markorm
Full Member
Didn't kill the fecker mind.
was it john venables in an attempt to win public support?Didn't kill the fecker mind.
He'll be back in Hawaii on his playstation within a week.
you're spot on Pletch - shame he wasn't finished off though as I'm sure you'll agreeHe'll be back in Hawaii on his playstation within a week.
no need to take the piss Jopub - the Authorities need 8 years for rehabilitation to work so it'll be at least 4 years per child. Ample punishment to satisfy your blood lustHave to say i cant see why Huntley's in there at all
You'd have thought by now he'd have done his 'licence' and been out under a nicely assumed new life and a free man
He did destroy two little lives - surely a perfect example of a, victim, sorry I mean fiend, that could be fully 'rehabilitated'
I'd say he's done enough time by now, what 2003, so tha's 3 years for each little girl
poor fecker
deserved it.Didn't kill the fecker mind.
Add a zero onto each one and I'll concede , just for a second, there might be some justice in thereno need to take the piss Jopub - the Authorities need 8 years for rehabilitation to work so it'll be at least 4 years per child. Ample punishment to satisfy your blood lust
No. Life without the possibilty of parole is a just sentence. This creep will have to live the rest of his life wondering if someone is going to finish him off.Add a zero onto each one and I'll concede , just for a second, there might be some justice in there
....otherwise one bullet - just the one would do
Don't be silly.no need to take the piss Jopub - the Authorities need 8 years for rehabilitation to work so it'll be at least 4 years per child. Ample punishment to satisfy your blood lust
Butlin's and a Wii at the very least.He'll be back in Hawaii on his playstation within a week.
Draconian...Butlin's and a Wii at the very least.
deserved it.
the man should have been executed years ago.
I (genuinely) hope you guys never get falsely condemned - something which inevitably happens in any justice system - and then gruesomely murdered. But if you do, you won't have any cause to feel hard done by as the knife/bullet goes in.Add a zero onto each one and I'll concede , just for a second, there might be some justice in there
....otherwise one bullet - just the one would do
Sorry.Draconian...
Have to say i cant see why Huntley's in there at all
You'd have thought by now he'd have done his 'licence' and been out under a nicely assumed new life and a free man
He did destroy two little lives - surely a perfect example of a, victim, sorry I mean fiend, that could be fully 'rehabilitated'
I'd say he's done enough time by now, what 2003, so tha's 3 years for each little girl
poor fecker
You do know he was sentenced to life with a minimum tariff of 40 years right?no need to take the piss Jopub - the Authorities need 8 years for rehabilitation to work so it'll be at least 4 years per child. Ample punishment to satisfy your blood lust
With a Playstation in a holiday camp I assume?You do know he was sentenced to life with a minimum tariff of 40 years right?
Who has been falsely condemned?Draconian...
I (genuinely) hope you guys never get falsely condemned - something which inevitably happens in any justice system - and then gruesomely murdered. But if you do, you won't have any cause to feel hard done by as the knife/bullet goes in.
Plenty of people. It's inevitable in any justice system.Who has been falsely condemned?
Nope, don't want anyone 'cut to ribbons', prison will do fine.If ever there was a case for some rough justice surely even the most namby pamby liberal lets rehabilitate the poor little nonce brigade should want this cnut cut to ribbons.
It's what he wants though. He is trying to kill himself constantly either by his own hand or through 'death by inmate'.Shame he survived, hopefully someone gets it right one day.
Actually I did get falsely accused of something many many years ago and the police did a right fking number on me and it scared me shitlessDraconian...
I (genuinely) hope you guys never get falsely condemned - something which inevitably happens in any justice system - and then gruesomely murdered. But if you do, you won't have any cause to feel hard done by as the knife/bullet goes in.
Mmm but when the crime is premeditated and unarguable and been admitted, that's a different matter entirely imo of course• Stefan Kiszko served 16 years in prison after being wrongly convicted of the 1975 murder of the schoolgirl Lesley Molseed in West Yorkshire. He was freed on appeal in 1992. Later, Ronald Castree's DNA was found to match samples taken from semen on the 11-year-old's clothes. He was jailed for life for the murder in 2007. Kiszko, who had a very low mental age, dies of a heart attack shortly after being released from prison.
• Stephen Downing was jailed for 27 years for beating to death the typist Wendy Sewell in Bakewell. His conviction was quashed in 2002 after a campaign by the then editor of the Matlock Mercury, Don Hale, who said Downing had been interviewed without legal representation and his signed confession had been written by a police officer.
• Derek Bentley, 19, was hanged for involvement in the murder of the police constable Sidney Miles in 1953. His family campaigned to clear his name, saying he had severe learning difficulties and a mental age of 11. In 1998, his conviction was overturned by the court of appeal because the trial judge had misdirected the jury on points of law.
• Judith Ward spent 18 years in jail for the IRA killing of 12 people on board an army coach on the M62 in February 1973. Her conviction was quashed in 1992 after her lawyers argued the trial jury should have been told of her history of mental illness. Three appeal court judges concluded Ward's conviction had been "secured by ambush" and that government forensic scientists withheld vital information.
• Babysitter Suzanne Holdsworth spent three years in prison for murdering Kyle Fisher, a neighbour's two-year-old son, before she was cleared in a retrial last year. She had been jailed for life after being convicted in 2005 of killing the toddler by repeatedly banging his head against a wooden bannister at her Hartlepool home. The appeal court ruled her conviction was unsafe after new medical evidence emerged suggesting Kyle may have died from an epileptic seizure. She was found not guilty at the retrial.
• Angela Cannings was jailed for life in 2002 for murdering her two baby sons, but freed the following year after her conviction was overturned on appeal. Cannings from Salisbury, Wiltshire, was convicted of murdering seven-week-old Jason in 1991, and 18-week-old Matthew in 1999. She always maintained the two boys died of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (Sids) or cot death.
• The solicitor Sally Clark was jailed for murdering her two baby sons, and cleared by the appeal court in 2003. The mother, from Wilmslow, Cheshire, had always protested her innocence since being jailed for life in November 1999. She was convicted of smothering 11-week-old Christopher in December 1996 and shaking eight-week-old Harry to death in January 1998. In 2007, she was found dead at her home. Her family said she had never recovered from the ordeal.
Not to mention all of the "innocent until proven Irish" terrorism convictions. Of course stringing them up tends to reduce the complaining.
Lucky for you they didn't shoot you.Actually I did get falsely accused of something many many years ago and the police did a right fking number on me and it scared me shitless
They admitted getting it wrong, after banging me up for a few days without so much as an apology, and of course machined every effort I made to seek some public admission of wrongdoing from them
So although nothing as immense as these cases I do know, to some extent, how that feels to have your liberty taken away within a blink of an eye
There's never absolutely no doubt. About anything, except maths.However for premeditated murdering bastards where there is absolutely no doubt about the actual conviction (as in Huntley's case) I see no reason at all to keep them alive
The Birmingham Six and Guildford Four come to mind there. They were jailed for premeditated crimes that they had confessed to. They still didn't do it.Mmm but when the crime is premeditated and unarguable and been admitted, that's a different matter entirely imo of course
Why the hell are you laughing at a smashing poster whose spot on with his comments
Quite simply,Actually I did get falsely accused of something many many years ago and the police did a right fking number on me and it scared me shitless
They admitted getting it wrong, after banging me up for a few days without so much as an apology, and of course machined every effort I made to seek some public admission of wrongdoing from them
So although nothing as immense as these cases I do know, to some extent, how that feels to have your liberty taken away within a blink of an eye
However for premeditated murdering bastards where there is absolutely no doubt about the actual conviction (as in Huntley's case) I see no reason at all to keep them alive
none
In a number of those cases a "confession" was obtained.Mmm but when the crime is premeditated and unarguable and been admitted, that's a different matter entirely imo of course
That's debatable, really dependent upon whether you take a Kantian view of morality or favour a utilitarian/social contract version. Basically, you could make an argument stating that people could deserve to die for their crimes.Quite simply,
A man has no right over another mans life.
You are not the ultimate moral authority when it comes to decisions made on anothers life. You are a murderer yourself.
See films like the green mile and the life of david gale as examples of this.
I've no doubt I would, thankfully I live in a country where victims of crime - the least impartial people involved - get no say over judgement or sentencing.I think many people would view things very differently if they had children or family members hurt by these monsters.It is easy to remain calm and call for leniency when you have never experienced what these monsters can do to the life of a family who have suffered at their hands.
so in the case of Huntley you think it's acceptable to have him live his life in relative comfort after what he did to those poor girls.I've no doubt I would, thankfully I live in a country where victims of crime - the least impartial people involved - get no say over judgement or sentencing.
Nope, don't want anyone 'cut to ribbons', prison will do fine.