as an entity and business are in the right to ban such crap.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
31,980
Because in this day and age of internet and social media, it's easy for anyone to write absolute crap and send it worldwide within seconds. Doesn't mean the more serious media outlets are like that.
Ok, so in that case the club as an entity and business are in the right to ban such crap.
Exactly this. We haven't banned freedom of speech by not allowing the journalists in the conference. They can still spew whatever shit they want. They just lost certain privileges due to a lack of journalistic integrity.
 

Velvet Revolver

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2010
Messages
1,355
Location
Inside Scholes's Brain
That it's quite possible that the reports are true and that United have banned journalists because the club didn't like it.
Well in that case United should ban all media outlet not just the 'chosen' few. When have you seen anything positive written about united in the past few years?
 

always_hoping

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
7,871
Location
Constans Hiberniae
Andrew Ward who pulled the plug on them. Has been the Director of Media Relations & Public Affairs for United since Feb 2022.

He was 19 years as a journalist with the Financial Times so knows how these chaps works especially the tabloid muck.
 

Amir

Full Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2000
Messages
24,996
Location
Rehovot, Israel
Well in that case United should ban all media outlet not just the 'chosen' few. When have you seen anything positive written about united in the past few years?
Now that would be chaos that will place the entire media against United. Easier to ban a few journalists who printed something negative today and wait and see if it had an intimidating effect on everyone.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
31,980
No, it's reported that some players are losing confidence. Not the same thing.
It's being reported that players are not wanting to run, that isolated players are training really well, that ten hags methods are questioned and so on. It's all the same types of briefs in different words. And it's happened with every manager by the same journalists. It's really not hard to tell what's going on with them.
 

THE ZOL

Daddy Sancho
Joined
Apr 22, 2022
Messages
216
Location
Sudan
Supports
Al-Merreikh (Omdorman)
The desperation of the Ten Hag cultists in this thread is hilarious.

According to them, it’s the duty of the Manchester Evening News, a respectable local media outlet with a proud tradition of independent reporting that is older than Manchester United football club as we know it, to do United’s PR for them. If you want solely positive media coverage of United, MUTV is right there! It specialises in this sort of them.

Accoring to the Ten Hag cultists, a journalist that keeps their sources anonymous is simply making things up and the only way they can be truthful is if they name their sources and expose them to severe career consequences that will essentially make them unemployable.

According to the Ten Hag cultists, it’s a bad thing that journalists are briefed that squad morale is at all time low but it is totally fine that journalists are briefed character assasinations on players that have been victims of an abuse of power by this egotistical control-freak of a manager. They perfectly happy to accept the briefings they like as factual, but they cast doubt on the credibility of those that go against their agenda.

Is it not the duty of us, as fans, to know both the good and bad that is happening at United internally? Or would you rather have your heads buried in the sand without an explanation as to why we have been so awful.

An honest question to the Ten Hag cultists. Who is your first loyalty to? Is it to Manchester United, the club that has brought you happiness for decades? Or to a manager that is treating OUR club like his personal little dictatorship? Why should we allow him to drag our reputation and standards through the mud with his illogical tactical decisions and shambolic squad management?

Because the players are to blame? We’re all with you on that one. They aren’t good enough. But isn’t it the manager’s job to keep them onboard and coach them to success?

Or should we accept Ten Hag disrespecting this club by treating it like his dictatorship because “there is no alternative” and “we need to end this cycle of hiring and firing”? By this logic, managers from Moyes to Ole should not have been fired.

Please use your logic, rationality and common sense and put the interests of United first. Ten Hag’s persistence with the same disgusting tactics with the same repeated flaws have shown us enough that he cannot be trusted and his position is untenable.

If this mutiny is necessary in order to accelerate his sacking then sobeit. The season is already a write off with this manager and we should start preparing for the next one without him.
 

Oranges038

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
12,390
I am sorry - but that is just BS from the club. Let's just say that these writers are correct - and any of them go to United and ask for a comment - what will United say ? That there isn't an inch of truth in the stories. It reminds me of that story with OGS and the Spurs-rumours in 97-98. In a moment of frustration during an international break - OGS told a local reporter that he thought of leaving United due to lack of game-time. The reporter whose paper was the equivalent to Stockport Daily or Salford Gazette - thought he had got the scoop of a lifetime, whereas OGS realized that the comment would not go down well with Ferguson so he backtracked. The reporter printed the story and OGS claimed it was a lie - but admitted several years later that it was correct, and that he had felt really bad about accusing the reporter of lying but he feared Ferguson would kick him out.

United, just like reporters will say and do what is best for them - and even if there are 5-6-7 players who want ETH gone - they will of course never admit it. So if you print a story like this - true or not, there is no point to contact the club -. because the club will deny it - true or not.
You'd have a point if it was just some random journalists. Luckhurst has been covering Utd for 10 years, he knows exactly what he's doing. This is what he thought of SAF banning journalists over 10 years ago.

https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/sa...guson-bans-journalists-reports_b_1832503.html

His ban is long overdue.
 

Velvet Revolver

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2010
Messages
1,355
Location
Inside Scholes's Brain
Now that would be chaos that will place the entire media against United. Easier to ban a few journalists who printed something negative today and wait and see if it had an intimidating effect on everyone.
A win (rare) for the club then. I still don't understand what your gripe with this is. I am not going to respond anymore so lets move on.
 

Red00012

Full Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
12,399
The desperation of the Ten Hag cultists in this thread is hilarious.

According to them, it’s the duty of the Manchester Evening News, a respectable local media outlet with a proud tradition of independent reporting that is older than Manchester United football club as we know it, to do United’s PR for them. If you want solely positive media coverage of United, MUTV is right there! It specialises in this sort of them.

Accoring to the Ten Hag cultists, a journalist that keeps their sources anonymous is simply making things up and the only way they can be truthful is if they name their sources and expose them to severe career consequences that will essentially make them unemployable.

According to the Ten Hag cultists, it’s a bad thing that journalists are briefed that squad morale is at all time low but it is totally fine that journalists are briefed character assasinations on players that have been victims of an abuse of power by this egotistical control-freak of a manager. They perfectly happy to accept the briefings they like as factual, but they cast doubt on the credibility of those that go against their agenda.

Is it not the duty of us, as fans, to know both the good and bad that is happening at United internally? Or would you rather have your heads buried in the sand without an explanation as to why we have been so awful.

An honest question to the Ten Hag cultists. Who is your first loyalty to? Is it to Manchester United, the club that has brought you happiness for decades? Or to a manager that is treating OUR club like his personal little dictatorship? Why should we allow him to drag our reputation and standards through the mud with his illogical tactical decisions and shambolic squad management?

Because the players are to blame? We’re all with you on that one. They aren’t good enough. But isn’t it the manager’s job to keep them onboard and coach them to success?

Or should we accept Ten Hag disrespecting this club by treating it like his dictatorship because “there is no alternative” and “we need to end this cycle of hiring and firing”? By this logic, managers from Moyes to Ole should not have been fired.

Please use your logic, rationality and common sense and put the interests of United first. Ten Hag’s persistence with the same disgusting tactics with the same repeated flaws have shown us enough that he cannot be trusted and his position is untenable.

If this mutiny is necessary in order to accelerate his sacking then sobeit. The season is already a write off with this manager and we should start preparing for the next one without him.
So you voted Keep Ten Hag yes?
 

Gandalf

Full Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2018
Messages
4,838
Location
Alabama but always Wales in my heart
According to them, it’s the duty of the Manchester Evening News, a respectable local media outlet with a proud tradition of independent reporting that is older than Manchester United football club as we know it, to do United’s PR for them. If you want solely positive media coverage of United, MUTV is right there! It specialises in this sort of them.
You might want to take a look at the state of reporting in the social media age. The MEN, like most traditional press, has become unrecognizable from the likes of buzzfeed etc. Their business model is entirely based on driving clicks and the best and most surefire way to do that is through negative coverage of United because that not only attracts supporters but a global audience of fans of other clubs who love to revel in our misery. The concept of fact checking stories and verifying sources has completely fallen by the wayside and the notion of offering the club the chance to respond to or dispute their articles is ignored for the very reason that they know 99% of what they publish is horseshit and could be irrefutably proven false by the club thereby leaving them with nothing to print unless they want to risk legal action for printing lies after they have been given the proof their story is false.

FYI, I am no ETH ******* and I lean strongly towards the view that he is out of his depth and difficult as it will be we probably will need to take another shot at finding the right guy.
 

Pickle85

Full Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2021
Messages
6,665
The desperation of the Ten Hag cultists in this thread is hilarious.

According to them, it’s the duty of the Manchester Evening News, a respectable local media outlet with a proud tradition of independent reporting that is older than Manchester United football club as we know it, to do United’s PR for them. If you want solely positive media coverage of United, MUTV is right there! It specialises in this sort of them.

Accoring to the Ten Hag cultists, a journalist that keeps their sources anonymous is simply making things up and the only way they can be truthful is if they name their sources and expose them to severe career consequences that will essentially make them unemployable.

According to the Ten Hag cultists, it’s a bad thing that journalists are briefed that squad morale is at all time low but it is totally fine that journalists are briefed character assasinations on players that have been victims of an abuse of power by this egotistical control-freak of a manager. They perfectly happy to accept the briefings they like as factual, but they cast doubt on the credibility of those that go against their agenda.

Is it not the duty of us, as fans, to know both the good and bad that is happening at United internally? Or would you rather have your heads buried in the sand without an explanation as to why we have been so awful.

An honest question to the Ten Hag cultists. Who is your first loyalty to? Is it to Manchester United, the club that has brought you happiness for decades? Or to a manager that is treating OUR club like his personal little dictatorship? Why should we allow him to drag our reputation and standards through the mud with his illogical tactical decisions and shambolic squad management?

Because the players are to blame? We’re all with you on that one. They aren’t good enough. But isn’t it the manager’s job to keep them onboard and coach them to success?

Or should we accept Ten Hag disrespecting this club by treating it like his dictatorship because “there is no alternative” and “we need to end this cycle of hiring and firing”? By this logic, managers from Moyes to Ole should not have been fired.

Please use your logic, rationality and common sense and put the interests of United first. Ten Hag’s persistence with the same disgusting tactics with the same repeated flaws have shown us enough that he cannot be trusted and his position is untenable.

If this mutiny is necessary in order to accelerate his sacking then sobeit. The season is already a write off with this manager and we should start preparing for the next one without him.
Genuine question: are you Jason Sancho?
 

Denis79

Full Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2014
Messages
7,787
Even if they do ask for a comment from the club who says they can't run the exact same stories? Just add at the end that Manchester United denies these claims and you're good to go.
 

Someone

Something
Joined
Oct 21, 2007
Messages
7,979
Location
Somewhere
Don't think this was the right move. feck the journalists, but as far as they're concerned, they've done a damn good job getting that story, and it's not a made up one because it's obviously a leak from inside the club to several journalists. In this specific story, asking the club for a comment wouldn't have made a difference at all. What were we going to say?

We're happy here with the ban but what will it achieve? All the journalists now will pile on the club. ETH will get even more negative press, and the circus will just keep going.

What we need to do is find out who keeps leaking stories, and get them out of the club regardless to what happens to ETH. Banning journalists now isn't the best approach. People will say Fergie did it, but he did it from a point of strength, we're at rock bottom.
 

GreatDane

Full Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Messages
1,616
The desperation of the Ten Hag cultists in this thread is hilarious.

Accoring to the Ten Hag cultists..

According to the Ten Hag cultists....

An honest question to the Ten Hag cultists...
I Hag out, but this is ridiculous.
 

Plant0x84

Shame we’re aren’t more like Brighton
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
13,537
Location
Carpark and snack area adjacent to the abyss
The desperation of the Ten Hag cultists in this thread is hilarious.

According to them, it’s the duty of the Manchester Evening News, a respectable local media outlet with a proud tradition of independent reporting that is older than Manchester United football club as we know it, to do United’s PR for them. If you want solely positive media coverage of United, MUTV is right there! It specialises in this sort of them.

Accoring to the Ten Hag cultists, a journalist that keeps their sources anonymous is simply making things up and the only way they can be truthful is if they name their sources and expose them to severe career consequences that will essentially make them unemployable.

According to the Ten Hag cultists, it’s a bad thing that journalists are briefed that squad morale is at all time low but it is totally fine that journalists are briefed character assasinations on players that have been victims of an abuse of power by this egotistical control-freak of a manager. They perfectly happy to accept the briefings they like as factual, but they cast doubt on the credibility of those that go against their agenda.

Is it not the duty of us, as fans, to know both the good and bad that is happening at United internally? Or would you rather have your heads buried in the sand without an explanation as to why we have been so awful.

An honest question to the Ten Hag cultists. Who is your first loyalty to? Is it to Manchester United, the club that has brought you happiness for decades? Or to a manager that is treating OUR club like his personal little dictatorship? Why should we allow him to drag our reputation and standards through the mud with his illogical tactical decisions and shambolic squad management?

Because the players are to blame? We’re all with you on that one. They aren’t good enough. But isn’t it the manager’s job to keep them onboard and coach them to success?

Or should we accept Ten Hag disrespecting this club by treating it like his dictatorship because “there is no alternative” and “we need to end this cycle of hiring and firing”? By this logic, managers from Moyes to Ole should not have been fired.

Please use your logic, rationality and common sense and put the interests of United first. Ten Hag’s persistence with the same disgusting tactics with the same repeated flaws have shown us enough that he cannot be trusted and his position is untenable.

If this mutiny is necessary in order to accelerate his sacking then sobeit. The season is already a write off with this manager and we should start preparing for the next one without him.
Supporting the team and the manager = ten hag *******. This fan base is so weird at times.
 

NK86

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
10,439
The desperation of the Ten Hag cultists in this thread is hilarious.

According to them, it’s the duty of the Manchester Evening News, a respectable local media outlet with a proud tradition of independent reporting that is older than Manchester United football club as we know it, to do United’s PR for them. If you want solely positive media coverage of United, MUTV is right there! It specialises in this sort of them.

Accoring to the Ten Hag cultists, a journalist that keeps their sources anonymous is simply making things up and the only way they can be truthful is if they name their sources and expose them to severe career consequences that will essentially make them unemployable.

According to the Ten Hag cultists, it’s a bad thing that journalists are briefed that squad morale is at all time low but it is totally fine that journalists are briefed character assasinations on players that have been victims of an abuse of power by this egotistical control-freak of a manager. They perfectly happy to accept the briefings they like as factual, but they cast doubt on the credibility of those that go against their agenda.

Is it not the duty of us, as fans, to know both the good and bad that is happening at United internally? Or would you rather have your heads buried in the sand without an explanation as to why we have been so awful.

An honest question to the Ten Hag cultists. Who is your first loyalty to? Is it to Manchester United, the club that has brought you happiness for decades? Or to a manager that is treating OUR club like his personal little dictatorship? Why should we allow him to drag our reputation and standards through the mud with his illogical tactical decisions and shambolic squad management?

Because the players are to blame? We’re all with you on that one. They aren’t good enough. But isn’t it the manager’s job to keep them onboard and coach them to success?

Or should we accept Ten Hag disrespecting this club by treating it like his dictatorship because “there is no alternative” and “we need to end this cycle of hiring and firing”? By this logic, managers from Moyes to Ole should not have been fired.

Please use your logic, rationality and common sense and put the interests of United first. Ten Hag’s persistence with the same disgusting tactics with the same repeated flaws have shown us enough that he cannot be trusted and his position is untenable.

If this mutiny is necessary in order to accelerate his sacking then sobeit. The season is already a write off with this manager and we should start preparing for the next one without him.
We finally found out Sancho's username on the caf.
 

Kelly15

Full Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2014
Messages
251
Because in this day and age of internet and social media, it's easy for anyone to write absolute crap and send it worldwide within seconds. Doesn't mean the more serious media outlets are like that.
Yes they are. That's why we are trying to make them accountable. You want to write bull shit well you're going to be held accountable. It's about time we got back to that. For to long we have been letting anyone write whatever they want without any truth to it. They make money off of us printing these articles. If they want to make money the dirty way then they are not welcome to our press conferences any more.
 

Sir Erik ten Hag

Full Member
Joined
May 21, 2022
Messages
1,241
The desperation of the Ten Hag cultists in this thread is hilarious.

According to them, it’s the duty of the Manchester Evening News, a respectable local media outlet with a proud tradition of independent reporting that is older than Manchester United football club as we know it, to do United’s PR for them. If you want solely positive media coverage of United, MUTV is right there! It specialises in this sort of them.

Accoring to the Ten Hag cultists, a journalist that keeps their sources anonymous is simply making things up and the only way they can be truthful is if they name their sources and expose them to severe career consequences that will essentially make them unemployable.

According to the Ten Hag cultists, it’s a bad thing that journalists are briefed that squad morale is at all time low but it is totally fine that journalists are briefed character assasinations on players that have been victims of an abuse of power by this egotistical control-freak of a manager. They perfectly happy to accept the briefings they like as factual, but they cast doubt on the credibility of those that go against their agenda.

Is it not the duty of us, as fans, to know both the good and bad that is happening at United internally? Or would you rather have your heads buried in the sand without an explanation as to why we have been so awful.

An honest question to the Ten Hag cultists. Who is your first loyalty to? Is it to Manchester United, the club that has brought you happiness for decades? Or to a manager that is treating OUR club like his personal little dictatorship? Why should we allow him to drag our reputation and standards through the mud with his illogical tactical decisions and shambolic squad management?

Because the players are to blame? We’re all with you on that one. They aren’t good enough. But isn’t it the manager’s job to keep them onboard and coach them to success?

Or should we accept Ten Hag disrespecting this club by treating it like his dictatorship because “there is no alternative” and “we need to end this cycle of hiring and firing”? By this logic, managers from Moyes to Ole should not have been fired.

Please use your logic, rationality and common sense and put the interests of United first. Ten Hag’s persistence with the same disgusting tactics with the same repeated flaws have shown us enough that he cannot be trusted and his position is untenable.

If this mutiny is necessary in order to accelerate his sacking then sobeit. The season is already a write off with this manager and we should start preparing for the next one without him.
Welcome to the forum, Jadon! What took you so long? :D
 

Kelly15

Full Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2014
Messages
251
Exactly this. We haven't banned freedom of speech by not allowing the journalists in the conference. They can still spew whatever shit they want. They just lost certain privileges due to a lack of journalistic integrity.
Perfectly said!
 

Rojofiam

Full Member
Joined
May 11, 2017
Messages
3,580
Well done to the club.

Solhekol and Luckhurst are pricks of the highest order.
 

Kelly15

Full Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2014
Messages
251
Don't think this was the right move. feck the journalists, but as far as they're concerned, they've done a damn good job getting that story, and it's not a made up one because it's obviously a leak from inside the club to several journalists. In this specific story, asking the club for a comment wouldn't have made a difference at all. What were we going to say?

We're happy here with the ban but what will it achieve? All the journalists now will pile on the club. ETH will get even more negative press, and the circus will just keep going.

What we need to do is find out who keeps leaking stories, and get them out of the club regardless to what happens to ETH. Banning journalists now isn't the best approach. People will say Fergie did it, but he did it from a point of strength, we're at rock bottom.
Perfect. Time to create a seige mentality.