Flying high
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2015
- Messages
- 1,828
I remember it well. I also remember all the pundits lining up to tell us that DDG should have been stronger.
I remember it well. I also remember all the pundits lining up to tell us that DDG should have been stronger.
How many times did this happen to DeGea and because everyone said he was weak, they just wrote it off saying he has to be stronger.No way would the ref disallow that if it was down the other end.
Theres no way Onana would have got away with that.
They've literally just covered it!No mention of the disallowed goal on Sky.
If Henderson had jumped before Højlund came in and was about to collect the ball then it's a nailed on freekick. They jump more or less at the same time and Henderson is a fanny, imoDon't know if it was a foul or not but I seriously doubt it would have been given against our GK.
They literally always go with the on field decision. Var is a big waste of time.Would have been controversial if VAR had overturned that one. One of those where the on-field decision determines the outcome. For me it was a foul.
Exactly what I thought. The Palace player goes through the back of Dalot. Was there even a VAR check for that?He literally goes through the back of Dalot and doesn't touch the ball...All fine for VAR. Just another United game.
It's never a foul in a million years. You'd be raging if that was given against us.How was that not a foul on Casemiro?
That’s the problem. Weak as feck from the club.Yet the club will still be quiet as a mouse. cnuts need calling out. Take the fine.
The commentator was so fecking careful with his words when confirming the VAR decision on Højlund.Well this is hilarious though, we are absolute dogshit. But some of these decisions... the 'foul' on henderson was nonexistent, looked like Dalot got absolutely cleaned out for their third goal...
I guess the foul on Hojlund though is yet more bullshit VAR technicality? Like they can't recommend the ref to have a look because the foul took place outside the box?
But then if the foul was a DOGSO it's a potential red card, so VAR 'should' be able to recommend a look? I literally have no fecking idea, bin the whole thing! Looks like the ref blew the whistle late for the foul on henderson to avoid the call...
he doesnt jump much into him, so you’re just interpreting rules in an extreme manner.He jumps into him while he's trying to catch the ball. I only have the Dutch rulebook, but that says the keeper has a protected status in the 6 yards box and you cant physically impede them from getting the ball.
Though this rule book is like 2 years old, so I suppose it might as well have changed entirely by now
And everyone on here screamed free kick at the time.I hate our team but also feck off referee. De Gea got fouled few times and goals stood. Feck off.
But foul wasn't given was it?And everyone on here screamed free kick at the time.
Straightforward foul, jumps into Henderson, moves him out of the way of the ball when he has his arms up ready to catch it.
He goes down a bit too easily. It looked like a clear two handed push though, I've yet to see a better replay from another angle. But that was what I thought from one side view.How was that not a foul on Casemiro?
Yeah, the look always gives it away in these kinda situations.If Hoijlund doesn't look at him moments before he jumps into him then maybe we get the goal.
I mean, we were. We were also absolutely dreadful but those things are not mutually exclusive. The disallowed goal was absurd, there's nothing in it and I've seen De Gea being lambasted for years for being too weak in much harder situations and there was a foul on Dalot. The outcome of the game should not matter in debating the refereeing of them.Are people really trying to make out we've been hard done by tonight.
To be fair, that was allowed as it was part of a FA approved campaign to kick racism out of footballGames gone soft, John Terry didn't even look for a penalty when Diaby kicked him in the head.
I don't see how it is different from the Badiashile bump on Konsa (I believe?) which was the reason they ruled out Disasi's late winner. Most people here believed that was a legit call, which I actually agreed with.The disallowed goal was wrong. Henderson needs to be far stronger.
If it was two outfield players would the ref have batted an eyelid? They both jumped for the ball and both missed.I don't see how it is different from the Badiashile bump on Konsa (I believe?) which was the reason they ruled out Disasi's late winner. Most people here believed that was a legit call, which I actually agreed with.
Really? It's very different when you watch both back. The Henderson/Hojlund situation is a 50/50 jump for the ball. The Badiashile/Konsa situation is a deliberate barge.I don't see how it is different from the Badiashile bump on Konsa (I believe?) which was the reason they ruled out Disasi's late winner. Most people here believed that was a legit call, which I actually agreed with.
The question I asked at the time was, if it was at the other end of the pitch, would the ref give a penalty for a slight bump like that? I didn't have a problem with the Badiashile call and I think this one probably is a foul too. I did think Anderson went through Dalot for their 3rd goal, which I think was a foul.If it was two outfield players would the ref have batted an eyelid? They both jumped for the ball and both missed.
Fair enough. I guess it being outfield player vs keeper is the key difference but to me on the replays it looked like an okay call.Really? It's very different when you watch both back. The Henderson/Hojlund situation is a 50/50 jump for the ball. The Badiashile/Konsa situation is a deliberate barge.
I think if Hojlund does what Badiashile does it's a foul and rightly disallowed and if Badiashile does what Hojlund does your goal doesn't get disallowed.Fair enough. I guess it being outfield player vs keeper is the key difference but to me on the replays it looked like an okay call.