Boycott The Qatar World Cup?

MackRobinson

New Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2017
Messages
5,134
Location
Terminal D
Supports
Football
I guess the annoying bit is that that is being used a way to counter arguments of people in this thread. I have never silenced ozil, no one in this thread ever silenced ozil or supported it, but somehow that is an argument to counter what people are saying in this thread?

It's just a cheap and obvious tactic to change the course of the conversation.

And here we are proving it works.
He literally just posted a picture. If anything, he's highlighting the hypocrisy, which he's allowed to do. He never argued Qatar is right or Germany is wrong. But b/c we all understand the implications of the picture, we scream whataboutism. It's lame as hell.
 

Stack

Leave Women's Football Alone!!!
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
13,428
Location
Auckland New Zealand
is this the word of the day? I am not mate. Compassion does not help the cause anyway! I respect the demonstrations for any noble cause. But is it enough? Is it loud enough? Is it as “aggressive”as what is happening now?

by the way, are you boycotting the world cup?
yes I won’t watch a single game. I’ve watched every World Cup since 1974. I typically watch every game, groups and all. I’m not watching because fifa is so corrupt and Qatar should never have been awarded this ex in the first place. My problem is with fifa primarily. The issues with Qatar are one of the reasons they shouldnt have been awarded this World Cup but it’s on fifa for this decision.
 

MackRobinson

New Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2017
Messages
5,134
Location
Terminal D
Supports
Football
A lot of people don't realise how damaging hypocrisy is to credibility, no one is saying you have to be squeaky clean to point out injustices, but when you have German treatment of Ozil and German clubs going to the middle East for warm weather training it does seem a bit baffling, . Then you have Denmark who are making changes to their kit to highlight human rights but played in Tel Aviv a year ago without a peep, you can't make it up. Its not whatabouttery as all these actions are football related and connected. And when push came to shove they wouldn't stand up for it because of threats of yellow cards, it just comes accross insincere and hollow.
Amen
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
10,454
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
He literally just posted a picture. If anything, he's highlighting the hypocrisy, which he's allowed to do. He never argued Qatar is right or Germany is wrong. But b/c we all understand the implications of the picture, we scream whataboutism. It's lame as hell.
So the point was not to change the course of the conversation from qatari human rights abuses (which is the point of this thread) to western organizations are hypocrites. Right... I bet you own a lot of bridges.
 

Pintu

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Messages
4,312
Location
Sweden
So the point was not to change the course of the conversation from qatari human rights abuses (which is the point of this thread) to western organizations are hypocrites. Right... I bet you own a lot of bridges.
The point could be:

"it is a shame German Football Association are hypocrites, hence untrustworthy which is bound to make their rightful pro-LGBT stance inaudible..."
 

The Corinthian

I will not take Mad Winger's name in vain
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
12,088
Supports
A Free Palestine
I mean, I've seen you call out whataboutism in the palestine thread a few times. You even used the term.
I’ve used it at a certain poster who can’t seem to discuss Israel in the Israel thread.

This is a fairly broad thread talking about a whole range of topics - going from LGBT issues, political armbands, migrant workers, Fifa as an organisation and what they stand for, human rights and organisational structures. And asking the question why Ozil was given so much shit for speaking out about Uighurs (not necessarily by Fifa, but by other football organisations) in this thread is quite valid.
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
10,454
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
The point could be:

"it is a shame German Football Association are hypocrites, hence untrustworthy which is bound to make their rightful pro-LGBT stance inaudible..."
The problem is that following that logic we arrive at the conclusion literally no organization can criticize another organization. No person is pure, so no one can criticize anyone. I mean, we can, but we'd be hypocrites, so what's the point anyway?
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
10,454
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
I’ve used it at a certain poster who can’t seem to discuss Israel in the Israel thread.

This is a fairly broad thread talking about a whole range of topics - going from LGBT issues, political armbands, migrant workers, Fifa as an organisation and what they stand for, human rights and organisational structures. And asking the question why Ozil was given so much shit for speaking out about Uighurs (not necessarily by Fifa, but by other football organisations) in this thread is quite valid.
All those issues related to qatar. No about china or germany.
 

MackRobinson

New Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2017
Messages
5,134
Location
Terminal D
Supports
Football
So the point was not to change the course of the conversation from qatari human rights abuses (which is the point of this thread) to western organizations are hypocrites. Right... I bet you own a lot of bridges.
The point is to post a counterexample is not automatically a whataboutism. Simple as.
 

The Corinthian

I will not take Mad Winger's name in vain
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
12,088
Supports
A Free Palestine
All those issues related to qatar. No about china or germany.
The FAs of different countries have been discussed in this thread though, as well as a whole host of other topics. Someone bringing Ozil’s treatment at the hands of the German FA on the same day the German NT and FA make a political gesture is a valid thing to bring up.
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
10,454
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
The point is to post a counterexample is not automatically a whataboutism. Simple as.
A counter example to the loads of posts saying western fa's are not hypocrites? Can you point me to these posts claiming european fa's are not hypocrites and a leading example? Because it looks like a counter example to something that wasn't said.
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
10,454
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
The FAs of different countries have been discussed in this thread though, as well as a whole host of other topics. Someone bringing Ozil’s treatment at the hands of the German FA on the same day the German NT and FA make a political gesture is a valid thing to bring up.
I honestly see no difference to what fearless does bringing up hamas all the time in the palestine thread, but ok, let's disagree.

In a way my point is proven, in that the last few posts are about anything but the original intent of this thread, so I'll stop here.
 

MackRobinson

New Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2017
Messages
5,134
Location
Terminal D
Supports
Football
A counter example to the loads of posts saying western fa's are not hypocrites? Can you point me to these posts claiming european fa's are not hypocrites and a leading example? Because it looks like a counter example to something that wasn't said.
It's a forum. He's allowed to point out the hypocrisy even if nobody posted they weren't hypocrites. He's allowed to share his point of view, correct? The fact that he wasn't responding to anything, in particular, makes the claims of whataboutism even more absurd.
 

The Corinthian

I will not take Mad Winger's name in vain
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
12,088
Supports
A Free Palestine
I honestly see no difference to what fearless does bringing up hamas all the time in the palestine thread, but ok, let's disagree.

In a way my point is proven, in that the last few posts are about anything but the original intent of this thread, so I'll stop here.
No I get what you’re saying. He loves bringing up Uighurs/China, Saudi Arabia, etc as well (which is what my point was).

The other thing he does is just not discuss the topic and paste some irrelevant YouTube link which is nonsense.
 

Pintu

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Messages
4,312
Location
Sweden
The problem is that following that logic we arrive at the conclusion literally no organization can criticize another organization. No person is pure, so no one can criticize anyone. I mean, we can, but we'd be hypocrites, so what's the point anyway?
It depends. I believe that most people would find criticism from Amnesty and HRW to be valid and trustworthy, as they've been writing about Qatar for years without shying away from other issues. Their impurity is not disqualifying them.

The impurity of most Western MSM and football organizations is far more problematic. And it is a credibility killer in the eyes of many around the world.
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
10,454
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
It's a forum. He's allowed to point out the hypocrisy even if nobody posted they weren't hypocrites. He's allowed to share his point of view, correct? The fact that he wasn't responding to anything, in particular, makes the claims of whataboutism even more absurd.
Then it's not really a counter example, is it? He's allowed to post whatever he wants, just as I have the right to point out it's whataboutism.
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
10,454
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
It depends. I believe that most people would find criticism from Amnesty and HRW to be valid and trustworthy, as they've been writing about Qatar for years without shying away from other issues. Their impurity is not disqualifying them.

The impurity of most Western MSM and football organizations is far more problematic. And it is a credibility killer in the eyes of many around the world.
I'm sure you missed how amnesty was obliterated a few months ago regarding ukraine, with people saying "yeah but what about russia". This reasoning is everywhere and just dilutes the point that should be the focus in that moment.
 

MackRobinson

New Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2017
Messages
5,134
Location
Terminal D
Supports
Football
Then it's not really a counter example, is it? He's allowed to post whatever he wants, just as I have the right to point out it's whataboutism.
Counter to the narrative in this thread, but you can just call it an example if you want to be precise. Regardless, if it's not countering anything as you say how can it be whataboutism? You do understand what that word means right?
 

Hanks

Full Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2010
Messages
499
Location
Poland
Agree. The 2nd Amendment is probably most well-known example of how shit things end up being when an ancient law is still being taken as gospel.
As a person whose people have been abused and are now getting daily murdered by the state, I can tell you, I dream of the day our country has 2nd amendment. Maybe then, the 10-15% who run the country wouldn't be able to mass murder and silence the majority, just because they have all the guns.

I think it was Lenin who said, a single person with a gun can control 100 without a gun. It's hard to fight dictatorships and brutal state-sponsored murder with rocks and molotov cocktails :(
 

maniak

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
10,454
Location
Lisboa
Supports
Arsenal
Counter to the narrative in this thread, but you can just call it an example if you want to be precise. Regardless, if it's not countering anything as you say how can it be whataboutism? You do understand what that word means right?
"germany player protested in qatar by covering their mouths"

"yeah what about that time they silenced ozil"

Not whataboutism at all.
 

NM

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2011
Messages
12,396
As a person whose people have been abused and are now getting daily murdered by the state, I can tell you, I dream of the day our country has 2nd amendment. Maybe then, the 10-15% who run the country wouldn't be able to mass murder and silence the majority, just because they have all the guns.

I think it was Lenin who said, a single person with a gun can control 100 without a gun. It's hard to fight dictatorships and brutal state-sponsored murder with rocks and molotov cocktails :(
Your location is Canada.. Unless you are a native American your statement makes no sense.
 

Hanks

Full Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2010
Messages
499
Location
Poland
Your location is Canada.. Unless you are a native American your statement makes no sense.
I am Iranian. Living in Canada most my life, because I can't return home due to political reasons.
 

MackRobinson

New Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2017
Messages
5,134
Location
Terminal D
Supports
Football
"germany player protested in qatar by covering their mouths"

"yeah what about that time they silenced ozil"

Not whataboutism at all.
That's not what happened and the side you agree with doesn't get to monopolize expressing opinions.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
21,467
I honestly see no difference to what fearless does bringing up hamas all the time in the palestine thread, but ok, let's disagree.

In a way my point is proven, in that the last few posts are about anything but the original intent of this thread, so I'll stop here.
And that is exactly the point of whataboutery.
 

NLunited

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Messages
4,190
Location
US
Fifa is the problem.

Qatar is no place to host a world cup. In addition to the horrible laws discriminating women and killing/imprisoning gays, it is not fun hanging out there for supporters. A world cup should be a big party.

Russia was not much better. It is hypocritical they weren’t called out more for their homophobic laws and killing off critical journalists.

Now Fifa is considering a Saudi Arabia bid for the World Cup, can you believe it? Another horrible place.
 

united for life

Full Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2014
Messages
2,277
yes I won’t watch a single game. I’ve watched every World Cup since 1974. I typically watch every game, groups and all. I’m not watching because fifa is so corrupt and Qatar should never have been awarded this ex in the first place. My problem is with fifa primarily. The issues with Qatar are one of the reasons they shouldnt have been awarded this World Cup but it’s on fifa for this decision.
fair play. Probably the first person i spoke to who actually does what he preaches for with respect to this topic. I might not agree with you, but respect.
 

Bert_

Full Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2022
Messages
1,640
Location
Manchester
No need to start another thread on the Uighurs as there's already one, unfortunately it only has a few pages as no one gives a feck.
Probably because it's not full of people defending China's actions and throwing around wild accusations of hypocrisy
 

Stack

Leave Women's Football Alone!!!
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
13,428
Location
Auckland New Zealand
fair play. Probably the first person i spoke to who actually does what he preaches for with respect to this topic. I might not agree with you, but respect.
I dont have any problem with people watching the games or going to Qatar for the games and I also dont have any problem with anyone who disagrees. Im happy and comfortable in that decision. I know Im going to miss a huge amount of great football and for me the WC is the best, I prefer it over club football and the EPL, its always been what I most look forward to. I already have an issue with the next WC but thats not likely to lead to me boycotting it. I hate the new 48 team WC thats happening next time. Football is losing its soul and FIFA is to blame.
 

Pickle85

Full Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2021
Messages
6,909
That's not what happened and the side you agree with doesn't get to monopolize expressing opinions.
Which is 'the side' that poster agrees with? The one that doesn't approve of migrant worker rights abuses and human rights abuses? Are these things you disagree with? Otherwise, I'm not sure what side you're referring to.
 

Pickle85

Full Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2021
Messages
6,909
Counter to the narrative in this thread, but you can just call it an example if you want to be precise. Regardless, if it's not countering anything as you say how can it be whataboutism? You do understand what that word means right?
Don't start crying pedantry because you're imprecise in your posting. Try harder. Whataboutism is a diversionary tactic and a cheap one at that. It's not an attempt to counter the substance of the points made against Qatar.
 
Last edited:

Pickle85

Full Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2021
Messages
6,909
No need to start another thread on the Uighurs as there's already one, unfortunately it only has a few pages as no one gives a feck.
I imagine that thread would be significantly more active if China were hosting a world cup at the moment, but you'd likely be in it posting about how nobody gives a feck about human rights abuses in the middle east.
 

Iker Quesadillas

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Messages
4,276
Supports
Real Madrid
A lot of people don't realise how damaging hypocrisy is to credibility, no one is saying you have to be squeaky clean to point out injustices, but when you have German treatment of Ozil and German clubs going to the middle East for warm weather training it does seem a bit baffling.
It is better to be a little hypocritical while increasing net good than to be perfectly consistent at doing jack shit.

That is the problem with the accusations that get called "whataboutism" here. When people here say "why don't you support this and not that?" they are not actually asking you to support this and that. They are just asking you to shut up.
 

Abizzz

Full Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
7,734
It is better to be a little hypocritical while increasing net good than to be perfectly consistent at doing jack shit.

That is the problem with the accusations that get called "whataboutism" here. When people here say "why don't you support this and not that?" they are not actually asking you to support this and that. They are just asking you to shut up.
The entire shtick of hypocrisy is so laughable when the vast majority of whataboutism is used to defend some of the most hypocritical people on earth.


It's like evangelicals complaining that a certain criticism of Trumpism is untactful :lol:
 

Gehrman

Phallic connoisseur, unlike shamans
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
11,341
The entire shtick of hypocrisy is so laughable when the vast majority of whataboutism is used to defend some of the most hypocritical people on earth.


It's like evangelicals complaining that a certain criticism of Trumpism is untactful :lol:
Also it's aimed at complete strangers they know next to nothing about.
 

Polar

Full Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2020
Messages
1,426
Haven’t watched a single match yet. Not because I’ve boycotted WC, but Qatar and FIFA arrogance have increased my threshold for watching matches. I’ve decided to limit my watching to the most exciting ones. It’s just my way to demonstrate against FIFA and abuse of power :)
 

moses

Can't We Just Be Nice?
Staff
Joined
Jul 28, 2006
Messages
44,601
Location
I have no idea either, yet.
It is better to be a little hypocritical while increasing net good than to be perfectly consistent at doing jack shit.

That is the problem with the accusations that get called "whataboutism" here. When people here say "why don't you support this and not that?" they are not actually asking you to support this and that. They are just asking you to shut up.
Yep.