Zen86
Full Member
The problem is how many players we’re benching to play this formation.
Not a problem, change it up with 343 against poor teams.The problem is how many players we’re benching to play this formation.
Can telles or shaw play on the right ?If we play this formation Telles should be playing ahead of Shaw on our left.
Telles can be more advanced because he has cover behind him Which will allow him to whip in those crosses. Especially with cavani and ronaldo in he box.
Shaw LCB and Maguire on the bench?Can telles or shaw play on the right ?
3-5-2 suits Pogba just fine. Can slot in where McTominay is.We look more balanced now.
But what happens to rashford, sancho and pogba ?
I agree but then we should recall Laird and let him play instead of AWB and VD Beek instead of Mac. A sort 343 withIf we play this formation Telles should be playing ahead of Shaw on our left.
Telles can be more advanced because he has cover behind him Which will allow him to whip in those crosses. Especially with cavani and ronaldo in he box.
I don't see ole ditching mcfred which means either pogba or bruno will be benched along with rashford and sancho unless they can play as wingbacks.3-5-2 suits Pogba just fine. Can slot in where McTominay is.
Rashford can play as one of the two, so can Greenwood. That’s 4 strikers for two positions, like during SAF’s time here.
We can also play with a 3-4-3 if we want to fit a Sancho and Rashford for example, just off a striker, in some games.
I think we have two forward too many, but no matter what formation you play, many of our best players will be on the bench.
We should prioritize a balanced team over trying to fit everyone on the pitch.
Shaw was excellent at LWB this summer? People jump on this Telles hype just because he whips a good cross in.If we play this formation Telles should be playing ahead of Shaw on our left.
Telles can be more advanced because he has cover behind him Which will allow him to whip in those crosses. Especially with cavani and ronaldo in he box.
Not that I’m using this game as the benchmark, but if it produces results why is that a problem? Or for that matter any formation?The problem is how many players we’re benching to play this formation.
Arguably it’s not playing to the teams strengths considering how much talent we have in our wide players. But yeah, results are the most important thing.Not that I’m using this game as the benchmark, but if it produces results why is that a problem? Or for that matter any formation?
What’s important is playing to the teams strengths, not the individuals.
I do agree, with the players we have, you’d expect to find a happy medium between ultra attack and ultra defence. But I think the important thing is we’re now exploring other options than that ridiculous 424, even if the issue has been forced due to recent events.Arguably it’s not playing to the teams strengths considering how much talent we have in our wide players. But yeah, results are the most important thing.
The team can't perform well (with the current staff) if we play 3 attackers AND Bruno or pogba. Quality in depth doesn't matter when they can't play together. This can be a strength if used properly, always having one of them to come in and go up against tired defenders.Arguably it’s not playing to the teams strengths considering how much talent we have in our wide players. But yeah, results are the most important thing.
Trying to fit too many players is the actual problem with the team to begin with. We have too many attackers in the squad and need to trim it down for balance.The problem is how many players we’re benching to play this formation.
With so many good forwards you'd think the team would be firing but Ole hasn't yet been able to implement an effective attacking lineup this season.We have too many quality forwards to play two at the from. Sancho, Greenwood and Rashford would probably like to play.
Would you rather 4-2-4 so they can get a game?We have too many quality forwards to play two at the from. Sancho, Greenwood and Rashford would probably like to play.
Yes, prob why we shouldn't get conteThe problem is how many players we’re benching to play this formation.
Non issue. They can't play together so it doesn't matter.The problem is how many players we’re benching to play this formation.
I would rather our most valuable assets don't leave the club when the old men are retired too.Would you rather 4-2-4 so they can get a game?
I do agree, with the players we have, you’d expect to find a happy medium between ultra attack and ultra defence. But I think the important thing is we’re now exploring other options than that ridiculous 424, even if the issue has been forced due to recent events.
For most of his tenure here, my thoughts are that Ole has generally utilised the squad to its strengths in playing fast, direct football. It suited the attacking players we had at the time and compensated for weaknesses in midfield and defence. It wasn’t wasn’t the fashionable possession game, but it was effective enough for us.Trying to fit too many players is the actual problem with the team to begin with. We have too many attackers in the squad and need to trim it down for balance.
I'd rather that problem than not winning.The problem is how many players we’re benching to play this formation.
That should be the least of Ole’s concerns don’t you think? he is in survival mode.The problem is how many players we’re benching to play this formation.
Why? If it means keeping clean sheets and being defensively solid, we should persist. We are a counter-attacking team and today showed Ronny and Cavani and Bruno can click.Not for me. For certain games yes but not for the entire season
If Ole is to stay then it's our best chance IMO. Use the Chelsea/Tuchel method of just rotating around your front 3 between 6 quality players, always making subs to change things up, and then the defence stays solid by nature of having more numbers and quality players.Not for me. For certain games yes but not for the entire season
Fred is not United quality but did you see how much work he and McT put in today. Really not sure Pogba is a good fit there. He just doesn’t work hard enough.It's nice to have this as a system we can use but I don't think it's the long-term answer. We'd basically just be writing off our 80M investment in Sancho because he absolutely doesn't fit in this system at all.
If we are going to continue playing it there are some tweaks we can make. I don't think playing the three centre backs together is necessary. I'd much rather see Shaw at LCB and Telles used as a wing back. And with five at the back, we absolutely can play Pogba in a midfield two alongside McTominay or Fred.
Because at home, we are gonna be expected to control the game and create more. Spurs were woeful tooWhy? If it means keeping clean sheets and being defensively solid, we should persist. We are a counter-attacking team and today showed Ronny and Cavani and Bruno can click.