No he can't. That's not how EO's work.or joseph robinette biden can sign an executive order banning assault rifles.
The original AWB was an act of Congress, and any future one will have to be as well.
No he can't. That's not how EO's work.or joseph robinette biden can sign an executive order banning assault rifles.
Okay, sure. Let's just make believe.yes he can
he can if he wants to. he can also sign an eo canceling student debt. instead he is doing nothing.Okay, sure. Let's just make believe.
Feel free to explain how an executive order can be issued on a non-existing piece of legislation.
Cool. Enjoy la-la land.he can if he wants to.
For those who might not know, that’s the democrat running for governor…
They imply Republicans care about fetuses.I don't see either of those statements as contradicting what you have said to be honest.
For those who might not know, that’s the democrat running for governor…
he can if he wants to. he can also sign an eo canceling student debt. instead he is doing nothing.
he can if he wants to. he can also sign an eo canceling student debt. instead he is doing nothing.
The tweet you linked to doesn't even have an EO for banning assault weapons... it includes "Passing a new federal assault weapons ban" because Elizabeth Warren knows what you can and can't do with an EO.
"No it isn't"If you look at what her plans were there an executive order did not include that specific thing, as it was under the legislation section. EOs are more or less just directives for how a POTUS wants their administration to behave regarding enforcing existing legislation, so their power is limited.
For those who might not know, that’s the democrat running for governor…
Very very true.Yeah, nothing meaningful can happen without Congress, the President, and the Supreme Court. Also, for those living in Europe, I am not sure you understand how well the NRA did in linking guns to freedom, religion, and patriotism. I live in a blue state (but a red county) and I can't drive anywhere without seeing a truck with some sort of guns/freedom type sticker or decal. It's tied to their identity and I don't see it changing.
Yeah, nothing meaningful can happen without Congress, the President, and the Supreme Court. Also, for those living in Europe, I am not sure you understand how well the NRA did in linking guns to freedom, religion, and patriotism. I live in a blue state (but a red county) and I can't drive anywhere without seeing a truck with some sort of guns/freedom type sticker or decal. It's tied to their identity and I don't see it changing.
I know it didn’t include specifically banning assault rifles. But you get my drift. There are things that can be achieved through eo.If you look at what her plans were there an executive order did not include that specific thing, as it was under the legislation section. EOs are more or less just directives for how a POTUS wants their administration to behave regarding enforcing existing legislation, so their power is limited.
Look up how many Port Arthur sized shootings we've had since Australia had Port Arthur.It happened in Australia after port Arthur. Everyone came together to say enough is enough. The government discredited the NRA as extremists. America stops needing to see itself as a special case. You don’t exist in a vacuum. Other countries have searched their souls and made changes.
We got your drift when you doubled and tripled down that an EO could ban assault weapons.I know it didn’t include specifically banning assault rifles. But you get my drift. There are things that can be achieved through eo.
Just to reinforce, the United States Army literally did not exist in 1791.Some analyst/politician was on MSNBC last night discussing the second amendment was written before the modern bullet existed. Small lead balls/pellets were used in that era. The person said he doubts this particular amendment would have been written the way it was and so vague if high-projectile instruments like an AR-15 or M-4 had existed. That and we did not have the uniformed services like we see today so the militia was necessary to national/state defense.
No he can't. That's not how EO's work.
The original AWB was an act of Congress, and any future one will have to be as well.
That has nothing to do with you saying that an EO could ban assault weapons.did you expect warren’s plan to be ditto to biden’s?
Brilliant!Can't Biden simply issue an EO to cancel the 2nd Amendment ?
I know that. I was giving an example of a platform that used eo as a means for stricter gun control measures. like, why is this confusing?That has nothing to do with you saying that an EO could ban assault weapons.
Probably because you're changing the subject instead of saying "oh, you were right, the president actually can't do what I said".I know that. I was giving an example of a platform that used eo as a means for stricter gun control measures. like, why is this confusing?
Columbine was/is a meme, and each incident reinforces it. That's my thought at least.any theories on why this basically wasn't a thing before Columbine, limited to maybe 10-15 incidents of the 80 years preceding it
again, did you expect warren’s platform to be ditto to biden’s??Probably because you're changing the subject instead of saying "oh, you were right, the president actually can't do what I said".
Now it’s just false flag events with crisis actors. Gotta keep the public entertained / brainwashed.any theories on why this basically wasn't a thing before Columbine, limited to maybe 10-15 incidents of the 80 years preceding it
why did columbine become a meme and not Charles Whitman?Columbine was/is a meme, and each incident reinforces it. That's my thought at least.
You have completely missed the point of my comment but at the same time have totally affirmed the point of my comment.12 months???
you do know there are mass shooting in the states everyday not all of them reported. Sometimes multiple shootings every day.
take a look at the last two weeks only.
Dunno, maybe something about TV coverage in the 90s vs presumably less in the 60s?why did columbine become a meme and not Charles Whitman?
Right….again, did you expect warren’s platform to be ditto to biden’s??
or joseph robinette biden can sign an executive order banning assault rifles.
No he can't. That's not how EO's work.
yes he can
… you were wrong. Stop.he can if he wants to
Some analyst/politician was on MSNBC last night discussing the second amendment was written before the modern bullet existed. Small lead balls/pellets were used in that era. The person said he doubts this particular amendment would have been written the way it was and so vague if high-projectile instruments like an AR-15 or M-4 had existed. That and we did not have the uniformed services like we see today so the militia was necessary to national/state defense.
I think it would be difficult to summarize or pin the blame on a specific thing. There are many layers to what is happening in the US; things like this and the epidemic of ‘deaths of despair’ point to systemic dysfunctions that will take some time in unraveling.any theories on why this basically wasn't a thing before Columbine, limited to maybe 10-15 incidents of the 80 years preceding it