AttackingFlair
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2007
- Messages
- 9,654
I remember one amazing pass he made to Obertan with his right foot. Perfect weight, accuracy, it had range and also on his weaker foot.
Yeah, I remember that. He's actually got a decent range of passing with his right foot. In fact, he's less likely to feck up with his right because he doesn't try so many wildly ambitious passes.I remember one amazing pass he made to Obertan with his right foot. Perfect weight, accuracy, it had range and also on his weaker foot.
Well he could play as a SS but that either means dropping Berba or Rooney... Not likely to happenWe learnt nothing new with Anderson today i felt...its always been relatively clear hes a far more talented effective player in a 3 man midfield than a two man midfield....lighten the load of responsibility on him and give him the added cover another man in there offers and he naturally expresses himself to a far greater level...
Trouble is we dont have the forwards to play a 4-3-3 on a regular basis....it suits Anderson but it dosnt suit the team for the majority of matches.
I'm not sure what an SS is but I've a horrible feeling you're suggesting playing Anderson as a striker. Which would be insane, obviously.Well he could play as a SS but that either means dropping Berba or Rooney... Not likely to happen
Second Striker? God that's horrible, I hope it doesn't catch on.I'm not sure what an SS is but I've a horrible feeling you're suggesting playing Anderson as a striker. Which would be insane, obviously.
Well he could play as a SS but that either means dropping Berba or Rooney... Not likely to happen
I'm not sure what an SS is but I've a horrible feeling you're suggesting playing Anderson as a striker. Which would be insane, obviously.
I think he was referring to the SchutzstaffelI'm not sure what an SS is but I've a horrible feeling you're suggesting playing Anderson as a striker. Which would be insane, obviously.
Given his propensity to hit rocket launcher-esque passes, getting him closer to his targets might not be the best idea.Well he could play as a SS but that either means dropping Berba or Rooney... Not likely to happen
Well more a SS playing in the hole between attack and midfield, the number of times i've seen him play as the most attacking in a midfield 3 ahead of 2 others makes you think that if you give him the freedom of the pitch he may express himself much better. I mean once Carrick came on and we went 433 Anderson looked much better, also i recall a lot of his early Porto days he would often play in those more advanced positions in the UCLI'm not sure what an SS is but I've a horrible feeling you're suggesting playing Anderson as a striker. Which would be insane, obviously.
Good point about Scholes. NOBODY passes like Scholes with the same accuracy and weighting, not even Carrick comes close.Got a pass on him, but needs to find his zone. He has a tendency to over hit the long balls, or cut them short so that the attack can't beat his defender to it. He'll get better. Maybe needs to work with Scholesy a bit more.
Only problem with that is who do you play on a wing, Berba or Rooney or do you drop one of them and play Giggs/Nani/Park/ObertanI didn't watch last nights game but its hard to judge Anderson because of how we play him. He almost always looks brilliant in a 433 but without Ronaldo I'm not sure we have the players for it. Whereas in a 442 his performances seem to range from good to average and fluctuate a lot between that.
Personally I think the 433 suits all our midfielders and I'd like to see us give it a shot.
Thats the dilemma.but Rooney and giggs will work in the front three. And valencias playing very well, he should be able to do the job too.Only problem with that is who do you play on a wing, Berba or Rooney or do you drop one of them and play Giggs/Nani/Park/Obertan
The problem is 4-3-3 suits our midfielders but not our attackers or wide men.I didn't watch last nights game but its hard to judge Anderson because of how we play him. He almost always looks brilliant in a 433 but without Ronaldo I'm not sure we have the players for it. Whereas in a 442 his performances seem to range from good to average and fluctuate a lot between that.
Personally I think the 433 suits all our midfielders and I'd like to see us give it a shot.
And Giggs is getting on now, we cant really expect him to give blow out performances 2 times a week (i know he has but its still asking a lot from him). Although when Henry went to Barca he was played on the left side and it took him a while to figure it out which he did, so it might be a idea to put Berba there and see how we/he doesThats the dilemma.but Rooney and giggs will work in the front three. And valencias playing very well, he should be able to do the job too.
Only issue is berbatov has always been dropped when we play a 433 so fergus seems to think he doesn't work in that formation.
Berb is just too slow for the role really. He either has to play down the middle ina 4-3-3 or not at all.And Giggs is getting on now, we cant really expect him to give blow out performances 2 times a week (i know he has but its still asking a lot from him). Although when Henry went to Barca he was played on the left side and it took him a while to figure it out which he did, so it might be a idea to put Berba there and see how we/he does
they are completly different players, henry was always a player who could take people on and did a lot of good work from the left with his speed and dribbling. Berbatov is a central striker and this will always remain. Rooney if anyone could go on the left hand side of the attack with berbatov in the middle and valencia on the right.And Giggs is getting on now, we cant really expect him to give blow out performances 2 times a week (i know he has but its still asking a lot from him). Although when Henry went to Barca he was played on the left side and it took him a while to figure it out which he did, so it might be a idea to put Berba there and see how we/he does
Our midfield was shockingly bad for most of the game though, everything was either punted long or spread wide.He had a cracking game when he came on. Credit where credit's due
Me either but i suppose its all down to people expecting young players to be world beaters by the times they're 23^^ Cop out
Was very good when he came on. Showed his range of passing, from instictive Scholes-esque 40 yard spreads to little Scholes-esque back heal through balls. Failed to show his other Scholes-esque balls though, fortunately.
Once again, how anyone can't see the potential this boy has at 21 baffles me. But then again Orange skins baffle me, so meh.
At 21 he is still looking a fecking good buy.^^ Cop out
Was very good when he came on. Showed his range of passing, from instictive Scholes-esque 40 yard spreads to little Scholes-esque back heal through balls. Failed to show his other Scholes-esque balls though, fortunately.
Once again, how anyone can't see the potential this boy has at 21 baffles me. But then again Orange skins baffle me, so meh.