Archie Leach
Gooner
Now that's some Grade-A Liverpool bitterness.
He's one of the reasons we've been so shit this year, he wouldn't even be starting if Wilshere was fit. You seem to be implying that he's too good for us but I can assure you that is far from the case.
No. And the fact we got Balotelli instead compounds the bitterness.You Liverpool fans still not gotten over his decision to join us instead of you?
Bright lights. That's it really. Though the chronic lack of bottle and ambition will get to him eventually but by that time he'll have become an ex-footballing great. I doubt if even PSG will come in for him in the summer. Maybe Zenit or some other rich irrelevant club?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/ar...-Wenger-sacked-staying-s-tainting-legacy.html
Can you guys believe Martin Samuel is quoting Claude, Ty, some people off twitter and this is the first article on the site.
Unbelievable.
MadnessI have never understand this Wilshere hype! Im not even sure that he is much better than Cleverley..
heheheI have never understand this Wilshere hype! Im not even sure that he is much better than Cleverley..
I don't think Wenger is the problem in terms of his management. He does need to get a clue with his defense though. The players they have at the moment aren't remotely adequate.Wenger quite simply has to go for the club to move forward.
He's obviously a much better player than Cleverley, but he'll never amount to much because of his injuries.I have never understand this Wilshere hype! Im not even sure that he is much better than Cleverley..
Steve Bould was meant to be the man to sort out Arsenal defensively. Seems like he's a bit useless.I don't think Wenger is the problem in terms of his management. He does need to get a clue with his defense though. The players they have at the moment aren't remotely adequate.
Bright lights. That's it really. Though the chronic lack of bottle and ambition will get to him eventually but by that time he'll have become an ex-footballing great. I doubt if even PSG will come in for him in the summer. Maybe Zenit or some other rich irrelevant club?
Agree with the first part but is it really the injuries holding him back? Personally, I just don't think he's all that but surely a lot of people should now be wondering where all the hype was coming from? Honestly, he's the first player that comes to my mind when someone talks about overrated English players.He's obviously a much better player than Cleverley, but he'll never amount to much because of his injuries.
You offered me out on Arsenal-Mania, after telling me what a racist club Arsenal are for having white kids in one of their photos. When I joined this forum, after you told me you were Poster of the Month, I saw a whole thread dedicated to someone you had offered out here.
Alexander Graham Bell and the like must be so glad they legged it up the patent office to give you a chance to vent. Well done. I feel a Pride of Britain award coming.
One man surrounded by a whole bunch of embarrassed faces? Don't think it compares to a bunch of fans waiting at the train station to boo and demand the exit of their manager.Eh, they did.
Anyway, it's poor form. I'd replace Wenger at the end of the season, but I wouldn't abuse him, Arsenal owe him a lot.
No way will Arsen Wenger ever win another league title with Arsenal in my view.The man was a certified football genius 10 years ago. Its a pity to see his reputation being tarnished like this. I still think he has it in him to win another Premiership but he's gonna need to buy a few players and pray the injuries go away.
All it does is highlight just how impressive SAF was for being so consistently competitive and being able to reinvent the team after new challengers appeared. Wenger was able to compete with Fergie but had no answer to City and Chelseas, SAF did.
They won't even challenge. If they finish fourth, they'll be closer to fifth than third.No way will Arsen Wenger ever win another league title with Arsenal in my view.
Arsene Wenger must accept the majority of the blame. He appears to have absolutely no clue at the moment.
I think he has been poor in the transfer market and is tactically naive. He must go.
Wow, that's shocking!Look at the state of this
I appreciate the point but I must admit the first thing that jumped out at me was the difference in quality between the players at Chelsea and the players at Arsenal particularly when we are comparing Hazard, Terry and Matic to Ozil, Debuchy and Arteta. I think that is more of the issue than the loss of players.How would Chelsea perform without Hazard, Ivanovic, Terry and Matic all out at the same time for a long period? Because that's what we're experiencing without Ozil, Debuchy, Koscielny and Arteta.
Exactly the same, all of the Chelsea players are better than the Arsenal player they're paired with.I appreciate the point but I must admit the first thing that jumped out at me was the difference in quality between the players at Chelsea and the players at Arsenal particularly when we are comparing Hazard, Terry and Matic to Ozil, Debuchy and Arteta. I think that is more of the issue than the lost of players.
You have some reasonable points, but for the bolded he really isn't. Danny is doing exactly what he has done for his entire career. Which is why I don't understand wengers choice of buying him, nor the expectations people had that mean his current work is somehow 'underperforming' .How would Chelsea perform without Hazard, Ivanovic, Terry and Matic all out at the same time for a long period? Because that's what we're experiencing without Ozil, Debuchy, Koscielny and Arteta.
Not to mention Wilshere, Walcott, Chesney and Giroud being out injured as well. That's more than half of our first teamers.
Haven't even counted the fact that Ramsey is off form, Welbeck is underperforming. Injuries are a part of football etc etc but this is just a level above the normal injuries. At Stoke we played our 3rd choice goal keeper with a rookie RB with only 3 or 4 first team appearances to his name alongside our 3rd choice CB who used to be a RB and our LB was carrying a knock.
I am sorry but you should never compare Arsenal's injury list to justify the bad form. It's not like its something new, is it?How would Chelsea perform without Hazard, Ivanovic, Terry and Matic all out at the same time for a long period? Because that's what we're experiencing without Ozil, Debuchy, Koscielny and Arteta.
They won't even come close to winning Premier League with Wenger as it's been said.The man was a certified football genius 10 years ago. Its a pity to see his reputation being tarnished like this. I still think he has it in him to win another Premiership but he's gonna need to buy a few players and pray the injuries go away.
All it does is highlight just how impressive SAF was for being so consistently competitive and being able to reinvent the team after new challengers appeared. Wenger was able to compete with Fergie but had no answer to City and Chelseas, SAF did.
How big a miss has Ozil really been though? He seems to go missing most of the time especially during the big matches or when you're needing someone to produce a moment of quality. Arsenal badly needed a top class. dominant, mobile central defender, instead Wenger bought a young kid and threw him in at the deep end to compensate. Same really with a holding midfielder, another issue within the side that the manger seems to constantly overlook.I was more comparing position and importance to the team rather than individual quality.
Ozil, Koscielny, Arteta, Debuchy are our spine whereas Hazard, Terry, Matic and Ivanovic are the spine for Chelsea's team.
Would we be doing as good as Chelsea if our bunch were fit? No, but would they be doing as well as they are if those players were all out simultaneously? No.