Hargreaves vs. Carrick, Feadingseagulls vs. Noodle, Chief (Bayern Fan!) vs. Logic

Status
Not open for further replies.

Plechazunga

Grammar partisan who sleeps with a real life Ryan
Joined
May 5, 2003
Messages
51,762
Location
Where Albert Stubbins scored a diving header
4 points:

1 As per usual, you ignore the even less defendable point Noods made about the chief's argument re the Bayern game.

:lol: I don't even remember the terrible things noodle is meant to have said. Only you do. I was making a point about an obvious incongruity in one of your childish rants, I'm not obliged to trawl through all of them.

2 Once again you ignore the fact that Noods posted the 'better than' remark as an explanation (and therefore presumably hyperbole free remark) regarding his point.

Yet again: the giant robot bit was the hyperbole

3 Effenberg v. Keane - you seem to be the only person so far (I raised the question earlier) to rate Effenberg (via the opinions of unsubstantiated others) as superior.

I don't. I reckon at their peaks there was nothing much between them. I said I was sure plenty of people do, such things being largely a matter of opinion and not, as you think, forensic analysis.

Congratulations. By your own notably stupid logic, you are now guilty of LYING, dishonesty and hypocrisy.


4 Noods continued to construct new misrepresentations of both what the chief and I posted - not consistent with honesty - especially when he purports to advance evidence in support of his case.
Child

This is worth a separate remark before retiring for the night.

The mere fact that you don't realise that 'exaggerating what your opponent said in order to make it easier to attack' is massively different from 'exaggerating your own point for rhetorical effect' would suggest you are either much less intelligent than I reckoned - or being deliberately disingenuous.

One misrepresents the view of an opponent and casts the negative judgements upon him. The other should, when used correctly, invite the reader to judge whether the exaggeration is justified.

Take Nucks' remarks about Hargreaves - his remarks about passing are sound - what about his contention about runs past opponents? He may reckon this is open to debate - he may even reckon he is definitely right. The crucial point surely, is that by stretching the point in an argument he himself is making he is inviting negative judgement on himself.

Noods, by making what he maintains the chief said to be less believable, is inviting negative judgement against his opponent. That's one aspect of what makes it dishonest.
I don't know or care what Nuck's remark was - he himself seems to think no hyperbole was intended. All irrelevant to whether noodle was exaggerating for comic effect - which he obviously was - but possibly relevant to your capacity or otherwise to correctly identify hyperbole.

He was a clone because he shared most of the same characteristics - that I'd reckon was accurate.

The eventual debating points would be - to what degree? - and then, to what effect?
Clone usually means identical. The Chief is now claiming he meant shared characteristics, but if so it seems unlikely he'd have said clone. Either way it doesn't matter, as it's not necessary on a football forum to find written evidence of a poster's views, you can just say what you reckon he thinks based on the tenor of his posts, if he disagrees he can say so, as the Chief frequently and robustly does.

It's called a conversation
 

kf

Full Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2001
Messages
6,336
He instead became a very down graded version of a Keane. With similar defensive ability and but little of the attacking skills the great Keane possessed. More akin to Keane in his decline. Only with much more speed & none of the attacking ability Keane possessed.
I think this is a fair assessment Chief. I would add though that when I've seen him play for United this season, he hasn't been particularly fast or mobile. I'm worried that whatever pace or mobility he did have has gone away after his injury. As I said in probably my only other serious post in this thread, it may be that with a full preseason behind him and a run of games he can become a more effective regular player for United. I don't know.

I don't see how anyone can support the image of Hargreaves making defense splitting passes or going on surging forward runs based on his appearances for United. I think you would say that isn't his job and would agree that certainly as far as the creative passing is concerned, Carrick has been more productive. (FS isn't of course supporting the argument, he's merely debating the method of argument which is his wont).

Also Nucks uses the argument that Hargreaves had done well this season when up against a more talented midfield. Given that we don't often play teams with a more talented midfield (who are we talking about this season? Arsenal aruguably? I can think of no other team we've played this season who can match our midfield resources) - if he's only going to be of use against a more talented midfield, he's not going to be of use very often is he? And it's not possible to just play him in those games as he wouldn't be sharp and fit for the games where he's 'needed', which on this season's evidence would be from the Champions League semis onwards.

Just to be clear, in case FS thinks I hate Owen Hargreaves like everyone else who says he hasn't set Old Trafford alight this season... I don't want OH to fail or be sold. I would just like to see him start to play better. I don't really think I'm going to see that this season because I suspect his injuries and lack of games are too serious for him to recover without a full preseason behind him. Hopefully, with a summer free of international football and a good preseason with United and more luck with injuries, we'll see the player you all tell us he is next season.
 

Mozza

It’s Carrick you know
Joined
Jul 13, 2002
Messages
23,353
Location
Let Rooney be Rooney
Actually, people have claimed much, much more, as I pointed out earlier to a similar remark (of course, all anti-OH posters will have read ALL their opponents' remarks as Noods demanded of me).

Let's see 'if you love football and love Owen Hargreaves you have a hole in your soul' - location of an anti-OH poster here.

Remarks about OH being 'anti-football' and 'pointless' in contexts which referred to his general function as a footballer 'at all'.

You may be right that 'No one has claimed to hate OH' but a number have indicated feelings that amount to that. It is true though, that even posters who don't really hate OH, manage to post the same type of shit as those who do. :D
I think Hargreaves is crap, I don't think he's any good as a footballer, I'm not saying this lot to antagonise.

He runs down the left
He runs down the riggggggghhhhhhhttttt
That boy Hargreaves
Makes United play shite

I did post that to antagonise
 

Sultan

Gentleness adorns everything
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
48,569
Location
Redcafe
I reckon a team like Newcastle or Spurs would be his ideal station.
 

noodlehair

"It's like..."
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
16,508
Location
Flagg
I reckon a team like Newcastle or Spurs would be his ideal station.
Newcastle maybe.

Spurs have players like Huddlestone, Jenas and Ohara (don't know how to spell his name), who are far better technically. Their style of play isn't all that dissimilar from ours. I reckon they need a top class midfielder, and a less spastic defence. Not Owen Hargreaves
 

kf

Full Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2001
Messages
6,336
In tribute to Page 76, what this thread needs is a gay Owen Hargreaves lookalike in a hat with a feather in it...

Oh look! Introduced by Jason no less :wenger:

 

Colly

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 26, 2006
Messages
1,813
In tribute to Page 76, what this thread needs is a gay Owen Hargreaves lookalike in a hat with a feather in it...

Oh look! Introduced by Jason no less :wenger:

This thread is gone beyond the realms of oddness !!
 

Sultan

Gentleness adorns everything
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
48,569
Location
Redcafe
United is an ideal station for Hargreaves, just give him time
With respect, he's at an age where he should be at the peak of his profession. I don't buy into the argument he's had a stop start season, or he's adapting to a new country, or league. He was never anything special in his Bayern days.
 

Cupid Stunt

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 9, 2008
Messages
1,515
Location
"In that, Anfield is unbeatable. Put a shit h
Fergie stalked his man for a long, long time. Trust the master!



I thought Hargreaves was great at Bayern but ive been less than impressed during his short stay here but very optimisting about what he can offer us in the future. The nature of the premiership is different to the German, International or European games he has experianced, all very slow tempo, pass to the next man football. Once he gets to grip with how we expect him to play in the premier league we'll have a top player. If you read into the type of character he is and seen his achievements you would be wiser to write him off.
 

noodlehair

"It's like..."
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
16,508
Location
Flagg
Er no. I was just saying that he was at fault for that particular goal. The one that knocked them out of Europe. In the game where he supposedly put in a performance that made Pele look like Ralphie Milne.
Prepare to be stalked across the forum by Feadingseagulls
 

Frosty

Logical and sensible but turns women gay
Joined
Jan 11, 2007
Messages
17,446
Location
Yes I can hear you Clem Fandango!
I picture Feeding Seagulls as a disgruntled academic whose work never reached the level that he wanted so he takes out his disappointment by using long words on an internet forum to sound pretentious.

Then again, I also picture Bazalini as Christopher Walken and think Devilish could well be Kevin Keegan in disguise, so you shouldn't read too much into that.

Hey, didn't Golden Blunder also say that a United player posts on these boards too?

Wait a minute....

The Chief....

Supports both United AND Bayern....

He's German yet speaks English....

Could it be? It all makes sense now....

THE CHIEF IS OWEN HARGREAVES!!!
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2002
Messages
52,851
Location
Founder of IhateMakeleles.org and Gourcufffanboysa
I picture Feeding Seagulls as a disgruntled academic whose work never reached the level that he wanted so he takes out his disappointment by using long words on an internet forum to sound pretentious.

Then again, I also picture Bazalini as Christopher Walken and think Devilish could well be Kevin Keegan in disguise, so you shouldn't read too much into that.

Hey, didn't Golden Blunder also say that a United player posts on these boards too?

Wait a minute....

The Chief....

Supports both United AND Bayern....

He's German yet speaks English....

Could it be? It all makes sense now....

THE CHIEF IS OWEN HARGREAVES!!!
:lol:dumbo:lol:
 

Sultan

Gentleness adorns everything
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
48,569
Location
Redcafe
Chief is class...

He brings a smile to my face, when reading his posts.

Hargreaves is still rubbish mind.
 

Chorley1974

Lady Ole
Joined
Nov 24, 2006
Messages
13,071
I picture Feeding Seagulls as a disgruntled academic whose work never reached the level that he wanted so he takes out his disappointment by using long words on an internet forum to sound pretentious.

Then again, I also picture Bazalini as Christopher Walken and think Devilish could well be Kevin Keegan in disguise, so you shouldn't read too much into that.

Hey, didn't Golden Blunder also say that a United player posts on these boards too?

Wait a minute....

The Chief....

Supports both United AND Bayern....

He's German yet speaks English....

Could it be? It all makes sense now....

THE CHIEF IS OWEN HARGREAVES!!!


Your argument is preposterous, Baz as Christopher Walken ffs!
 

Sam

New Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2007
Messages
31,585
PS - how are your man-boobs you seemed so keen to tell us all about? :D
:confused:

I don't know. I don't have 'man-boobs'. Just the thought of it makes me ill.

What this has to do with OH I don't know.

You do so in almost ever post .That's why you came up with the fecking stupid notion that his only job is to stop us conceding goals. Deny that makes you the idiot
He is a defensive midfielder, his main priority is to help stop us concede goals, a bit like a centre forward's main role is to score goals.

Hargreaves supports our attacks by keeping players like Scholes supplied with the ball constantly. By him winning it back and passing it to them. Then going further upfield to be an extra man outside the opponents box, to intercept clearances. That job doesn't need holy wood passes. Through balls or mazy runs with long shots, or amazing balls unless of course its a fecking computer game/console game. Where players can often impersonate Maradona when having the skills of Bramble.
Kinell, playing 5 yard passes to a teammate after winning the ball back isn't exactly a hard job job, anyone can do that, apart from, it seems, OH. Most of the time he dwells on the ball, running round for a while, before eventually deciding to pass, and even then it's a 50/50 chance that that pass will be any good. That may be his job, but at the moment, he's not doing it very well.

He's also not winning the ball back that often, he just hassles the player before fouling him, or forcing him into a pass, and to be able to make those interceptions, you have to have good positional sense, something OH has not.

By the way, if you thought that I actually expected Hargreaves to do all those things I mentioned in a previous post, your very stupid. That was a joke.
 

Wes

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 11, 2006
Messages
9,955
Location
Dublin, in the Irish Republic
Hargreaves, theres only 1 Hargreaves
theres only 1 Hargreaves
theres only 1 Hargreaves
theres only 1 Hargreaves
theres only 1 Hargreaves
theres only 1 Hargreaves
(Thank feck)
 

Pogue Mahone

Swiftie Fan Club President
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,489
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Kinell, playing 5 yard passes to a teammate after winning the ball back isn't exactly a hard job job, anyone can do that, apart from, it seems, OH. Most of the time he dwells on the ball, running round for a while, before eventually deciding to pass, and even then it's a 50/50 chance that that pass will be any good. That may be his job, but at the moment, he's not doing it very well.

Actually, it's an 85/15 chance

Which compares favourably with:

Anderson, 80/20 chance
Mascherano 82/18
Makalele 82/18
Fabregas 78/22
Gerrard 75/25

http://telegraph.jumpmediagroup.com/PlayerStat.aspx?p1id=5127&p2id=3789

The whole "Hargreaves can't pass for shite" myth is one of many bizarre idiosyncracies of the caf.

His biggest flaw, when we're in possession, is a tendency to delay on the ball but I wonder if that might be due to him having only played 19 league games this season, with the team re-shuffled in almost every game he plays?

Or are we expecting him to be familiar the runs and movement of his new team-mates from the moment he signed for us?

Hmmmm...
 

Sam

New Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2007
Messages
31,585
Actually, it's an 85/15 chance

Which compares favourably with:

Anderson, 80/20 chance
Mascherano 82/18
Makalele 82/18
Fabregas 78/22
Gerrard 75/25

http://telegraph.jumpmediagroup.com/PlayerStat.aspx?p1id=5127&p2id=3789

The whole "Hargreaves can't pass for shite" myth is one of many bizarre idiosyncracies of the caf.

His biggest flaw, when we're in possession, is a tendency to delay on the ball but I wonder if that might be due to him having only played 19 league games this season, with the team re-shuffled in almost every game he plays?

Or are we expecting him to be familiar the runs and movement of his new team-mates from the moment he signed for us?

Hmmmm...
Don't forget that the likes of Fabregas, Gerrard and Anderson try a lot of 'killer' balls, rather than just 5 yard passes to a teammate.

The fact that Hargreaves record is almost identical to Makelele and Mascherano , 2 players that often get criticised for their passing ability says it all really.
 

ralphie88

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2006
Messages
14,356
Location
Stretford
Actually, it's an 85/15 chance

Which compares favourably with:

Anderson, 80/20 chance
Mascherano 82/18
Makalele 82/18
Fabregas 78/22
Gerrard 75/25
You can't compare the accuracy of Hargreaves' passing to that of Anderson/Ronaldo etc. I'm sure Anderson would have better stats if he always played a 5-yard horizontal ball.

If we're talking stats, how about someone digging up Carrick's tackling? Surprised the hell out of me.
 

spinoza

Paz's ion
Joined
Oct 26, 2001
Messages
24,080
Location
Walking in a whisky wonderland.
You can't compare the accuracy of Hargreaves' passing to that of Anderson/Ronaldo etc. I'm sure Anderson would have better stats if he always played a 5-yard horizontal ball.

If we're talking stats, how about someone digging up Carrick's tackling? Surprised the hell out of me.
Probably because you expected him to tackle like Scholes. So did I, for some reason.
 

Cupid Stunt

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 9, 2008
Messages
1,515
Location
"In that, Anfield is unbeatable. Put a shit h
Don't forget that the likes of Fabregas, Gerrard and Anderson try a lot of 'killer' balls, rather than just 5 yard passes to a teammate.

The fact that Hargreaves record is almost identical to Makelele and Mascherano , 2 players that often get criticised for their passing ability says it all really.
To reason sam you have to take in information, try it.

He is a good passer, proven himself as one of the best holding midfielders in Europe, played for two of the biggest clubs in the world, won a bucket full of medals and personal awards.

The guy is one of the best at what he does, he cant do stepovers, the maradona turn or any of that, he just does what every team needs and hes one of the best at it. Our modern day Nobby Stiles.

Sooner or later hes going to make everyone who doubted him eat their words.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.