Venue for the next press conference, Four Seasons Landscaping is fully-booked.What the hell is that thing on the roof?
g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
Venue for the next press conference, Four Seasons Landscaping is fully-booked.What the hell is that thing on the roof?
"A failed-Coup"and the culminated in Biden winning, not taking the senate, and losing house seats.
WHAT!!
If this isn't illegal already, it should be.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Free speech.If this isn't illegal already, it should be.
You could also frame it as taking people's money based on lies.Free speech.
And they will frame it as people donating on their own volition.You could also frame it as taking people's money based on lies.
Stupid and depressing, yes. Imagine not having a whole lot to begin with, and deciding to donate to this circus to desperately try to keep in power a person who could not care less about you.And they will frame it as people donating on their own volition.
It’s stupid, but that’s how they do things over there.
How can one state sue another ?
I’m no legal expert, but I’m not sure what standing Texas has. I could be wrong.How can one state sue another ?
Why would not they be allowed to? That's why SC is for in many countries in fact.How can one state sue another ?
But can a state sue another state because the one state does not like the election outcome in another state?Why would not they be allowed to? That's why SC is for in many countries in fact.
The claim seems to be that by diluting electoral practices via unconstitutional means these states have diluted the rights of voters in Texas as well with respect to Presidential election.I’m no legal expert, but I’m not sure what standing Texas has. I could be wrong.
But the mentally deficient Trump supporters are certain this is the breakthrough they have been anticipating.
This will be thrown out most likely due to same reason. But interesting legal Q as to if Texas was to conduct overtly fraudulent election to aid a presidential candidate does other states have ground to sue since outcome of federal elections is going to impact each and every state.But can a state sue another state because the one state does not like the election outcome in another state?
Which is nowhere near enough to constitute standing in any reasonable court of law.The claim seems to be that by diluting electoral practices via unconstitutional means these states have diluted the rights of voters in Texas as well with respect to Presidential election.
Now the Electors Clause does not say anything about election rules - only about appointing electors!Elections for federal office must comport with federal constitutional standards. For presidential elections, each state must appoint its electors to the electoral college in a manner that complies with the Constitution. The Electors Clause requirement that only state legislatures may set the rules governing the appointment of electors and elections and cannot be delegated to local officials. The majority of the rushed decisions, made by local officials, were not approved by the state legislatures, thereby circumventing the Constitution.
I'm no legal expert either but this looks nothing more than empty political posturing.Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.
So, 1-50?Which is nowhere near enough to constitute standing in any reasonable court of law.
Also, the whole "unconstitutional" thing is on pretty shaky grounds. Here's the statement of the Texas Attorney General:
Now the Electors Clause does not say anything about election rules - only about appointing electors!
I'm no legal expert either but this looks nothing more than empty political posturing.
Trumpism.Every expert on twitter saying this is going nowhere. Which leads me to this question.
How have things gotten so bad that an entire state is being mage to flog this nonsense conspiracy?
embarrassingly incompetentThis is peak comedy...
embarrassingly incompetent
Abbott, Cruz, and ilk positioning themselves for a 2024 bid?Every expert on twitter saying this is going nowhere. Which leads me to this question.
How have things gotten so bad that an entire state is being mage to flog this nonsense conspiracy?
It's not really 'an entire state' though, as in its population. It's a political decision made by a political office to pursue this case. You only need a few crazies at the top to make that happen. I feel (vaguely) sorry for the staffers that had to work on this and probably know very well how stupid and pointless this is, but have to do the job regardless. (Like some of the staffers of UK ministers that have had to find ways to somehow back up their bosses' nonsense and lies about Brexit.)Every expert on twitter saying this is going nowhere. Which leads me to this question.
How have things gotten so bad that an entire state is being mage to flog this nonsense conspiracy?
No dissent either.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Keep on winning!
edit: I look forward to him/his die hard supporters coming out & proclaiming SCOTUS is part of the deep state plot to steal the election.
I was hoping that would be the case. Anyone with half a brain cell knows Trump’s got no evidence & is chatting shit. Good to see that none of them will entertain his lies.No dissent either.
This Presidential election should have proven to anyone who was still curious whether "Nazi Germany" could still happen today. There are tens of millions of people who genuinely believe that the Socialist Democrats stole the election. Imagine a situation where democratic norms had broken down even further, and enough military leaders were willing to accept that reality. There would be nothing stopping Trump completing a coup (and any impartial observer has to admit that he's attempting one even now).What an absolute cnut this fecker is...
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/12/go...-won-the-electoral-college-and-a-second-term/