Moby
Dick
One juror has a hearing aid & takes it out when Amber's witnesses are testifying
One juror has a hearing aid & takes it out when Amber's witnesses are testifying
That's hilarious.One juror has a hearing aid & takes it out when Amber's witnesses are testifying. That's some body language even I could read
But yea, overall I wouldn't expect most people to make accurate reads on juror body language.
He basically said that Depp doesn't get aggressive or angrier when he takes drugs, i don't see how his deposition is supposed to help Heard.This guy known Depp since the 80s & was close to him up until the op-ed came out. This could be damaging to Depp, or just another load of nothing like the rest of Amber's witnesses.
Edit: Nevermind it's just another waste of time character assassination of "ooooooh did you know Johnny took drugs?".
It was to suggest people around Depp wouldn't speak out against him. It's to try discredit some of Depp's witnesses.He basically said that Depp doesn't get aggressive or angrier when he takes drugs, i don't see how his deposition is supposed to help Heard.
They're now giving us a disgruntled fired agent. Really scraping the bottom of the barrel already.Are they parading the people who leeched off Johnny Depp other than Heard's cronies now?
Can't wait for them to have the people who got sued after nicking his money up nextThey're now giving us a disgruntled fired agent. Really scraping the bottom of the barrel already.
Eh she's a big agent with big name clients. Can't imagine she's taking much pleasure in bad mouthing a former client as it's not a good look for her business wise.They're now giving us a disgruntled fired agent. Really scraping the bottom of the barrel already.
The extent to which you are emotionally invested in a single outcome is genuinely worrying.They're now giving us a disgruntled fired agent. Really scraping the bottom of the barrel already.
The extent to which it matters to you what I think is odd. Forgive me for assessing all available evidence & making a judgement. I assume you think it doesn't matter which way cases are decided?The extent to which you are emotionally invested in a single outcome is genuinely worrying.
Wasn't she only successful because Depp stuck with her when a load of others were abandoning her agency and that got her a big promotion, he then left her representation and she became bitter about it?Eh she's a big agent with big name clients. Can't imagine she's taking much pleasure in bad mouthing a former client as it's not a good look for her business wise.
Yup. She was involved with the guys that stole $650m from him too. No wonder he cut ties & she's disgruntled.Wasn't she only successful because Depp stuck with her when a load of others were abandoning her agency and that got her a big promotion, he then left her representation and she became bitter about it?
Jesus. What a prediction. They couldn't buy a credible witness ffs.Can't wait for them to have the people who got sued after nicking his money up next
You're making it sound like she's a criminal. Doesn't sound to me like she said anything unreasonable anyway. Hardly a shocker that Depp was unprofessional on set when dealing with substance abuse. Or that he asked her for money when facing financial ruin.Yup. She was involved with the guys that stole $650m from him too. No wonder he cut ties & she's disgruntled.
felt it in my bonesJesus. What a prediction. They couldn't buy a credible witness ffs.
What a load of bollocks.
Grounds for a mistrial because some jurors are bored
I am not a legal expert but do you realize that would exactly be a cause for a mistrial? I highly doubt any of the above is happening. It is also weird a lot of Johnny Depp apologists are saying this because an idea of jurors being biased would be against his case.That's hilarious.
Sometimes jurors have just made up their minds..
The important question there is whether Depp's unprofessional behavior was the main reason why his career took a nosedive? That's obviously relevant when it comes to damages in this trial. It's certainly possible that due to unpleasant history with Depp the agent overstated the role his behavior played in losing movie roles and so on.You're making it sound like she's a criminal. Doesn't sound to me like she said anything unreasonable anyway. Hardly a shocker that Depp was unprofessional on set when dealing with substance abuse. Or that he asked her for money when facing financial ruin.
Do you want a mistrial for the murderers of Ahmaud Arbery?I am not a legal expert but do you realize that would exactly be a cause for a mistrial? I highly doubt any of the above is happening. It is also weird a lot of Johnny Depp apologists are saying this because an idea of jurors being biased would be against his case.
he talked a lot about childhood trauma earlier in the trial, so maybeWhy do you think Depp does so many drugs? Is he sad?
I found her believable. The stuff about him being unprofessional on the last PIrates has been reported on for years. If she really was bitter and wanted to land him in trouble she could have said he was violent or something. She clearly said she never saw him get violent when asked.The important question there is whether Depp's unprofessional behavior was the main reason why his career took a nosedive? That's obviously relevant when it comes to damages in this trial. It's certainly possible that due to unpleasant history with Depp the agent overstated the role his behavior played in losing movie roles and so on.
This is just plain stupid. Why nail down a jail sentence for yourself just to get a dig in at someone? She was never present at any alleged incident, it'd be extremely risky to testify to something like that.I found her believable. The stuff about him being unprofessional on the last PIrates has been reported on for years. If she really was bitter and wanted to land him in trouble she could have said he was violent or something. She clearly said she never saw him get violent when asked.
People like to bash on him for Pirates 5 despite his issues being caused by Amber during that film. Like yea, sure it's JD's fault they had to pause for 5 weeks whilst he dealt with MRSA. Definitely not Amber's fault for slicing his fecking finger off.He was never going to be fired for being late ffs
He delayed the shooting of Pirates 5 by 5 weeks with his finger injury and the film still made Disney a profit of like $600-800m
This post sounded like a hard relateWhy do you think Depp does so many drugs? Is he sad?
Will be funny if they run out of time due to this pointless show and aren't able to fully cross examine Depp's rebuttal witnessesJesus, what a pathetic tactic this is from Heard's team. They know he can't answer anything because of attorney-client privilege but they just want to make it look like Depp's team is hiding something. Underhanded borefest.
They won't run out of time. They've clearly got nothing & are running on fumes & they still have a fair chunk of time left.Will be funny if they run out of time due to this pointless show and aren't able to fully cross examine Depp's rebuttal witnesses
Not a chanceHe was never going to be fired for being late ffs
He delayed the shooting of Pirates 5 by 5 weeks with his finger injury and the film still made Disney a profit of like $600-800m
The box office was $800m and the budget was between $200-300m. Made $500-600m with box office & obviously will have made more money since.Not a chance
If only you were doing what you claim to be doing.The extent to which it matters to you what I think is odd. Forgive me for assessing all available evidence & making a judgement. I assume you think it doesn't matter which way cases are decided?
Very non-descript answer. Nice.If only you were doing what you claim to be doing.
Such a waste of time. What is the point of this police witness? She's literally helping Johnny by confirming that the 4 officers testifying against Amber did everything correctly.Speed running a strike out of Heard's counter claim here