TsuWave
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2013
- Messages
- 14,315
Should try him as left wingback next time Shaw is injured
Well I could have appreciated those traits if we brought him for free or on a loan. We paid insane money for an attacker with absolutely zero attacking output. We are halfway through his second season and he has 0 goals & 0 assists this season. Hard to look at his work ethic with such outputYeah, he's frustrating, but he runs his fecking socks off for the team, game after game. Never gives up, and never lets his head drop. You'd think our fans would at the very least appreciate that, after all the lazy shite we've had to endure in recent years.
Yeah what a cnut he is demanding United pay so much money for him.Well I could have appreciated those traits if we brought him for free or on a loan. We paid insane money for an attacker with absolutely zero attacking output. We are halfway through his second season and he has 0 goals & 0 assists this season. Hard to look at his work ethic with such output
I wondered about this too, but honestly why bother trying to make do and turn him into something he isn’t when we can ship him out along with Dalot and get a competent RW and RB. Seems too much hassle for such a limited player.I could definitely see Antony in a defensive role with a proper RW in front of him.
Yeah, he's frustrating, but he runs his fecking socks off for the team, game after game. Never gives up, and never lets his head drop. You'd think our fans would at the very least appreciate that, after all the lazy shite we've had to endure in recent years.
Yeah but enough about Dan James.Yeah, he's frustrating, but he runs his fecking socks off for the team, game after game. Never gives up, and never lets his head drop. You'd think our fans would at the very least appreciate that, after all the lazy shite we've had to endure in recent years.
I guess it's by the by now, but I am curious how Antony was rated at Ajax.Who was the better player in the Dutch league - Anthony or Kudus?
Honestly I don’t even blame Antony much. He always leaves everything on the pitch and that I admire. It’s just that he’s not actually that talented - in teams of physical gifts, technical excellence, weight of pass, proper awareness on the football field. It’s the fact that the club approved spending that much on him that I find so bizarre and worthy of criticism.Scapegoat…‘A person who is blamed for the wrongdoings, mistakes, or faults of others’
Antony is blamed for all his wrongdoings, mistakes and faults. Of which, he has many.
Antony was key in Ajax winning the league so I’d imagine him.Who was the better player in the Dutch league - Anthony or Kudus?
Who was the better player in the Dutch league - Anthony or Kudus?
I guess it's by the by now, but I am curious how Antony was rated at Ajax.
Jaap Stam on The Overlap (47:50-49:20) spoke about Antony. He said he wasn’t exactly the best player in the Eredivisie, questioned the fee and whether he can play at this level and noted how it’s easy to standout in a league full of mediocre players.Antony was key in Ajax winning the league so I’d imagine him.
The difference is that Park was more than just a hard worker defensively (and even then, his tackling, pressing and tracking back is better than Antony’s). Park could also shoot and cross with both feet. His movement was unreal, he could find pockets of space or he would perfectly time runs in behind. He was surprisingly good in the air also. Despite also lacking pace and power like Antony, he could at least work a yard to get a cross in or play in an overlapping runner or play a one-two to beat his fullback. Park’s football IQ is in a different galaxy to Antony’s, alongside the variety to his game. While Park often played a defensive role in big games we must not forget that he was also a brilliant attacker & he has goals and assists in so many big games to show for it (Chelsea, Liverpool, AC Milan and Arsenal).I see potential in him as a defensive winger like Park but yeah he doesn't have much quality. Like another poster said if we're going to make him work then the other two attackers have to be world class like they were during Park's day
Comparing Antony to Park is an insult to the latter. They can't be more different either, aside from the energy aspect. Park made the players around him shine by doing the dirty work, creating spaces, move into spaces and being part of the combination play - with occasionally scoring the important goals. Even technichally he was much more underrated than his reputation, his ability to dribble or use both feet was decent. I've seen nothing that even implies Antony could do that. He just runs like a headless chicken, has zero vision and mostly stops and passes back to the midfielder and stays at his position instead of moving into the empty space. He's absolutely terrible.I see potential in him as a defensive winger like Park but yeah he doesn't have much quality. Like another poster said if we're going to make him work then the other two attackers have to be world class like they were during Park's day
That's my biggest concern - pace may be an issue, but even when he has acres of space he doesn't trust himself.Terrible going forward. Laughable that he's almost through on goal on the counter attack and just stops the ball dead, looking confusingly for a pass.
Sell at next opportunity and get a real right winger in there.