Your post made so many sense that probably most of the other users hate it..I think people are missing the point. If Sanchez has asked to leave and categorically said he doesn't want to play for us anymore then for the betterment of the squad we definitely have to let him go.
Ole has come out publicly to back him in previous press conferences, but maybe it seemed that Sanchez has made up his mind he wants to restart his career in Italy.
Slowly we are getting rid of players who have questionable attitudes and possible negative effects on the dressing room. At the end of the day, I would rather give youth a chance than persist with a 31 year old Sanchez who has a limited future at the club anyways. Therefore, whatever costs we incur from his loan are irrelevant if it means the club moves forwards.
There is a long term plan to rebuild the team with players who give a shit about the club and who have the potential to become world class. Thats fine by me if we have to go through some growing pains.
Yes it is, it’s a necessary step towards getting him gone.Is it? Really? For a big club we're quite stingy especially considered how light we are on the flanks and upfront.
He wasn't scapegoat, many even forgot he was ManUtd player.Another scapegoat gone, who are we going to blame now
Lingard is still here though
Yeah I agree. Plus him and his wage are a time-bomb in the dressing room.Rather he not be here and rely on a youth team player than have him in or around the squad on full pay on standby should we actually be desperate enough to include him. Hes been incredibly wasteful and lethargic in his time here and it's best for everyone he goes for good asap.
Agree. Sanchez is clearly finished at United and not part of Solskjaer's plans so we are losing nothing.I think people are missing the point. If Sanchez has asked to leave and categorically said he doesn't want to play for us anymore then for the betterment of the squad we definitely have to let him go.
Ole has come out publicly to back him in previous press conferences, but maybe it seemed that Sanchez has made up his mind he wants to restart his career in Italy.
Slowly we are getting rid of players who have questionable attitudes and possible negative effects on the dressing room. At the end of the day, I would rather give youth a chance than persist with a 31 year old Sanchez who has a limited future at the club anyways. Therefore, whatever costs we incur from his loan are irrelevant if it means the club moves forwards.
There is a long term plan to rebuild the team with players who give a shit about the club and who have the potential to become world class. Thats fine by me if we have to go through some growing pains.
We're left with an unbalanced squad which extremely light upfront and all for what, to spare less then 10m from our payroll? Its not as if we're going to invest those 10m in a new player anytime soonYes it is, it’s a necessary step towards getting him gone.
I think people are missing the point. If Sanchez has asked to leave and categorically said he doesn't want to play for us anymore then for the betterment of the squad we definitely have to let him go.
Ole has come out publicly to back him in previous press conferences, but maybe it seemed that Sanchez has made up his mind he wants to restart his career in Italy.
Slowly we are getting rid of players who have questionable attitudes and possible negative effects on the dressing room. At the end of the day, I would rather give youth a chance than persist with a 31 year old Sanchez who has a limited future at the club anyways. Therefore, whatever costs we incur from his loan are irrelevant if it means the club moves forwards.
There is a long term plan to rebuild the team with players who give a shit about the club and who have the potential to become world class. Thats fine by me if we have to go through some growing pains.
Does that sound to you that he has questionable attitude?‘He is a great professional. He comes in and works hard. He has not been put in the reserves, he has been training with the first team’.
"Alexis is such a professional and he comes in working every single day really hard," Solskjaer said.
"And he wants to be a part of this and it's these stories he's again that he's been put in the reserves, of course he hasn't. He's a part of our squad and a very, very good player.
“He's had three weeks now, he's a few weeks behind the rest but he's close to being part of it. We don't have the biggest forward line in numbers, so Alexis might end up playing a lot more games than you expect, because we expect him to come good at this club, he's quality.
"We've had a behind closed doors game, and he's training, he's doing a little bit of extras, he'll be gradually integrated into more and more playing time, but we'll have more behind closed doors games.
“With one game a week now, it's hard to keep players ticking, so we're arranging a few of them."
Nobody will buy Sanchez because no club will match his salary or come close. This is the issue. At least this loan is one foot out the door.We're left with an unbalanced squad which extremely light upfront and all for what, to spare less then 10m from our payroll? Its not as if we're going to invest those 10m in a new player anytime soon
Sanchez should have been sold. However a club with some ambition wouldn't let so many CMs and forwards to go without replacement. That's just criminal.
Transfers should had been made prior letting players go not beforehand. Now we're left with a team that has 7 CBs on one hand and barely anyone able to play upfront on the other. Also we're not really letting Sanchez go. He'll probably be back on our payroll in 10 months time.Nobody will buy Sanchez because no club will match his salary or come close. This is the issue. At least this loan is one foot out the door.
I’ve no doubt Ole will be looking to recruit in the positions you’ve mentioned, it just takes time. With the players we’ve sold, and the players he’s frozen out already, he’s made a great start at cleaning this mess up. If we can build an identity this season it’ll put us in a good position to bring players in.
You can't buy when you have so many deadwood, you need to clear them before there is space made to buy new players. You just need a reason to blame the club and manager for everythingTransfers should had been made prior letting players go not beforehand. Now we're left with a team that has 7 CBs on one hand and barely anyone able to play upfront on the other. Also we're not really letting Sanchez go. He'll probably be back on our payroll in 10 months time.
Seriously mate, I can't see how anyone can try to justify all this. This club is one hell of a joke
People read too much into this stuff.Last interview about him in Ole's words:
Does that sound to you that he has questionable attitude?
Problem with him is that he's simply past his better days, doesn't mean he has questionable attitude.
This I can agree with. Almost criminal, at any rate. It was a huge disappointment. It bugs me that we don’t know what has happened behind the scenes. Solskjær’s statements about how many positions we were looking to strengthen, and about if Lukaku (or Pogba) left, we’d have to replace them, points to him having identified targets in midfield/attack, and that Woodgate/Judge couldn’t or wouldn’t bring them in. Solskjær then again might have been offered a choice of keeping Lukaku/Sanchez, get in second or third choices or wait until prime choices became available and stick with youth. Hard to say. Solskjær has said positive things about both Lukaku and Sanchez, but it doesn’t say much - even if he thought them toxic and rubbish, he wouldn’t say so in public while needing other clubs to want to pay up for them. Woodgate of course have said precious little, which is also probably for the best.We're left with an unbalanced squad which extremely light upfront and all for what, to spare less then 10m from our payroll? Its not as if we're going to invest those 10m in a new player anytime soon
Sanchez should have been sold. However a club with some ambition wouldn't let so many CMs and forwards to go without replacement. That's just criminal.
Point is we haven't heard any indication of him being disruptive for the dressing room, just journo stuff due to his wages. He's just over the hill, not toxic..People read too much into this stuff.
Ole knew full well we were touting him around the world to be picked up by someone else so what's he going to say?
"Yeah he's a bit of a cnut to be honest. He's done nothing while he's been here apart from upset everyone due to his wages and lack of output, in fact, we're almost certain a kid from the reserve team could give us more options."
"On top of that, he's only willing to play left wing despite us having limited options on the right. We'll all be glad when he's gone but as it happens he's got about another 3 years left on his deal so we'll have to put up with the shit until then, because let's face it, you'd have to be fecking daft to go anywhere near him."
I blame the club when we end with a mid table squad as we currently haveYou can't buy when you have so many deadwood, you need to clear them before there is space made to buy new players. You just need a reason to blame the club and manager for everything
You came to that conclusion after 3 games? Also it's easy to blame the club for everything isn't itI blame the club when we end with a mid table squad as we currently have
Should I blame Fr Christmas for two years of under investment and incompetence?You came to that conclusion after 3 games? Also it's easy to blame the club for everything isn't it
That is about the time I started supporting United, so my recollection could be faulty. I thought Wayne was 18 when he signed for us. He also was a known quantity then, having two years of PL experience, plus international success at the senior level. Greenwood may be the next Rooney, I certainly hope he is, but he hasn’t had the opportunity to prove that yet.Guess you started supporting us post-Rooney.
Whatever floats your boat bro!Should I blame Fr Christmas for two years of under investment and incompetence?
Sanchez needed to go but not replacing both him and Lukaku is a poor management that deserved criticism.Whatever floats your boat bro!
on a serious note, yes the club has not done things well but blaming the club and manager for every little bad thing is not a good approach. That's all. If we keep Alexis you blame the management, if we sell them you blame the management. There should be some middle ground right?
And what about the manager that put us in this crap?Sanchez needed to go but not replacing both him and Lukaku is a poor management that deserved criticism.
I don't get your post.And what about the manager that put us in this crap?
Sanchez and Lukaku were burdens on the team. A burden created by Mourinho. We need to get rid of this burden first. Think of replacing later.I don't get your post.
You asked me why I am so negative in the previous post. Well, rather then negative (which I am, cause I don't see a bright future for the club) I am more of pissed off really. Here's the reason why.This I can agree with. Almost criminal, at any rate. It was a huge disappointment. It bugs me that we don’t know what has happened behind the scenes. Solskjær’s statements about how many positions we were looking to strengthen, and about if Lukaku (or Pogba) left, we’d have to replace them, points to him having identified targets in midfield/attack, and that Woodgate/Judge couldn’t or wouldn’t bring them in. Solskjær then again might have been offered a choice of keeping Lukaku/Sanchez, get in second or third choices or wait until prime choices became available and stick with youth. Hard to say. Solskjær has said positive things about both Lukaku and Sanchez, but it doesn’t say much - even if he thought them toxic and rubbish, he wouldn’t say so in public while needing other clubs to want to pay up for them. Woodgate of course have said precious little, which is also probably for the best.
The result is that we are extremely thin forward, in the short term, and we are uncertain who’s to blame. Apart from Woodgate/Glazers, who certainly are to blame one way or the other.
In the long run, it may well be that getting rid of Lukaku and Sanchez was right and important regardless, like it was right getting rid of Ince and Sharpe in 95. But we had better players in 95, and the competition is much harder now, so ‘bouncing back with kids’ will look different. With this squad, 4th place will be a good achievement.
What I hope, is that we are in this situation because of high ambition, not because of low ambition. Time will tell.
He was sacked as far as I'm concerned.Sanchez and Lukaku were burdens on the team. A burden created by Mourinho. We need to get rid of this burden first. Think of replacing later.
We're discussing a mess created by Mourinho. A mess doesn't get cleaned up that fast. Wake up, this is how bad Jose fecked our club.He was sacked as far as I'm concerned.
That has nothing related to us selling players without replacing them and entering the season with a squad like. It's poor management by the club, and has feck all to do with the current or the previous manager, unless Ole was happy entering the season with such crap squad. Signing one striker option wasn't much of a problem, especially when we had a net spend of only 70m or so.
Honestly, your post has feck all to do with what we're talking about.
Sanchez didn't add any value to the team last year, how is loosing him any different from him being here apart from reduction of wages?Sanchez needed to go but not replacing both him and Lukaku is a poor management that deserved criticism.
Yeah Ok. He fecked up our club so hard that we can't sign a replacement for 2 players we sold this summer when we had a net spend of only 70m. I get the relation now. Thanks.We're discussing a mess created by Mourinho. A mess doesn't get cleaned up that fast. Wake up, this is how bad Jose fecked our club.
Both him and Lukaku needed to be replaced by at least one senior striker is what I'm saying. I have no problem with Sanchez leaving as I said. He's done for, but you can't keep selling without buying. It's madness.Sanchez didn't add any value to the team last year, how is loosing him any different from him being here apart from reduction of wages?
Not having a replacement for Lukaku on the other hand is an issue, maybe ole wanted Greenwood to take his opportunity?
You think finding two key forward players is that easy. We tried with Dybala. He didn't want to come. It's not as simple as replacement.Yeah Ok. He fecked up our club so hard that we can't sign a replacement for 2 players we sold this summer when we had a net spend of only 70m. I get the relation now. Thanks.
Let me tell you what I think about Sanchez. First of all I wonder who was the genius who gave Sanchez such ridiculous contract especially at a time when so many players were in the middle of the contract renewal in the first place. I guess its the same guys who gave Rojo, Mata and Jones ridiculously long contracts. Surely anyone with brains would have notice that paying a player so much in terms of salary would have lead to problems. Anyway I had absolutely no problem with us getting rid of Sanchez. However that should have been done after making sure we actually have cover for Rashford, a RW etc. FFS what's the point of sparing a measly 10m off our payroll when we're so light upfront? We're talking about Manchester United here, one of the richest clubs in the world, not Bury.Whatever floats your boat bro!
on a serious note, yes the club has not done things well but blaming the club and manager for every little bad thing is not a good approach. That's all. If we keep Alexis you blame the management, if we sell them you blame the management. There should be some middle ground right?
Just one good senior striker would have been enough. We're not asking for the impossible.You think finding two key forward players is that easy. We tried with Dybala. He didn't want to come. It's not as simple as replacement.
Mourinho fecked us. He put us in a position where we can no longer attract the best of the best. It will take time. First step is to get rid.
I agree, but I think fixing our defense was more important that getting the strike force strengthened this season. which we have done. Also buying for the sake of buying is not good either, we should strive for quality and players that will fit a system under a manager and not because he is available and no one wants him!Both him and Lukaku needed to be replaced by at least one senior striker is what I'm saying. I have no problem with Sanchez leaving as I said. He's done for, but you can't keep selling without buying. It's madness.