Are we too pragmatic in the big games?

Tapori

Full Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
2,397
Location
Manchester - South Side
I am going to defend Ole.

In the Liverpool game and today's Arsenal match, we had very very very good chances to win.
Pogba and Cavani and Rashford and Martial before in the CL.
We score and take them and win and Ole is a genius.
Fine margins, but his approach is suited to the fact that we cannot move up the pitch through midfield safely, penetratingly and consistently enough and play in spurts.
 

Olecurls99

Full Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2021
Messages
2,168
I am going to defend Ole.

In the Liverpool game and today's Arsenal match, we had very very very good chances to win.
Pogba and Cavani and Rashford and Martial before in the CL.
We score and take them and win and Ole is a genius.
Fine margins, but his approach is suited to the fact that we cannot move up the pitch through midfield safely, penetratingly and consistently enough and play in spurts.
I agree with the idea that we don't have the 11 players necessary, not just the midfielders because everyone barring the goalkeeper needs to be slick on the ball, to beat a really good press and gradually move the ball up the pitch before scoring.
I would suggest that for that style of play we would need a Grealish to relieve lots of pressure with a dribble or a feint here and there.
My question is why do we have to set up in our half? Why not press high ourselves and camp in top opposition's halves? We've got good pressing midfielders and we've got pace at the back. We should look to do it back to other teams.
 

Berbasbullet

Too Boring For A Funny Tagline
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
20,230
We were quite attacking I thought? The final ball was just lacking.
 

YouOnlyLiveTwice

Full Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Messages
5,468
We need to go for it a bit more next season if we strive to win the title.

Some of these games we have had good chances, but lacked the final quality pass or shot to win it.
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
No. We just don’t have attacking players good enough to merit doing anything particularly different. Bruno and Pogba are great but the rest blow hot and cold or are otherwise middling.

People bang on about McTominay and Fred (who both have some good qualities) but by Christ they can’t pass a ball. What do you expect?
 

DWelbz19

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
34,023
He must have PTSD from that 6-1, or something. Look a completely different side in big games from his first season.
 

kouroux

45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
96,001
Location
Djibouti (La terre des braves)
No. We just don’t have attacking players good enough to merit doing anything particularly different. Bruno and Pogba are great but the rest blow hot and cold or are otherwise middling.

People bang on about McTominay and Fred (who both have some good qualities) but by Christ they can’t pass a ball. What do you expect?
Very true. This plus the fact that Ole isn't the most proactive coach, it's an impossible mix
 

The_Midfielder

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
3,621
We need a better CF and a RW.. we have players that prefer to hang outside the CF positions ..so we become easy to defend ..
Then we do not have a RW...
 

Shane88

Actually Nostradamus
Joined
Jan 12, 2011
Messages
35,223
Location
Targaryen loyalist
1-6 vs Spurs.
0-0 vs Chelsea.
0-1 vs Arsenal.
0-0 vs City.
2-2 vs Leicester (I so no reason why they shouldn't be counted these days).
0-0 vs Liverpool.
0-0 vs Arsenal.
0-0 vs Chelsea.

8 games. 3 goals. 0 wins.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,021
Location
Canada
You look at the positioning of Fred and McTominay and you get your answer. It was the same for Chelsea today though, 3 CBs, and Chilwell on the "wing", second half another fullback added in, and then a midfield of Kovacic and Kante. So hard to play through and always going to be a game of almost no chances.
 

el3mel

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2016
Messages
43,735
Location
Egypt
The record is diabolical to the point it's becoming actually funny. We can't even score in these games anyway.
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,372
Location
Birmingham
1-6 vs Spurs.
0-0 vs Chelsea.
0-1 vs Arsenal.
0-0 vs City.
2-2 vs Leicester (I so no reason why they shouldn't be counted these days).
0-0 vs Liverpool.
0-0 vs Arsenal.
0-0 vs Chelsea.

8 games. 3 goals. 0 wins.
Abysmal.
 

darko

Full Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2000
Messages
3,473
Location
Toronto, Canada
There was more to gain for Chelsea to push for the win today and honestly there was no reason for United to be the side taking the risks. Let's be honest, City are not going to drop 10 points.
 

Sylar

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
40,462
The set up isnt fully the problem. Its the quality of some of the players.
I mean that last counter, McT had three players to hit, and put it behind all three and hits a chelsea player.

I do think the 6-1 earlier in the season may affect our approach and some of the players.

The one good thing is were not terrible at the back. But Fred and McT (esp today) were so wasteful in possession. We are where we are in the table (rightfully imo) based on our squad.
 

Judas

Open to offers
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,107
Location
Where the grass is greener.
He must have PTSD from that 6-1, or something. Look a completely different side in big games from his first season.
Yep. Feels like it doesn't it. So much fear, we never want to risk anything, always looking for a clean sheet first, and if we can nick a goal great, but sadly we've looked far from likely to do that this season. Not good enough.
 

lysglimt

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
15,268
In some games we have been too careful - today it was much more important not to lose than to win.
 

El Jefe

Full Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
4,904
The record is diabolical to the point it's becoming actually funny. We can't even score in these games anyway.
It really is pathetic. There's clearly a cowardly element to our approach in these games. It's too easy to say get a better CF or RW. We are somehow the highest scorers in the league without a world class front line so being unable to score in these games is no coincidence.
 

Dan_F

Full Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
10,391
Not sure it was Ole’s fault today. We pressed very well in the first half, but clearly couldn’t do that for 90 mins. Tuchel also changed the system well at half time.

The passing from defence to midfield is just such a huge issue. It’s hard to see us going anywhere against the top teams.
 

Infra-red

Full Member
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
13,419
Location
left wing
Ole, like Mourinho, is a counter attacking manager.

If you want to improve your side's quality in possession, these are not the coaches to do it.
 

Champagne Football

New Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2015
Messages
4,187
Location
El Beatle
We play a double pivot with 2 defensive style midfielders. Neither one can play through the lines or can score consistently.

Greenwood is having 2nd season syndrome.

Martial has given up.

Cavani missing takes away out our cutting edge in front of goal.

That leaves Bruno and Rashford as our only genuine threat. They both look tired and we rely too heavy on them. We are still one or two attacking players, or attacking Central midfielders away from being able to be more adventurous in a game like today.
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
1-6 vs Spurs.
0-0 vs Chelsea.
0-1 vs Arsenal.
0-0 vs City.
2-2 vs Leicester (I so no reason why they shouldn't be counted these days).
0-0 vs Liverpool.
0-0 vs Arsenal.
0-0 vs Chelsea.

8 games. 3 goals. 0 wins.
Let's be real the 1-6 was a freak game against 10 men so if you ignore that one while the goals scored is invisible it's only 1 penalty conceded as well so ya know every cloud (I'm also ignoring Leicester as they're never included on these lists)
 

RORY65

Full Member
Joined
May 28, 2009
Messages
4,529
I'm not sure its pragmatism. Last season the big sides didn't respect us and so gave us the counter attack at which we excelled. This season they fear the counter more and because of that we're having to be slightly more proactive and we haven't got a clue.
 

tjb

Full Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,328
Don't think we are. I feel people who praise our midfield in these games and yet bash us for being pragmatic don't seem to realise that the reason we are so toothless in these games is because our central midfield is usually outclassed. As they are outclassed, due to fear of leaving open gaps, they drop deeper than they should, not by instruction and furthermore are relative scared of playing incisive build up passes. This forces us to either get those passes from deep in the shape of Maguire or Lindelof making those incisive passes, playing it long or driving themselves or having to combine from the flanks ( which is not effective with Daniel James as he lacks any technical skills, completely hampering our right side). This means that if Rashford isn't playing well in these games, we have no real attacking outlet, not because our attackers played poorly, but because our midfield can't do their job offensively.
 

TMDaines

Fun sponge.
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
13,986
Amazing how adding a few goals to a team that is fairly solid defensively makes a massive difference in these games. Pragmatism is the only way to approach these matches in my view. That’s why Ferguson was so successful.