Feck off!Bale was shit. This is all.
Feck off!Bale was shit. This is all.
I know people in India who have that going for them!Ben Afleck has one thing going for him at least; he'll make a better Batman than George Clooney.
He did win an academy award for Argo,somehow.Ben Affleck? He must have friends..
I wouldn't go as far as 'shit' ... but he wasn't anything special, not that the role required him to show off much in the way of acting chops mind.Bale was shit. This is all.
I know people in India who have that going for them!
Daredevil was pretty bad.Was there a worse superhero movie than that one btw? A funking love triangle? I waste use whether I was watching batman or a 90's Bollywood movie.
Well, technically, the film won an award - Affleck himself didn't win the best director award or anything.He did win an academy award for Argo,somehow.
This. He did justice to a role that was not very challenging.I wouldn't go as far as 'shit' ... but he wasn't anything special, not that the role required him to show off much in the way of acting chops mind.
I didn't like it to be honest. I only silver linings playbook out of the other contenders and preferred it. Argo was just a bit flat for me. Nothing particularly interesting about it. It didn't move me. It didn't enlighten me. It was just okay viewing.Well, technically, the film won an award - Affleck himself didn't win the best director award or anything.
Mind you, considering the competition, it was one of the better films to pick from.
You should watch our superhero film, ra.one. You'll never watch another film again.Daredevil was pretty bad.
Same. I've no idea what all the fuss was about.I didn't like it to be honest. I only silver linings playbook out of the other contenders and preferred it. Argo was just a bit flat for me. Nothing particularly interesting about it. It didn't move me. It didn't enlighten me. It was just okay viewing.
True, and considering the alternative for that was Zero Dark Thirty (which is crap), I'd rather it was Argo.Same. I've no idea what all the fuss was about.
I really liked the opening scene and there was a tense moment in the airport that lasted about sixty seconds, but other than that nothing happened. Afleck was virtually anonymous.
It essentially won the Oscar because it depicted America shoving it to some foreign country. All Oscar winners these days depict America shoving it to some foreign country.
Yep, Life of Pi was truly outstanding and Zero Dark Thirty was worse than Argo.True, and considering the alternative for that was Zero Dark Thirty (which is crap), I'd rather it was Argo.
Personally I'd have given it to Life of Pi.
That's because America is usually shoving it to some foreign countrySame. I've no idea what all the fuss was about.
I really liked the opening scene and there was a tense moment in the airport that lasted about sixty seconds, but other than that nothing happened. Afleck was virtually anonymous.
It essentially won the Oscar because it depicted America shoving it to some foreign country. All Oscar winners these days depict America shoving it to some foreign country.
Personally, I think Slumdog is brilliant - and only recieves a backlash because it got so much acclaim. It is an incredibly well made movie - a different/actually quite interesting story told in a very compelling way.That's because America is usually shoving it to some foreign country
I know the oscar for best film is usually given to a certain "type" of film, but they've been taking the piss of late. Slum dog millionaire was only given the award because it was based around poor children. It was such am average film. Even the music composed by our most prominent composer, a.r Rahman, was woeful compared to his other work, won the award for best music. Then there'd Argo who was average. I didn't even like that movie about he bomb defusing team, thought it was utterly boreing (expect many to disagree with this one).
Next best thing though.It's not Henry V is it?
It's not Henry V is it? You basically just need hair, legs, a good chin and the ability to speak in a low growly whisper occasionally. Sometimes you have to stare off into the distance and look a bit angry. But Nolan's done his serious take, and he's playing a cameo in a Superman film, so it's basically just the hair, legs & chin.
Affleck is an infinitely better actor than Henry Cavill is. Or Toby Maguire. Or Thor Guy. Or half the people who're playing Superheroes at the moment. I've no idea what people are complaining about. He looks the part. Can act. Done.
Shut up geeks.
He did win an academy award for Argo,somehow.
No, but he did win an academy award years ago for the script of Good Will Hunting!Well, technically, the film won an award - Affleck himself didn't win the best director award or anything.
I dont mind him as an actor but I dont think he can pull off Batman
Same. I've no idea what all the fuss was about.
I really liked the opening scene and there was a tense moment in the airport that lasted about sixty seconds, but other than that nothing happened. Afleck was virtually anonymous.
It essentially won the Oscar because it depicted America shoving it to some foreign country. All Oscar winners these days depict America shoving it to some foreign country.
Team America was spot on.
What? Batman at least has to be good looking. Bruce Wayne is a partyboy, a ladies man. Shannon is the next Jaws in a Bond flick should there be one.Michael Shannon would make a proper cool Batman.