The aftermath if Spurs beat us in the final will be horrendous - full strength team for the OT leg and manage that game, then rest everyone until the final.
Seeing what Amorim wants to do, I can't help think the key positions are actually 10 and CB in terms of our immediate recruitment.
Amorim seems to want at least one CM who is much more of a screen/interceptor than someone to play out through, but if you start Case + Ugarte in front of that back 3, due respect, but you aren't playing through a good press. So next season I think it is safe to assume Bruno will fully transition to a CM to somewhat alleviate that issue but it's the creativity from the CBs that is so key if we insist on playing with 3. We need someone far more technical in the RCB role, someone who can bring that flank into the game more then it gets used at the moment and also can play through press, that's likely why Maz is currently our best RCB (in my mind) even though he's not a CB and not great at longer passes.
At the moment, there's no real jeopardy for a team to commit the extra man forwards - only Martinez consistently can pass through a press or feed Garnacho/Hojlund into a channel - the rest of our team just don't have it in their locker bar, arguably Yoro, but he's still going to be quite raw for a while given his age. So you can simply block the WBs and get tight on the CMs and we have nothing else to offer.
I don't care about the result in the final in
that way TBH, the idea that even Ange can salvage his position after presenting this season's shower of shite (more so in his second full season) seems ridiculous to me. They have scored the same goals as Arsenal, and they are sitting 30 points behind them with the manager saying that this is his football. Even if we win, it will be a stay of execution, if we don't get our act together. Next season, the midweek games in the CL will be unforgiving and if we don't start our league campaign on the front foot either, the pressure on Amorim will be tremendous and the Europa title won't mean anything. The only way to break the cycle of negativity is to play good football.
Problem number one is that we're easy to play against. The run-of-the-mill 442 defensive shape makes our build-up slow and laborious. You don't have to be particularly good at pressing us to make it hard for us. If you watch our games against midtable opposition, they don't even bother to press, they just shadow the pivots and the WBs, and let Onana and the centre-halves pass the ball from side to side. In the end, we either hoof the ball or we involve the WBs which is generally an if-all-else-fails scenario when you want to play out of the back and move the ball through the thirds. How bad is it? Grab your seat. No team in the PL has lost possession in their own half more than Manchester United. Let that sink in for a minute.
The centre-halves are obviously an issue. There's little ability in passing the ball through the lines with tempo and conviction, driving the ball forward or stepping up into the midfield. They're not alone, though. They also have poor options in the pivots ahead of them. We rarely see the midfielders offering themselves to receive the ball with their backs to goal. It's not who they are. That's why we never see the little bounce balls that test the opposition's shape and/or these "touch and short side-ball" sequences that often do the trick for other (more successful) teams who progress the ball centrally. Casemiro can do it occasionally, but he's a grenade-launcher on the ball, not a tempo-setter. Ugarte has his uses, but he's not the answer to anything. Mainoo is still too soft and often goes missing for periods within games. That leaves us with Bruno, the prescription for all ills. No one has created more chances and no one has lost the ball more times than him this season. Where would you want a player like that ideally? Closer to your forward or your keeper?
Besides, even if we do transition him into a more permanent deeper role, we'd still need to sign another midfielder. I've been screaming my lungs out about this for years. The last thing United need is a "destroyer" in the midfield. You put one next to Bruno, the first thing you achieve is make it easier for the opposition to mark him out of the game. The best combo currently seems to be him with Casemiro (the latter's passing stats are better with Bruno next to him). The major downside to that is that they're both high-risk passers. That's why SAF loved Carrick and never gave a rat's arse about the Fellainis, the Freds or the Ugartes of the football world. It's always easier to add a defensive body in the midfield battle when your risks (as a team that aims to play expansive football and win titles) don't pay off. The real challenge is to create a side that will take better care of the ball within these parameters.
I won't disagree about the #10s or the forwards. We don't see players wanting to receive the ball in the half-spaces and play combination football. They prefer to stay wide and then make the run in-behind. Who's going to play them in? You guessed it... Bruno, again, the man for all jobs. The downsides to having a single point of reference for creativity are obvious. Moreover, Bruno has the tendency to drop deeper when the opposition tactics are focused on not allowing him easy access to the spaces between the lines. Which creates other holes that aren't always easy to plug. So, yes, wherever we play him, we need better ballers all around (him).
We need to become less easy to play against for starters. The attack also needs to be looked at (our conversion rate is horrendous for a club of our size), but Amorim wants us to be vertical, aggressive and decisive on the ball. And when we do manage to move the ball with purpose through the thirds, thus getting our attackers on the ball running at an unorganized defence, these players can be dangerous. So, there's that. In a weird way, the Newcastle game seemed to be a microcosm of our season. We gave the ball away 50 times in our half. We had a prayer as long as Bruno could get in good positions between the lines, but evaporated when they man-marked him in the second half. Couldn't keep the ball for five seconds under pressure, but the one time we did, we scored the archetypical Amorim goal.